1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 7, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 7, 2020

Discharges, Poor-Performer Quits, and Layoffs as Valued Exits: Is It Really Addition by Subtraction?

Abstract

We contend that a variety of types of employee exits from the firm are presumed to be a net positive and are thus valued by management, resulting in a potentially important new way to think about these leavers. For each of three valued exit (VE) types (discharges, poor-performer quits, and layoffs) we examine incidence, construct similarities and differences, and antecedents. We also summarize and critique the literature on VE consequences for the organization. In doing so we discuss how an underlying tension must accompany the analysis of VEs. Specifically, the intuitive notion of addition by subtraction must be considered relative to important contextual considerations and to evidence that the operational disruption created by VE departures may at times mitigate or even outweigh the VE benefits. Underlying our analysis is the stipulation that the formal consideration of VEs is in its infancy and is thus laden with conceptual and methodological challenges that scholars must address if we are to benefit from this new approach to employee exits from the firm.

Keyword(s): discharges, dismissals, downsizing, involuntary turnover, layoffs, organizational effectiveness, performance, turnover
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343
2020-01-21
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/7/1/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abelson MA, Baysinger BD. 1984. Optimal and dysfunctional turnover: toward an organizational level model. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9:331–41
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguinis H. 2013. Performance Management Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. , 3rd ed..
  3. Allen DG, Bryant PC, Vardaman JM 2010. Retaining talent: replacing misconceptions with evidence-based strategies. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 24:48–64
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aquino K, Lewis MU, Bradfield M 1999. Justice constructs, negative affectivity, and employee deviance: a proposed model and empirical test. J. Organ. Behav. 20:1073–91
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Argote L, Insko CA, Yovetich N, Romero AA 1995. Group learning curves: the effects of turnover and task complexity on group performance. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25:512–29
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Batt R. 2002. Managing customer services: human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Acad. Manag. J. 45:587–97
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Batt R, Colvin AJ. 2011. An employment systems approach to turnover: human resources practices, quits, dismissals, and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 54:695–717
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Batt R, Colvin AJ, Keefe J 2002. Employee voice, human resource practices, and quit rates: evidence from the telecommunications industry. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 55:573–94
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bell ST. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:595–615
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolt JF. 1983. Job security—Its time has come. Harv. Bus. Rev. 61:115–23
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Boudreau JW. 1983. Effects of employee flows on utility analysis of human resource productivity improvement programs. J. Appl. Psychol. 68:396–406
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Boudreau JW, Berger CJ. 1985. Decision-theoretic utility analysis applied to employee separations and acquisitions. J. Appl. Psychol. 70:581–612
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Boudreau JW, Ramstad PM. 2003. Strategic industrial and organizational psychology and the role of utility analysis models. Handb. Psychol. 15:193–221
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brief AP, Motowidlo SJ. 1986. Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad. Manag. Rev. 11:710–25
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brockner J, Grover S, Reed TF, Dewitt RL 1992. Layoffs, job insecurity, and survivors’ work effort: evidence of an inverted-U relationship. Acad. Manag. J. 35:413–25
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Brockner J, Konovsky M, Cooper-Schneider R, Folger R, Martin C, Bies RJ 1994. Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivors of job loss. Acad. Manag. J. 37:397–409
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Budros A. 1997. The new capitalism and organizational rationality: the adoption of downsizing programs, 1979–1994. Soc. Forces 76:229–50
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Burdett K. 1978. A theory of employee job search and quit rates. Am. Econ. Rev. 68:212–20
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Bycio P, Hackett RD, Alvares KM 1990. Job performance and turnover: a review and meta‐analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 39:47–76
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cadsby CB, Song F, Tapon F 2007. Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: an experimental investigation. Acad. Manag. J. 50:387–405
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Call ML, Nyberg AJ, Ployhart RE, Weekley J 2015. The dynamic nature of collective turnover and unit performance: the impact of time, quality, and replacements. Acad. Manag. J. 58:1208–32
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Campion MA. 1991. Meaning and measurement of turnover: comparison of alternative measures and recommendations for research. J. Appl. Psychol. 76:199–212
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Carlson N. 2015. The day Marissa Mayer's honeymoon at Yahoo ended. Bus. Insider Jan. 2. https://www.businessinsider.com/marissa-mayer-yahoo-nicholas-carlson-book-excerpt-2014-12
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Cascio WF. 1993. Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned?. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 7:95–104
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cascio WF. 2002. Strategies for responsible restructuring. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 16:80–91
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Cascio WF, Boudreau JW. 2011. Investing in People: Financial Impact of Human Resource Initiatives Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press . , 2nd ed..
  27. Cascio WF, Young CE, Morris JR 1997. Financial consequences of employment-change decisions in major US corporations. Acad. Manag. J. 40:1175–89
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Chang E. 2002. Distributive justice and organizational commitment revisited: moderation by layoff in the case of Korean employees. Hum. Resour. Manag. 41:261–70
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Colquitt JA. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:386–400
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Conger JA, Church AH. 2018. The 3 types of C players and what to do about them. Harv. Bus. Rev. Feb. 1. https://hbr.org/2018/02/the-3-types-of-c-players-and-what-to-do-about-them
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dalal RS. 2005. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:1241–55
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dalton DR, Krackhardt DM, Porter LW 1981. Functional turnover: an empirical assessment. J. Appl. Psychol. 66:716–21
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Dalton DR, Todor WD. 1982. Turnover: a lucrative hard dollar phenomenon. Acad. Manag. Rev. 7:212–18
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Dalton DR, Todor WD, Krackhardt DM 1982. Turnover overstated: the functional taxonomy. Acad. Manag. Rev. 7:117–23
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Datta DK, Basuil D, Radeva EA 2012. Employee downsizing and organizational performance: What do we know?. Downsizing: Is Less Still More? CL Cooper, A Pandey, JC Quick pp. 199–227 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Datta DK, Guthrie JP, Basuil D, Pandey A 2010. Causes and effects of employee downsizing: a review and synthesis. J. Manag. 36:281–348
     [Google Scholar]
  37. De Stefano F, Bonet R, Camuffo A 2019. Does losing temporary workers matter? The effects of planned turnover on replacements and unit performance. Acad. Manag. J. 62:979–1002
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Dess GG, Shaw JD. 2001. Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Acad. Manag. Rev. 26:446–56
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Dyer L, Foltman F, Milkovich G 1985. Contemporary employment stabilization practices. Hum. Resour. Manag. Ind. Relat. 1985:203–14
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Empl. Advocates 2006. Are quits treated differently from discharges in an unemployment case?. Employer Advocates http://employeradvocates.com/faq/quits_discharges_considerations.html
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Employ. Dev. Dep 2019. Voluntary quit VQ 135: voluntary leaving or discharge. State of California. https://www.edd.ca.gov/uibdg/Voluntary_Quit_VQ_135.htm
  42. Fatemi F. 2016. The true cost of a bad hire—It's more than you think. Forbes Sep. 28. https://www.forbes.com/sites/falonfatemi/2016/09/28/the-true-cost-of-a-bad-hire-its-more-than-you-think/#4592a89d4aa4
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Fleisher MS. 2011. Temporal patterns of functional and dysfunctional employee turnover PhD Diss., Univ Tenn., Knoxville:
  44. Fox S, Spector PE, Miles D 2001. Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. J. Vocat. Behav. 59:291–309
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Franz DR, Crawford D, Dwyer DJ 1998. Downsizing, corporate performance, and shareholder wealth. Am. J. Bus. 13:11–20
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gen. Electr. Co 2001. GE 2000 Annual Report. https://www.ge.com/annual00/download/images/GEannual00.pdf
  47. Gerhart B, Rynes SL. 2003. Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publ.
  48. Gerhart B, Rynes SL, Fulmer IS 2009. 6. Pay and performance: individuals, groups, and executives. Acad. Manag. Ann. 3:251–315
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gerhart B, Trevor CO. 1996. Employment variability under different managerial compensation systems. Acad. Manag. J. 39:1692–712
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Gilson C, Hurd F, Wagar T 2004. Creating a concession climate: the case of the serial downsizers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 15:1056–68
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Gong Y, Law KS, Chang S, Xin KR 2009. Human resources management and firm performance: the differential role of managerial affective and continuance commitment. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:263–75
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Greenberg J. 1990. Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. J. Manag. 16:399–432
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Griffeth RW, Hom PW, Gaertner S 2000. A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. J. Manag. 26:463–88
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK 2007. A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Acad. Manag. J. 50:327–47
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hancock JI, Allen DG, Soelberg C 2017. Collective turnover: an expanded meta-analytic exploration and comparison. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 27:61–86
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hausknecht JP. 2017. Collective turnover. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4:527–44
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hausknecht JP, Holwerda JA. 2013. When does employee turnover matter? Dynamic member configurations, productive capacity, and collective performance. Organ. Sci. 24:210–25
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hausknecht JP, Trevor CO. 2011. Collective turnover at the group, unit, and organizational levels: evidence, issues, and implications. J. Manag. 37:352–88
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hausknecht JP, Trevor CO, Howard MJ 2009. Unit-level voluntary turnover rates and customer service quality: implications of group cohesiveness, newcomer concentration, and size. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:1068–75
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Heavey AL, Holwerda JA, Hausknecht JP 2013. Causes and consequences of collective turnover: a meta-analytic review. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:412–53
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Hesford JW, Malina MA, Pizzini M 2016. Turnover and unit-level financial performance: an analysis of the costs and benefits of voluntary and involuntary turnover in unskilled jobs. Advances in Management Accounting M Epstein, M Malina 35–65 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hollenbeck JR, Williams CR. 1986. Turnover functionality versus turnover frequency: a note on work attitudes and organizational effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 71:606–11
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Holtom BC, Mitchell TR, Lee TW, Eberly MB 2008. 5. Turnover and retention research: a glance at the past, a closer review of the present, and a venture into the future. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:231–74
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Hom PW, Lee TW, Shaw JD, Hausknecht JP 2017. One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:530–45
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Hoskisson RE, Hitt MA, Hill CW 1993. Managerial incentives and investment in R&D in large multiproduct firms. Organ. Sci. 4:325–41
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Huckman RS, Pisano GP. 2006. The firm specificity of individual performance: evidence from cardiac surgery. Manag. Sci. 52:473–88
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Hunter JE. 1986. Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance. J. Vocat. Behav. 29:340–62
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hur Y. 2013. Turnover, voluntary turnover, and organizational performance: evidence from municipal police departments. Public Adm. Q. 37:3–35
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Jackofsky EF. 1984. Turnover and job performance: an integrated process model. Acad. Manag. Rev. 9:74–83
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Jacobs DL. 2013. Unemployment insurance: nine things that may stop you from collecting benefits. Forbes Sep. 3. https://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahljacobs/2013/09/03/unemployment-insurance-nine-things-that-may-stop-you-from-collecting-benefits/#1221a4384f8a
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Johnston MW, Futrell CM. 1989. Functional salesforce turnover: an empirical investigation into the positive effects of turnover. J. Bus. Res. 18:141–57
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Jones v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. 2004-Ohio-2821 2004.
  73. Jovanovic B. 1979. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econ. 87:972–90
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Kacmar KM, Andrews MC, Van Rooy DL, Steilberg CR, Cerrone S 2006. Sure everyone can be replaced…but at what cost? Turnover as a predictor of unit-level performance. Acad. Manag. J. 49:133–44
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Kalleberg AL. 2000. Nonstandard employment relations: part-time, temporary and contract work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26:341–65
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Klaas BS, Dell'omo GG. 1997. Managerial use of dismissal: organizational‐level determinants. Pers. Psychol. 50:927–53
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Klaas BS, McClendon JA. 1996. To lead, lag, or match: estimating the financial impact of pay level policies. Pers. Psychol. 49:121–41
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Koys DJ. 2001. The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: a unit‐level, longitudinal study. Pers. Psychol. 54:101–14
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Kozlowski SW, Bell BS. 2003. Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of Psychology WC Borman, DR Ilgen, RJ Klimoski 333–75 New York: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Kwoh L. 2012. ‘Rank and yank’ retains vocal fans. Wall Street J Jan. 31. https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052970203363504577186970064375222
    [Google Scholar]
  81. La Monica PR. 2013. You're fired. Stock rises. Wall Street loves layoffs. The Buzz: CNN Money Oct. 1. http://buzz.money.cnn.com/2013/10/01/layoffs-stocks/
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Lawler E. 1971. Pay and Organization Effectiveness: A Psychological View New York: McGraw-Hill
  83. Lazear EP. 2000. Performance pay and productivity. Am. Econ. Rev. 90:1346–61
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Lazear EP, Rosen S. 1981. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econ. 89:841–64
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Leana CR, Feldman DC. 1988. Individual responses to job loss: perceptions, reactions, and coping behaviors. J. Manag. 14:375–89
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Leana CR, Van Buren HJ 1999. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24:538–55
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Lee S. 2018. Employee turnover and organizational performance in US federal agencies. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 48:522–34
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Love G, Nohria N. 2005. Reducing slack: the performance consequences of downsizing by large industrial firms, 1977–93. Strateg. Manag. J. 26:1087–108
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Luthans BC, Sommer SM. 1999. The impact of downsizing on workplace attitudes: differing reactions of managers and staff in a health care organization. Group Organ. Manag. 24:46–70
     [Google Scholar]
  90. March JG, Simon HA. 1958. Organizations Oxford, UK: Wiley
  91. McCain BE, O'Reilly C, Pfeffer J 1983. The effects of departmental demography on turnover: the case of a university. Acad. Manag. J. 26:626–41
     [Google Scholar]
  92. McElroy JC, Morrow PC, Rude SN 2001. Turnover and organizational performance: a comparative analysis of the effects of voluntary, involuntary, and reduction-in-force turnover. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:1294–99
     [Google Scholar]
  93. McEvoy GM, Cascio WF. 1987. Do good or poor performers leave? A meta-analysis of the relationship between performance and turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 30:744–62
     [Google Scholar]
  94. McKinley W, Sanchez CM, Schick AG 1995. Organizational downsizing: constraining, cloning, learning. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 9:32–42
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Mercer 2018. North America employee turnover: trends and effects. Mercer https://www.imercer.com/ecommerce/articleinsights/North-American-Employee-Turnover-Trends-and-Effects
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Morgeson FP, Reider MH, Campion MA 2005. Selecting individuals in team settings: the importance of social skills, personality characteristics, and teamwork knowledge. Pers. Psychol. 58:583–611
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Moussouris v. Microsoft Corp. 0:18-cv-35791 (9th Cir 2019.
  98. Murphy KR, Shiarella AH. 1997. Implications of the multidimensional nature of job performance for the validity of selection tests: multivariate frameworks for studying test validity. Pers. Psychol. 50:823–54
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Neuman JH, Baron RA. 1998. Workplace violence and workplace aggression: evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. J. Manag. 24:391–419
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Nixon RD, Hitt MA, Lee HU, Jeong E 2004. Market reactions to announcements of corporate downsizing actions and implementation strategies. Strateg. Manag. J. 25:1121–29
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Noer DM. 1993. Healing the Wounds: Overcoming the Trauma of Layoffs and Revitalizing Downsized Organizations San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  102. Nyberg A, Ployhart RE. 2013. Context-emergent turnover (CET) theory: a theory of collective turnover. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:109–31
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Organ DW. 1988. Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
  104. Ostroff C, Kozlowski SW. 1992. Organizational socialization as a learning process: the role of information acquisition. Pers. Psychol. 45:849–74
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Palmon O, Sun H-L, Tang AP 1997. Layoff announcements: stock market impact and financial performance. Financ. Manag. 26:54–68
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Park HY, Ofori-Dankwa J, Bishop DR 1994. Organizational and environmental determinants of functional and dysfunctional turnover: practical and research implications. Hum. Relat. 47:353–66
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Park T-Y, Shaw JD. 2013. Turnover rates and organizational performance: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:268–309
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Ployhart RE, Weekley JA, Ramsey J 2009. The consequences of human resource stocks and flows: a longitudinal examination of unit service orientation and unit effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 52:996–1015
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Polivka AE, Nardone T. 1989. On the definition of contingent work. Monthly Lab. Rev. 112:9–16
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Reagans R, Argote L, Brooks D 2005. Individual experience and experience working together: predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Manag. Sci. 51:869–81
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Reilly G, Nyberg AJ, Maltarich M, Weller I 2014. Human capital flows: using context-emergent turnover (CET) theory to explore the process by which turnover, hiring, and job demands affect patient satisfaction. Acad. Manag. J. 57:766–90
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Reisel WD, Chia S-L, Maloles CM 2005. Job insecurity spillover to key account management: negative effects on performance, effectiveness, adaptiveness, and esprit de corps. J. Bus. Psychol. 19:483–503
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Robinson SL, Bennett RJ. 1995. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: a multidimensional scaling study. Acad. Manag. J. 38:555–72
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Rubenstein AL, Eberly MB, Lee TW, Mitchell TR 2018. Surveying the forest: a meta‐analysis, moderator investigation, and future‐oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Pers. Psychol. 71:23–65
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Sackett PR. 2002. The structure of counterproductive work behaviors: dimensionality and relationships with facets of job performance. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 10:5–11
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Sackett PR, Berry CM, Wiemann SA, Laczo RM 2006. Citizenship and counterproductive behavior: clarifying relations between the two domains. Hum. Perform. 19:441–64
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Salamin A, Hom PW. 2005. In search of the elusive U-shaped performance-turnover relationship: Are high performing Swiss bankers more liable to quit?. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:1204–16
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Scullen SE, Bergey PK, Aiman‐Smith L 2005. Forced distribution rating systems and the improvement of workforce potential: a baseline simulation. Pers. Psychol. 58:1–32
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Shaw JD. 2015. Pay dispersion, sorting, and organizational performance. Acad. Manag. Discov. 1:165–79
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Shaw JD, Delery JE, Jenkins GD, Gupta N 1998. An organization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 41:511–25
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Shaw JD, Dineen BR, Fang R, Vellella RF 2009. Employee-organization exchange relationships, HRM practices, and quit rates of good and poor performers. Acad. Manag. J. 52:1016–33
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Shaw JD, Duffy MK, Johnson JL, Lockhart DE 2005. Turnover, social capital losses, and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 48:594–606
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Shaw JD, Gupta N. 2007. Pay system characteristics and quit patterns of good, average, and poor performers. Pers. Psychol. 60:903–28
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Shaw JD, Park T-Y, Kim E 2013. A resource‐based perspective on human capital losses, HRM investments, and organizational performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 34:572–89
     [Google Scholar]
  125. SHRM (Soc. Hum. Resource Manag.) 2017. Human capital benchmarking report Rep., Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag., Alexandria, VA. https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/2017-Human-Capital-Benchmarking.pdf
  126. Siegel v. Ford Motor Co. No. 01-102583-CL (Wayne Co., Mich., Apr. 27 2001.
  127. Skarlicki DP, Folger R. 1997. Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:434–43
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Spreitzer GM, Mishra AK. 2002. To stay or to go: voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing. J. Organ. Behav. 23:707–29
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Staw BM. 1980. The consequences of turnover. J. Occup. Behav. 1:253–73
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Steers RM, Mowday RT. 1981. Employee turnover and post-decision justification. Res. Organ. Behav. 3:235–82
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Steiner ID. 1972. Group Process and Productivity Cambridge, MA: Academic
  132. Stumpf SA, Dawley PK. 1981. Predicting voluntary and involuntary turnover using absenteeism and performance indices. Acad. Manag. J. 24:148–63
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Sturman MC, Trevor CO, Boudreau JW, Gerhart B 2003. Is it worth it to win the talent war? Evaluating the utility of performance‐based pay. Pers. Psychol. 56:997–1035
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Subramony M, Holtom B. 2011. Customer satisfaction as a mediator of the turnover-performance relationship. J. Organ. Psychol. 11:49–62
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Summers JK, Humphrey SE, Ferris GR 2012. Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Acad. Manag. J. 55:314–38
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Travaglione A, Cross B. 2006. Diminishing the social network in organizations: Does there need to be such a phenomenon as ‘survivor syndrome’ after downsizing?. Strateg. Change 15:1–13
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Trevor CO. 2001. Interactions among actual ease-of-movement determinants and job satisfaction in the prediction of voluntary turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 44:621–38
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Trevor CO, Gerhart B, Boudreau JW 1997. Voluntary turnover and job performance: curvilinearity and the moderating influences of salary growth and promotions. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:44–61
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Trevor CO, Hausknecht JP, Howard MJ 2007. Why high and low performers leave and what they find elsewhere: job performance effects on employment transitions Work. Pap. 07-11, Cornell Univ Ithaca, NY: https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1467&context=cahrswp
  140. Trevor CO, Nyberg AJ. 2008. Keeping your headcount when all about you are losing theirs: downsizing, voluntary turnover rates, and the moderating role of HR practices. Acad. Manag. J. 51:259–76
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Trevor CO, Reilly G, Gerhart B 2012. Reconsidering pay dispersion's effect on the performance of interdependent work: reconciling sorting and pay inequality. Acad. Manag. J. 55:585–610
     [Google Scholar]
  142. US Dep. Labor 2019. Job openings and labor turnover survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics https://www.bls.gov/jlt/
    [Google Scholar]
  143. US Gen. Account. Off 1985. Reduction in Force Can Sometimes Be More Costly to Agencies Than Attrition and Furlough Washington, DC: US Gen. Account. Off https://www.gao.gov/assets/150/143102.pdf
  144. Van Dyne L, Cummings LL, Parks JM 1995. Extra-role behaviors: in pursuit of construct and definitional clarity (a bridge over muddied waters). Res. Organ. Behav. 17:215–85
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Van Dyne L, LePine JA 1998. Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Acad. Manag. J. 41:108–19
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Vroom VH. 1964. Work and Motivation New York: Wiley
  147. Wanous JP, Stumpf SA, Bedrosian H 1979. Job survival of new employees. Pers. Psychol. 32:651–62
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Watrous KM, Huffman AH, Pritchard RD 2006. When coworkers and managers quit: the effects of turnover and shared values on performance. J. Bus. Psychol. 21:103–26
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Williams CR, Livingstone LP. 1994. Another look at the relationship between performance and voluntary turnover. Acad. Manag. J. 37:269–98
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343
Loading
Discharges, Poor-Performer Quits, and Layoffs as Valued Exits: Is It Really Addition by Subtraction?
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 7, 181 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045343
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error