Advancing Socioeconomic Rights Through Interdisciplinary Factfinding: Opportunities and Challenges

Literature Cited

1. Alston P, Knuckey S 2016a. The Transformation of Human Rights Fact-Finding Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
2. Alston P, Knuckey S 2016b. The transformation of human rights fact-finding: challenges and opportunities. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 3–12
3. Andreassen BA, Sano HO, McInerney-Lankford S 2017. Research Methods in Human Rights: A Handbook Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
4. Ball P. 2016. The bigness of big data: samples, models, and the facts we might find when looking at data. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 425–38
5. Chapman AR, Ball P. 2001. The truth of truth commissions: comparative lessons from Haiti, South Africa, and Guatemala. Hum. Rights Q. 23:1–44
   [Google Scholar]
6. Combs NA. 2010. Fact-Finding Without Facts: Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
7. Coomans F, Grünfeld F, Kamminga MT 2009. Methods of Human Rights Research Cambridge, UK: Intersentia
8. Corkery A. 2016. Investigating economic, social, and cultural rights violations. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 377–93
9. Fondebrider L, Scheinsohn V 2015. Forensic archaeology: the Argentinian way. Forensic Archaeology: A Global Perspective WJM Groen, N Márquez-Grant, RC Janaway 369–78 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
   [Google Scholar]
10. Giffard C. 2000. The Torture Reporting Handbook. Colchester, UK: Univ. Essex
11. Glob. Indig. Data Alliance 2019. CARE principles for indigenous data governance https://www.gida-global.org/care
12. Groome D. 2011. The Handbook of Human Rights Investigation Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace, 2nd ed..
13. Heller KJ. 2021. The UN International Commission of Inquiry (2011–2012) and international crimes in Libya. International Commissions: The Role Of Commissions of Inquiry in the Investigation of International Crimes J Meierhenrich Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press In press
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hum. Rights Watch 2020. About our research https://www.hrw.org/about-our-research
15. Int. Bar Assoc 2009. Guidelines on International Human Rights Fact-Finding Visits and Reports: The Lund-London Guidelines Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc.
16. Kim HJ. 2016. The role of UN Commissions of Inquiry in developing global human rights: prospects and challenges. Korean J. Int. Stud. 14:2241–64
    [Google Scholar]
17. Koettl C, Murray D, Dubberley S 2020. Open source investigation for human rights reporting: a brief history. Digital Witness: Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation, and Accountability S Dubberley, A Keonig, D Murray 12–31 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
18. McConnell L, Smith R 2018. Research Methods in Human Rights Abingdon, UK: Routledge
19. Montgomery B. 2004. Fact-finding by human rights non-governmental organizations: challenges, strategies, and the shaping of archival evidence. Archivaria 58:29–30
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mwatana Hum. Rights 2016. Chapters from hell: violations of the international humanitarian law in the armed ground conflict in Taiz Rep., Mwatana Hum. Rights, Sana'a Yemen:
21. Nowak M. 2009. Fact-finding on torture and ill-treatment and conditions of detention. J. Hum. Rights Pract. 1:1101–19
    [Google Scholar]
22. Orentlicher D. 1990. Bearing witness: the art and science of human rights fact-finding. Harvard Hum. Rights J. 3:83–135
    [Google Scholar]
23. Price M. 2013. Convenience samples: what they are, and what they should (and should not) be used for. Human Rights Data Analysis Group April 5. https://hrdag.org/2013/04/05/convenience-samples-what-they-are/
    [Google Scholar]
24. Satterthwaite M. 2021. The seductions of quantification rebuffed? The curious failure by the CESCR to engage water and sanitation data. Festschrift in Honor of Sally Engle Merry P Alston Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. In press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Satterthwaite M, Kacinski D. 2017. Quantitative methods in advocacy oriented human rights research. See Andreassen et al. 2017 pp. 282–305
26. Satterthwaite M, Simeone J. 2016. A conceptual roadmap for social science methods in human rights fact-finding. See Alston & Knuckey 2016a 321–54
27. Seybolt TB, Aronson JD, Fischhoff B 2013. Introduction. Counting Civilian Casualties: Introduction to Recording and Estimating Nonmilitary Deaths in Conflict TB Seybolt, JD Aronson, B Fischhoff 3–14 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
28. Steadman DW, Hagland WD. 2005. The scope of anthropological contributions to human rights investigations. J. Forensic Sci. 50:123–30
    [Google Scholar]
29. Stokols D. 2006. Toward a science of transdisciplinary action research. Am. J. Community Psychol. 38:63–77
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stokols D, Fuqua J, Gress J, Harvey R, Phillips K et al. 2003. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine Tob. Res. 5:S21–S39
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sunga LS. 2011. How can UN human rights special procedures sharpen ICC fact-finding?. Int. J. Hum. Rights 15:2187–205
    [Google Scholar]
32. Thoolen H, Verstappen B. 1986. Human Rights Missions: A Study of the Fact-Finding Practice of Non-Governmental Organizations Leiden, Neth: Brill
33. Wagner C, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein JT, Boyack KW et al. 2011. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature. J. Inf. 165:14–26
    [Google Scholar]
34. Weissbrodt D, McCarthy J 1982. Fact-finding by nongovernmental organizations. International Law and Fact-Finding in the Field of Human Rights BG Ramcharan 173–219 Leiden, Neth: Brill
    [Google Scholar]