International Negotiation: Some Conceptual Developments

Literature Cited

1. Aksoy D 2012. Institutional arrangements and logrolling: evidence from the European Union. Am. J. Political Sci. 56:3538–52
   [Google Scholar]
2. Albin C, Druckman D 2014. Bargaining over weapons: justice and effectiveness in arms control negotiations. Int. Negot. 19:3426–58
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albin C, Young A 2012. Setting the table for success—or failure? Agenda management in the WTO. Int. Negot. 17:137–64
   [Google Scholar]
4. Allan JE, Dauvergne P 2013. The global south in environmental negotiations: the politics of coalitions in REDD+. Third World Q 34:81307–22
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ásgeirsdóttir Á 2008. Who Gets What? Domestic Influences on International Negotiations Allocating Shared Resources Albany: State Univ. New York Press
6. Atran S, Axelrod R 2008. Reframing sacred values. Negot. J. 24:3221–46
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bailer S 2004. Bargaining success in the European Union. Eur. Union Politics 5:199–123
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bailer S 2010. What factors determine bargaining power and success in EU negotiations?. J. Eur. Public Policy 17:5743–57
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bazerman MH, Curhan JR, Moore DA, Valley KL 2000. Negotiation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51:279–314
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berridge G 2005. Diplomacy: Theory and Practice New York: Palgrave Macmillan
11. Binmore K, Shaked A, Sutton J 1989. An outside option experiment. Q. J. Econ. 104:4753–70
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bjola C 2015. Using momentum analysis to explain and forecast the outcome of international negotiations. Int. Negot. 20:2319–49
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blavoukos S, Bourantonis D 2011. Chairs as policy entrepreneurs in multilateral negotiations. Rev. Int. Stud. 37:2653–72
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blaydes L 2004. Rewarding impatience: a bargaining and enforcement model of OPEC. Int. Organ. 58:2213–37
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chatterjee K 2014. Game theory and the practice of bargaining. Game Theory and Business Applications K Chatterjee, W Samuelson 189–206 New York Springer:
    [Google Scholar]
16. Colson A 2008. The ambassador between light and shade: the emergence of secrecy as the norm for international negotiation. Int. Negot. 13:2179–95
    [Google Scholar]
17. Conconi P, Facchini G, Zanardi M 2012. Fast-track authority and international trade negotiations. Am. Econ. J. 4:3146–89
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cordona D, Ponsati C 2015. Representing a democratic constituency in negotiations: delegation versus ratification. Soc. Choice Welf. 45:2399–414
    [Google Scholar]
19. Davis CL 2004. International institutions and issue linkage: building support for agricultural trade liberalization. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 98:1153–69
    [Google Scholar]
20. Davis CL 2009. Economic and security bargaining in the Anglo-Japanese alliance, 1902–23. Int. Secur. 33:3143–79
    [Google Scholar]
21. Druckman D 2001. Turning points in international negotiation: a comparative analysis. J. Confl. Resolut. 45:4519–44
    [Google Scholar]
22. Druckman D, Husbands JL, Johnston K 1991. Turning points in the INF negotiations. Negot. J. 7:155–77
    [Google Scholar]
23. Evans PB, Jacobson HK, Putnam RD 1993. Double-Edged Diplomacy Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
24. Gino F, Moore DA 2008. Why negotiators should reveal their deadlines: disclosing weaknesses can make you stronger. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 1:177–96
    [Google Scholar]
25. Harsanyi J 1962. Measurement of social power, opportunity costs, and the theory of two-person bargaining games. Behav. Sci. 7:167–80
    [Google Scholar]
26. Heifetz A, Ponsati C 2007. All in good time. Int. J. Game Theory 35:4521–38
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hosli MO, Arnold C 2010. The importance of actor cleavages in negotiating the European Constitution. Int. Stud. Q. 54:3615–32
    [Google Scholar]
28. Humphreys M 2008. Coalitions. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11:351–86
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jackson M, Sonnenschein H 2007. Overcoming incentive constraints by linking decisions. Econometrica 75:1241–57
    [Google Scholar]
30. Johns L 2012. Courts as coordinators: endogenous enforcement and jurisdiction in international adjudication. J. Confl. Resolut. 56:2257–89
    [Google Scholar]
31. Jupille J 1999. The European Union and international outcomes. Int. Organ. 53:2409–25
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kahneman D 2015. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux
33. Kahneman D, Tversky A 1979. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:2263–91
    [Google Scholar]
34. Kauppi H, Widgrén M, Carrillo JD 2004. What determines EU decision making? Needs, power or both?. Econ. Policy 19:39221–66
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kobrin S 1987. Testing the bargaining hypothesis in the manufacturing sector in developing countries. Int. Organ. 41:4609–38
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kreps D 1990. Game Theory and Economic Modeling New York: Oxford Univ. Press
37. Ma CA, Manove M 1993. Bargaining with deadlines and imperfect player control. Econometrica 61:61313–39
    [Google Scholar]
38. Maggi G 2017. Issue linkage. Handbook of Commercial Policy K Bagwell, R Staiger 1513–64 New York: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
39. McDermott R 2009. Prospect theory and negotiation. Negotiated Risks: International Talks on Hazardous Issues G Sjostea, R Avenhaus 87–111 New York: Springer-Verlag
    [Google Scholar]
40. McKibben HE 2013. The effects of structures and power on state bargaining strategies. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:2411–27
    [Google Scholar]
41. McKibben H, Western S 2014. Levels of linkage: across-agreement versus within-agreement explanations of consensus formation among states. Int. Stud. Q. 58:144–54
    [Google Scholar]
42. McLean EV, Stone RW 2012. The Kyoto Protocol: two-level bargaining and European integration. Int. Stud. Q. 56:199–113
    [Google Scholar]
43. Milne D 2011. The 1968 Paris peace negotiations: a two-level game?. Rev. Int. Stud. 37:2577–99
    [Google Scholar]
44. Monheim K 2015. How Effective Negotiation Management Promotes Multilateral Cooperation: The Power of Process in Climate, Trade and Biosafety Negotiations New York: Routledge
45. Muthoo A 1999. Bargaining Theory with Applications New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
46. Myerson RB, Satterthwaite M 1983. Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. J. Econ. Theory 29:2265–81
    [Google Scholar]
47. Narlikar A 2012. Collective agency, systemic consequences: bargaining coalitions in the WTO. Oxford Handbook on the World Trade Organization M Daunton, A Narlikar, RM Stern 184–209 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Nash JF 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:2155–62
    [Google Scholar]
49. Nasiritousi N, Linnér B 2016. Open or closed meetings? Explaining non-state actor involvement in the international climate change negotiations. Int. Environ. Agreem. 16:1127–44
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nebus J, Rufin C 2010. Extending the bargaining power model: explaining bargaining outcomes among nations, MNEs and NGOs. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 41:6996–1015
    [Google Scholar]
51. Niemann A, Mak J 2010. (How) do norms guide Presidency behaviour in EU negotiations?. J. Eur. Public Policy 17:5727–42
    [Google Scholar]
52. Odell JS 2005. Chairing a WTO negotiation. J. Int. Econ. Law 8:2425–48
    [Google Scholar]
53. Odell JS 2010. Three islands of knowledge about negotiation in international organizations. J. Eur. Public Policy 17:5619–32
    [Google Scholar]
54. O'Kane E 2006. When can conflicts be resolved? A critique of ripeness. Civil Wars 8:3/4268–84
    [Google Scholar]
55. O'Neill B 1986. International escalation and the dollar auction. J. Confl. Resolut. 30:133–50
    [Google Scholar]
56. O'Neill B 1994. A question of procedure at the Vienna arms talks. Cooperative Models in International Relations Research M Intriligator, U Luterbacher 203–21 New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
57. O'Neill B 1996. Power and satisfaction in the United Nations Security Council. J. Confl. Resolut. 40:2219–37
    [Google Scholar]
58. O'Neill B 2003. Mediating national honor: lessons from the era of dueling. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 159:11–19
    [Google Scholar]
59. O'Neill B 2018. Symmetrically formed agreements as non-well-founded sets Disc. Pap., Federmann Cent. Stud Rationality, Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Israel:
60. Panke D 2010. Small States in the European Union Farnham, UK: Ashgate
61. Perry M, Samuelson L 1994. Open- versus closed-door negotiations. RAND J. Econ. 25:2348–59
    [Google Scholar]
62. Pinfari M 2011. Time to agree: Is time pressure good for peace negotiations. ? J. Confl. Resolut. 55:5683–709
    [Google Scholar]
63. Pinfari M 2013. Peace Negotiations and Time: Deadline Diplomacy in Territorial Disputes New York: Routledge
64. Poast P 2012. Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945. Int. Organ. 66:2277–310
    [Google Scholar]
65. Putnam RD 1988. Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. Int. Organ. 42:3427–60
    [Google Scholar]
66. Raiffa H 2002. Negotiation Analysis Cambridge, UK: Belknap
67. Ray D, Vohra R 2015. Coalition formation. Handbook of Game Theory HP Young, S Zamir IV240–326 New York: Elsevier
    [Google Scholar]
68. Roth AE, Murnighan JK, Schoumaker F 1988. The deadline effect in bargaining: some experimental evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 78:4806–23
    [Google Scholar]
69. Rubin JZ, Zartman W 1995. Asymmetrical negotiation: some survey results that may surprise. Negot. J. 11:4349–64
    [Google Scholar]
70. Rubinstein A 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50:197–109
    [Google Scholar]
71. Schelling TC 1960. The Strategy of Conflict Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
72. Schneider CJ 2011. Weak states and institutionalized bargaining power in international organizations. Int. Stud. Q. 55:2331–55
    [Google Scholar]
73. Sebenius J, Singh M 2012. Is a nuclear deal with Iran possible? An analytical framework for the Iran nuclear negotiations. Int. Secur. 37:352–91
    [Google Scholar]
74. Shapley L 1977. A comparison of power indices and a non-symmetric generalization. Pap P–5872 RAND Corp Santa Monica, CA:
75. Shapley L, Shubik M 1954. A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 48:3787–92
    [Google Scholar]
76. Slapin JB 2006. Who is powerful? Examining preferences and testing sources of bargaining strength at European intergovernmental conferences. Eur. Union Politics 7:151–76
    [Google Scholar]
77. Slapin JB 2009. Exit, voice, and cooperation: bargaining power in international organizations and federal systems. J. Theor. Politics 21:2187–211
    [Google Scholar]
78. Stasavage D 2004. Open-door or closed-door? Transparency in domestic and international bargaining. Int. Organ. 58:4667–703
    [Google Scholar]
79. Stedman SJ 1991. Peacemaking in Civil War Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
80. Tallberg J 2008. Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
81. Tallberg J 2010. The power of the chair: formal leadership in international cooperation. Int. Stud. Q. 54:1241–65
    [Google Scholar]
82. Terris LG, Tykocinski OE 2016. Inaction inertia in international negotiations: the consequences of missed opportunities. Br. J. Political Sci. 46:3701–17
    [Google Scholar]
83. Tetlock P 2003. Thinking the unthinkable, sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:7320–24
    [Google Scholar]
84. Thomson R 2011. Resolving Controversy in the European Union New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
85. Thomson R, Stokman F, Achen C, König T 2006. The European Union Decides Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
86. Urpelainen J 2012. How uncertainty about outside options impedes international cooperation. Int. Theory 4:1133–63
    [Google Scholar]
87. Voeten E 2001. Outside options and the logic of Security Council action. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 95:4845–58
    [Google Scholar]
88. Wanis-St. John A 2006. Back-channel negotiation: international bargaining in the shadows. Negot. J. 22:2119–44
    [Google Scholar]
89. Wanis-St. John A 2011. Back Channel Negotiation: Secrecy in the Middle East Peace Process Syracuse, NY: Syracuse Univ. Press
90. Weihmiller GR 1986. US-Soviet Summits: An Account of East-West Diplomacy at the Top, 1955–1985 Lanham, MD: Univ. Press Am.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Zartman W 2007. Ripeness revisited: the push and pull of conflict management. Negotiation and Conflict Management W Zartman 232–44 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]