1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 24, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 24, 2021

The Backlash Against Globalization

Abstract

In recent years, the world has seen a rising backlash against globalization. This article reviews the nature, causes, and consequences of the globalization backlash. It shows that, contrary to a popular narrative, the backlash is not associated with a large swing in public opinion against globalization but is rather a result of its politicization. The increasing influence of globalization-skeptic actors has resulted in more protectionist, isolationist, and nationalist policies, some of which fundamentally threaten pillars of the contemporary international order. Both material and nonmaterial causes drive the globalization backlash, and these causes interact and mediate each other. The consequences are shaped by the responses of societal actors, national governments, and international policy makers. These responses can either yield to and reinforce the global backlash or push back against it. Understanding these dynamics will be an important task for future research.

Keyword(s): backlash, globalization, international cooperation, international organizations, protectionism, public opinion
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
2021-05-11
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/24/1/annurev-polisci-041719-102405.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abou-Chadi T, Helbling M. 2018. How immigration reforms affect voting behavior. Political Stud 66:3687–717
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Abou-Chadi T, Krause W. 2018. The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: a regression discontinuity approach. Br. J. Political Sci. 50:3829–47
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahlquist J, Copelovitch M, Walter S. 2020. The political consequences of external economic shocks: evidence from Poland. Am. J. Political Sci. 64:4904–20
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alter KJ, Gathii JT, Helfer LR. 2016. Backlash against international courts in west, east and southern Africa: causes and consequences. Eur. J. Int. Law 27:2293–328
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson B, Bernauer T, Kachi A. 2019. Does international pooling of authority affect the perceived legitimacy of global governance?. Rev. Int. Organ. 14:4661–83
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansell B, Adler D 2019. Brexit and the politics of housing in Britain. Political Q 90:S2105–16
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Armingeon K, Guthmann K. 2014. Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. Eur. J. Political Res. 53:3423–42
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakker R, De Vries C, Edwards E, Hooghe L, Jolly S et al. 2015. Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics 21:1143–52
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ballard-Rosa C, Malik M, Rickard S, Scheve K 2021. The economic origins of authoritarian values: evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Comp. Political Stud. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bearce DH, Jolliff Scott BJ 2019. Popular non-support for international organizations: How extensive and what does this represent?. Rev. Int. Organ. 14:2187–216
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Beramendi P, Häusermann S, Kitschelt H, Kriesi H. 2015. The Politics of Advanced Capitalism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  12. Bisbee J, Mosley L, Pepinsky TB, Rosendorff BP. 2020. Decompensating domestically: the political economy of anti-globalism. J. Eur. Public Policy 27:71090–102
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bischof D, Wagner M. 2019. Do voters polarize when radical parties enter parliament?. Am. J. Political Sci. 63:4888–904
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Blauberger M, Heindlmaier A, Kramer D, Martinsen DS, Sampson Thierry J et al. 2018. ECJ Judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. J. Eur. Public Policy 25:101422–41
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bølstad J. 2014. Dynamics of European integration: public opinion in the core and periphery. Eur. Union Politics 16:123–44
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bornschier S. 2018. Globalization, cleavages, and the radical right. The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right J Rydgren 212–38 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bressanelli E, Koop C, Reh C. 2020. EU Actors under pressure: politicisation and depoliticisation as strategic responses. J. Eur. Public Policy 27:3329–41
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Broz L, Frieden J, Weymouth S. 2021. Populism in place: the economic geography of the globalization backlash. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Brutger R, Strezhnev A. 2018. International disputes, media coverage, and backlash against international law Paper presented at the International Political Economy Society Conference Nov. 2–3 Cambridge, MA: https://www.internationalpoliticaleconomysociety.org/sites/default/files/conference_files/IPES_Proposal_2018_Brutger_Strezhnev_0.pdf
  20. Burgoon B. 2013. Inequality and anti-globalization backlash by political parties. Eur. Union Politics 14:3408–35
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Burgoon B, Oliver T, Trubowitz P. 2017. Globalization, domestic politics, and transatlantic relations. Int. Politics 54:4420–33
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bursztyn L, Egorov G, Fiorin S. 2017. From extreme to mainstream: how social norms unravel NBER Work. Pap. 23415
  23. Carnegie A, Carson A. 2019. Reckless rhetoric? Compliance pessimism and international order in the age of Trump. J. Politics 81:2739–46
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Carreras M, Irepoglu Carreras Y, Bowler S 2019. Long-term economic distress, cultural backlash, and support for Brexit. Comp. Political Stud. 52:91396–424
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chilton AS, Milner HV, Tingley D. 2017. Reciprocity and public opposition to foreign direct investment. Br. J. Political Sci. 50:1129–53
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Chopin T, Lequesne C. 2020. Disintegration reversed: Brexit and the cohesiveness of the EU27. J. Contemp. Eur. Stud. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018a. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. Am. J. Political Sci. 62:4936–53
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018b. Global competition and Brexit. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:2201–18
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2019. The surge of economic nationalism in Western Europe. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:4128–51
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Constantinescu C, Mattoo A, Ruta M. 2020. The global trade slowdown: cyclical or structural?. World Bank Econ. Rev. 34:1121–42
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Cooley A, Nexon D. 2020. Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  32. Crepaz MML, Damron R. 2009. Constructing tolerance: how the welfare state shapes attitudes about immigrants. Comp. Political Stud. 42:3437–63
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Dancygier RM, Donnelly MJ. 2013. Sectoral economies, economic contexts, and attitudes toward immigration. J. Politics 75:117–35
     [Google Scholar]
  34. De Vries C 2017. Benchmarking Brexit: how the British decision to leave shapes EU public opinion. J. Common. Market Stud. 55:38–53
     [Google Scholar]
  35. De Vries C. 2018. Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  36. De Vries C, Edwards EE. 2009. Taking Europe to its extremes: extremist parties and public Euroscepticism. Party Politics 15:15–28
     [Google Scholar]
  37. De Vries C, Hobolt S. 2020. Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  38. De Vries C, Hobolt S, Walter S. 2021. Politicizing international cooperation: the mass public, political entrepreneurs and political opportunity structures. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. De Wilde P. 2011. No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. J. Eur. Integrat. 33:5559–75
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Della Porta D, Andretta M, Calle A, Combes H, Eggert N et al. 2015. Global Justice Movement: Cross-National and Transnational Perspectives New York: Routledge
  41. Dellmuth LM, Tallberg J. 2020. Elite communication and the popular legitimacy of international organizations. Br. J. Political Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Dippel C, Gold R, Heblich S. 2015. Globalization and its (dis-)content: trade shocks and voting behavior NBER Work. Pap. 21812
  43. Döring H, Manow P. 2019. Parliaments and Governments Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies Dev. version. http://www.parlgov.org/. Accessed June 25, 2020
  44. Dorn D, Hanson G, Majlesi K. 2020. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure. Am. Econ. Rev. 110:103139–83
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Drezner DW. 2019. Present at the destruction: the Trump administration and the foreign policy bureaucracy. J. Politics 81:2723–30
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Duina F. 2019. Why the excitement? Values, identities, and the politicization of EU trade policy with North America. J. Eur. Public Policy 26:121866–82
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Ecker-Ehrhardt M. 2014. Why parties politicise international institutions: on globalisation backlash and authority contestation. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 21:61275–312
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Ecker-Ehrhardt M. 2018. International organizations “going public”? An event history analysis of public communication reforms 1950–2015. Int. Stud. Q. 62:4723–36
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ehrlich SD. 2018. The Politics of Fair Trade: Moving Beyond Free Trade and Protection Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  50. Ehrlich SD, Maestas C. 2010. Risk, risk orientation, and policy opinions: the case of free trade. Political Psychol 5:31657–84
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Eilstrup-Sangiovanni M. 2020. Death of international organizations. The organizational ecology of intergovernmental organizations, 1815–2015. Rev. Int. Organ. 15:1815–2015
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Engler S, Weisstanner D. 2020. The threat of social decline: income inequality and radical right support. J. Eur. Public Policy In press
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Farrell H, Newman AL. 2019. Weaponized interdependence: how global economic networks shape state coercion. Int. Secur. 44:142–79
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Feigenbaum JJ, Hall AB. 2015. How legislators respond to localized economic shocks: evidence from Chinese import competition. J. Politics 77:41012–30
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Fetzer T. 2019. Did austerity cause Brexit?. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:113849–86
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Foster C, Frieden J. 2017. Crisis of trust: socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. Eur. Union Politics 18:4511–35
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Frey CB, Berger T, Chen C. 2018. Political machinery: Did robots swing the 2016 US presidential election?. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 34:3418–42
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Funke M, Schularick M, Trebesch C. 2016. Going to extremes: politics after financial crises, 1870–2014. Eur. Econ. Rev. 88:227–60
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Gidron N, Hall P. 2017. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. Br. J. Sociol. 68:S1S57–84
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Golder M. 2016. Far right parties in Europe. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:477–97
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Goodman SW, Pepinsky T. 2021. The exclusionary foundations of embedded liberalism. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Goodwin M, Milazzo C. 2017. Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. Br. J. Politics Int. Relat. 19:3450–64
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Gray J. 2018. Life, death, or zombie? The vitality of international organizations. Int. Stud. Q. 62:11–13
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Gronau J, Schmidtke H. 2016. The quest for legitimacy in world politics—international institutions’ legitimation strategies. Rev. Int. Stud. 42:3535–57
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Grynberg C, Walter S, Wasserfallen F. 2019. Expectations, vote choice, and opinion stability since the 2016 Brexit referendum. Eur. Union Politics 21:2255–75
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Guisinger A, Saunders EN. 2017. Mapping the boundaries of elite cues: how elites shape mass opinion across international issues. Int. Stud. Q. 61:2425–41
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Gygli S, Haelg F, Potrafke N, Sturm J-E. 2019. The KOF globalisation index—revisited. Rev. Int. Organ. 14:3543–74
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Gyongyosi G, Verner E. 2018. Financial crisis, creditor-debtor conflict, and political extremism Paper presented at Beiträge zur Jahrestagung des Vereins für Socialpolitik 2018: Digitale Wirtschaft—Session: International Financial Markets II, No. F19-V3, Sep. 25 Freiburg im Breisgau, Ger: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/181587
  69. Ha E. 2012. Globalization, government ideology, and income inequality in developing countries. J. Politics 74:2541–57
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Hagemann S, Hobolt S, Wratil C. 2017. Government responsiveness in the European Union: evidence from council voting. Comp. Political Stud. 50:6850–76
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hainmueller J, Hopkins DJ. 2014. Public attitudes toward immigration. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 17:225–49
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Hays J, Ehrlich S, Peinhardt C. 2005. Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: an empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. Int. Organ. 59:2473–94
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Hays J, Lim J, Spoon J-J. 2019. The path from trade to right-wing populism in Europe. Elect. Stud 60:102038
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Hobolt S. 2016. The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. J. Eur. Public Policy 23:91259–77
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Hobolt S, De Vries C. 2016. Public support for European integration. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:413–32
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Hobolt S, Leeper T, Tilley J. 2020. Divided by the vote: affective polarization in the wake of Brexit. Br. J. Political Sci. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. Br. J. Political Sci. 39:11–23
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2018. Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. J. Eur. Public Policy 25:1109–35
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Hopkin J, Blyth M. 2019. The global economics of European populism: growth regimes and party system change in Europe (the Government and Opposition/Leonard Schapiro lecture 2017). Gov. Oppos. 54:2193–225
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Hutter S, Grande E, Kriesi H. 2016. Politicising Europe New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  81. Hutter S, Kriesi H. 2019. Politicizing Europe in times of crisis. J. Eur. Public Policy 26:7996–1017
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Im ZJ, Mayer N, Palier B, Rovny J. 2019. The “losers of automation”: a reservoir of votes for the radical right?. Res. Politics 6:1 https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822395
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. IMF (Int. Monet. Fund) 2019. World Economic Outlook 2019 Washington, DC: Int. Monet. Fund
  84. Irwin DA. 2017. The false promise of protectionism: Why Trump's trade policy could backfire. Foreign Aff 96:45–56
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Jedinger A, Burger AM. 2020. The ideological foundations of economic protectionism: authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and the moderating role of political involvement. Political Psychol 41:2403–24
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Johns L, Pelc KJ, Wellhausen RL. 2019. How a retreat from global economic governance may empower business interests. J. Politics 81:2731–38
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Jurado I, Walter S, Konstantinidis N, Dinas E. 2020. Keeping the euro at any cost? Explaining preferences for euro membership in Greece. Eur. Union Politics. 21:3383–405
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Kelemen RD. 2017. Europe's other democratic deficit: national authoritarianism in Europe's democratic union. Gov. Oppos. 52:2211–38
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Kiratli OS. 2020. Together or not? Dynamics of public attitudes on UN and NATO. Political Stud In press
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Kriesi H, Grande E, Lachat R, Dolezal M, Bornschier S, Frey T. 2006. Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared. Eur. J. Political Res. 45:6921–56
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Kriesi H, Grande E, Lachat R, Dolezal M, Bornschier S, Frey T. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  92. Kurer T. 2020. The declining middle: occupational change, social status, and the populist right. Comp. Political Stud. 53:10–111798–1835
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Lacewell OP. 2017. Beyond policy positions: how party type conditions programmatic responses to globalization pressures. Party Politics 23:4448–60
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Lake D, Martin L, Risse T. 2021. Challenges to the liberal order: reflections on International Organization. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Lang VF, Tavares MMM. 2018. The Distribution of Gains from Globalization Washington, DC: Int. Monet. Fund
  96. Linardi S, Rudra N. 2020. Globalization and willingness to support the poor in developing countries: an experiment in India. Comp. Political Stud. 53:10–111656–89
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Lü X, Scheve K, Slaughter MJ. 2012. Inequity aversion and the international distribution of trade protection. Am. J. Political Sci. 56:3638–54
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Mader M, Steiner ND, Schoen H. 2019. The globalisation divide in the public mind: belief systems on globalisation and their electoral consequences. J. Eur. Public Policy 27:101526–45
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Madsen MR, Cebulak P, Wiebusch M. 2018. Backlash against international courts: explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts. Int. J. Law Context 14:2197–220
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Malhotra N, Margalit Y, Mo CH 2013. Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. Am. J. Political Sci. 57:2391–410
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Mansfield E, Rudra N. 2021. Embedded liberalism in the digital era. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Mansfield ED, Mutz D. 2009. Support for free trade: self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. Int. Organ. 63:2425–57
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Mansfield ED, Mutz DC. 2013. US versus them: mass attitudes toward offshore outsourcing. World Politics 65:4571–608
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Margalit Y. 2012. Lost in globalization: international economic integration and the sources of popular discontent. Int. Stud. Q. 56:3484–500
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Meijers MJ. 2017. Contagious Euroscepticism: the impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration. Party Politics 23:4413–23
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Menendez I, Owen E, Walter S 2018. Low skill products by high skill workers: the distributive effects of trade in developing countries Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Aug. 30–Sep. 2 Boston, MA:
  107. Meunier S, Czesana R. 2019. From back rooms to the street? A research agenda for explaining variation in the public salience of trade policy-making in Europe. J. Eur. Public Policy 26:121847–65
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Milner H. 2021. Voting for populism in Europe: globalization, technological change, and the extreme right. Comp. Political Stud. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Moschella M, Pinto L, Martocchia Diodati N 2020. Let's speak more? How the ECB responds to public contestation. J. Eur. Public Policy 27:3400–18
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Mudde C. 2013. Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?. Eur. J. Political Res. 52:11–19
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Mutz DC. 2018. Status threat, not economic hardship, explains the 2016 presidential vote. PNAS 115:19E4330–39
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Naoi M. 2020. Survey experiments in international political economy: what we (don't) know about the backlash against globalization. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23:333–56
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Naoi M, Urata S. 2013. Free trade agreements and domestic politics: the case of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement. Asian Econ. Policy Rev. 8:2326–49
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Nguyen Q, Spilker G 2019. The elephant in the negotiation room: PTAs through the eyes of citizens. The Shifting Landscape of Global Trade Governance: World Trade Forum G Spilker, M Elsig, M Hahn 17–47 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Nooruddin I, Rudra N. 2014. Are developing countries really defying the embedded liberalism compact?. World Politics 66:4603–40
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Norris P, Inglehart R. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  117. O'Rourke KH. 2019. Economic history and contemporary challenges to globalization. J. Econ. Hist. 79:2356–82
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Obstfeld M. 2020. Globalization cycles. Italian Econ. J. 6:11–12
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Owen E. 2017. Exposure to offshoring and the politics of trade liberalization: debate and votes on free trade agreements in the US House of Representatives, 2001–2006. Int. Stud. Q. 61:2297–311
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Owen E, Johnston N. 2017. Occupation and the political economy of trade: job routineness, offshorability and protectionist sentiment. Int. Organ. 71:4665–99
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Owen E, Walter S. 2017. Open economy politics and Brexit: insights, puzzles, and ways forward. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 24:2179–202
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Palmtag T, Rommel T, Walter S. 2018. International trade and public protest: evidence from Russian regions. Int. Stud. Q. 64:4939–55
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Peinhardt C, Wellhausen RL. 2016. Withdrawing from investment treaties but protecting investment. Glob. Policy 7:4571–76
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Pepinsky T, Walter S. 2019. Introduction to the debate section: understanding contemporary challenges to the global order. J. Eur. Public Policy 27:71074–76
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Pevehouse JCW, Nordstrom T, McManus RW, Jamison AS. 2019. Tracking organizations in the world: the Correlates of War IGO Version 3.0 datasets. J. Peace Res. 57:3492–503
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Reh C, Bressanelli E, Koop C. 2020. Responsive withdrawal? The politics of EU agenda-setting. J. Eur. Public Policy 27:3419–38
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Risse T. 2010. A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  128. Rocabert J, Schimmelfennig F, Crasnic L, Winzen T. 2019. The rise of international parliamentary institutions: purpose and legitimation. Rev. Int. Organ. 14:4607–31
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Rodríguez-Pose A. 2018. The revenge of the places that don't matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge J. Regions Econ. Soc. 11:1189–209
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Rodrik D. 2018. Populism and the economics of globalization. J. Int. Business Policy 1:12–33
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Rodrik D. 2020. Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism NBER Work. Pap. 27526
  132. Rogowski R. 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  133. Rommel T, Walter S. 2018. The electoral consequences of offshoring: how the globalization of production shapes party preferences. Comp. Political Stud. 51:5621–58
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Roth S. 2018. Introduction: contemporary counter-movements in the age of Brexit and Trump. Sociol. Res. Online 23:2496–506
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Rudra N. 2008. Globalization and the Race to the Bottom in Developing Countries: Who Really Gets Hurt? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Ruggie J. 1982. International regimes, transactions and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. Int. Organ. 36:2379–415
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Schneider C. 2019. The Responsive Union: National Elections and European Governance New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  138. Schneider C. 2020. Public commitments as signals of responsiveness in the European Union. J. Politics 82:1329–44
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Sciarini P, Lanz S, Nai A. 2015. Till immigration do us part? Public opinion and the dilemma between immigration control and bilateral agreements. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 21:2271–86
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Steenbergen MR, Siczek T. 2017. Better the devil you know? Risk-taking, globalization and populism in Great Britain. Eur. Union Politics 18:1119–36
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Steinberg D, McDowell D, Gueorguiev D. 2020. Inside looking out: how international policy trends shape the politics of capital controls in China. Pac. Rev. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Stephen MD, Zürn M. 2019. Contested World Orders: Rising Powers, Non-Governmental Organizations, and the Politics of Authority Beyond the Nation-State New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  143. Swank D, Betz H-G. 2003. Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Econ. Rev. 1:2215–45
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Tallberg J, Zürn M. 2019. The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework. Rev. Int. Organ. 14:581–606
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Trubowitz P, Burgoon B. 2020. The retreat of the west. Perspect. Politics In press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720001218
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  146. UNCTAD (United Nations Conf. Trade Dev.) 2020. International Investment Agreements Navigator. https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/international-investment-agreements. Accessed July 4, 2020
  147. Verbeek B, Zaslove A 2017. Populism and foreign policy. Oxford Handbook of Populism CR Kaltwasser, P Taggart, P Ochoa Espejo, P Ostiguy 384–405 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Voeten E. 2019. Populism and backlashes against international courts. Perspect. Politics 18:2407–22
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Volkens A, Krause W, Lehmann P, Matthieß T, Merz N et al. 2019. The manifesto data collection Version 2019b. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), updated Dec. 19, 2019. accessed July 15, 2020. https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasets
  150. von Borzyskowski I, Vabulas F. 2019. Hello, goodbye: When do states withdraw from international organizations?. Rev. Int. Organ. 14:335–66
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Walter S. 2010. Globalization and the welfare state: testing the microfoundations of the compensation hypothesis. Int. Stud. Q. 54:2403–26
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Walter S. 2017. Globalization and the demand-side of politics. How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Sci. Res. Methods 5:155–80
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Walter S. 2020. The mass politics of international disintegration Work. Pap. 105 Cent. Comp. Int. Stud., Univ. Zürich Zürich, Switz:.
  154. Walter S 2021. Brexit domino? The political contagion effects of voter-endorsed withdrawals from international institutions. Comp. Political Stud In press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414021997169
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  155. Walter S, Dinas E, Jurado I, Konstantinidis N. 2018. Noncooperation by popular vote: expectations, foreign intervention, and the vote in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum. Int. Organ. 72:4969–94
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Weiss JC, Wallace J. 2021. Domestic politics, China's rise, and the future of the liberal international order. Int. Organ. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  157. WTO (World Trade Organ.) 2020. Annual report 2020 Rep., World Trade Organ Washington, DC: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/anrep20_e.htm
  158. Zaslove A. 2008. Exclusion, community, and a populist political economy: the radical right as an anti-globalization movement. Comp. Eur. Politics 6:2169–89
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Zaum D. 2013. Legitimating International Organizations Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  160. Zürn M, Binder M, Ecker-Ehrhardt M. 2012. International authority and its politicization. Int. Theory 4:169–106
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
Loading
The Backlash Against Globalization
Annual Review of Political Science 24, 421 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error