When Do Children Lose the Language Instinct? A Critical Review of the Critical Periods Literature

Literature Cited

1. Asher JJ, García R. 1969. The optimal age to learn a foreign language. Mod. Lang. J. 53:5334–41
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakker M, Hartgerink CH, Wicherts JM, van der Maas HL. 2016. Researchers’ intuitions about power in psychological research. Psychol. Sci. 27:81069–77
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berzak Y, Reichart R, Katz B. 2014. Reconstructing native language typology from foreign language usage. arXiv:1404.6312 [cs.CL]
4. Birdsong D 2014. The critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition: tailoring the coat of many colors. Essential Topics in Applied Linguistics and Multilingualism M Pawlak, L Aronin 43–50 Cham, Switz: Springer
   [Google Scholar]
5. Birdsong D. 2018. Plasticity, variability and age in second language acquisition and bilingualism. Front. Psychol. 9:81
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chen T, Hartshorne JK 2021. More evidence from over 1.1 million subjects that the critical period for syntax closes in late adolescence. Cognition 214:104706
   [Google Scholar]
7. DeKeyser R. 2018. The critical period hypothesis: a diamond in the rough. Biling.: Lang. Cogn. 21:5915–16
   [Google Scholar]
8. Flege JE. 2019. A non-critical period for second-language learning. A Sound Approach to Language Matters: In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn AM Nyvad, M Hejná, A Højen, AB Jespersen, MH Sørensen et al.501–41 Aarhus, Den: AU Libr. Scholarly Publ. Serv https://ebooks.au.dk/aul/catalog/view/322/218/986-1
   [Google Scholar]
9. Frank MC. 2018. With great data comes great (theoretical) opportunity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22:8669–71
   [Google Scholar]
10. Germine L, Nakayama K, Duchaine BC, Chabris CF, Chatterjee G, Wilmer JB 2012. Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19:5847–57
    [Google Scholar]
11. Hakuta K, Bialystok E, Wiley E 2003. Critical evidence: a test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychol. Sci. 14:131–38
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hartshorne JK. 2020. How massive online experiments (MOEs) can illuminate critical and sensitive periods in development. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 36:135–43
    [Google Scholar]
13. Hartshorne JK, de Leeuw JR, Goodman ND, Jennings M, O'Donnell TJ 2019. A thousand studies for the price of one: accelerating psychological science with Pushkin. Behav. Res. Methods 51:41782–1803
    [Google Scholar]
14. Hartshorne JK, Germine LT. 2015. When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychol. Sci. 26:4433–43
    [Google Scholar]
15. Hartshorne JK, Tenenbaum JB, Pinker S. 2018. A critical period for second language acquisition: evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition 177:263–77
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hernandez AE, Bodet JP III, Gehm K, Shen S. 2021. What does a critical period for second language acquisition mean?: Reflections on. Hartshorne et al. 2018. Cognition 206104478
17. Hernandez A, Li P, MacWhinney B 2005. The emergence of competing modules in bilingualism. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9:5220–25
    [Google Scholar]
18. Hyltenstam K. 2018. Second language ultimate attainment: effects of maturation, exercise, and social/psychological factors. Biling.: Lang. Cogn. 21:5921–23
    [Google Scholar]
19. Johnson JS, Newport EL 1989. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cogn. Psychol. 21:160–99
    [Google Scholar]
20. Krashen SD, Long MA, Scarcella RC 1979. Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Q 13:4573–82
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lenneberg EH. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language New York: Wiley
22. Mayberry RI, Eichen EB. 1991. The long-lasting advantage of learning sign language in childhood: another look at the critical period for language acquisition. J. Mem. Lang. 30:4486–512
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mayberry RI, Kluender R. 2018. Rethinking the critical period for language: new insights into an old question from American Sign Language. Biling.: Lang. Cogn. 21:5886–905
    [Google Scholar]
24. Maye J, Werker JF, Gerken LA. 2002. Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82:B101–11
    [Google Scholar]
25. Miller G. 2012. The smartphone psychology manifesto. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 7:3221–37
    [Google Scholar]
26. Newport EL. 1988. Constraints on learning and their role in language acquisition: studies of the acquisition of American Sign Language. Lang. Sci. 10:1147–72
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pfenninger SE, Singleton D. 2019. A critical review of research relating to the learning, use and effects of additional and multiple languages in later life. Lang. Teach. 52:4419–49
    [Google Scholar]
28. Reinecke K, Gajos KZ. 2015. LabintheWild: conducting large-scale online experiments with uncompensated samples. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CCSW '15)1364–78 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Sainani K. 2013. Interpreting “null” results. PM&R 5:6520–23
    [Google Scholar]
30. Schepens J, van Hout R, Jaeger TF. 2020. Big data suggest strong constraints of linguistic similarity on adult language learning. Cognition 194:104056
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sedlmeier P, Gigerenzer G. 1989. Do studies of statistical power have an effect on the power of studies?. Psychol. Bull. 105:2309–16
    [Google Scholar]
32. Singleton D. 2005. The critical period hypothesis: a coat of many colours. Int. Rev. Appl. Linguist. Lang. Teach. 43:4269–85
    [Google Scholar]
33. Snedeker J, Geren J, Shafto CL 2012. Disentangling the effects of cognitive development and linguistic expertise: a longitudinal study of the acquisition of English in internationally-adopted children. Cogn. Psychol. 65:139–76
    [Google Scholar]
34. Snow CE, Hoefnagel-Höhle M. 1978. The critical period for language acquisition: evidence from second language learning. Child Dev 49:41114–28
    [Google Scholar]
35. Stevens G. 1999. Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Lang. Soc 28:4555–78
    [Google Scholar]
36. Ullman MT 2015. The declarative/procedural model. Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction B VanPatten, J Williams 135–58 New York: Routledge, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
37. Vanhove J. 2013. The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: a statistical critique and a reanalysis. PLOS ONE 8:7e69172
    [Google Scholar]
38. von Ahn L. 2013. Duolingo: learn a language for free while helping to translate the web. Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces1–2 New York: Assoc. Comput. Mach.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Werker JF, Hensch TK. 2015. Critical periods in speech perception: new directions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66:173–96
    [Google Scholar]