1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 10, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 10, 2023

Understanding the Dynamic Interplay Between Actor and Context for Creativity: Progress and Desirable Directions

Abstract

Individual and team creativity and innovation are essential for organizational effectiveness and success. The typology we developed in 2014 has stimulated much research in the past decade. We review this body of work and structure our article around the four quadrants described in our typology. We then revisit and update the eight research recommendations we proposed previously, identifying rich opportunities for developing theory and conceiving empirical studies. Finally, we highlight four desirable directions that help to chart the path for conducting frame-breaking research and accelerating theoretical breakthroughs.

Keyword(s): creativity, innovation, person-context interaction, person-situation interaction, team-context interaction, team-situation interaction
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457
2023-01-23
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/10/1/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Amabile TM. 1996. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity Boulder, CO: Westview Press
  2. Amabile TM, Pratt MG. 2016. The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: making progress, making meaning. Res. Organ. Behav. 36:157–83
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson N, Potocnik K, Zhou J. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Manag. 40:1297–1333
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Audenaert M, Decramer A. 2018. When empowering leadership fosters creative performance: the role of problem-solving demands and creative personality. J. Manag. Organ. 24:14–18
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Babalola MT, Kwan HK, Ren S, Agyemang-Mintah P, Chen H, Li J 2021. Being ignored by loved ones: understanding when and why family ostracism inhibits creativity at work. J. Organ. Behav. 42:3349–64
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bin Saeed B, Afsar B, Shahjehan A, Imad Shah S. 2019. Does transformational leadership foster innovative work behavior? The roles of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Econ. Res.-Ekon. Istraz. 32:1254–81
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, Erez M, Farr J. 2009a. A dialectic perspective on innovation: conflicting demands, multiple pathways, and ambidexterity. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2:3305–37
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bledow R, Frese M, Anderson N, Erez M, Farr J. 2009b. Extending and refining the dialectic perspective on innovation: There is nothing as practical as a good theory; nothing as theoretical as a good practice. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2:3363–73
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bledow R, Kühnel J, Jin M, Kuhl J 2022. Breaking the chains: the inverted-U-shaped relationship between action-state orientation and creativity under low job autonomy. J. Manag. 48:4905–35
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Boeker W, Goodstein J. 1993. Performance and successor choice: the moderating effects of governance and ownership. Acad. Manag. J. 36:1172–86
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bogilović S, Černe M 2018. The intellectual structure and outlooks for individual creativity research: a bibliometric analysis for the period 1950–2016. Individual Creativity in the Workplace R Reiter-Palmon, VL Kennel, JC Kaufman 153–88. London: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bormann KC. 2020. Turning daily time pressure into a creative day: the interactionist roles of employee neuroticism and time pressure dispersion. Appl. Psychol. 69:3589–615
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Boulamatsi A, Liu S, Lambert LS, Yao X, Guo R, Yin J. 2021. How and when are learning-adaptable newcomers innovative? Examining mechanisms and constraints. Pers. Psychol. 74:4751–72
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Byron K, Keem S, Darden T, Shalley CE, Zhou J. 2022. Building blocks of idea generation and implementation in teams: a meta-analysis of team design and team creativity and innovation. Pers. Psychol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12501
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cai W, Khapova S, Bossink B, Lysova E, Yuan J. 2020. Optimizing employee creativity in the digital era: uncovering the interactional effects of abilities, motivations, and opportunities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:31038
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chae H, Choi JN 2018. Contextualizing the effects of job complexity on creativity and task performance: extending job design theory with social and contextual contingencies. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 91:2316–39
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen L, Gong Y, Song Y, Wang M. 2021. From creative environment to administrative innovation: creation and implementation in top management teams. J. Creat. Behav. 55:604–21
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen Y, Liu D, Tang G, Hogan TM. 2021. Workplace events and employee creativity: a multistudy field investigation. Pers. Psychol. 74:2211–36
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Christensen-Salem A, Walumbwa FO, Hsu CIC, Misati E, Babalola MT, Kim K. 2021. Unmasking the creative self-efficacy–creative performance relationship: the roles of thriving at work, perceived work significance, and task interdependence. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32:224820–46
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chua R, Jin M 2020. Across the great divides: Gender dynamics influence how intercultural conflict helps or hurts creative collaboration. Acad. Manag. J. 63:3903–34
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Colakoglu SS, Chung Y, Ceylan C. 2022. Collaboration-based HR systems and innovative work behaviors: the role of information exchange and HR system strength. Eur. Manag. J. 40:4518–31
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Colakoglu SS, Erhardt N, Pougnet-Rozan S, Martin-Rios C 2019. Reviewing creativity and innovation research through the strategic HRM lens. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 37 MR Buckley, AR Wheeler, JE Baur, JRB Halbesleben 227–71. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publ.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Curşeu PL, Schruijer SGL, Fodor OC. 2022. Minority dissent, openness to change and group creativity. Creat. Res. J. 34:193–105
     [Google Scholar]
  24. da Costa CG, Zhou Q, Ferreira AI. 2018. The impact of anger on creative process engagement: the role of social contexts. J. Organ. Behav. 39:4495–506
     [Google Scholar]
  25. de Clercq D, Pereira R. 2021. Sleepy but creative? How affective commitment, knowledge sharing and organizational forgiveness mitigate the dysfunctional effect of insomnia on creative behaviors. Pers. Rev. 50:1108–28
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Do H, Budhwar PS, Patel C. 2018. Relationship between innovation-led HR policy, strategy, and firm performance: a serial mediation investigation. Hum. Resour. Manag. 57:51271–84
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Do H, Shipton H. 2019. High-performance work systems and innovation in Vietnamese small firms. Int. Small Bus. J. 37:7732–53
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Errichiello L, Pianese T. 2018. Smart work centers as “creative workspaces” for remote employees. CERN IdeaSquare J. Exp. Innov. 2:114–21
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan XL, van Knippenberg D, Wang XH. 2022. Vision–value match: leader communication of visions, follower values, meaningfulness, and creativity. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 31:4550–56
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ford CM. 1996. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Acad. Manag. Rev. 21:41112–42
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gerhart B, Fang M. 2015. Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: revisiting long-held beliefs. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:489–521
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Goncalo JA, Chatman JA, Duguid MM, Kennedy JA. 2015. Creativity from constraint? How the political correctness norm influences creativity in mixed-sex work groups. Adm. Sci. Q. 60:11–30
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Goncalo JA, Staw BM. 2006. Individualism-collectivism and group creativity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 100:196–109
     [Google Scholar]
  34. González-Gómez HV, Richter AW 2015. Turning shame into creativity: the importance of exposure to creative team environments. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process 126:142–61
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Guo L, Decoster S, Babalola MT, de Schutter L, Garba OA, Riisla K. 2018. Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: the moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence. J. Bus. Res. 92:219–30
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hoever IJ, Zhou J, van Knippenberg D. 2018. Different strokes for different teams: the contingent effects of positive and negative feedback on the creativity of informationally homogeneous and diverse teams. Acad. Manag. J. 61:12159–81
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hu C, Baranik LE, Cheng YN, Huang JC, Yang CC. 2020. Mentoring support and protégé creativity: examining the moderating roles of job dissatisfaction and Chinese traditionality. Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour. 58:3335–55
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Hu J, Erdogan B, Jiang K, Bauer TN, Liu S. 2018. Leader humility and team creativity: the role of team information sharing, psychological safety, and power distance. J. Appl. Psychol. 103:3313–23
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Hundschell A, Razinskas S, Backmann J, Hoegl M. 2022. The effects of diversity on creativity: a literature review and synthesis. Appl. Psychol. 71:41598–1634
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Jahanzeb S, Bouckenooghe D, Mushtaq R. 2021. Silence and proactivity in managing supervisor ostracism: implications for creativity. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 42:5705–21
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kim SH, Weaver SJ, Yang T, Rosen MA 2019. Managing creativity and compliance in the pursuit of patient safety. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19:116
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kim SL. 2019. The interaction effects of proactive personality and empowering leadership and close monitoring behaviour on creativity. Creat. Innov. Manag. 28:2230–39
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim SL, Cheong M, Srivastava A, Yoo Y, Yun S 2021. Knowledge sharing and creative behavior: the interaction effects of knowledge sharing and regulatory focus on creative behavior. Hum. Perform. 34:149–66
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kung CW, Uen JF, Lin SC. 2020. Ambidextrous leadership and employee innovation in public museums. Chinese Manag. Stud. 14:4995–1014
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee YS, Chang JY, Choi JN. 2017. Why reject creative ideas? Fear as a driver of implicit bias against creativity. Creat. Res. J. 29:3225–35
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Li Q, She Z, Yang B 2018. Promoting innovative performance in multidisciplinary teams: the roles of paradoxical leadership and team perspective taking. Front. Psychol. 9:1038
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Li Y, Yang B, Ma L 2018. When is task conflict translated into employee creativity? The moderating role of growth need strength. J. Pers. Psychol. 17:122–32
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Liang B, van Knippenberg D, Gu Q. 2021. A cross-level model of shared leadership, meaning, and individual creativity. J. Organ. Behav. 42:168–83
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu D, Gong Y, Zhou J, Huang JC. 2017. Human resource systems, employee creativity, and firm innovation: the moderating role of firm ownership. Acad. Manag. J. 60:31164–88
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu D, Jiang K, Shalley CE, Keem S, Zhou J. 2016. Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: a meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 137:236–63
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu X, Liao H, Derfler-Rozin R, Zheng X, Wee EXM, Qiu F. 2020. In line and out of the box: how ethical leaders help offset the negative effect of morality on creativity. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:121447–65
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu X, Zhang X, Zhang X. 2021. Faultlines and team creativity: the moderating role of leaders’ cognitive reappraisal. Small Group Res. 52:4481–503
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Liu XY, Kwan HK, Zhang X. 2020. Introverts maintain creativity: a resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip. Asia Pacific J. Manag. 37:1325–44
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lu JG, Hafenbrack AC, Maddux WW, Eastwick PW, Wang DJ, Galinsky AD. 2017.. “ Going out” of the box: Depth of intercultural romantic relationships and friendships predicts creativity, workplace innovations, and entrepreneurship. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:71091–1108
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lu S, Bartol KM, Venkataramani V, Zheng X, Liu X. 2019. Pitching novel ideas to the boss: the interactive effects of employees’ idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation. Acad. Manag. J. 62:2579–606
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Ma X, Jiang W, Wang L, Xiong J 2020. A curvilinear relationship between transformational leadership and employee creativity. Manag. Decis. 58:71355–73
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Ma Y, Corter JE. 2019. The effect of manipulating group task orientation and support for innovation on collaborative creativity in an educational setting. Think. Skills Creat. 33:100587
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Ma Y, Zhang H, Dai Y. 2021. How job creativity requirements affects employee creativity: evidence from a across-level analysis. Front. Psychol. 12:714886
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Ma Z, Gong Y, Long L, Zhang Y. 2021. Team-level high-performance work systems, self-efficacy and creativity: differential moderating roles of person-job fit and goal difficulty. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 32:2478–511
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Malik OF, Shahzad A, Raziq MM, Khan MM, Yusaf S, Khan A. 2019. Perceptions of organizational politics, knowledge hiding, and employee creativity: the moderating role of professional commitment. Pers. Individ. Differ. 142:232–37
     [Google Scholar]
  61. March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2:171–87
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Martinaityte I, Sacramento C, Aryee S. 2019. Delighting the customer: creativity-oriented high-performance work systems, frontline employee creative performance, and customer satisfaction. J. Manag. 45:2728–51
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Mehmood MS, Jian Z, Akram U. 2020. Be so creative they can't ignore you! How can entrepreneurial leader enhance the employee creativity?. Think. Skills Creat. 38:100721
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Mo S, Ling CD, Xie XY. 2019. The curvilinear relationship between ethical leadership and team creativity: the moderating role of team faultlines. J. Bus. Ethics 154:1229–42
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Mohammed SS, Batistic S, Černe M, Poell RF. 2021. Does the context matter? The interplay of HR systems and relational climates predicting individual and team creativity. Creat. Res. J. In press. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.2009665
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Mueller J, Melwani S, Loewenstein J, Deal JJ. 2018. Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Acad. Manag. J. 61:194–110
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Nishii LH, Wright P. 2008. Variability at multiple levels of analysis: implications for strategic human resource management. The People Make the Place DB Smith 225–48. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. O'Reilly CA, Tushman ML 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harv. Bus. Rev. 82:474–83
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Pan Y, Shang Y, Malika R 2020. Enhancing creativity in organizations: the role of the need for cognition. Manag. Decis. 59:92057–76
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Park SH, Luo Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strateg. Manag. J. 22:5455–77
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Paulus PB, Dzindolet M, Kohn NW 2012. Collaborative creativity—group creativity and team innovation. Handbook of Organizational Creativity MD Mumford 327–57. London: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Peng J, Wang Z, Chen X 2019. Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. J. Bus. Ethics 159:2419–33
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Peng MW, Wang DY, Jiang Y. 2008. An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 39:920–36
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Peralta CF, Saldanha MF, Lopes PN, Lourenço PR, Pais L. 2021. Does supervisor's moral courage to go beyond compliance have a role in the relationships between teamwork quality, team creativity, and team idea implementation?. J. Bus. Ethics 168:4677–96
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Perry-Smith JE, Mannucci PV 2016. From creativity to innovation: the social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journal. Acad. Manag. Rev. 42:53–79
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Rouse ED. 2020. Where you end and I begin: understanding intimate co-creation. Acad. Manag. Rev. 45:1181–204
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sears GJ, Shen W, Zhang H. 2018. When and why are proactive employees more creative? Investigations of relational and motivational mechanisms and contextual contingencies in the east and west. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 48:11593–607
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Seo SJ, Kim YK, Lee S 2020. Every cloud has a silver lining: the positive effect of fearful attachment state on creative idea generation. Am. J. Psychol. 133:2181–96
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Shalley CE, Breidenthal AP 2021. Conducting rigorous research on individual creativity. Handbook of Research on Creativity and Innovation J Zhou, ED Rouse 12–27. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Shen C, Yang J, Hu S. 2020a. Combined effect of abusive supervision and abusive supervision climate on employee creativity: a moderated mediation model. Front. Psychol. 11:1175
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Shen C, Zhang Y, Yang J, Liu S. 2020b. Abusive supervision and employee creativity: a moderated mediation model. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 41:2193–207
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Shin SJ, Yuan F, Zhou J. 2017. When perceived innovation job requirement increases employee innovative behavior: a sensemaking perspective. J. Organ. Behav. 38:168–86
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Tian J, Peng Y, Zhou X. 2020. The effects of abusive supervision and motivational preference on employees’ innovative behavior. Sustainability 12:208510
     [Google Scholar]
  84. To ML, Tse HHM, Ashkanasy NM. 2015. A multilevel model of transformational leadership, affect, and creative process behavior in work teams. Leadersh. Q. 26:4543–56
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Toyama H, Mauno S. 2017. Associations of trait emotional intelligence with social support, work engagement, and creativity in Japanese eldercare nurses. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 59:114–25
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Tse HHM, To ML, Chiu WCK. 2018. When and why does transformational leadership influence employee creativity? The roles of personal control and creative personality. Hum. Resour. Manag. 57:1145–57
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Tu M, Cheng Z, Liu W. 2019. Spotlight on the effect of workplace ostracism on creativity: a social cognitive perspective. Front. Psychol. 10:1215
     [Google Scholar]
  88. van Knippenberg D, Hirst G. 2020. A motivational lens model of person x situation interactions in employee creativity. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:101129–44
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang X, Li H, Yin H. 2020. Antecedents and consequences of creativity in teams: when and how leader humility promotes performance via team creativity. J. Creat. Behav. 54:4843–56
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Acad. Manag. Rev. 18:293–321
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Yuan Y, van Knippenberg D. 2020. From member creativity to team creativity? Team information elaboration as moderator of the additive and disjunctive models. PLOS ONE 15:12e0243289
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Zacher H, Robinson AJ, Rosing K. 2016. Ambidextrous leadership and employees’ self-reported innovative performance: the role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. J. Creat. Behav. 50:124–46
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang K, Jia X, Chen J 2019. Talent management under a big data induced revolution: the double-edged sword effects of challenge stressors on creativity. Manag. Decis. 57:82010–31
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang R, Kang H, Jiang Z, Niu Z. 2022. How does workplace ostracism hurt employee creativity? Thriving at work as a mediator and organization-based self-esteem as a moderator. Appl. Psychol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12374
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Zhang W, Xu F, Sun B. 2020. Openness to experience, job characteristics, and employee creativity: an interactionist perspective. Soc. Behav. Pers. 48:4e9047
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang X, Zhou J. 2014. Empowering leadership, uncertainty avoidance, trust, and employee creativity: interaction effects and a mediating mechanism. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 124:2150–64
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhang X, Zhou J, Kwan HK. 2017. Configuring challenge and hindrance contexts for introversion and creativity: joint effects of task complexity and guanxi management. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 143:54–68
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Zhang Ying, Zhang J, Gu J, Tse HHM. 2022. Employee radical creativity: the roles of supervisor autonomy support and employee intrinsic work goal orientation. Innov. Organ. Manag. 24:2272–89
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Zhang Yong, He W, Long L, Zhang J. 2022. Does pay for individual performance truly undermine employee creativity? The different moderating roles of vertical and horizontal collectivist orientations. Hum. Resour. Manag. 61:121–38
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Zheng X, Liu X. 2017. The buffering effect of mindfulness on abusive supervision and creative performance: a social cognitive framework. Front. Psychol. 8:1588
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhou J, George JM. 2003. Awakening employee creativity: the role of leader emotional intelligence. Leadersh. Q. 14:545–68
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhou J, Hoever IJ. 2014. Research on workplace creativity: a review and redirection. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:333–59
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Zhou J, May Wang X, Jiwen Song L, Wu J 2017. Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:2180–202
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Zhou J, Shalley CE 2003. Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 22 JJ Martocchio, GR Ferris 165–217. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Sci.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhou J, Shalley CE 2011. Deepening our understanding of creativity in the workplace: a review of different approaches to creativity research. APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1 Building and Developing the Organization, ed. S Zedeck 275–302. Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Zhou J, Wang XM, Bavato D, Tasselli S, Wu J. 2019. Understanding the receiving side of creativity: a multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. J. Manag. 45:62570–95
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Zhou J, Woodman RW. 2003. Managers’ recognition of employees’ creative ideas. International Handbook on Innovation LV Shavinina 631–40. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Zuberi MA, Khattak A. 2021. Impact of proactive personality and leader member exchange on innovative work behavior: a job design perspective. Int. J. Innov. Sci. 13:5664–83
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457
Loading
Understanding the Dynamic Interplay Between Actor and Context for Creativity: Progress and Desirable Directions
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 10, 109 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055457
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error