1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Medicine
  4. Volume 71, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Medicine

Volume 71, 2020

Atherosclerosis: Making a U Turn

Abstract

The development of potent cholesterol-reducing medications in the last decade of the twentieth century has altered the approach to prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Initial experience with statins, and more recently with the addition of PCSK9 inhibitors, has proven that human CVD, like that in animal models, can be halted and regressed. Available clinical data show that the lower the achieved level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the greater the regression of disease. Investigative studies are now aimed to understand those factors that both accelerate and impede this healing process. Some of these are likely to be modifiable, and the future of atherosclerotic CVD treatment is likely to be early screening, use of measures to repair atherosclerotic arteries, and prevention of most CVD events.

Keyword(s): cholesterol, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, statin
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-042418-011108
2020-01-27
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/med/71/1/annurev-med-042418-011108.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-042418-011108&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Williams KJ, Feig JE, Fisher EA 2008. Rapid regression of atherosclerosis: insights from the clinical and experimental literature. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 5:91–102
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2. 
    Schoenheimer R. 1931. New contributions in sterol metabolism. Science 74:579–84
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Clay MA, Hopkins GJ, Ehnholm CP, Barter PJ 1989. The rabbit as an animal model of hepatic lipase deficiency. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1002:173–81
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    McMillan GC, Horlick L, Duff GL 1955. Cholesterol content of aorta in relation to severity of atherosclerosis; studies during progression and retrogression of experimental lesions. AMA Arch. Pathol. 59:285–90
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Duff GL, McMillan GC. 1949. The effect of alloxan diabetes on experimental cholesterol atherosclerosis in the rabbit. J. Exp. Med. 89:611–30
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Nordestgaard BG, Stender S, Kjeldsen K 1988. Reduced atherogenesis in cholesterol-fed diabetic rabbits. Giant lipoproteins do not enter the arterial wall. Arteriosclerosis 8:421–28
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Fisher EA. 2016. Regression of atherosclerosis: the journey from the liver to the plaque and back. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 36:226–35
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Feig JE, Parathath S, Rong JX, Mick SL, Vengrenyuk Y et al. 2011. Reversal of hyperlipidemia with a genetic switch favorably affects the content and inflammatory state of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation 123:989–98
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Basu D, Hu Y, Huggins LA, Mullick AE, Graham MJ et al. 2018. Novel reversible model of atherosclerosis and regression using oligonucleotide regulation of the LDL receptor. Circ. Res. 122:560–67
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    Vartiainen I, Kanerva K. 1947. Arteriosclerosis and war-time. Ann. Med. Intern. Fenn. 36:748–58
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11. 
    Wanscher O, Clemmesen J, Nielsen A 1951. Negative correlation between atherosclerosis and carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 5:172–74
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Wilens SL. 1947. The resorption of arterial atheromatous deposits in wasting disease. Am. J. Pathol. 23:793–804
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 13. 
    Wissler RW, Vesselinovitch D. 1976. Studies of regression of advanced atherosclerosis in experimental animals and man. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 275:363–78
     [Google Scholar]
  14. 14. 
    Ost CR, Stenson S. 1967. Regression of peripheral atherosclerosis during therapy with high doses of nicotinic acid. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Investig. Suppl. 99:241–45
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Ornish D, Brown SE, Scherwitz LW et al. 1990. Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial. Lancet 336:129–33
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Ornish D, Scherwitz LW, Billings JH et al. 1998. Intensive lifestyle changes for reversal of coronary heart disease. JAMA 280:2001–7
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Esselstyn CB Jr., Ellis SG, Medendorp SV, Crowe TD. 1995. A strategy to arrest and reverse coronary artery disease: a 5-year longitudinal study of a single physician's practice. J. Fam. Pract. 41:560–68
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Blankenhorn DH, Hodis HN. 1994. George Lyman Duff Memorial Lecture. Arterial imaging and atherosclerosis reversal. Arterioscler. Thromb. 14:177–92
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Brown BG, Zhao XQ, Sacco DE, Albers JJ 1993. Lipid lowering and plaque regression. New insights into prevention of plaque disruption and clinical events in coronary disease. Circulation 87:1781–91
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Stein Y, Stein O. 2001. Does therapeutic intervention achieve slowing of progression or bona fide regression of atherosclerotic lesions. ? Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 21:183–88
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Kuo PT, Hayase K, Kostis JB, Moreyra AE 1979. Use of combined diet and colestipol in long-term (7–7 1/2 years) treatment of patients with type II hyperlipoproteinemia. Circulation 59:199–211
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Kuo PT. 1982. Regression, retardation of atherosclerosis progression, and collateral circulation. Their functional importance. Chest 81:3–5
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Zhao XQ, Krasuski RA, Baer J et al. 2009. Effects of combination lipid therapy on coronary stenosis progression and clinical cardiovascular events in coronary disease patients with metabolic syndrome: a combined analysis of the Familial Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (FATS), the HDL-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (HATS), and the Armed Forces Regression Study (AFREGS). Am. J. Cardiol. 104:1457–64
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Brown G, Albers JJ, Fisher LD et al. 1990. Regression of coronary artery disease as a result of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in men with high levels of apolipoprotein B. N. Engl. J. Med. 323:1289–98
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25. 
    Kane JP, Malloy MJ, Ports TA et al. 1990. Regression of coronary atherosclerosis during treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia with combined drug regimens. JAMA 264:3007–12
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26. 
    Brensike JF, Levy RI, Kelsey SF et al. 1984. Effects of therapy with cholestyramine on progression of coronary arteriosclerosis: results of the NHLBI Type II Coronary Intervention Study. Circulation 69:313–24
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27. 
    Blankenhorn DH, Nessim SA, Johnson RL et al. 1987. Beneficial effects of combined colestipol-niacin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis and coronary venous bypass grafts. JAMA 257:3233–40
     [Google Scholar]
  28. 28. 
    Cashin-Hemphill L, Mack WJ, Pogoda JM et al. 1990. Beneficial effects of colestipol-niacin on coronary atherosclerosis. A 4-year follow-up. JAMA 264:3013–17
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Schuler G, Hambrecht R, Schlierf G et al. 1992. Regular physical exercise and low-fat diet. Effects on progression of coronary artery disease. Circulation 86:1–11
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 30. 
    Blankenhorn DH, Azen SP, Kramsch DM et al. 1993. Coronary angiographic changes with lovastatin therapy. The Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study (MARS). Ann. Intern. Med. 119:969–76
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Buchwald H, Varco RL, Matts JP et al. 1990. Effect of partial ileal bypass surgery on mortality and morbidity from coronary heart disease in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Report of the Program on the Surgical Control of the Hyperlipidemias (POSCH). N. Engl. J. Med. 323:946–55
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Zhao XQ, Brown BG, Hillger L et al. 1993. Effects of intensive lipid-lowering therapy on the coronary arteries of asymptomatic subjects with elevated apolipoprotein B. Circulation 88:2744–53
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P et al. 2004. Effect of intensive compared with moderate lipid-lowering therapy on progression of coronary atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:1071–80
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Sipahi I et al. 2006. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: the ASTEROID trial. JAMA 295:1556–65
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Sipahi I et al. 2007. Statins, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and regression of coronary atherosclerosis. JAMA 297:499–508
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Nicholls SJ, Ballantyne CM, Barter PJ et al. 2011. Effect of two intensive statin regimens on progression of coronary disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 365:2078–87
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Tsujita K, Sugiyama S, Sumida H et al. 2015. Impact of dual lipid-lowering strategy with ezetimibe and atorvastatin on coronary plaque regression in patients with percutaneous coronary intervention: the multicenter randomized controlled PRECISE-IVUS trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 66:495–507
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Tarkin JM, Dweck MR, Evans NR et al. 2016. Imaging atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 118:750–69
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    D'Ascenzo F, Agostoni P, Abbate A et al. 2013. Atherosclerotic coronary plaque regression and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events: a meta-regression of randomized clinical trials. Atherosclerosis 226:178–85
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T et al. 2016. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: the GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:2373–84
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Azen SP, Mack WJ, Cashin-Hemphill L et al. 1996. Progression of coronary artery disease predicts clinical coronary events. Long-term follow-up from the Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study. Circulation 93:34–41
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Taylor AJ, Kent SM, Flaherty PJ et al. 2002. ARBITER: Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol: a randomized trial comparing the effects of atorvastatin and pravastatin on carotid intima medial thickness. Circulation 106:2055–60
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Taylor AJ, Sullenberger LE, Lee HJ et al. 2004. Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol (ARBITER) 2: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of extended-release niacin on atherosclerosis progression in secondary prevention patients treated with statins. Circulation 110:3512–17
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Taylor AJ, Villines TC, Stanek EJ et al. 2009. Extended-release niacin or ezetimibe and carotid intima-media thickness. N. Engl. J. Med. 361:2113–22
     [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    Villines TC, Stanek EJ, Devine PJ et al. 2010. The ARBITER 6-HALTS trial (Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 6-HDL and LDL Treatment Strategies in Atherosclerosis): final results and the impact of medication adherence, dose, and treatment duration. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 55:2721–26
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46. 
    Mulder HJ, Bal ET, Jukema JW et al. 2000. Pravastatin reduces restenosis two years after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (REGRESS trial). Am. J. Cardiol. 86:742–46
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Habara M, Nasu K, Terashima M et al. 2014. Impact on optical coherence tomographic coronary findings of fluvastatin alone versus fluvastatin + ezetimibe. Am. J. Cardiol. 113:580–87
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Sandfort V, Lima JA, Bluemke DA 2015. Noninvasive imaging of atherosclerotic plaque progression: status of coronary computed tomography angiography. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 8:e003316
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Zeb I, Li D, Nasir K et al. 2013. Effect of statin treatment on coronary plaque progression—a serial coronary CT angiography study. Atherosclerosis 231:198–204
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Lo J, Lu MT, Ihenachor EJ et al. 2015. Effects of statin therapy on coronary artery plaque volume and high-risk plaque morphology in HIV-infected patients with subclinical atherosclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet HIV 2:e52–63
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Shishikura D. 2016. Noninvasive imaging modalities to visualize atherosclerotic plaques. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 6:340–53
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    Corti R, Fuster V, Fayad ZA et al. 2005. Effects of aggressive versus conventional lipid-lowering therapy by simvastatin on human atherosclerotic lesions: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46:106–12
     [Google Scholar]
  53. 53. 
    Sibley CT, Vavere AL, Gottlieb I et al. 2013. MRI-measured regression of carotid atherosclerosis induced by statins with and without niacin in a randomised controlled trial: the NIA plaque study. Heart 99:1675–80
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Underhill HR, Yuan C, Zhao XQ et al. 2008. Effect of rosuvastatin therapy on carotid plaque morphology and composition in moderately hypercholesterolemic patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging trial. Am. Heart J. 155:584
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Zhao XQ, Dong L, Hatsukami T et al. 2011. MR imaging of carotid plaque composition during lipid-lowering therapy: a prospective assessment of effect and time course. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 4:977–86
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Gould KL, Ornish D, Scherwitz L et al. 1995. Changes in myocardial perfusion abnormalities by positron emission tomography after long-term, intense risk factor modification. JAMA 274:894–901
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57. 
    Sdringola S, Nakagawa K, Nakagawa Y et al. 2003. Combined intense lifestyle and pharmacologic lipid treatment further reduce coronary events and myocardial perfusion abnormalities compared with usual-care cholesterol-lowering drugs in coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41:263–72
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Arbab-Zadeh A, Fuster V. 2015. The myth of the “vulnerable plaque”: transitioning from a focus on individual lesions to atherosclerotic disease burden for coronary artery disease risk assessment. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 65:846–55
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Pitt B, Waters D, Brown WV et al. 1999. Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy compared with angioplasty in stable coronary artery disease. Atorvastatin versus Revascularization Treatment investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 341:70–76
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Puri R, Libby P, Nissen SE et al. 2014. Long-term effects of maximally intensive statin therapy on changes in coronary atheroma composition: insights from SATURN. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 15:380–88
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61. 
    Puri R, Ballantyne CM, Hoogeveen RC et al. 2017. Lipoprotein(a) and coronary atheroma progression rates during long-term high-intensity statin therapy: insights from SATURN. Atherosclerosis 263:137–44
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Stegman B, Puri R, Cho L et al. 2014. High-intensity statin therapy alters the natural history of diabetic coronary atherosclerosis: insights from SATURN. Diabetes Care 37:3114–20
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63. 
    Reis ED, Li J, Fayad ZA et al. 2001. Dramatic remodeling of advanced atherosclerotic plaques of the apolipoprotein E-deficient mouse in a novel transplantation model. J. Vascular Surg. 34:541–47
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    Lieu HD, Withycombe SK, Walker Q et al. 2003. Eliminating atherogenesis in mice by switching off hepatic lipoprotein secretion. Circulation 107:1315–21
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65. 
    Rahman K, Vengrenyuk Y, Ramsey SA et al. 2017. Inflammatory Ly6Chi monocytes and their conversion to M2 macrophages drive atherosclerosis regression. J. Clin. Investig. 127:2904–15
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66. 
    Lin JD, Nishi H, Poles J et al. 2019. Single-cell analysis of fate-mapped macrophages reveals heterogeneity, including stem-like properties, during atherosclerosis progression and regression. JCI Insight 4: e124574
    [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    Park L, Raman KG, Lee KJ et al. 1998. Suppression of accelerated diabetic atherosclerosis by the soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts. Nat. Med. 4:1025–31
     [Google Scholar]
  68. 68. 
    Kanter JE, Kramer F, Barnhart S et al. 2012. Diabetes promotes an inflammatory macrophage phenotype and atherosclerosis through acyl-CoA synthetase 1. PNAS 109:E715–24
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69. 
    Parathath S, Grauer L, Huang LS et al. 2011. Diabetes adversely affects macrophages during atherosclerotic plaque regression in mice. Diabetes 60:1759–69
     [Google Scholar]
  70. 70. 
    Gaudreault N, Kumar N, Olivas VR et al. 2013. Hyperglycemia impairs atherosclerosis regression in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 183:1981–92
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    Nagareddy PR, Murphy AJ, Stirzaker RA et al. 2013. Hyperglycemia promotes myelopoiesis and impairs the resolution of atherosclerosis. Cell Metab 17:695–708
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72. 
    Yuan C, Hu J, Parathath S et al. 2018. Human aldose reductase expression prevents atherosclerosis regression in diabetic mice. Diabetes 67:1880–91
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73. 
    Distel E, Barrett TJ, Chung K et al. 2014. miR33 inhibition overcomes deleterious effects of diabetes mellitus on atherosclerosis plaque regression in mice. Circ. Res. 115:759–69
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74. 
    Yvan-Charvet L, Pagler T, Gautier EL et al. 2010. ATP-binding cassette transporters and HDL suppress hematopoietic stem cell proliferation. Science 328:1689–93
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75. 
    Feig JE, Rong JX, Shamir R et al. 2011. HDL promotes rapid atherosclerosis regression in mice and alters inflammatory properties of plaque monocyte-derived cells. PNAS 108:7166–71
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76. 
    Hewing B, Parathath S, Barrett T et al. 2014. Effects of native and myeloperoxidase-modified apolipoprotein A-I on reverse cholesterol transport and atherosclerosis in mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34:779–89
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77. 
    Murphy AJ, Woollard KJ, Hoang A et al. 2008. High-density lipoprotein reduces the human monocyte inflammatory response. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28:2071–77
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78. 
    Iqbal AJ, Barrett TJ, Taylor L et al. 2016. Acute exposure to apolipoprotein A1 inhibits macrophage chemotaxis in vitro and monocyte recruitment in vivo. eLife 5:e15190
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79. 
    Sorci-Thomas MG, Owen JS, Fulp B et al. 2012. Nascent high density lipoproteins formed by ABCA1 resemble lipid rafts and are structurally organized by three apoA-I monomers. J. Lipid Res. 53:1890–909
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80. 
    Glass CK, Witztum JL. 2001. Atherosclerosis: the road ahead. Cell 104:503–16
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81. 
    Libby P, Ridker PM, Hansson GK 2011. Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis. Nature 473:317–25
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82. 
    Ruparelia N, Chai JT, Fisher EA, Choudhury RP 2017. Inflammatory processes in cardiovascular disease: a route to targeted therapies. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 14:133–44
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83. 
    Perez-Gomez MV, Sanchez-Nino MD, Sanz AB et al. 2016. Targeting inflammation in diabetic kidney disease: early clinical trials. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 25:1045–58
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84. 
    Bertrand MJ, Tardif JC. 2017. Inflammation and beyond: new directions and emerging drugs for treating atherosclerosis. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 22:1–26
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85. 
    Egawa M, Mukai K, Yoshikawa S et al. 2013. Inflammatory monocytes recruited to allergic skin acquire an anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype via basophil-derived interleukin-4. Immunity 38:570–80
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86. 
    Nathan C, Ding A. 2010. Nonresolving inflammation. Cell 140:871–82
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87. 
    Tabas I. 2017. 2016 Russell Ross Memorial Lecture in Vascular Biology: molecular-cellular mechanisms in the progression of atherosclerosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 37:183–89
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88. 
    Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T et al. 2017. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 377:1119–31
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89. 
    Kini AS, Baber U, Kovacic JC et al. 2013. Changes in plaque lipid content after short-term intensive versus standard statin therapy: the YELLOW trial (reduction in yellow plaque by aggressive lipid-lowering therapy). J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 62:21–29
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-042418-011108
Loading
Atherosclerosis: Making a U Turn
Annual Review of Medicine 71, 191 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-med-042418-011108
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-042418-011108
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-med-042418-011108
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error