Advances in the Treatment of Context in Organizational Research

Literature Cited

1. Adair WL, Buchan NR, Chen X-P, Liu D. 2016. A model of communication context and measure of context dependence. Acad. Manag. Discov. 2:198–217 [Google Scholar]
2. Addae HM, Johns G, Boies K. 2013. The legitimacy of absenteeism from work: a nine-nation exploratory study. Cross Cult. Manag. 20:402–28 [Google Scholar]
3. Ashford SJ, George E, Blatt R. 2007. Old assumptions, new work: the opportunities and challenges of research on nonstandard employment. Acad. Manag. Ann. 1:65–117 [Google Scholar]
4. Bacharach SB, Bamberger PA. 2007. 9/11 and New York City firefighters' post hoc unit support and control climates: a context theory of the consequences of involvement in traumatic work-related events. Acad. Manag. J. 50:849–68 [Google Scholar]
5. Barley SR. 2015. Why the Internet makes buying a car less loathsome: how technologies change role relations. Acad. Manag. Discov. 1:5–35 [Google Scholar]
6. Barnes CM, Lefter AM, Bhave DP, Wagner DT. 2016. The benefits of bad economies: business cycles and time-based work-life conflict. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 21:235–49 [Google Scholar]
7. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Li N. 2013. The theory of purposive work behavior: the role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:132–53 [Google Scholar]
8. Becker TE, Atinc G, Breaugh JA, Carlson KD, Edwards JR, Spector PE. 2016. Statistical control in correlational studies: 10 essential recommendations for organizational researchers. J. Organ. Behav. 37:157–67 [Google Scholar]
9. Benner MJ, Tushman ML. 2015. Reflections on the 2013 decade award—“Exploitation, exploration, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited” ten years later. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40:497–514 [Google Scholar]
10. Bergman ME, Jean VA. 2016. Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial-organizational psychology literature. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 9:84–113 [Google Scholar]
11. Bhave DP, Glomb TM. 2016. The role of occupational emotional labor requirements on the surface acting–job satisfaction relationship. J. Manag. 42:722–41 [Google Scholar]
12. Blalock HM. 1984. Contextual-effects models: theoretical and methodological issues. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 10:353–72 [Google Scholar]
13. Borgogni L, Dello Russo S, Petitta L, Latham GP. 2009. Collective efficacy and organizational commitment in an Italian city hall. Eur. Psychol. 14:363–71 [Google Scholar]
14. Borgogni L, Dello Russo S, Petitta L, Vecchione M. 2010a. Predicting job satisfaction and job performance in a privatized organization. Int. Public Manag. J. 13:275–96 [Google Scholar]
15. Borgogni L, Petitta L, Mastrorilli A. 2010b. Correlates of collective efficacy in the Italian Air Force. Appl. Psychol.: Int. Rev. 59:515–37 [Google Scholar]
16. Bosco FA, Steel P, Oswald FL, Uggerslev K, Field JG. 2015. Cloud-based meta-analysis to bridge science and practice: welcome to metaBUS. Pers. Assess. Decis. 1:3–17 [Google Scholar]
17. Bowling NA, Khazon S, Meyer RD, Burrus CJ. 2015. Situational strength as a moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analytic examination. J. Bus. Psychol. 30:89–104 [Google Scholar]
18. Boyce CJ, Wood AM, Daly M, Sedikides C. 2015. Personality change following unemployment. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:991–1011 [Google Scholar]
19. Burke MJ, Chan-Serafin S, Salvador R, Smith A, Sarpy SA. 2008. The role of national culture and organizational climate in safety training effectiveness. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 17:133–52 [Google Scholar]
20. Cappelli P, Sherer PD. 1991. The missing role of context in OB: the need for a meso-level approach. Res. Organ. Behav. 13:55–110 [Google Scholar]
21. Chatman JA Jehn KA. 1994. Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be. ? Acad. Manag. J. 37:522–53 [Google Scholar]
22. Christensen CM, van Bever D. 2014. The capitalist's dilemma. Harv. Bus. Rev. 92:660–68 [Google Scholar]
23. Cohen L, Duberley J. 2015. Three faces of context and their implications for career: a study of public sector careers cut short. J. Vocat. Behav. 91:189–202 [Google Scholar]
24. Cooper WH, Withey MJ. 2009. The strong situation hypothesis. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 13:62–72 [Google Scholar]
25. Côté S. 2011. How social class shapes thoughts and actions in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 31:43–71 [Google Scholar]
26. Crossland C, Hambrick DC. 2011. Differences in managerial discretion across countries: how nation-level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strateg. Manag. J. 32:797–819 [Google Scholar]
27. de Treville S, Antonakis J. 2006. Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues. J. Oper. Manag. 24:99–123 [Google Scholar]
28. Dello Russo S, Miraglia M, Borgogni L, Johns G. 2013. How time and perceptions of social context shape employee absenteeism trajectories. J. Vocat. Behav. 83:209–17 [Google Scholar]
29. Dierdorff EC, Morgeson FP. 2013. Getting what the occupation gives: exploring multilevel links between work design and occupational values. Pers. Psychol. 66:687–721 [Google Scholar]
30. Dierdorff EC, Rubin RS, Bachrach DG. 2012. Role expectations as antecedents of citizenship and the moderating effects of work context. J. Manag. 38:573–98 [Google Scholar]
31. Dierdorff EC, Rubin RS, Morgeson FP. 2009. The milieu of managerial work: an integrative framework linking work context to role requirements. J. Appl. Psychol. 94:972–88 [Google Scholar]
32. Djurdjevic E, Wheeler AR. 2014. A dynamic multilevel model of performance rating. Res. Pers. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32:147–76 [Google Scholar]
33. Eriksson-Zetterquist U, Lindberg K, Styhre A. 2009. When the good times are over: professionals encountering new technology. Hum. Relat. 62:1145–70 [Google Scholar]
34. Felin T, Foss NJ, Ployhart RE. 2015. The microfoundations movement in strategy and organization theory. Acad. Manag. Ann. 9:575–632 [Google Scholar]
35. Ferris GR, Harris JN, Russell ZA, Ellen BP III, Martinez AD, Blass RR. 2014. The role of reputation in the organizational sciences: a multilevel review, construct assessment, and research. Res. Pers. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32:241–303 [Google Scholar]
36. Fiss PC. 2007. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:1180–98 [Google Scholar]
37. Gersick CJG. 1988. Time and transition in work teams: toward a new model of group development. Acad. Manag. J. 31:9–41 [Google Scholar]
38. Gino F, Pierce L. 2009. The abundance effect: unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 109:142–55 [Google Scholar]
39. Gino F, Pierce L. 2010. Robin Hood under the hood: wealth-based discrimination in illicit customer help. Organ. Sci. 21:1176–94 [Google Scholar]
40. Gioia DA, Chittipeddi K. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strateg. Manag. J. 12:433–48 [Google Scholar]
41. Grant AM, Parker SK. 2009. Redesigning work design theories: the rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Acad. Manag. Ann. 3:317–75 [Google Scholar]
42. Guarana CL, Hernandez M. 2016. Identified ambivalence: when cognitive conflicts can help individuals overcome cognitive traps. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:1013–29 [Google Scholar]
43. Gulati R, Sytch M. 2007. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in interorganizational relationships: effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer's performance in procurement. Adm. Sci. Q. 52:32–69 [Google Scholar]
44. Hackman JR. 2003. Learning more by crossing levels: evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. J. Organ. Behav. 24:905–22 [Google Scholar]
45. Hambrick DC, Abrahamson E. 1995. Assessing managerial discretion across industries: a multimethod approach. Acad. Manag. J. 38:1427–41 [Google Scholar]
46. Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S. 1987. Managerial discretion: a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Res. Organ. Behav. 9:369–406 [Google Scholar]
47. Hernandez JI. 2015. Regional variation in work absence cultures in the United States PhD Thesis, Dep. Psychol., Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
48. Hershcovis MS. 2011. “Incivility, social undermining, bullying…oh my!”: a call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. J. Organ. Behav. 32:499–519 [Google Scholar]
49. Higgins A, O'Halloran P, Porter S. 2012. Management of long term sickness absence: a systematic realist review. J. Occup. Rehabil. 22:322–32 [Google Scholar]
50. Hirsch PM. 1987. Pack Your Own Parachute New York: Addison-Wesley
51. Hochschild AR. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
52. Irwin N. 2015. How Stanford took on the giants of economics. New York Times Sept. 10. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/13/upshot/how-stanford-took-on-the-giants-of-economics.html?_r=0
53. Johns G. 1991. Substantive and methodological constraints on behavior and attitudes in organizational research. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 49:80–104 [Google Scholar]
54. Johns G. 1993. Constraints on the adoption of psychology-based personnel practices: lessons from organizational innovation. Pers. Psychol. 46:569–92 [Google Scholar]
55. Johns G. 1999. A multi-level theory of self-serving behavior in and by organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 21:1–38 [Google Scholar]
56. Johns G. 2001. In praise of context. J. Organ. Behav. 22:31–42 [Google Scholar]
57. Johns G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:386–408 [Google Scholar]
58. Johns G. 2010. Some unintended consequences of job design. J. Organ. Behav. 31:361–69 [Google Scholar]
59. Johns G. 2017. Reflections on the 2016 Decade Award: incorporating context in organizational research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 42:577–95 [Google Scholar]
60. Jordan PJ, Lindebaum D. 2015. A model of within person variation in leadership: emotion regulation and scripts as predictors of situationally appropriate leadership. Leadersh. Q. 26:594–605 [Google Scholar]
61. Joshi A, Roh H. 2009. The role of context in work team diversity research: a meta-analytic review. Acad. Manag. J. 52:599–627 [Google Scholar]
62. Judge TA, Bono JE, Locke EA. 2000. Personality and job satisfaction: the mediating role of job characteristics. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:237–49 [Google Scholar]
63. Judge TA, Zapata CP. 2015. The person-situation debate revisited: effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Acad. Manag. J. 58:1149–79 [Google Scholar]
64. Karam CM, Kwantes CT. 2011. Contextualizing cultural orientation and organizational citizenship behavior. J. Int. Manag. 17:303–15 [Google Scholar]
65. Kelley HH, Holmes JG, Kerr NL, Reis HT, Rusbult C, van Lange PAM. 2003. An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
66. Kirzner IM. 1979. Perception, Opportunity, and Profit Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
67. Kish-Gephart JJ, Campbell JT. 2015. Don't forget your roots: the influence of CEO social class background on strategic risk taking. Acad. Manag. J. 58:1614–36 [Google Scholar]
68. Kitayama S, Conway LG III, Pietromonaco PR, Park H, Plaut VC. 2010. Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: the production-adoption model of cultural change. Am. Psychol. 65:559–74 [Google Scholar]
69. Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ. 2000. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
70. Klimoski R. 2013. When it comes to leadership, context matters. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership MG Rumsey 267–87 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
71. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, Rheinschmidt ML, Keltner D. 2012. Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol. Rev. 119:546–72 [Google Scholar]
72. Larrick RP. 2016. The social context of decisions. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:441–67 [Google Scholar]
73. Leana CR, Meuris J. 2015. Living to work and working to live: income as a driver of organizational behavior. Acad. Manag. Ann. 9:55–95 [Google Scholar]
74. Lee TW, Mitchell TR. 1994. An alternative approach: the unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19:51–89 [Google Scholar]
75. Levy PE, Williams JR. 2004. The social context of performance appraisal: a review and framework for the future. J. Manag. 30:881–905 [Google Scholar]
76. Li H, Chen Y-R, Blader SL. 2016. Where is context? Advancing status research with a contextual value perspective. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:185–98 [Google Scholar]
77. Li PP. 2014. A tentative typology of context for trust research and beyond. J. Trust Res. 4:83–89 [Google Scholar]
78. Li W-D, Zhang Z, Song Z, Arvey RD. 2016. It is also in our nature: genetic influences on work characteristics and in explaining their relationships with well-being. J. Organ. Behav. 37:868–88 [Google Scholar]
79. Liden RC, Antonakis J. 2009. Considering context in leadership research. Hum. Relat. 62:1587–605 [Google Scholar]
80. Lockett A, Currie G, Finn R, Martin G, Waring J. 2014. The influence of social position on sensemaking about organizational change. Acad. Manag. J. 57:1102–29 [Google Scholar]
81. Maloney MM, Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn ME, Beaver GR. 2016. Contextualization and context theorizing in teams research: a look back and a path forward. Acad. Manag. Ann. 10:891–942 [Google Scholar]
82. Maréchal G, Linstead S, Munro I. 2013. The territorial organization: history, divergence and possibilities. Cult. Organ. 19:185–208 [Google Scholar]
83. McDaniel MA, Morgeson FP, Finnegan EB, Campion MA, Braverman EP. 2001. Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:730–40 [Google Scholar]
84. McFarland LA, Ployhart RE. 2015. Social media: a contextual framework to guide research and practice. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1653–77 [Google Scholar]
85. Meindl JR, Ehrlich SB, Dukerich JM. 1985. The romance of leadership. Adm. Sci. Q. 30:78–102 [Google Scholar]
86. Meneghel I, Borgogni L, Miraglia M, Salanova M, Martínez IM. 2016. From social context and resilience to performance through job satisfaction: a multilevel study over time. Hum. Relat. 69:2047–67 [Google Scholar]
87. Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsky L. 2002. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 61:20–52 [Google Scholar]
88. Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Bonaccio S. 2009. A meta-analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness-performance relationship. J. Organ. Behav. 30:1077–102 [Google Scholar]
89. Meyer RD, Dalal RS, Hermida R. 2010. A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. J. Manag. 36:121–40 [Google Scholar]
90. Meyer RD, Dalal RS, José IJ, Hermida R, Chen TR. et al. 2014. Measuring job-related situational strength and assessing its interactive effects. J. Manag. 40:1010–41 [Google Scholar]
91. Mischel W. 1977. The interaction of person and situation. Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology D Magnusson, NS Endler 333–52 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
92. Molloy JC, Ployhart RE, Wright PM. 2011. The myth of “the” micro-macro divide: bridging system-level and disciplinary divides. J. Manag. 37:581–609 [Google Scholar]
93. Morgeson FP, Dierdorff EC, Hmurovic JL. 2010. Work design in situ: understanding the role of occupational and organizational context. J. Organ. Behav. 31:351–60 [Google Scholar]
94. Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE. 2006. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:1321–39 [Google Scholar]
95. Morgeson FP, Mitchell TR, Liu D. 2015. Event system theory: an event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40:515–37 [Google Scholar]
96. Mowday R T, Sutton RI. 1993. Organizational behavior: linking individuals and groups to organizational contexts. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 44:195–229 [Google Scholar]
97. Mullins JW, Cummings LL. 1999. Situational strength: a framework for understanding the role of individuals in initiating proactive strategic change. J. Organ. Change Manag. 12:462–79 [Google Scholar]
98. Navis C, Osbeck OV. 2016. The right people in the wrong places: the paradox of entrepreneurial entry and successful opportunity realization. Acad. Manag. Rev. 41:109–29 [Google Scholar]
99. Nelson AJ, Irwin J. 2014. “Defining what we do—all over again”: occupational identity, technological change, and the librarian/Internet-search relationship. Acad. Manag. J. 57:892–928 [Google Scholar]
100. Obschonka M, Schmitt-Rodermund E, Silbereisen RK, Gosling SD, Potter J. 2013. The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a socioecological perspective. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 105:104–22 [Google Scholar]
101. Ocasio W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organ. Sci. 22:1286–96 [Google Scholar]
102. O'Leary MB, Almond BA. 2009. The industry settings of leading organizational research: the role of economic and non-economic factors. J. Organ. Behav. 30:497–524 [Google Scholar]
103. Ostroff C, Bowen DE. 2016. Reflections on the 2014 decade award: Is there strength in the construct of HR system strength. ? Acad. Manag. Rev. 41:196–214 [Google Scholar]
104. Park N, Peterson C. 2010. Does it matter where we live? The urban psychology of character strengths. Am. Psychol. 65:535–47 [Google Scholar]
105. Parmigiani A, Rivera-Santos M. 2011. Clearing a path through the forest: a meta-review of interorganizational relationships. J. Manag. 37:1108–36 [Google Scholar]
106. Patterson MG, West MA, Shackleton VJ, Dawson JF, Lawthom R. et al. 2005. Validating the organizational climate measure: links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. J. Organ. Behav. 26:379–408 [Google Scholar]
107. Patton E, Johns G. 2007. Women's absenteeism in the popular press: evidence for a gender-specific absence culture. Hum. Relat. 60:1579–612 [Google Scholar]
108. Peng MW, Heath PS. 1996. The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21:492–528 [Google Scholar]
109. Pignault A, Houssemand C. 2016. Construction and initial validation of the Work Context Inventory. J. Vocat. Behav. 92:1–11 [Google Scholar]
110. Porter LW, Schneider B. 2014. What was, what is, and what may be in OP/OB. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:1–21 [Google Scholar]
111. Quinn RE, Rohrbaugh J. 1981. A competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Public Prod. Rev. 5:122–40 [Google Scholar]
112. Raja U, Johns G. 2010. The joint effects of personality and job scope on in-role performance, citizenship behaviors, and creativity. Hum. Relat. 63:981–1005 [Google Scholar]
113. Reis HT. 2008. Reinvigorating the concept of situation in social psychology. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 12:311–29 [Google Scholar]
114. Rentfrow PJ. 2010. Statewide differences in personality: toward a psychological geography of the United States. Am. Psychol. 65:548–58 [Google Scholar]
115. Rentfrow PJ, Gosling SD, Jokela M, Stillwell DJ, Kosinsky M, Potter J. 2013. Divided we stand: three psychological regions of the United States and their political, economic, social, and health correlates. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 105:996–1012 [Google Scholar]
116. Rockmann KW, Pratt MG. 2015. Contagious offsite work and the lonely office: the unintended consequences of distributed work. Acad. Manag. Discov. 1:150–64 [Google Scholar]
117. Rousseau DM, Fried Y. 2001. Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research. J. Organ. Behav. 22:1–13 [Google Scholar]
118. Rynes SL, Bartunek JM, Daft RL. 2001. Across the great divide: knowledge creation and transfer between practitioners and academics. Acad. Manag. J. 44:340–55 [Google Scholar]
119. Schmit MJ, Ryan AM, Stierwalt SL, Powell AB. 1995. Frame-of-reference effects on personality scale scores and criterion-related validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 80:607–20 [Google Scholar]
120. Schmitt DP, Allik JA, McCrae RR, Benet-Martínez V. 2007. The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 38:173–212 [Google Scholar]
121. Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Macey WH. 2013. Organizational climate and culture. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64:361–88 [Google Scholar]
122. Schooler C, Mulatu MS, Oates G. 2004. Occupational self‐direction, intellectual functioning, and self‐directed orientation in older workers: findings and implications for individuals and societies. Am. J. Sociol. 110:161–97 [Google Scholar]
123. Sergeeva A, Andreeva T. 2016. Knowledge sharing research: bringing context back. J. Manag. Inq. 25:240–61 [Google Scholar]
124. Shaffer JA, Postlethwaite BE. 2012. A matter of context: a meta-analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. Pers. Psychol. 65:445–94 [Google Scholar]
125. Sillince JAA. 2007. Organizational context and the discursive construction of organizing. Manag. Commun. Q. 20:363–94 [Google Scholar]
126. Tang J, Kacmar KM, Busenitz L. 2012. Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. J. Bus. Ventur. 27:77–94 [Google Scholar]
127. Teece DJ. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 28:1319–50 [Google Scholar]
128. Tett RP, Burnett DD. 2003. A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 88:500–17 [Google Scholar]
129. Tsui AS. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: a case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 21:491–513 [Google Scholar]
130. Waller MJ, Huber GP, Glick WH. 1995. Functional background as a determinant of executives' selective perception. Acad. Manag. J. 38:943–74 [Google Scholar]
131. Wang Q, Bowling NA, Eschleman KJ. 2010. A meta-analytic examination of work and general locus of control. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:761–68 [Google Scholar]
132. Wangrow DB, Schepker DJ, Barker VL III. 2015. Managerial discretion: an empirical review and focus on future research directions. J. Manag. 41:199–135 [Google Scholar]
133. Wasti SA, Peterson MF, Breitsohl H, Cohen A, Jørgensen F. et al. 2016. Location, location, location: contextualizing workplace commitment. J. Organ. Behav. 37:613–32 [Google Scholar]
134. Wegman LA, Hoffman BJ, Carter NT, Twenge JM, Guenole N. 2016. Placing job characteristics in context: cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. J. Manag. In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316654545 [Crossref]
135. Weiss HM, Cropanzano R. 1996. Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Res. Organ. Behav. 18:1–74 [Google Scholar]
136. Whetten DA. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Manag. Organ. Rev. 5:29–55 [Google Scholar]
137. Ybarra O, Kross E, Sanchez-Burks J. 2014. The “big idea” that is yet to be: toward a more motivated, contextual, and dynamic model of emotional intelligence. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 28:93–107 [Google Scholar]
138. Yoder J, Khan AS. 2003. Making gender comparisons more meaningful: a call for more attention to social context. Psychol. Women Q. 27:281–90 [Google Scholar]