The Science of Leadership: A Theoretical Model and Research Agenda

Literature Cited

1. Alvesson M, Einola K 2019. Warning for excessive positivity: authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. Leadersh. Q. 30:4383–95
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amundsen S, Martinsen ØL 2014. Empowering leadership: construct clarification conceptualization and validation of a new scale. Leadersh. Q. 25:3487–511
   [Google Scholar]
3. Antonakis J, Bastardoz N, Jacquart P, Shamir B 2016. Charisma: an ill-defined and ill-measured gift. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:292–319
   [Google Scholar]
4. Antonakis J, House RJ, Simonton DK. 2017. Can super smart leaders suffer from too much of a good thing? The curvilinear effect of intelligence on perceived leadership behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:71003–21
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ashford SJ, Sitkin SB 2019. From problems to progress: a dialogue on prevailing issues in leadership research. Leadersh. Q. 30:4454–60
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ashford SJ, Wellman N, Sully de Luque M, De Stobbeleir KE, Wollan M 2018. Two roads to effectiveness: CEO feedback seeking vision articulation and firm performance. J. Organ. Behav. 39:182–95
   [Google Scholar]
7. Badura KL, Grijalva E, Galvin BM, Owens BP, Joseph DL. 2020. Motivation to lead: a meta-analysis and distal-proximal model of motivation and leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:4331–54
   [Google Scholar]
8. Balkundi P, Kilduff M, Harrison DA 2011. Centrality and charisma: comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:61209–22
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 1994. Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
10. Bedeian AG, Hunt JG. 2006. Academic amnesia and vestigial assumptions of our forefathers. Leadersh. Q. 17:2190–205
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bedi A, Alpaslan CM, Green S. 2016. A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. J. Bus. Ethics 139:3517–36
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brands RA, Menges JI, Kilduff M. 2015. The leader-in-social-network schema: perceptions of network structure affect gendered attributions of charisma. Organ. Sci. 26:41210–25
    [Google Scholar]
13. Breevaart K, Zacher H. 2019. Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 92:2384–409
    [Google Scholar]
14. Burns JM. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper and Row
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carton AM. 2018.. “ I'm not mopping the floors, I'm putting a man on the moon”: how NASA leaders enhanced the meaningfulness of work by changing the meaning of work. Adm. Sci. Q. 63:2323–69
    [Google Scholar]
16. Carton AM, Lucas BJ. 2018. How can leaders overcome the blurry vision bias? Identifying an antidote to the paradox of vision communication. Acad. Manag. J. 61:62106–29
    [Google Scholar]
17. Carton AM, Murphy C, Clark JR 2014. A (blurry) vision of the future: how leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance. Acad. Manag. J. 57:61544–70
    [Google Scholar]
18. Carton AM, Rosette AS. 2011. Explaining bias against black leaders: integrating theory on information processing and goal-based stereotyping. Acad. Manag. J. 54:61141–58
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chatterjee A, Hambrick DC 2011. Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: how narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Admin. Sci. Q. 56:2202–37
    [Google Scholar]
20. Chang D, Johnson RE 2010. Not all leader–member exchanges are created equal: importance of leader relational identity. Leadersh. Q. 21:5796–808
    [Google Scholar]
21. Chen G, Sharma PN, Edinger SK, Shapiro DL, Farh JL. 2011. Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:3541–57
    [Google Scholar]
22. Chen J, Nadkarni S. 2017. It's about time! CEOs’ temporal dispositions temporal leadership and corporate entrepreneurship. Adm. Sci. Q. 62:131–66
    [Google Scholar]
23. Chen Z, Zhu J, Zhou M. 2015. How does a servant leader fuel the service fire? A multilevel model of servant leadership, individual self identity, group competition climate, and customer service performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:2511–21
    [Google Scholar]
24. Cheong M, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Spain SM, Tsai CY. 2019. A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. Leadersh. Q. 30:134–58
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chiu CYC, Balkundi P, Weinberg FJ. 2017. When managers become leaders: the role of manager network centralities, social power, and followers' perception of leadership. Leadersh. Q. 28:2334–48
    [Google Scholar]
26. Colbert AE, Witt LA. 2009. The role of goal-focused leadership in enabling the expression of conscientiousness. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:3790–96
    [Google Scholar]
27. Cronbach LJ, Gleser GC. 1957. Psychological Tests and Personnel Decisions Champaign: Univ. Ill. Press
28. Day DV. 2000. Leadership development: a review in context. Leadersh. Q. 11:4581–613
    [Google Scholar]
29. Day DV, Dragoni L. 2015. Leadership development: an outcome-oriented review based on time and levels of analyses. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:133–56
    [Google Scholar]
30. Day DV, Sin HP. 2011. Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: charting and understanding developmental trajectories. Leadersh. Q. 22:3545–60
    [Google Scholar]
31. Den Hartog DN 2015. Ethical leadership. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:409–34
    [Google Scholar]
32. DeRue DS, Ashford SJ. 2010. Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:4627–47
    [Google Scholar]
33. DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Ashford SJ. 2015. Interpersonal perceptions and the emergence of leadership structures in groups: a network perspective. Organ. Sci. 26:41192–1209
    [Google Scholar]
34. DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Hollenbeck JR, Workman K. 2012. A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:5997–1015
    [Google Scholar]
35. DeRue DS, Nahrgang JD, Wellman E, Humphrey SE 2011. Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: an integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Pers. Psychol. 64:17–52
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dinh JE, Lord RG. 2012. Implications of dispositional and process views of traits for individual difference research in leadership. Leadersh. Q. 23:4651–69
    [Google Scholar]
37. Eisenberger R, Karagonlar G, Stinglhamber F, Neves P, Becker TE et al. 2010. Leader–member exchange and affective organizational commitment: the contribution of supervisor's organizational embodiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:61085–1103
    [Google Scholar]
38. Emrich CG, Brower HH, Feldman JM, Garland H. 2001. Images in words: presidential rhetoric, charisma, and greatness. Adm. Sci. Q. 46:3527–57
    [Google Scholar]
39. Epitropaki O, Martin R. 2004. Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:2293–310
    [Google Scholar]
40. Feng JM, Liu SS, Wu KJ, Wang HC. 2014. A review of the literature of humble leadership. Foreign Econ. Manag. 36:38–48
    [Google Scholar]
41. Foti RJ, Hansbrough TK, Epitropaki O, Coyle PT 2017. Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: approaches, findings, and future directions. Leadersh. Q. 28:2261–67
    [Google Scholar]
42. Foulk TA, Lanaj K, Tu MH, Erez A, Archambeau L 2018. Heavy is the head that wears the crown: an actor-centric approach to daily psychological power, abusive leader behavior, and perceived incivility. Acad. Manag. J. 61:2661–84
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gabriel AS, Lanaj K, Jennings RE. 2020. Is one the loneliest number? A within-person examination of the adaptive and maladaptive consequences of leader loneliness at work. J. Appl. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000838. In press
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
44. Gardner WL, Cogliser CC, Davis KM, Dickens MP. 2011. Authentic leadership: a review of the literature and research agenda. Leadersh. Q. 22:61120–45
    [Google Scholar]
45. Gary MS, Yang MM, Yetton PW, Sterman JD. 2017. Stretch goals and the distribution of organizational performance. Organ. Sci. 28:3395–410
    [Google Scholar]
46. Gerpott FH, Lehmann-Willenbrock N, Voelpel SC, Van Vugt M. 2019. It's not just what is said but when it's said: a temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Acad. Manag. J. 62:3717–38
    [Google Scholar]
47. Glynn MA, Raffaelli R. 2010. Uncovering mechanisms of theory development in an academic field: lessons from leadership research. Acad. Manag. Ann. 4:1359–401
    [Google Scholar]
48. Gobet F. 2005. Chunking models of expertise: implications for education. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19:2183–204
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gottfredson RK, Wright SL, Heaphy ED 2020. A critique of the Leader-Member Exchange construct: Back to square one. Leadersh. Q. 31:6101385
    [Google Scholar]
50. Grant AM. 2012. Leading with meaning: beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Acad. Manag. J. 55:2458–76
    [Google Scholar]
51. Grant AM, Gino F, Hofmann DA 2011. Reversing the extroverted leadership advantage: the role of employee proactivity. Acad. Manag. J. 54:3528–50
    [Google Scholar]
52. Gravetter FJ, Forzano LAB. 2011. Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. , 4th ed..
53. Griffin MA, Parker SK, Mason CM 2010. Leader vision and the development of adaptive and proactive performance: a longitudinal study. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1174–82
    [Google Scholar]
54. Guillén L, Mayo M, Korotov K. 2015. Is leadership a part of me? A leader identity approach to understanding the motivation to lead. Leadersh. Q. 26:5802–20
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gündemir S, Carton AM, Homan AC. 2019. The impact of organizational performance on the emergence of Asian American leaders. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:1107–22
    [Google Scholar]
56. Gupta A, Misangyi VF. 2018. Follow the leader (or not): the influence of peer CEOs’ characteristics on interorganizational imitation. Strateg. Manag. J. 39:51437–72
    [Google Scholar]
57. Hall RJ, Lord RG, Foster KE. 2009. Considerations in applying the social relations model to the study of leadership emergence in groups: a leadership categorization perspective. Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Leadership Bingley, UK: Emerald Group
    [Google Scholar]
58. Heath C, Heath D. 2007. Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die New York: Random House
59. Hogg MA, van Knippenberg D, Rast DE III 2012. The social identity theory of leadership: theoretical origins, research findings, and conceptual developments. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 23:1258–304
    [Google Scholar]
60. Hollenbeck JR, Beersma B, Schouten ME. 2012. Beyond team types and taxonomies: a dimensional scaling conceptualization for team description. Acad. Manag. Rev. 37:182–106
    [Google Scholar]
61. House RJ. 1996. Path-goal theory of leadership: lessons legacy and a reformulated theory. Leadersh. Q. 7:3323–52
    [Google Scholar]
62. Hu J, Erdogan B, Jiang K, Bauer TN, Liu S. 2018. Leader humility and team creativity: the role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. J. Appl. Psychol. 103:3313–23
    [Google Scholar]
63. Hu J, Liden RC. 2011. Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:4851–62
    [Google Scholar]
64. Hunt JG. 1999. Transformational/charismatic leadership's transformation of the field: an historical essay. Leadersh. Q. 10:2129–44
    [Google Scholar]
65. Jackson EM, Johnson RE 2012. When opposites do (and do not) attract: interplay of leader and follower self-identities and its consequences for leader–member exchange. Leadersh. Q. 23:3488–501
    [Google Scholar]
66. Johnson MK, Rowatt WC, Petrini L. 2011. A new trait on the market: Honesty–Humility as a unique predictor of job performance ratings. Pers. Individ. Differ. 50:6857–62
    [Google Scholar]
67. Johnson RE, King DD, Lin SHJ, Scott BA, Walker EMJ, Wang M. 2017. Regulatory focus trickle-down: how leader regulatory focus and behavior shape follower regulatory focus. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 140:29–45
    [Google Scholar]
68. Johnson RE, Venus M, Lanaj K, Mao C, Chang CH 2012. Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational consideration and abusive leadership behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:61262–72
    [Google Scholar]
69. Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt MW 2002. Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:4765–80
    [Google Scholar]
70. Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Ilies R. 2004. The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:136–51
    [Google Scholar]
71. Kalshoven K, Den Hartog DN, De Hoogh AH 2011. Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadersh. Q. 22:151–69
    [Google Scholar]
72. Kearney E, Shemla M, van Knippenberg D, Scholz FA. 2019. A paradox perspective on the interactive effects of visionary and empowering leadership. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 155:20–30
    [Google Scholar]
73. Kenny DA, Livi S. 2009. A componential analysis of leadership using the social relations model. Multi-Level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Leadership Bingley, UK: Emerald Group
    [Google Scholar]
74. Kenny DA, Zaccaro SJ. 1983. An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 68:4678–85
    [Google Scholar]
75. Kim Y. 2018. Enhancing employee communication behaviors for sensemaking and sensegiving in crisis situations: strategic management approach for effective internal crisis communication. J. Commun. Manag. 22:4451–75
    [Google Scholar]
76. Kniffin KM, Detert JR, Leroy HL. 2020. On leading and managing: synonyms or separate (and unequal)?. Acad. Manag. Discov. 6:4544–71
    [Google Scholar]
77. Koenig AM, Eagly AH, Mitchell AA, Ristikari T. 2011. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychol. Bull. 137:4616–42
    [Google Scholar]
78. Kozlowski SWJ, Klein KJ 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions KJ Klein, SWJ Kozlowski 3–90 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    [Google Scholar]
79. Kozlowski SWJ, Mak S, Chao GT. 2016. Team-centric leadership: an integrative review. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:21–54
    [Google Scholar]
80. Kwok N, Hanig S, Brown DJ, Shen W. 2018. How leader role identity influences the process of leader emergence: a social network analysis. Leadersh. Q. 29:6648–62
    [Google Scholar]
81. Lacerenza CN, Reyes DL, Marlow SL, Joseph DL, Salas E 2017. Leadership training design delivery and implementation: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:121686–1718
    [Google Scholar]
82. Lam W, Lee C, Taylor MS, Zhao HH 2018. Does proactive personality matter in leadership transitions? Effects of proactive personality on new leader identification and responses to new leaders and their change agendas. Acad. Manag. J. 61:1245–63
    [Google Scholar]
83. Lanaj K, Hollenbeck JR. 2015. Leadership over-emergence in self-managing teams: the role of gender and countervailing biases. Acad. Manag. J. 58:51476–94
    [Google Scholar]
84. Landay K, Harms PD, Credé M. 2019. Shall we serve the dark lords? A meta-analytic review of psychopathy and leadership. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:1183–96
    [Google Scholar]
85. Latham GP, Pinder CC. 2005. Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:485–516
    [Google Scholar]
86. Lemoine GJ, Blum TC, Roman PM. 2016. Detrimental effects of “stretch” goals in specialty substance use disorder treatment organizations. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 64:13–23
    [Google Scholar]
87. Lepisto D. 2021. Ritual work and the formation of a shared sense of meaningfulness. Acad. Manag. J. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0854. In press
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
88. Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Dahm PC. 2017. Why and when does the gender gap reverse? Diversity goals and the pay premium for high potential women. Acad. Manag. J. 60:2402–32
    [Google Scholar]
89. Lewis A, Clark J 2020. Dreams within a dream: multiple visions and organizational structure. J. Organ. Behav. 41:150–76
    [Google Scholar]
90. Li WD, Li S, Feng JJ, Wang M, Zhang H, Frese M, Wu CH 2020. Can becoming a leader change your personality? An investigation with two longitudinal studies from a role-based perspective. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:6882–902
    [Google Scholar]
91. Liberman N, Trope Y. 1998. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75:15–18
    [Google Scholar]
92. Liden RC, Anand S, Vidyarthi P. 2016. Dyadic relationships. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:139–66
    [Google Scholar]
93. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Liao C, Meuser JD. 2014. Servant leadership and serving culture: influence on individual and unit performance. Acad. Manag. J. 57:51434–52
    [Google Scholar]
94. Lin SHJ, Ma J, Johnson RE. 2016. When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: how ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:6815–30
    [Google Scholar]
95. Liu H, Chiang JTJ, Fehr R, Xu M, Wang S. 2017. How do leaders react when treated unfairly? Leader narcissism and self-interested behavior in response to unfair treatment. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:111590–99
    [Google Scholar]
96. Locke EA. 1999. The Essence of Leadership: The Four Keys to Leading Successfully Washington, DC: Lexington Books
97. Lord RG, Brown DJ. 2001. Leadership values and subordinate self-concepts. Leadersh. Q. 12:2133–52
    [Google Scholar]
98. Lord RG, Epitropaki O, Foti RJ, Hansbrough TK. 2020. Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. . Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 7:49–74
    [Google Scholar]
99. Lord RG, Foti RJ, De Vader CL. 1984. A test of leadership categorization theory: internal structure information processing and leadership perceptions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 34:3343–78
    [Google Scholar]
100. Lord RG, Gatti P, Chui SL. 2016. Social-cognitive relational and identity-based approaches to leadership. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 136:119–34
     [Google Scholar]
101. Lorinkova NM, Pearsall MJ, Sims HP Jr 2013. Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Acad. Manag. J. 56:2573–96
     [Google Scholar]
102. Lyness KS, Grotto AR. 2018. Women and leadership in the United States: Are we closing the gender gap?. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5:227–65
     [Google Scholar]
103. MacCallum R, Browne MW. 1993. The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. Psychol. Bull. 114:533–41
     [Google Scholar]
104. MacLaren NG, Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Sayama H, Mumford MD et al. 2020. Testing the babble hypothesis: Speaking time predicts leader emergence in small groups. Leadersh. Q. 31:5101409
     [Google Scholar]
105. Macrae CN, Bodenhausen GV. 2000. Social cognition: thinking categorically about others. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51:93–120
     [Google Scholar]
106. Marinova SV, Moon H, Kamdar D 2013. Getting ahead or getting along? The two-facet conceptualization of conscientiousness and leadership emergence. Organ. Sci. 24:41257–76
     [Google Scholar]
107. Martin SR, Côté S, Woodruff T 2016. Echoes of our upbringing: how growing up wealthy or poor relates to narcissism leader behavior and leader effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 59:62157–77
     [Google Scholar]
108. Mayer DM, Nurmohamed S, Treviño LK, Shapiro DL, Schminke M. 2013. Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 121:189–103
     [Google Scholar]
109. McClean EJ, Martin SR, Emich KJ, Woodruff CT. 2018. The social consequences of voice: an examination of voice type and gender on status and subsequent leader emergence. Acad. Manag. J. 61:51869–91
     [Google Scholar]
110. McClean ST, Barnes CM, Courtright SH, Johnson RE. 2019. Resetting the clock on dynamic leader behaviors: a conceptual integration and agenda for future research. Acad. Manag. Ann. 13:2479–508
     [Google Scholar]
111. Meindl JR. 1995. The romance of leadership as a follower-centric theory: a social constructionist approach. Leadersh. Q. 6:3329–41
     [Google Scholar]
112. Miscenko D, Guenter H, Day DV. 2017. Am I a leader? Examining leader identity development over time. Leadersh. Q. 28:5605–20
     [Google Scholar]
113. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C. 1996. Bandwidth–fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. J. Organ. Behav. 17:6609–26
     [Google Scholar]
114. Ou AY, Tsui AS, Kinicki AJ, Waldman DA, Xiao Z, Song LJ 2014. Humble chief executive officers’ connections to top management team integration and middle managers’ responses. Adm. Sci. Q. 59:134–72
     [Google Scholar]
115. Ouchi WG. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Adm. Sci. Q. 25:1129–41
     [Google Scholar]
116. Owens BP, Johnson MD, Mitchell TR 2013. Expressed humility in organizations: implications for performance teams and leadership. Organ. Sci. 24:51517–38
     [Google Scholar]
117. Park SH, Westphal JD. 2013. Social discrimination in the corporate elite: how status affects the propensity for minority CEOs to receive blame for low firm performance. Adm. Sci. Q. 58:4542–86
     [Google Scholar]
118. Paustian-Underdahl SC, Walker LS, Woehr DJ 2014. Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: a meta-analysis of contextual moderators. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:61129–45
     [Google Scholar]
119. Pearce CL, Wassenaar CL, Berson Y, Tuval-Mashiach R. 2019. Toward a theory of meta-paradoxical leadership. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 155:31–41
     [Google Scholar]
120. Petriglieri G, Stein M. 2012. The unwanted self: projective identification in leaders’ identity work. Organ. Stud. 33:91217–35
     [Google Scholar]
121. Pfeffer J. 1977. The ambiguity of leadership. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2:1104–12
     [Google Scholar]
122. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:5879–903
     [Google Scholar]
123. Qin X, Chen C, Yam KC, Huang M, Ju D. 2020. The double-edged sword of leader humility: investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:7693–712
     [Google Scholar]
124. Rosette AS, Leonardelli GJ, Phillips KW. 2008. The White standard: racial bias in leader categorization. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:4758–77
     [Google Scholar]
125. Rosette AS, Tost LP 2010. Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:2221–35
     [Google Scholar]
126. Ryan MK, Haslam SA, Hersby MD, Bongiorno R. 2011. Think crisis–think female: the glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager–think male stereotype. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:3470–84
     [Google Scholar]
127. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25:154–67
     [Google Scholar]
128. Schaubroeck JM, Hannah ST, Avolio BJ, Kozlowski SWJ, Lord RG et al. 2012. Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Acad. Manag. J. 55:51053–78
     [Google Scholar]
129. Schilpzand P, Houston L, Cho J 2018. Not too tired to be proactive: daily empowering leadership spurs next-morning employee proactivity as moderated by nightly sleep quality. Acad. Manag. J. 61:62367–87
     [Google Scholar]
130. Schlenker BR, Weigold MF 1989. Goals and the self-identification process: constructing desired identities. Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology LA Pervin 243–90 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
131. Shao Y, Nijstad BA, Täuber S. 2019. Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: the double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 155:7–19
     [Google Scholar]
132. Shondrick SJ, Lord RG 2010. Implicit leadership and followership theories: Dynamic structures for leadership perceptions, memory, and leader-follower processes. Int. Rev. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 25:1–33
     [Google Scholar]
133. Sluss D, Ployhart RE, Cobb MG, Ashforth BE. 2012. Generalizing newcomers' relational and organizational identifications: processes and prototypicality. Acad. Manag. J. 55:4949–75
     [Google Scholar]
134. Stam D, Lord RG, Knippenberg DV, Wisse B. 2014. An image of who we might become: vision communication, possible selves, and vision pursuit. Organ. Sci. 25:41172–94
     [Google Scholar]
135. Staw BM, DeCelles KA, de Goey P. 2019. Leadership in the locker room: how the intensity of leaders’ unpleasant affective displays shapes team performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:121547–57
     [Google Scholar]
136. Steffens NK, Haslam SA. 2013. Power through ‘us’: leaders’ use of we-referencing language predicts election victory. PLOS ONE 8:10e77952
     [Google Scholar]
137. Sy T, Shore LM, Strauss J, Shore TH, Tram S et al. 2010. Leadership perceptions as a function of race–occupation fit: the case of Asian Americans. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:5902–19
     [Google Scholar]
138. Tepper BJ, Simon L, Park HM. 2017. Abusive supervision. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4:123–52
     [Google Scholar]
139. Tost LP, Gino F, Larrick RP 2013. When power makes others speechless: the negative impact of leader power on team performance. Acad. Manag. J. 56:51465–86
     [Google Scholar]
140. Van Dierendonck D. 2011. Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. J. Manag. 37:41228–61
     [Google Scholar]
141. van Dijke M, De Cremer D, Mayer DM, Van Quaquebeke N. 2012. When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leadership types in relational justice models. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:2235–48
     [Google Scholar]
142. van Knippenberg D, Hogg MA. 2003. A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 25:243–95
     [Google Scholar]
143. van Knippenberg D, Sitkin SB. 2013. A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board?. Acad. Manag. Ann. 7:11–60
     [Google Scholar]
144. Vroom VH, Jago AG. 2007. The role of the situation in leadership. Am. Psychol. 62:117–24
     [Google Scholar]
145. Wang AC, Chiang JTJ, Tsai CY, Lin TT, Cheng BS 2013. Gender makes the difference: the moderating role of leader gender on the relationship between leadership styles and subordinate performance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 122:2101–13
     [Google Scholar]
146. Wang G, Oh IS, Courtright SH, Colbert AE. 2011. Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group Organ. Manag. 36:2223–70
     [Google Scholar]
147. Wang G, Van Iddekinge CH, Zhang L, Bishoff J. 2019. Meta-analytic and primary investigations of the role of followers in ratings of leadership behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:170–106
     [Google Scholar]
148. Wang L, Restubog S, Shao B, Lu V, Van Kleef GA 2018. Does anger expression help or harm leader effectiveness? The role of competence-based versus integrity-based violations and abusive supervision. Acad. Manag. J. 61:31050–72
     [Google Scholar]
149. Wang XHF, Howell JM. 2010. Exploring the dual-level effects of transformational leadership on followers. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:61134–44
     [Google Scholar]
150. Yammarino FJ, Dionne SD, Chun JU, Dansereau F 2005. Leadership and levels of analysis: a state-of-the-science review. Leadersh. Q. 16:6879–919
     [Google Scholar]
151. Yukl G. 2008. How leaders influence organizational effectiveness. Leadersh. Q. 19:6708–22
     [Google Scholar]
152. Yukl G, Gordon A, Taber T 2002. A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: integrating a half century of behavior research. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 9:115–32
     [Google Scholar]
153. Zapata CP, Carton AM, Liu JT. 2016. When justice promotes injustice: why minority leaders experience bias when they adhere to interpersonal justice rules. Acad. Manag. J. 59:41150–73
     [Google Scholar]
154. Zhang C, Nahrgang JD, Ashford SJ, DeRue DS. 2020. The risky side of leadership: conceptualizing risk perceptions in informal leadership and investigating the effects of their over-time changes in teams. Organ. Sci. 31:51138–58
     [Google Scholar]
155. Zhang X, Bartol KM. 2010. Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Acad. Manag. J. 53:1107–28
     [Google Scholar]
156. Zhang Y, LePine JA, Buckman BR, Wei F. 2014. It's not fair… or is it? The role of justice and leadership in explaining work stressor–job performance relationships. Acad. Manag. J. 57:3675–97
     [Google Scholar]
157. Zhang Y, Waldman DA, Han YL, Li XB 2015. Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Acad. Manag. J. 58:2538–66
     [Google Scholar]
158. Zhu DH, Chen G 2015. CEO narcissism and the impact of prior board experience on corporate strategy. Adm. Sci. Q. 60:131–65
     [Google Scholar]