1932

Abstract

Early research on wartime violence against civilians highlighted a distinction between macro- and micro-level approaches. Macro-level approaches, grounded in the international relations subfield, focus on variation across countries or conflicts, while micro-level approaches, more influenced by the comparative politics subfield, focus on variation within countries or conflicts. However, some of the recent research on civilian targeting does not fit neatly into this dichotomy—such as research comparing subnational units or armed groups across conflicts or research relying on geo-referenced event data for multiple conflicts. We review the literature and advocate moving beyond the language of the micro- and macro-level divide, instead focusing on the determinants of violence against civilians at five different levels of analysis: international, domestic, subnational, organizational, and individual. While acknowledging significant advances in the field, we argue for continued research aimed at developing a more integrated theoretical understanding of the multiple actors and interactive social processes driving violence against civilians.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102229
2021-05-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/24/1/annurev-polisci-041719-102229.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102229&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrahms M. 2012. The political effectiveness of terrorism revisited. Comp. Political Stud. 45:3366–93
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arjona A. 2016. Rebelocracy: Social Order in the Colombian Civil War New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Armstrong DA, Davenport C, Stam A 2020. Casualty estimates in the Rwandan genocide. J. Genocide Res. 22:1104–11
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arreguín-Toft I. 2005. How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Asal V, Phillips BJ, Rethemeyer RK, Simonelli C, Young JK 2019. Carrots, sticks, and insurgent targeting of civilians. J. Confl. Resolut. 63:71710–35
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Azam J-P. 2002. Looting and conflict between ethnoregional groups. Lessons for state formation in Africa. J. Confl. Resolut. 46:1131–53
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagozzi BE, Koren O, Mukherjee B 2017. Droughts, land appropriation, and rebel violence in the developing world. J. Politics 79:31057–72
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakke K, Cao K, O'Loughlin J, Ward MD 2009. Social distance in Bosnia-Herzegovina and the North Caucasus region of Russia: inter and intra-ethnic attitudes and identities. Nat. Nation. 15:2229–55
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Balcells L. 2010. Rivalry and revenge: violence against civilians in conventional civil wars. Int. Stud. Q. 54:2291–313
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Balcells L. 2012. The consequences of victimization on political identities: evidence from Spain. Politics Soc 40:3309–45
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Balcells L. 2017. Rivalry and Revenge: The Politics of Violence During Civil War New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  12. Balcells L, Justino P. 2014. Bridging micro and macro approaches on civil wars and political violence: issues, challenges, and the way forward. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:81343–59
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Balcells L, Kalyvas SN. 2010. Did Marxism make a difference? Marxist rebellions and national liberation movements Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Sep. 2–5, Washington, DC
  14. Balcells L, Kalyvas SN. 2014. Does warfare matter? Severity, duration, and outcomes of civil wars. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:81390–418
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Balcells L, Steele A. 2016. Warfare, political identities, and displacement in Spain and Colombia. Political Geogr 51:115–29
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bauer M, Blattman C, Chytilová J, Henrich J, Miguel E, Mitts T 2016. Can war foster cooperation. ? J. Econ. Persp. 30:3249–74
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Birnir J, Ghodes A. 2018. Voting in the shadow of violence: electoral politics and conflict in Peru. J. Global Secur. Stud. 3:2181–97
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bulutgil Z. 2016. The Roots of Ethnic Cleansing in Europe New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  19. Carey SC, Colaresi MP, Mitchell NJ 2015. Governments, informal links to militias, and accountability. J. Confl. Resolut. 59:5850–76
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cederman L-E, Hug S, Schubiger LI, Villamil F 2020. Civilian victimization and ethnic civil war. J. Confl. Resolut. 64:7–81199–225
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Clayton G, Thomson A. 2016. Civilianizing civil conflict: civilian defense militias and the logic of violence in intrastate conflict. Int. Stud. Q. 60:3499–510
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cohen DK. 2013. Explaining rape during civil war: cross-national evidence (1980–2009). Am. Political Sci. Rev 107:346177
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Cohen DK. 2016. Rape During Civil War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  24. Cohen DK, Nordås R. 2015. Do states delegate shameful violence to militias? Patterns of sexual violence in recent armed conflicts. J. Confl. Resolut. 59:5877–98
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Costalli S, Ruggeri A. 2015. Forging political entrepreneurs. Civil war effects on post-conflict politics in Italy. Political Geogr 44:40–49
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Davenport C, Ball P. 2002. Views to a kill: exploring the implications of source selection in the case of Guatemalan state terror, 1977–1995. J. Confl. Resolut. 46:3427–50
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Davenport C, Mokleiv Nygård H, Fjelde H, Armstrong D 2019. The consequences of contention: understanding the aftereffects of political conflict and violence. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:36177
    [Google Scholar]
  28. de la Calle L. 2017. Compliance versus constraints: a theory of rebel targeting in civil war. J. Peace Res. 54:3427–41
    [Google Scholar]
  29. DeMeritt JHR. 2015. Delegating death: military intervention and government killing. J. Confl. Resolut. 59:3428–54
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dragojevic M. 2019. Amoral Communities. Collective Crimes in Time of War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  31. Dube O, Vargas JF. 2013. Commodity price shocks and civil conflict: evidence from Colombia. Rev. Econ. Stud. 80:41384–421
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Elizur Y, Yishay-Krien N. 2009. Participation in atrocities among Israeli soldiers during the first intifada: a qualitative analysis. J. Peace Res. 46:2251–67
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fazal TM. 2018. Wars of Law: Unintended Consequences in the Regulation of Armed Conflict Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  34. Fielding D, Shortland A. 2012. The dynamics of terror during the Peruvian civil war. J. Peace Res. 49:6847–62
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Finkel E, Straus S. 2012. Macro, meso, and micro research on genocide: gains, shortcomings, and future areas of inquiry. Genocide Stud. Prev. 7:156–67
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Fjelde H, Hultman L. 2014. Weakening the enemy: a disaggregated study of violence against civilians in Africa. J. Confl. Resolut. 58:71230–57
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fjelde H, Hultman L, Nilsson D 2019. Protection through presence: UN peacekeeping and the costs of targeting civilians. Int. Organ. 73:1103–31
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Fortna P. 2015. Do terrorists win? Rebels’ use of terrorism and civil war outcomes. Int. Organ. 69:3519–56
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Fortna VP, Lotito NJ, Rubin MA 2018. Don't bite the hand that feeds: rebel funding sources and the use of terrorism in civil wars. Int. Stud. Q. 62:4782–94
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fujii LA. 2009. Killing Neighbors: Webs of Violence in Rwanda Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  41. Fujii LA. 2013. The puzzle of extra-lethal violence. Pers. Politics 11:2410–26
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gates S. 2017. Membership matters: coerced recruits and rebel allegiance. J. Peace Res. 54:5674–86
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gleditsch NP, Wallensteen P, Eriksson M, Sollenberg M, Strand H 2002. Armed conflict 1946–2001: a new dataset. J. Peace Res. 39:5615–37
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Gleditsch KS, Hug S, Schubiger LI, Wucherpfennig J 2018. International conventions and nonstate actors: selection, signaling, and reputation effects. J. Confl. Resolut. 62:2346–80
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Gohdes AR. 2020. Repression technology: internet accessibility and state violence. Am. J. Political Sci. 64:3488–503
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Goodwin J. 2006. A theory of categorical terrorism. Soc. Forces 84:42027–46
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gowrinathan N, Mampilly Z. 2019. Resistance and repression under the rule of rebels: women, clergy, and civilian agency in LTTE governed Sri Lanka. Comp. Politics 52:11–20
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Gutiérrez-Sanín F, Wood EJ. 2014. Ideology in civil war: instrumental adoption and beyond. J. Peace Res. 51:2213–26
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gutiérrez-Sanín F, Wood EJ. 2017. What should we mean by ‘pattern of political violence’? Repertoire, targeting, frequency, and technique. Perspect. Politics 15:20–41
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hadzic D, Carlson D, Tavits M 2020. How exposure to violence affects ethnic voting. Brit. J. Political Sci. 50:1345–62
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Haer R, Banholzer L, Elbert T, Weierstall R 2013. Analyzing the microfoundations of human violence in the DRC—intrinsic and extrinsic rewards and the prediction of appetite aggression. Confl. Health 7:11
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Hägerdal N. 2017. Ethnic cleansing and the politics of restraint: violence and coexistence in the Lebanese civil war. J. Confl. Resolut. 63:159–84
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Heger LL. 2015. Votes and violence: pursuing terrorism while navigating politics. J. Peace Res. 52:132–45
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hoover Green A. 2016. The commander's dilemma: creating and controlling armed group violence against civilians. J. Peace Res. 53:5619–32
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoover Green A. 2018. The Commander's Dilemma: Violence and Restraint in Wartime Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  56. Hovil L, Werker E. 2005. Portrait of a failed rebellion: an account of rational, sub-optimal violence in Western Uganda. Ration. Soc. 17:15–34
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hultman L. 2007. Battle losses and rebel violence: raising the costs for fighting. Terror. Political Viol. 19:2205–22
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Hultman L, Kathman J, Shannon M 2013. United Nations peacekeeping and civilian protection in civil war. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:4875–91
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Humphreys M, Weinstein JM. 2006. Handling and manhandling civilians in civil war. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 100:3429–47
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Hundman E, Parkinson SE. 2019. Rogues, degenerates, and heroes: disobedience as politics in military organizations. Eur. J. Int. Rel. 25:3645–71
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Jo H. 2015. Compliant Rebels: Rebel Groups and International Law in World Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Kalyvas SN. 2006. The Logic of Violence in Civil War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  63. Kalyvas SN. 2012. Micro-level studies of violence in civil war: refining and extending the control-collaboration model. Terror. Political Viol. 24:4658–68
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kalyvas SN, Balcells L. 2010. International system and technologies of rebellion: how the end of the Cold War shaped internal conflict. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:3415–29
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Kalyvas SN, Kocher MA. 2009. The dynamics of violence in Vietnam: an analysis of the Hamlet Evaluation System (HES). J. Peace Res. 46:3335–55
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Kaplan O. 2017. Resisting War: How Communities Protect Themselves New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  67. Kaufmann C. 1996. Possible and impossible solutions to ethnic civil wars. Int. Secur. 20:4136–75
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kim NK. 2016. Revolutionary leaders and mass killing. J. Confl. Resolut. 62:2289–317
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Koren O. 2017. Means to an end: pro-government militias as a predictive indicator of strategic mass killing. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 34:5461–84
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Koren O, Bagozzi BE. 2017. Living off the land: the connection between cropland, food security, and violence against civilians. J. Peace Res. 54:3351–64
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Krcmaric D. 2018. Varieties of civil war and mass killing: reassessing the relationship between guerrilla warfare and civilian victimization. J. Peace Res. 55:118–31
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Krcmaric D. 2019. Information, secrecy, and civilian targeting. Int. Stud. Q. 63:2322–33
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Krüger J, Ball P, Price M, Hoover Green A 2013. It doesn't add up: casualty counting issues and strategic peacebuilding initiatives. Counting Civilian Casualties T Seybolt, JD Aronson, B Fischhoff 247–64 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Kydd AH, Walter BF. 2006. The strategies of terrorism. Int. Secur. 31:149–80
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Leader Maynard J. 2019. Ideology and armed conflict. J. Peace Res. 56:5635–49
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Lichtenheld A. 2020. Explaining population displacement strategies in civil wars: a cross-national analysis. Int. Organ. 74:2253–94
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Lidow NH. 2016. Violent Order: Understanding Rebel Governance through Liberia's Civil War Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  78. Littman R, Paluck EL. 2015. The cycle of violence: understanding individual participation in collective violence. Adv. Political Psychol. 36:79–99
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Luft A. 2015. Toward a dynamic theory of action at the micro level of genocide: killing, resistance, and saving in 1994 Rwanda. Soc. Theory 33:2148–72
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Lyall J. 2009. Does indiscriminate violence incite insurgent attacks? Evidence from Chechnya. J. Confl. Resolut. 53:3331–62
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Lyall J. 2010. Are co-ethnics more effective counter-insurgents? Evidence from the Second Chechen War. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:11–20
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Lyall J. 2020. Civilian casualties, humanitarian aid, and insurgent violence in civil wars. Int. Organ. 73:4901–26
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lyall J, Blair G, Imai K 2013. Explaining support for combatants during wartime: a survey experiment in Afghanistan. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:4679–705
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Manekin D. 2020. Regular Soldiers, Irregular War: Violence and Restraint in the Second Intifada Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  85. McDoom OS. 2012. The psychology of threat in intergroup conflict. Int. Secur. 37:2119–55
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Mitton K. 2015. Rebels in a Rotten State: Understanding Atrocity in the Sierra Leone Civil War New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  87. Mylonas H. 2012. The Politics of Nation-Building. Making Co-Nationals, Refugees, and Minorities New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  88. Narang N, Stanton JA. 2017. A strategic logic of attacking aid workers: evidence from violence in Afghanistan. Int. Stud. Q. 61:138–51
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Nordås R, Cohen DK.2021 Conflict-related sexual violence. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 24:193211
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Oppenheim B, Weintraub M. 2017. Doctrine and violence: the impact of combatant training on civilian killings. Terr. Political Viol. 29:61126–48
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Pechenkina AO, Bausch AW, Skinner KK 2019. How do civilians attribute blame for state indiscriminate violence?. J. Peace Res. 56:4545–58
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Petersen R. 2001. Resistance and Rebellion: Lessons from Eastern Europe New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  93. Petersen R. 2002. Understanding Ethnic Violence New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  94. Pettersson T, Öberg M. 2020. Organized violence, 1989–2019. J. Peace Res. 57:4597–613
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Pierskalla JH, Hollenbach FM. 2013. Technology and collective action: the effect of cell phone coverage on political violence in Africa. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:2207–24
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Polo S, Gleditsch K. 2016. Twisting arms and sending messages: terrorist tactics in civil war. J. Peace Res. 53:6815–29
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Polo S, González B. 2020. The power to resist: mobilization and the logic of terrorist attacks in civil war. Comp. Political Stud. 53:132029–60
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Rapp C, Kijewski S, Freitag M 2019. The tolerance of Tamils: war-related experiences, psychological pathways, and the probability of granting civil liberties to former enemies. J. Politics 81:41328–41
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Rigterink A. 2020. Diamonds: rebel's and farmer's best friend. Impact of variation in the price of a lootable, labour-intensive natural resource on the intensity of violent conflict. J. Confl. Resolut. 64:190–126
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Salehyan I, Siroky D, Wood RM 2014. External rebel sponsorship and civilian abuse: a principal-agent analysis of wartime atrocities. Int. Organ. 68:3633–61
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Schubiger L.2021 State violence and wartime civilian agency: evidence from Peru. J. Politics. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Schutte S. 2016. Violence and civilian loyalties: evidence from Afghanistan. J. Confl. Resolut. 61:81595–625
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Schutte S. 2017. Geographic determinants of indiscriminate violence in civil wars. Confl. Manag. Peace Sci. 34:4380–405
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Sexton R. 2016. Aid as a tool against insurgency: evidence from contested and controlled territory in Afghanistan. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 110:4731–49
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Shapiro JN, Weidmann NB. 2015. Is the phone mightier than the sword? Cellphones and insurgent violence in Iraq. Int. Organ. 69:2247–74
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Shaver A, Shapiro JN. 2016. The effect of civilian casualties on wartime informing: evidence from the Iraq War HiCN Work. Pap. 210, Inst. Dev. Stud., Univ. Sussex, Brighton, UK
  107. Stanton JA. 2013. Terrorism in the context of civil war. J. Politics 75:41009–22
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Stanton JA. 2015. Regulating militias: governments, militias, and civilian targeting in civil war. J. Confl. Resolut. 59:5899–923
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Stanton JA. 2016. Violence and Restraint in Civil War: Civilian Targeting in the Shadow of International Law New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  110. Stanton JA. 2019. Terrorism, civil war, and insurgency. Oxford Handbook of Terrorism E Chenoweth, R English, A Gofas, SN Kalyvas 348–65 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Stanton JA. 2020. Rebel groups, international humanitarian law, and civil war outcomes in the post-Cold War era. Int. Organ. 74:3523–59
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Steele A. 2017. Democracy and Displacement in Colombia's Civil War Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  113. Stewart MA, Liou YM. 2017. Do good borders make good rebels? Territorial control and civilian casualties. J. Politics 79:1284–301
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Straus S. 2015. Making and Unmaking Nations: The Origins and Dynamics of Genocide in Contemporary Africa Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  115. Tao R, Strandow D, Findley M, Thill J-C, Walsh J 2016. A hybrid approach to modeling territorial control in violent armed conflicts. Trans. GIS 20:413–25
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Thaler K. 2012. Ideology and violence in civil wars: theory and evidence from Mozambique and Angola. Civil Wars 14:4546–67
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Thomas J. 2014. Rewarding bad behavior: how governments respond to terrorism in civil war. Am. J. Political Sci. 58:4804–18
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Toft MD, Zhukov YM. 2015. Islamists and nationalists: rebel motivation and counterinsurgency in Russia's North Caucasus. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 109:2222–38
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Uzonyi G. 2018. Interstate rivalry, genocide, and politicide. J. Peace Res. 55:4476–90
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Valentino B. 2004. Final Solutions: Mass Killing and Genocide in the Twentieth Century Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  121. Valentino B. 2014. Why we kill: the political science of political violence against civilians. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 17:89–103
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Valentino B, Huth P, Balch-Lindsay D 2004. “Draining the sea”: mass killing and guerrilla warfare. Int. Organ. 58:2375–407
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Voytas E. 2020. What can money buy? The political consequences of material reparations Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Sep. 8–13, Washington, DC
  124. Weidmann N. 2011. Violence “from above” or “from below”? The role of ethnicity in Bosnia's civil war. J. Politics 73:41178–90
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Weidmann N. 2016. A closer look at reporting bias in conflict event data. Am. J. Political Sci. 60:1206–18
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Weinstein JM. 2007. Inside Rebellion: The Politics of Insurgent Violence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  127. Weintraub M. 2016. Do all good things go together? Development assistance and insurgent violence in civil war. J. Politics 78:4989–1002
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Wimmer A, Miner C. 2019. The strategic logic of ethnoterritorial competition: violence against civilians in Africa's civil wars. J. Glob. Secur. Stud. 5:3389–407
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Wood EJ. 2003. Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  130. Wood EJ. 2008. The social processes of civil war: the wartime transformation of social networks. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 11:539–61
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Wood EJ. 2009. Armed groups and sexual violence: When is wartime rape rare?. Politics Soc 37:1131–62
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Wood EJ. 2018. Rape as a practice of war: toward a typology of political violence. Politics Soc 46:4513–37
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Wood RM. 2010. Rebel capability and strategic violence against civilians. J. Peace Res. 47:5601–14
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Wood RM. 2014. From loss to looting? Battlefield costs and rebel incentives for violence. Int. Organ. 68:4979–99
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Wood RM, Kathman JD. 2011. Managing threat, cost, and incentive to kill: the short- and long-term effects of intervention in mass killings. J. Confl. Resolut. 55:5735–60
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Wood RM, Kathman JD. 2014. Too much of a bad thing? Civilian victimization and bargaining in civil war. Brit. J. Political Sci. 44:3685–706
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Wood RM, Sullivan C. 2015. Doing harm by doing good? The negative externalities of humanitarian aid provision during civil conflict. J. Politics 77:3736–48
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhukov YM. 2017. External resources and indiscriminate violence: evidence from German-occupied Belarus. World Politics 69:154–97
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Zhukov YM, Davenport C, Kostyuk N 2019. Introducing xSub: a new portal for cross-national data on subnational violence. J. Peace Res. 56:4604–14
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102229
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102229
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error