Big Data in Industrial-Organizational Psychology and Human Resource Management: Forward Progress for Organizational Research and Practice

Literature Cited

1. Aguinis H, Pierce CA, Bosco FA, Muslin IS 2009. First decade of organizational research methods: trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics. Organ. Res. Methods 12:69–112
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aiken LS, West SG, Millsap RE 2008. Graduate training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's 1990 survey of PhD programs in North America. Am. Psychol. 63:32–50
   [Google Scholar]
3. Al-Kassab J, Ouertani ZM, Schiuma G, Neely A 2014. Information visualization to support management decisions. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 13:407–28
   [Google Scholar]
4. Angrave D, Charlwood A, Kirkpatrick I, Lawrence M, Stuart M 2016. HR and analytics: why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 26:1–11
   [Google Scholar]
5. APA (Am. Psychol. Assoc.) 2017. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
6. Austin JT, Scherbaum CA, Mahlman RA 2002. History of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology: measurement, design, analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Industrial and Organizational Psychology SG Rogelberg 1–33 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bair E, Hastie T, Debashis P, Tibshirani R 2006. Prediction by supervised principal components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101:119–37
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bal K. 2016. Building an HR analytics team. Human Resource Executive March 16. http://hrearchive.lrp.com/HRE/print.jhtml?id=534360037
   [Google Scholar]
9. Berk RA. 2006. An introduction to ensemble methods for data analysis. Sociol. Methods Res. 34:263–95
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berman JJ. 2013. Principles of Big Data: Preparing, Sharing, and Analyzing Complex Information Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann
11. Bien J, Taylor J, Tibshirani R 2013. A lasso for hierarchal interactions. Ann. Stat. 41:1111–41
    [Google Scholar]
12. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3:993–1022
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bosco FA, Uggerslev K, Steel P 2014. Scientific findings as big data for research synthesis: the metaBUS Project. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data18–22 New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
14. Boudreau JW, Jesuthasan R. 2011. Transformative HR: How Great Companies Use Evidence-Based Change for Sustainable Advantage San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
15. Braun MT, Kuljanin G, DeShon RP 2017. Special considerations for the acquisition and wrangling of big data. Organ. Res. Methods 21:633–59
    [Google Scholar]
16. Breiman L. 2001a. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45:5–32
    [Google Scholar]
17. Breiman L. 2001b. Statistical modeling: the two cultures. Stat. Sci. 16:199–215
    [Google Scholar]
18. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ 1984. Classification and Regression Trees New York: Chapman & Hall
19. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach New York: Springer. , 2nd ed..
20. Campbell DT, Fiske DW. 1959. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56:281–105
    [Google Scholar]
21. Campbell JP, Wilmot MP. 2018. The functioning of theory in IWOP. Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational (IWOP) Psychology, Vol. 1: Personnel Psychology N Anderson, DS Ones, HK Sinangil, C Viswesvaran 3–37 London: SAGE. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
22. Campion MC, Campion MA, Campion ED, Reider MH 2016. Initial investigation into computer scoring of candidate essays for personnel selection. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:958–75
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cascio W, Boudreau J, Fink A 2019. Investing in People: Financial Impact of Human Resource Initiatives Alexandria, VA: Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag. , 3rd ed..
24. Chaffin D, Heidl R, Hollenbeck JR, Howe M, Yu A et al. 2017. The promise and perils of wearable sensors in organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 20:3–31
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chamorro-Premuzic T, Winsborough D, Sherman RA, Hogan R 2016. New talent signals: shiny new objects or a brave new world?. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 9:621–40
    [Google Scholar]
26. Chatfield C. 1995. Model uncertainty, data mining, and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 158:419–66
    [Google Scholar]
27. Chen EE, Wojcik SP. 2016. A practical guide to big data research in psychology. Psychol. Methods 21:458–74
    [Google Scholar]
28. Connelly BS, Ones DS. 2010. An other perspective on personality: meta-analytic integration of observers’ accuracy and predictive validity. Psychol. Bull. 6:1092–122
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cronbach LJ, Meehl PE. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol. Bull. 52:281–302
    [Google Scholar]
30. da Silva N, Cook D, Lee E-K 2017. Interactive graphics for visually diagnosing forest classifiers in R. arXiv:1704.02502 [stat.ML ]
31. Domingos P. 2012. A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM 55:78–87
    [Google Scholar]
32. Douthitt EA, Aiello JR. 2001. The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:867–74
    [Google Scholar]
33. Ducey AJ, Guenole N, Weiner SP, Herleman HA, Gibby RE, Delany T 2015. I-Os in the vanguard of big data analytics and privacy. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:555–63
    [Google Scholar]
34. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77:802–13
    [Google Scholar]
35. Fiske ST, Hauser RM. 2014. Protecting human research participants in the age of big data. PNAS 111:3813675–76
    [Google Scholar]
36. Friedman J. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. 19:1–67
    [Google Scholar]
37. Friedman J. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29:1189–232
    [Google Scholar]
38. Friedman J. 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 38:367–78
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gandomi A, Haider M. 2015. Beyond the hype: big data concepts, methods, and analytics. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 35:137–44
    [Google Scholar]
40. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A 2016. Deep Learning Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
41. Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G, Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT 2016. The dynamics of team cognition: a process-oriented theory of knowledge emergence in teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:1353–85
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hambrick DC. 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: too much of a good thing. ? Acad. Manag. J. 50:1346–52
    [Google Scholar]
43. Harv. Bus. Rev. Anal. Serv 2014. HR joins the analytics revolution Rep., Harvard Bus. Sch. Publ Boston:
44. Hastie T, Tibshirani R. 1990. Generalized Additive Models London: Chapman and Hall
45. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J 2009. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction New York: Springer. , 2nd ed..
46. Hoeting JA, Madigan D, Raferty AE, Volinksy CT 1999. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat. Sci. 14:382–417
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. 2015. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. , 3rd ed..
48. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R 2013. An Introduction to Statistical Learning with Applications in R New York: Springer
49. Kern ML, Park G, Eischstaedt JC, Schwartz HA, Sap M et al. 2016. Gaining insights from social media language: methodologies and challenges. Psychol. Methods 21:507–25
    [Google Scholar]
50. King EB, Tonidandel S, Cortina JM, Fink AA 2016. Building understanding of the data science revolution and IO psychology. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology S Tonidandel, EB King, JM Cortina 1–15 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
51. Kosinski M, Matz SC, Gosling SD, Popov V, Stillwell D 2015. Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. Am. Psychol. 70:543–56
    [Google Scholar]
52. Kosinski M, Wang Y, Lakkaraju H, Leskovec J 2016. Mining big data to extract patterns and predict real-life outcomes. Psychol. Methods 21:493–506
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT. 2018. Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. Am. Psychol. 73:576–92
    [Google Scholar]
54. Kozlowski SWJ, Chao GT, Grand JA, Braun MT, Kuljanin G 2016. Capturing the multilevel dynamics of emergence: computational modeling, simulation, and virtual experimentation. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 6:3–33
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kuhn M, Johnson K. 2013. Applied Predictive Modeling New York: Springer
56. Landers RN. 2014. Developing a theory of gamified learning: linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simul. Gaming 45:752–68
    [Google Scholar]
57. Landers RN. 2017. A crash course in natural language processing. Ind. Psychol. 54:5–16
    [Google Scholar]
58. Landers RN, Brusso RC, Cavanaugh KJ, Collmus AB 2016. A primer on theory-driven web-scraping: automatic extraction of big data from the Internet for use in psychological research. Psychol. Methods 21:475–92
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lee D, Lee W, Lee Y, Pawitan Y 2011. Sparse partial least-squares regression and its applications to high-throughput data analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 109:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
60. Locke EA. 2007. The case for inductive theory building. J. Manag. 33:867–90
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lohr S. 2014. For big-data scientists, ‘janitor work’ is key hurdle to insights. New York Times Aug. 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/technology/for-big-data-scientists-hurdle-to-insights-is-janitor-work.html
    [Google Scholar]
62. MacCallum RC, Wegener DT, Uchino BN, Fabrigar LR 1993. The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychol. Bull. 114:185–99
    [Google Scholar]
63. Martinsson PG, Rokhlin V, Tygert M 2011. A randomized algorithm for the decomposition of matrices. Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal. 30:47–68
    [Google Scholar]
64. McLean S, Stakim C, Timner H, Lyon C 2016. Big data and human resources—letting the computer decide. ? Scitech Lawyer 12:20–23
    [Google Scholar]
65. Merenda PF. 2007. Psychometrics and psychometricians in the 20th and 21st centuries: how it was in the 20th century and how it is now. Percept. Motor Skills 104:3–20
    [Google Scholar]
66. Miller PJ, Lubke GH, McArtor DB, Bergeman CS 2016. Finding structure in data using multivariate tree boosting. Psychol. Methods 21:583–602
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mitroff SR, Biggs AT, Adamo SH, Dowd EW, Winkle J, Clark K 2015. What can 1 billion trials tell us about visual search?. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 41:1–5
    [Google Scholar]
68. Molloy JC, Ployhart RE, Wright PM 2011. The myth of “the” micro-macro divide: bridging system-level and disciplinary divides. J. Manag. 37:581–609
    [Google Scholar]
69. Muñoz C, Smith M, Patil DJ 2016. Big data: a report on algorithmic systems, opportunity, and civil rights Rep., Exec. Office Pres Washington, DC: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/2016_0504_data_discrimination.pdf
70. Murgia M. 2019. Who's using your face? The ugly truth about facial recognition. Financial Times April 19. https://www.ft.com/content/cf19b956-60a2-11e9-b285-3acd5d43599e
    [Google Scholar]
71. Naim I, Tanveer MI, Gildea D, Hoque ME 2016. Automated analysis and prediction of job interview performance. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 99:191–204
    [Google Scholar]
72. Olguín Olguín D, Waber BN, Kim T, Mohan A, Ara K, Pentland A 2009. Sensible organizations: technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 39:43–55
    [Google Scholar]
73. Oswald FL, Putka DJ. 2016. Statistical methods for big data: a scenic tour. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology S Tonidandel, EB King, JM Cortina 43–63 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
74. Oswald FL, Putka DJ. 2017. Big data methods in the social sciences. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 18:103–6
    [Google Scholar]
75. Park G, Schwartz HA, Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Kosinski M et al. 2015. Automatic personality assessment through social media language. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 108:934–52
    [Google Scholar]
76. Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:547–77
    [Google Scholar]
77. Preacher KJ, Merkle EC. 2012. The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling. Psychol. Methods 17:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
78. Press G. 2016. Cleaning big data: most time-consuming, least enjoyable data science task, survey says. Fortune March 23. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2016/03/23/data-preparation-most-time-consuming-least-enjoyable-data-science-task-survey-says/#7b9080bc6f63
    [Google Scholar]
79. PriceWaterhouseCoopers 2015. Innovating for tomorrow's workforce: transformation enabled by HR in the Cloud Survey, PriceWaterhouseCoopers London: https://roubler.com/au/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2017/02/hr-tech-survey.pdf
80. Putka DJ, Beatty AS, Reeder MC 2018. Modern prediction methods: new perspectives on a common problem. Organ. Res. Methods 21:689–732
    [Google Scholar]
81. Ribiero MT, Singh S, Guestrin C 2016. Local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME): an introduction. O'Reilly Aug. 12. https://www.oreilly.com/learning/introduction-to-local-interpretable-model-agnostic-explanations-lime
    [Google Scholar]
82. Rocher L, Hendrickx JM, de Montjoye Y-A 2019. Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models. Nat. Commun. 10:3069
    [Google Scholar]
83. Rotolo CT, Church AH. 2015. Big data recommendations for industrial-organizational psychology: Are we in Whoville?. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:515–20
    [Google Scholar]
84. Rousseau V, Aubé C, Savoie A 2006. Teamwork behaviors: a review and integration of frameworks. Small Group Res 37:540–70
    [Google Scholar]
85. Ryan J, Herleman H. 2015. A big data platform for workforce analytics. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology S Tonidandel, EB King, JM Cortina 19–42 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
86. Shaffer T. 2017. The 42 V's of big data and data science. KDnuggets April. https://www.kdnuggets.com/2017/04/42-vs-big-data-data-science.html
    [Google Scholar]
87. Sharpe D. 2013. Why the resistance to statistical innovations? Bridging the communication gap. Psychol. Methods 18:572–82
    [Google Scholar]
88. Shen W, Kiger TB, Davies SE, Rasch RL, Simon KM, Ones DS 2011. Samples in applied psychology: over a decade of research in review. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:1055–64
    [Google Scholar]
89. Short JC, McKenny AF, Reid SW 2018. More than words? Computer-aided text analysis in organizational behavior and psychology research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5:415–35
    [Google Scholar]
90. SHRM (Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag.) Found 2016. Use of Workforce Analytics for Competitive Advantage New York: The Econ. Intell. Unit
91. Sinar EF. 2015. Data visualization. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology S Tonidandel, EB King, JM Cortina 115–57 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
92. SIOP (Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol.) 2018. Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 11:Suppl. S11–97
    [Google Scholar]
93. Spector PE, Rogelberg SG, Ryan AM, Schmitt N, Zedeck S 2014. Moving the pendulum back to the middle: reflections on and introduction to the inductive research special issue of Journal of Business and Psychology. J. Bus. Psychol 29:499–502
    [Google Scholar]
94. Strobl C, Malley J, Tutz G 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychol. Methods 14:323–48
    [Google Scholar]
95. Sutton CD. 2005. Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting. Handb. Stat. 24:303–29
    [Google Scholar]
96. Tay L, Parrigon S, Huang Q, LeBreton JM 2016. Graphical descriptives: a way to improve data transparency and methodological rigor in psychology. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11:5692–701
    [Google Scholar]
97. Tett RP, Walser B, Brown C, Simonet DV, Tonidandel S 2013. The 2011 SIOP I-O Psychology Graduate Program Benchmarking Survey Part 3: curriculum and competencies. Ind.-Organ. Psychol. 50:69–89
    [Google Scholar]
98. Tibshirani R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 58:267–88
    [Google Scholar]
99. Tikkinen-Piri C, Rohunen A, Markkula J 2018. EU General Data Protection Regulation: changes and implications for personal data collecting companies. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 34:134–53
    [Google Scholar]
100. Tonidandel S, King EB, Cortina JM 2018. Big data methods: leveraging modern data analytic techniques to build organizational science. Organ. Res. Methods 21:525–47
     [Google Scholar]
101. Trzesniewski KH, Donnellan MB, Lucas RE 2011. Secondary Data Analysis: An Introduction for Psychologists Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
102. Vapnik V. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory New York: Wiley & Sons
103. Wanberg CR, Banas JT. 2000. Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. J. Appl. Psychol. 85:132–42
     [Google Scholar]
104. Wax A, Asencio R, Carter DR 2015. Thinking big about big data. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:545–50
     [Google Scholar]
105. Whelan TJ, DuVernet AM. 2015. The big duplicity of big data. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:509–15
     [Google Scholar]
106. Yost A, Behrend TS, Howardson GN, Darrow JB, Jensen J 2018. Reactance to electronic surveillance: a test of antecedents and outcomes. J. Bus. Psychol. 34:71–86
     [Google Scholar]
107. Youyou W, Kosinski M, Stillwell D 2015. Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. PNAS 112:1036–40
     [Google Scholar]
108. Zou H, Hastie T. 2005. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67:301–20
     [Google Scholar]
109. Zyphur MJ, Oswald FL, Rupp DE 2016. Rendezvous overdue: Bayes analysis meets organizational research. J. Manag. 41:387–89
     [Google Scholar]