New Developments in Social Network Analysis

Literature Cited

1. Aral S, Van Alstyne M. 2011. The diversity-bandwidth trade-off. Am. J. Sociol. 117:90–171
   [Google Scholar]
2. Asch SE 1951. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. Groups, Leadership, and Men H Guetzkow 171–90 Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker W. 2019. Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: toward a multilevel model. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 6:373–95
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barley SR. 1990. The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Adm. Sci. Q. 35:61–103
   [Google Scholar]
5. Battilana J, Casciaro T. 2012. Change agents, networks, and institutions: a contingency theory of organizational change. Acad. Manag. J. 55:381–98
   [Google Scholar]
6. Battilana J, Casciaro T. 2013. Overcoming resistance to organizational change: strong ties and affective cooptation. Manag. Sci. 59:4819–36
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bian Y. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. Am. Sociol. Rev. 62:366–85
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bizzi L. 2013. The dark side of structural holes: a multilevel investigation. J. Manag. 39:1554–78
   [Google Scholar]
9. Borgatti SP, Brass DJ 2020. Centrality: concepts and measures. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 9–22 New York: Routledge
   [Google Scholar]
10. Borgatti SP, Brass DJ, Halgin DS 2014. Social network research: confusions, criticisms, and controversies. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40: Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks DJ Brass, G Labianca, A Mehra, DS Halgin, SP Borgatti 1–33 New York: Emerald Group Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Borgatti SP, Cross R. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Manag. Sci. 49:432–45
    [Google Scholar]
12. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC 2002. UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis Harvard, MA: Analytic Technol.
13. Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks Los Angeles: Sage
14. Borgatti SP, Halgin DS 2011a. Analyzing affiliation networks. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis J Scott, PJ Harrington 417–33 London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
15. Borgatti SP, Halgin DS. 2011b. On network theory. Organ. Sci. 22:168–81
    [Google Scholar]
16. Borgatti SP, Mehra A, Brass DJ, Labianca G. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323:5916892–95
    [Google Scholar]
17. Brands RA. 2013. Cognitive social structures in social network research: a review. J. Organ. Behav. 34:S182–103
    [Google Scholar]
18. Brands RA, Brady G, Shah N, Mehra A. 2021. Alter-centric uncertainty and the willingness to accept referrals from would-be brokers Work. Pap., London Bus. Sch London:
19. Brands RA, Kilduff M. 2014. Just like a woman? Effects of gender-biased perceptions of friendship network brokerage on attributions and performance. Organ. Sci. 25:1530–48
    [Google Scholar]
20. Brands RA, Mehra A. 2019. Gender, brokerage, and performance: a construal approach. Acad. Manag. J. 62:196–219
    [Google Scholar]
21. Brass DJ. 1984. Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 29:518–39
    [Google Scholar]
22. Brass DJ 2009. Connecting to brokers: strategies for acquiring social capital. Social Capital: Reaching Out, Reaching In VO Bartkus, JH Davis 260–74 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Brass DJ 2012. A social network perspective on organizational psychology. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology SWJ Kozlowski 667–95 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. Brass DJ 2018. A social network perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Citizenship Behavior PM Podsakoff, SB MacKenzie, NP Podsakoff 317–30 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
25. Brass DJ, Borgatti SP 2018. Multilevel thoughts on social networks. The Handbook for Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis JM LeBurton, S Humphrey 187–200 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Brass DJ, Borgatti SP 2020. Social Networks at Work New York: Routledge
27. Brass DJ, Burkhardt ME. 1993. Potential power and power use: an investigation of structure and behavior. Acad. Manag. J. 36:441–70
    [Google Scholar]
28. Brass DJ, Butterfield KD, Skaggs BC. 1998. Relationships and unethical behavior: a social network perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 23:114–31
    [Google Scholar]
29. Brass DJ, Galaskiewicz J, Greve HR, Tsai W 2004. Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 47::795–819
    [Google Scholar]
30. Brass DJ, Krackhardt D 2012. Power, politics, and social networks in organizations. Politics in Organizations: Theory and Research Considerations GR Ferris, DC Treadway 355–75 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
31. Breiger RL. 1974. The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces. 53:181–90
    [Google Scholar]
32. Brennecke J. 2020. Dissonant ties in intraorganizational networks: why individuals seek problem-solving assistance from difficult colleagues. Acad. Manag. J. 63:743–78
    [Google Scholar]
33. Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ. 1990. Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Adm. Sci. Q. 35:104–27
    [Google Scholar]
34. Burt RS. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
35. Burt RS. 2002. Bridge decay. Soc. Netw 24:4333–63
    [Google Scholar]
36. Burt RS. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. Am. J. Sociol. 110:2349–99
    [Google Scholar]
37. Burt RS. 2007. Second-hand brokerage: evidence on the importance of local structure on managers, bankers, and analysts. Acad. Manag. J. 50:110–45
    [Google Scholar]
38. Burt RS, Burzynska K. 2017. Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi. Manag. Organ. Rev. 13:2221–60
    [Google Scholar]
39. Burt RS, Hogarth RM, Michaud C. 2000. The social capital of French and American managers. Organ. Sci. 11:123–47
    [Google Scholar]
40. Burt RS, Kilduff M, Tasselli S. 2013. Social network analysis: foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64:527–47
    [Google Scholar]
41. Burt RS, Merluzzi J 2014. Embedded brokerage: hubs versus locals. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40: Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks DJ Brass, G Labianca, A Mehra, DS Halgin, SP Borgatti 161–78 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Burt RS, Merluzzi J. 2016. Network oscillation. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2:368–91
    [Google Scholar]
43. Buskens V, van de Rijt A. 2008. Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. Am. J. Sociol. 114:2371–407
    [Google Scholar]
44. Byron K, Landis B 2020. Relational misperceptions in the workplace: new frontiers and challenges. Organ. Sci. 31:1223–42
    [Google Scholar]
45. Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E, Converse S 1993. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individual and Group Decision Making NJ Castellan, pp 221–46 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Carnabuci G, Diószegi B. 2015. Social networks, cognitive style, and innovative performance: a contingency perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 58:881–905
    [Google Scholar]
47. Casciaro T. 2020. Networks and affect in the workplace. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 21–48 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
48. Casciaro T, Lobo MS. 2005. Competent jerks, lovable fools and the formation of social networks. Harvard. Bus. Rev. 83:92–99
    [Google Scholar]
49. Casciaro T, Lobo MS. 2008. When competence is irrelevant: the role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties. Adm. Sci. Q. 53:465–84
    [Google Scholar]
50. Centola D. 2010. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329:1194–97
    [Google Scholar]
51. Coleman JS. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge, MA: Harvard. Univ. Press
52. Coleman J, Katz E, Menzel H. 1957. The diffusion of innovation among physicians. Sociometry 20:253–70
    [Google Scholar]
53. Contractor NS, Wasserman S, Faust K. 2006. Testing multitheoretical, multilevel hypotheses about organizational networks: an analytic framework and empirical results. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:681–703
    [Google Scholar]
54. Cross R, Parker A. 2004. The Hidden Power of Social Networks: Understanding How Work Really Gets Done in Organizations Boston: Harvard. Bus. Sch. Press
55. Cullen-Lester KL, Maupan CK, Carter DR 2017. Incorporating social networks into leadership development: a conceptual model and evaluation of research and practice. Lead. Q. 28:130–52
    [Google Scholar]
56. Cummings JN, Cross R. 2003. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Soc. Netw. 25:197–210
    [Google Scholar]
57. Dahlander L, McFarland DA. 2013. Ties that last: tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Adm. Sci. Q. 58:69–110
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ellwardt L, Steglich C, Wittek R. 2012. The co-evolution of gossip and friendship in workplace social networks. Soc. Netw. 34:623–33
    [Google Scholar]
59. Feld SL. 1981. The focused organization of social ties. Am. J. Sociol. 86:51015–35
    [Google Scholar]
60. Fernandez RM, Gould RV. 1994. A dilemma of state power: brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. Am. J. Sociol. 99:1455–91
    [Google Scholar]
61. Freeman L. 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1:215–39
    [Google Scholar]
62. Freeman L, Romney K, Freeman S 1987. Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. Am. Anthropol. 89:310–25
    [Google Scholar]
63. Galunic C, Ertug G, Gargiulo M. 2012. The positive externalities of social capital: benefiting from senior brokers. Acad. Manag. J. 55:51213–31
    [Google Scholar]
64. Granovetter MS. 1973. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 6:1360–80
    [Google Scholar]
65. Granovetter MS. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Soc. 91:481510
    [Google Scholar]
66. Grosser TJ, Obstfeld D, Choi EW, Woehler M, Lopez-Kidwell V et al. 2018. A sociopolitical perspective on employee innovativeness and job performance: the role of political skill and network structure. Organ. Sci. 29:4612–32
    [Google Scholar]
67. Grosser TJ, Obstfeld D, Labianca G, Borgatti S. 2019. Measuring mediation and separation brokerage orientations: a further step toward studying the social network brokerage process. Acad. Manag. Discov. 5:114–36
    [Google Scholar]
68. Grosser TJ, Park S, Mathieu JE, Reobuck AA. 2020. Network thinking in teams research. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 309–32 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
69. Hahl O, Kacperczyk A, Davis JP 2016. Knowledge asymmetry and brokerage: linking network perception to position in structural holes. Strategic Organ 14:2118–43
    [Google Scholar]
70. Halevy N, Halali E, Zlatev JJ 2019. Brokerage and brokering: an integrative review and organizing framework for third party influence. Acad. Manag. Ann. 13:215–39
    [Google Scholar]
71. Halgin DS, Borgatti SP, Huang Z. 2020. Prismatic effects of negative ties. Soc. Netw. 60:26–33
    [Google Scholar]
72. Hansen MT. 1999. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Adm. Sci. Q. 44:82–111
    [Google Scholar]
73. Harris JK. 2014. An Introduction to Exponential Random Graph Modeling Los Angeles: Sage
74. Hasan S. 2020. Social networks and careers. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 228–50 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
75. Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW. 2011. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Mark. Sci. 30:195–212
    [Google Scholar]
76. Kilduff M, Brass DJ. 2010. Organizational social network research: core ideas and key debates. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4:1317–57
    [Google Scholar]
77. Kilduff M, Buengerler C. 2020. Self-monitoring: a personality theory for network research. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 155–77 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kilduff M, Crossland C, Tsai W, Krackhardt D. 2008. Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 107:115–28
    [Google Scholar]
79. Kilduff M, Krackhardt D. 1994. Bringing the individual back in: a structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 37:87–108
    [Google Scholar]
80. Kilduff M, Lee JW. 2020. The integration of people and networks. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 7:155–79
    [Google Scholar]
81. Kilduff M, Tsai W. 2003. Social Networks and Organizations London: Sage
82. Kleinbaum AM. 2012. Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks. Adm. Sci. Q. 57:3407–52
    [Google Scholar]
83. Kleinbaum AM. 2018. Reorganization and tie decay choices. Manag. Sci. 64:2219–37
    [Google Scholar]
84. Kleinbaum AM, Jordan AH, Audia PG. 2015. An alter-centric perspective on the origins of brokerage in social networks: how perceived empathy moderates the self-monitoring effect. Organ. Sci. 26:41226–42
    [Google Scholar]
85. Krackhardt D. 1987. Cognitive social structure. Soc. Netw. 9:109–34
    [Google Scholar]
86. Krackhardt D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 35:342–69
    [Google Scholar]
87. Krackhardt D 1994. Constraints on the interactive organization as an ideal type. The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change C Hecksher, A Donnellon 211–22 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
88. Krackhardt D 1999. Simmelian ties: super strong and sticky. Power and Influence in Organizations R Kramer, M Neale 21–38 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
89. Krackhardt D, Kilduff M. 1999. Whether close or far: social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76:5770–82
    [Google Scholar]
90. Krackhardt D, Porter LW. 1985. When friends leave: a structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’ attitudes. Adm. Sci. Q. 30:242–61
    [Google Scholar]
91. Kwon S, Rondi E, Levin DZ, DeMassis A, Brass DJ 2020. Network brokerage: an integrative review and future research agenda. J. Manag. 46:1092–1120
    [Google Scholar]
92. Labianca G, Brass DJ. 2006. Exploring the social ledger: negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:596–614
    [Google Scholar]
93. Landis B, Kilduff M, Menges JI, Kilduff GJ. 2018. The paradox of agency: feeling powerful reduces brokerage opportunity recognition yet increases willingness to broker. J. Appl. Psychol. 103:929–38
    [Google Scholar]
94. Lazega E. 2020. Bureaucracy, Collegiality and Social Change: Redefining Organizations with Multilevel Relational Infrastructures Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
95. Lazega E, Snijders TAB 2015. Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences: Theory, Methods and Applications New York: Springer
96. Lazer D. 2001. The co-evolution of individual and network. J. Math. Sociol. 25:69–108
    [Google Scholar]
97. Levin DZ, Walter J, Appleyard MM, Cross R. 2016. Relational enhancement: how the relational dimension of social capital unlocks the value of network-bridging ties. Group Organ. Manag. 41:415–57
    [Google Scholar]
98. Levin DZ, Walter J, Murnighan JK 2011. Dormant ties: the value of reconnecting. Organ. Sci. 22:923–39
    [Google Scholar]
99. Lin N. 1999. Social networks and status attainment. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 25:467–87
    [Google Scholar]
100. Mannucci PV, Perry-Smith JE. 2021.. “ Who are you going to call?” Network activation in creative idea generation and elaboration. Acad. Manag. J. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0333. In press
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
101. Maoret M, Tortoriello M, Iubatti D. 2020. Big fish, big pond? The joint effect of formal and informal core–periphery positions on innovation productivity. Organ. Sci. 31:61538–59
     [Google Scholar]
102. McFadyen MA, Semadeni M, Cannella AA Jr 2009. Value of strong ties to disconnected others: examining knowledge creation in biomedicine. Organ. Sci. 20:3552–64
     [Google Scholar]
103. Mehra A, Kilduff M, Brass DJ. 2001. The social networks of high and low self-monitors: implications for workplace performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 46:1121–46
     [Google Scholar]
104. Methot JR, Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Christian JS. 2016. Are workplace friendships a mixed blessing? Exploring tradeoffs of multiplex relationships and their associations with job performance. Pers. Psychol. 69:2311–55
     [Google Scholar]
105. Methot JR, Rosado-Solomon E. 2020. Multiplex relationships in organizations: applying an ambivalence lens. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 79–103 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
106. Moliterno TP, Mahony DM. 2011. Network theory of organization: a multilevel approach. J. Manag. 37:2443–67
     [Google Scholar]
107. Moreno JL. 1934. Who Shall Survive?: A New Approach to the Problem of Human Interrelations Washington, DC: Nerv. Ment. Disease Publ.
108. Nebus J. 2006. Building collegial information networks: a theory of advice network generation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:615–37
     [Google Scholar]
109. Newcomb TM. 1961. The Acquaintance Process New York: Holt
110. Obstfeld D. 2005. Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 50:100–30
     [Google Scholar]
111. Obstfeld D, Borgatti SP, Davis J 2014. Brokerage as a process: decoupling third party action from social network structure. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 40: Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks DJ Brass, G Labianca, A Mehra, DS Halgin, SP Borgatti 135–59 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
112. Oh H, Kilduff M. 2008. The ripple effect of personality on social structure: self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. J. Appl. Psych. 93:1155–64
     [Google Scholar]
113. Parkinson C, Kleinbaum AM, Wheatly T. 2018. Similar neural responses predict friendship. Nat. Commun. 9:332
     [Google Scholar]
114. Paruchuri S. 2010. Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: a longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organ. Sci. 21:63–80
     [Google Scholar]
115. Paruchuri S, Goossen MC, Phelps C 2018. Conceptual foundations of multilevel social networks. The Handbook for Multilevel Theory, Measurement, and Analysis SE Humphrey, JM LeBreton 201–22 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Perry BL, Pescosolido BA, Borgatti SP. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
117. Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV. 2017. From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Acad. Manag. Rev. 42:53–79
     [Google Scholar]
118. Podolny JM. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. Am. J. Sociol. 107:33–60
     [Google Scholar]
119. Quintane E, Carnabuci G 2016. How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organ. Sci 27:61343–60
     [Google Scholar]
120. Reagans R, Zuckerman E, McEvily B 2004. How to make the team: social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 49:101–33
     [Google Scholar]
121. Rider CI 2009. Constraints on the control benefits of brokerage: a study of placement agents in U.S. venture capital fundraising. Adm. Sci. Q. 54:575–601
     [Google Scholar]
122. Rivera MT, Soderstrom SB, Uzzi B. 2010. Dynamics of dyads in social networks: assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:191–115
     [Google Scholar]
123. Roethlisberger FJ, Dixon WJ. 1939. Management and the Worker Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
124. Sasidharan S, Santhanam R, Brass DJ, Sambamurthy V. 2012. The effects of social network structure on enterprise system success: a longitudinal multilevel analysis. Info. Sys. Res. 23:658–78
     [Google Scholar]
125. Sasovova Z, Mehra A, Borgatti SP, Schippers MC. 2010. Network churn: the effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Adm. Sci. Q. 55:639–68
     [Google Scholar]
126. Seibert SE, Kraimer ML, Liden RC. 2001. A social capital theory of career success. Acad. Manag. J. 44:219–37
     [Google Scholar]
127. Simmel G 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel New York: Free Press
128. Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L. 2012. Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23:67–82
     [Google Scholar]
129. Snijders T, Koskinen J 2013. Longitudinal models. Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications D Lusher, J Koskinen, G Robins 130–40 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
130. Soda G, Mannucci PV, Burt RS. 2021. Networks, creativity, and time: staying creative through brokerage and network rejuvenation. Acad. Manag. J. 64:1164–90
     [Google Scholar]
131. Soda G, Tortoriello M, Iorio A. 2018. Harvesting value from brokerage: individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance. Acad. Manag. J 61:896–918
     [Google Scholar]
132. Soltis SM, Brass DJ, Lepak DM. 2018. Social resource management: an integration of social networks and human resource management. Acad. Manag. Ann. 12:537–73
     [Google Scholar]
133. Sparrowe RT, Liden RC. 2005. Two routes to influence: integrating leader-member exchange and network perspectives. Adm. Sci. Q. 50:505–35
     [Google Scholar]
134. Stovel K, Shaw L. 2012. Brokerage. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 38:139–58
     [Google Scholar]
135. Tasselli S, Kilduff M. 2018. When brokerage between friendship cliques endangers trust: a personality-network fit perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 61:3802–25
     [Google Scholar]
136. Tasselli S, Kilduff M. 2021. Network agency. Acad. Manag. Ann. 15:68–110
     [Google Scholar]
137. Tasselli S, Kilduff M, Landis B. 2018. Personality change: implications for organizational behavior. Acad. Manag. Ann. 12:467–93
     [Google Scholar]
138. Ter Wal A, Criscuolo P, McEvily B, Salter A 2020. Dual networking: how collaborators network in their quest for innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 65:4887–930
     [Google Scholar]
139. Tortoriello M, Reagans R, McEvily B. 2012. Bridging the knowledge gap: the influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organ. Sci. 23:41024–39
     [Google Scholar]
140. Travers J, Milgram S 1969. An experimental study of the “small world” problem. Sociometry 32:425–43
     [Google Scholar]
141. Tröster C, Parker A, van Knippenberg D, Sahlmüller B. 2019. The coevolution of social networks and thoughts of quitting. Acad. Manag. J. 62:122–43
     [Google Scholar]
142. Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q. 42:35–67
     [Google Scholar]
143. Venkataramani V, Labianca G, Grosser T. 2013. Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:1028–39
     [Google Scholar]
144. Vedres B. 2017. Forbidden triads and creative success in jazz: the Miles Davis factor. Appl. Netw. Sci. 2:31
     [Google Scholar]
145. Wagner WG, Pfeffer J, O'Reilly CA. 1984. Organizational demography and turnover in top-management teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 29:74–92
     [Google Scholar]
146. Walter J, Levin DZ, Murnighan JK 2015. Reconnection choices: selecting the most valuable (versus most preferred) dormant ties. Organ. Sci. 26:51447–65
     [Google Scholar]
147. Watts DJ. 2003. Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age New York: WW Norton
148. Xiao Z, Tsui AS 2007. When brokers may not work: the cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 52:1–31
     [Google Scholar]
149. Yang SW, Soltis SM, Ross JR, Labianca GJ 2021. Dormant tie reactivation as an affiliative coping response to stressors during the COVID-19 crisis. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:4489–50
     [Google Scholar]
150. Yang SW, Trincado F, Labianca G, Agneessen F. 2020. Negative ties at work. Social Networks at Work DJ Brass, SP Borgatti 49–78 New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]