1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 17, 2014
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 17, 2014

Does Transparency Improve Governance?

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the potential of transparency—the provision of information to the public—to improve governance in both developed and developing societies. In this article, we characterize and assess the evolution of transparency from an end in itself to a tool for resolving increasingly practical concerns of governance and government performance. After delineating four distinct varieties of transparency, we focus on the type that has received the most rigorous empirical scrutiny from social scientists—so-called “transparency and accountability” (T/A) interventions intended to improve the quality of public services and governance in developing countries. T/A interventions have yielded mixed results: some are highly successful; others appear to have little impact. We develop a rubric of five ideal-typical “worlds” facing transparency that helps to account for this variation in outcomes. Reform based on transparency can face obstacles of collective action, political resistance, and long implementation chains. T/A interventions are more likely to succeed in contextual “worlds” with fewer of these obstacles. We find that 16 experimental evaluations of T/A interventions are largely consistent with the theoretical predictions of our five-worlds rubric.

Keyword(s): development, freedom of information, India, participation, right to information, transparency and accountability intervention, Uganda
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
2014-05-11
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/17/1/annurev-polisci-032210-144356.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ackerman J. 2004. Co-governance for accountability: beyond “exit” and “voice”. World Dev. 32:447–63 [Google Scholar]
  2. Akerloff G. 1970. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84:488–500 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alsop R, Heinsohn N. 2005. Measuring empowerment in practice: structuring analysis and framing indicators World Bank Policy Res. Work. Pap. 3510 thesis World Bank Washington, DC:
  4. Andrabi T, Das J, Khwaja A. 2009. Report cards: the impact of providing school and child test-scores on educational markets Work. pap., Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, Cambridge, MA
  5. Banerjee AV, Banerji R, Duflo E, Glennerster R, Khemani S. 2010. Pitfalls of participatory programs: evidence from a randomized evaluation in education in India. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 2:1–30 [Google Scholar]
  6. Banerjee AV, Duflo E, Glennerster R. 2008. Putting a Band-Aid on a corpse: incentives for nurses in the Indian public health care system. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 6:487–500 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barron P, Woolcock M, Diprose R. 2011. Contesting Development: Participatory Projects and Local Conflict Dynamics in Indonesia New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  8. Bately R. 1999. The new public management in developing countries: implications for policy and organizational reform. J. Int. Dev. 11:761–65 [Google Scholar]
  9. Björkman M, Svensson J. 2009. Power to the people: evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda. Q. J. Econ. 124:735–69 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brandeis L. 1913. Other Peoples' Money and How Bankers Use It New York: F.A. Stokes
  11. Bueno de Mesquita B, Smith A, Siverson R, Morrow J. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival Cambridge, MA: MIT Pressxiii, 536
  12. Dorf MC, Sabel CF. 1998. A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Rev. 98:267–473 [Google Scholar]
  13. Duflo E, Hanna R, Ryan SP. 2012. Incentives work: getting teachers to come to school. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:1241–78 [Google Scholar]
  14. Fox J. 1994. The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: lessons from Mexico. World Polit. 46:151–84 [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox J. 2005. Empowerment and institutional change: mapping “virtuous circles” of state-society interaction. Power, Rights, and Poverty: Concepts and Connections R Alsop 68–92 Washington, DC: World Bank [Google Scholar]
  16. Fox J. 2007a. Accountability Politics: Power and Voice in Rural Mexico New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  17. Fox J. 2007b. The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Dev. Pract. 17:663–71 [Google Scholar]
  18. Frank D. 2003. Where are the workers in consumer-worker alliances? Class dynamics and the history of consumer-labor campaigns. Polit. Soc. 31:363–79 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fung A. 2001. Accountable autonomy: toward empowered deliberation in Chicago schools and policing. Polit. Soc. 29:73–103 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fung A, Graham M, Weil D. 2007. Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  21. Gaventa J, Barrett G. 2011. So what difference does it make? Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. IDS Work. Pap. 2010:01–72 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gibson C, Woolcock M. 2008. Empowerment, deliberative development, and local-level politics in Indonesia: participatory projects as a source of countervailing power. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 43:151–80 [Google Scholar]
  23. Giugni MG. 1998. Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:371–93 [Google Scholar]
  24. Glennerster R. 2005. Can Information Catalyze Reform? Sierra Leone and Rural India Cambridge, MA: Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab
  25. Glewwe P, Maïga EWH. 2011. The impacts of school management reforms in Madagascar: Do the impacts vary by teacher type?. J. Dev. Effectiveness 3:435–69 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hastings JS, Weinstein JM. 2008. Information, school choice, and academic achievement: evidence from two experiments. Q. J. Econ. 123:1373–414 [Google Scholar]
  27. J-PAL 2011. Governance review paper: JPAL governance initiative Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, Cambridge, MA
  28. Jenkins R, Goetz AM. 1999. Accounts and accountability: theoretical implications of the right-to-information movement in India. Third World Q. 20:603–22 [Google Scholar]
  29. Joshi A. 2008. Producing social accountability? The impact of service delivery reforms. IDS Bull. 38:10–17 [Google Scholar]
  30. Joshi A. 2010. Review of impact and effectiveness of transparency and accountability initiatives: annex 1 service delivery Prepared for Transparency and Accountability Initiative Worksh., Inst. Dev. Stud., Oct. 14–15
  31. Joshi A, Houtzager PP. 2012. Widgets or watchdogs?. Public Manage. Rev. 14:145–62 [Google Scholar]
  32. Keefer P, Khemani S. 2011. Mass media and public services: the effects of radio access on public education in Benin World Bank Policy Res. Pap. 5559, Dev. Res. Group, World Bank, Washington, DC
  33. Khan S. 2012. Topic guide on empowerment and accountability Gov. Soc. Dev. Resource Cent., Univ. Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
  34. Kosack S, Tolmie C, Griffin C. 2010. From the Ground Up: Improving Government Performance with Independent Monitoring Organizations Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
  35. Lake D, Baum M. 2001. The invisible hand of democracy: political control and the provision of public goods. Comp. Polit. Stud. 34:587–621 [Google Scholar]
  36. Leonhardt D. 2013. A simple way to send poor kids to top colleges. N. Y. Times
  37. Lieberman ES, Posner DN, Tsai L. 2013. Does information lead to more active citizenship? Evidence from an education intervention in rural Kenya. MIT Polit. Sci. Dep. Res. Pap. No. 2013-2
  38. Mansuri G, Rao V. 2013. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, DC: World Bank
  39. McAdam D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  40. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  41. McCarthy JD, Zald MN. 1977. Resource mobilization and social movements. Am. J. Sociol. 86:1212–41 [Google Scholar]
  42. McGee R, Gaventa J. 2011. Shifting power? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. IDS Work. Pap. 2011:1–39 [Google Scholar]
  43. McGuire J. 2010. Health, Wealth, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  44. Meiklejohn A. 1948. Free Speech and Its Relation to Self-Government New York: Harper Brothers
  45. Micheletti M, Follesdal A, Stolle D. 2006. Politics, Products, and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism Past and Present New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
  46. Muralidharan K, Sundararaman V. 2010. The impact of diagnostic feedback to teachers on student learning: experimental evidence from India. Econ. J. 120:F187–203 [Google Scholar]
  47. Narayan D, Petesch P. 2007. Agency, opportunity structure and poverty escapes. Moving Out of Poverty D Narayan, P Petesch 1–44 Washington, DC: World Bank [Google Scholar]
  48. North DC. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance Cambridge/New York: Cambridge Univ. Pressviii, 152
  49. Olken BA. 2007. Monitoring corruption: evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. J. Polit. Econ. 115:200–49 [Google Scholar]
  50. Olson M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Pressx, 176
  51. Ostrom E. 1990. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:137–58 [Google Scholar]
  52. Open Society Foundations 2012. Access to information laws: overview and statutory goals. Open Society Justice Initiative. http://www.right2info.org/access-to-information-laws/access-to-information-laws-overview-and-statutory
  53. Pandey P, Goyal S, Sundararaman V. 2009. Community participation in public schools: impact of information campaigns in three Indian states. Educ. Econ. 17:355–75 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pandey P, Sehgal AR, Riboud M, Levine D, Goyal M. 2007. Informing resource-poor populations and the delivery of entitled health and social services in rural India. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 298:1867–75 [Google Scholar]
  55. Piven FF, Cloward RA. 1979. Poor People's Movements New York: Vintage
  56. Polletta F, Jasper JM. 2001. Collective identity and social movements. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:283–305 [Google Scholar]
  57. Pradhan M, Suryadarma D, Beatty A, Wong M, Gaduh A, Artha RP. 2011. Improving educational quality through enhancing community participation: results from a randomised field experiment in Indonesia. World Bank Policy Res. Pap. 5795, Dev. Res. Group, World Bank, Washington, DC
  58. Pritchett L. 2013. The Rebirth of Education: Schooling Ain't Learning. Washington, DC: Cent. Glob. Dev.
  59. Reinikka R, Svensson J. 2005. Fighting corruption to improve schooling: evidence from a newspaper campaign in Uganda. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 3:259–67 [Google Scholar]
  60. Reinikka R, Svensson J. 2011. The power of information in public services: evidence from education in Uganda. J. Public Econ. 95:956–66 [Google Scholar]
  61. Roberts A. 2008. Blacked Out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Schultz TP. 2004. Evidence of returns to schooling in Africa from household surveys: monitoring and restructuring the market for education. J. Afr. Econ. 13:ii95–ii148 [Google Scholar]
  63. Scott JC. 1987. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  64. Stigler GJ. 1961. The economics of information. J. Polit. Econ. 69:213–25 [Google Scholar]
  65. Stiglitz J, Weiss A. 1981. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. Am. Econ. Rev. 71:393–410 [Google Scholar]
  66. Tandon R. 2003. Civil society and policy reforms IDS Civil Soc. and Governance Policy Brief No. 9, Inst. Dev. Stud., Brighton, UK
  67. Tyler G. 1995. Look for the Union Label: A History of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union Armonk, NY: ME Sharp
  68. United Nations 2008. People Matter: Civic Engagement in Public Governance New York: UN Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff.
  69. Wheeler D, Elkington J. 2001. The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication. Bus. Strategy Environ. 10:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  70. World Bank 1994. The World Bank and Participation Washington, DC: World Bank
  71. World Bank 2004. Making Services Work for Poor People World Dev. Rep New York: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
Loading
Does Transparency Improve Governance?
Annual Review of Political Science 17, 65 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error