1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 21, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 21, 2018

Cities and Politics in the Developing World

Abstract

The last 20 years have witnessed an impressive outpouring of comparative politics research examining urban politics in the developing world. This research advances our understanding of phenomena such as clientelism, law and order, and local public goods provision. Scholarship could be strengthened, however, through more careful attention to how the urban setting of this research affects the politics examined. This article proposes two distinct ways in which urban politics can be conceptualized: politics taking place in urban agglomerations, characterized by large, diverse populations settled at high densities; or politics taking place within the boundaries of city jurisdictions, possessing legal powers and responsibilities distinct from those at other tiers of government or in rural areas. Adopting either of these conceptualizations illuminates new avenues for empirical work, theoretical innovation, and improved measurement. This article also shows that recent scholarship has neglected important, and fundamentally political, topics such as urban political economy, land markets, and environmental harms. Engaging with these areas would allow political scientists to revisit classic questions regarding the institutional influences on economic growth, the politics of redistribution, and the determinants of collective action.

Keyword(s): city, clientelism, development, law and order, local public goods, security, slum, urban
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-102405
2018-05-11
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/21/1/annurev-polisci-042716-102405.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-102405&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abers R 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
  2. Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W 1999. Public goods and ethnic divisions. Q. J. Econ. 114:1243–84
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anthony RM 2014. Urbanization and political change in the developing world: a cross-national analysis, 1965–2010. Urban Aff. Rev. 50:743–80
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arias ED 2006. Drugs and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: Trafficking, Social Networks, and Public Security Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina Press
  5. Arias ED 2013. The impacts of differential armed dominance on politics in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 48:263–84
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Arias ED, Ungar M 2009. Community policing and Latin America's citizen security crisis. Comp. Politics 41:409–29
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Auerbach AM 2016. Clients and communities: the political economy of party network organization and development in India's urban slums. World Politics 68:1111–48
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Auerbach AM 2017. Neighborhood associations and the urban poor: India's slum development committees. World Dev 96:119–35
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Auerbach AM, LeBas A, Post AE, Weitz-Shapiro R 2017. The politics of urban informality: innovations in theory and research design from the city's margins Work. Pap., Univ. Calif. Berkeley, CA:
  10. Auyero J 2000. Poor People's Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  11. Auyero J, Swistun DA 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  12. Baiocchi G 2005. Militants and Citizens Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  13. Bateson R 2013. Order and violence in postwar Guatemala PhD Diss., Yale Univ. New Haven, CT:
  14. Bertorelli E, Heller P, Swaminathan S, Varshney A 2017. Does citizenship abate class? Evidence and reflections from Bangalore. Econ. Political Wkly. 52:3247–57
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Boone C 2014. Property and Political Order: Land Rights and the Structure of Conflict in Africa New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  16. Caldeira T 2000. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  17. Cammett M 2007. Business-government relations and industrial change: the politics of upgrading in Morocco and Tunisia. World Dev 35:1889–903
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Carruthers DV 2008. Environmental Justice in Latin America: Problems, Promise, and Practice Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  19. Carter D 2013. Non-state security, state legitimacy, and political participation in South Africa PhD Diss., Mich. State Univ. East Lansing, MI:
  20. Chubb J 1981. The social bases of an urban political machine: the case of Palermo. Political Sci. Q. 96:107–25
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cleary MR 2007. Electoral competition, participation, and government responsiveness in Mexico. Am. J. Political Sci. 51:283–99
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Collier D 1976. Squatters and Oligarchs: Authoritarian Rule and Policy Change in Peru Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  23. Cornelius W 1975. Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  24. Dahl R 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  25. Davis D 2010. Irregular armed forces, shifting patterns of commitment, and fragmented sovereignty in the developing world. Theory Soc 39:397–413
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Davis D 2006. Undermining the rule of law: democratization and the dark side of police reform in Mexico. Lat. Am. Politics Soc. 48:55–86
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Denis E, Mukhopadhyay P, Zerah M-H 2012. Subalteran urbanisation in India. Econ. Politics Wkly. 47:52–62
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Donaghy M 2011. Do participatory governance institutions matter? An analysis of municipal councils and social housing programs in Brazil. J. Comp. Politics 44:83–102
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Eaton K 2008. Paradoxes of police reform: federalism, parties, and civil society in Argentina's public security crisis. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 43:5–32
     [Google Scholar]
  30. El-Kazaz S 2014. Building politics: urban transformation and governance in Cairo and Istanbul PhD Diss., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  31. Erie S 1988. Rainbow's End: Irish-Americans and the Dilemmas of Urban Machine Politics, 1840–1985 Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press
  32. Evans P 2002. Livable Cities: Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  33. Flom H 2016. Police, politicians and the regulation of drug trafficking in Latin America PhD Diss., Univ. Calif. Berkeley:
  34. Flom H, Post AE 2016. Blame avoidance and policy stability in developing democracies: the politics of public security in Buenos Aires. Comp. Politics 49:23–46
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Frug G, Barron DJ 2008. City Bound: How States Stifle Urban Innovation Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  36. Fruhling H 2009. Recent police reform in Latin America. Policing Insecurity: Police Reform, Security, and Human Rights in Latin America NA Uildriks 21–46 Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gaikwad N, Nellis G 2017. The majority-minority divide in attitudes toward internal migration: evidence from Mumbai. Am. J. Political Sci. 61:2256–72
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gay R 1994. Popular Organization and Democracy in Rio de Janeiro: A Tale of Two Favelas Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  39. Ghertner DA 2011. Gentrifying the state, gentrifying participation: elite governance programs in Delhi. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 35:504–32
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Goldfrank B 2007. The politics of deepening local democracy: decentralization, party institutionalization, and participation. Comp. Politics 39:147–68
     [Google Scholar]
  41. González Y 2016. Varieties of participatory security: assessing community participation in policing in Latin America. Public Adm. Dev. 36:132–43
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gore CD, Gopakumar G 2015. Infrastructure and metropolitan reorganization: an exploration of the relationship in Africa and India. J. Urban Aff. 37:548–67
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Grossman S 2016. The politics of order in informal markets: evidence from Lagos PhD Diss., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  44. Grossman S, Honig D 2017. Evidence from Lagos on discrimination across ethnic and class identities in informal trade. World Dev 96:520–28
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Habyarimana J, Humphreys M, Posner D, Weinstein J 2009. Coethnicity: Diversity and the Dilemma of Collective Action New York: Russell Sage
  46. Hardoy JE, Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D 2013. Environmental Problems in an Urbanizing World: Finding Solutions in Cities in Africa, Asia and Latin America London: Routledge
  47. Herrera V 2017.a Water and Politics: Clientelism and Reform in Urban Mexico Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. Mich. Press
  48. Herrera V 2017.b From participatory promises to partisan capture: local democratic transitions and citizen water boards in Mexico. Comp. Politics 49:479–99
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Herrera V, Post AE 2014. Can developing countries both decentralize and depoliticize urban water services? Evaluating the legacy of the 1990s reform wave. World Dev 64:621–41
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hidalgo FD, Lessing B 2015. Endogenous state weakness in violent democracies: paramilitaries at the polls Work. Pap Mass. Inst. Technol. Cambridge, MA:
  51. Hinton MS, Newburn T 2009. Policing Developing Democracies London: Routledge
  52. Hiskey J 2003. Demand-based development and local electoral environments in Mexico. Comp. Politics 36:41–59
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Holland A 2016. Forbearance. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 110:232–46
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Holland A, Palmer-Rubin B 2015. Beyond the machine: clientelistic brokers and interest organizations in Latin America. Comp. Political Stud. 48:1186–223
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hooghe L, Marks G 2003. Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 97:233–43
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hsing Y 2010. The Great Urban Transformation: The Politics of Land and Property in China New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  57. Hummel C 2017. Disobedient markets: street vendors, enforcement, and state intervention in collective action. Comp. Political Stud. 50:1524–55
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hunter F 1953. Community Power Structure: A Study of Decision Makers Chapel Hill: Univ. North Carolina Press
  59. Ichino N, Nathan N 2013. Crossing the line: local ethnic geography and voting in Ghana. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:344–61
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Jha S, Rao V, Woolcock M 2007. Governance in the gullies: democratic responsiveness and leadership in Delhi's slums. World Dev 35:230–46
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Joireman SF 2011. Where There Is No Government: Enforcing Property Rights in Common Law Africa New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  62. Kjellen M, McGranahan G 2006. Informal water vendors and the urban poor Hum. Settl. Disc. Pap. Ser. No. 978-1-84369-586-8 Int. Inst. Environ. Dev. London:
  63. Kramon E, Posner D 2013. Who benefits from distributive politics? How the outcome one studies affects the answer one gets. Perspect. Politics 11:461–74
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Krause M 2009. The Political Economy of Water and Sanitation New York: Routledge
  65. Krishna A 2013. Stuck in place: investigating social mobility in 14 Bangalore slums. J. Dev. Stud. 49:1010–28
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Kübler D, Pagano MA 2012. Urban politics as multi-level analysis. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics K Mossberger, SE Clarke, P John 114–29 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Schleifer A, Vishny R 1999. The quality of government. J. Law Econ. Organ. 15:222–79
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Larreguy H, Marshall J, Trucco L 2015. Can clientelistic ties be broken? Evidence from an urban titling program in Mexico Work. Pap Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  69. LeBas A 2013. Violence and urban order in Nairobi, Kenya and Lagos, Nigeria. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 48:240–62
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Leeds E 1996. Cocaine and parallel polities in the Brazilian urban periphery: constraints on local-level democratization. Lat. Am. Res. Rev. 31:47–83
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Levitsky S 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  72. Lim M, Metzler R, Bar-Yam Y 2007. Global pattern formation and ethnic/cultural violence. Science 317:1540–44
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Lipset S 1959. Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 53:69–105
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Logan J, Molotch HL 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  75. Macaulay F 2012. Cycles of police reform in Latin America. Policing in Africa DJ Francis 165–90 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Magaloni B, Franco E, Melo V 2015. Killing in the slums: an impact evaluation of police reform in Rio de Janeiro Work. Pap. No. 556 Stanford Cent. Int. Dev. Stanford, CA:
  77. Mares I, Young L 2016. Buying, expropriating, and stealing votes. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:267–88
     [Google Scholar]
  78. McNulty S 2015. Barriers to participation: exploring gender in Peru's participatory budget process. J. Dev. Stud. 51:1429–43
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Michelitch K 2015. Does electoral competition exacerbate interethnic or interpartisan economic discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in market price bargaining. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 109:43–61
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Moncada E 2013. The politics of urban violence: challenges for development in the Global South. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 48:217–39
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Moncada E 2016. Cities, Business, and the Politics of Urban Violence in Latin America Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  82. Montgomery M 2008. The urban transformation of the developing world. Science 319:761–64
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Mumford L 1937. What is a city?. Archit. Rec. 82:59–62
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Nathan N 2016.a Does participation reinforce patronage? Policy preferences and turnout in urban Ghana. Br. J. Political Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123416000351
    [Crossref]
  85. Nathan N 2016.b Local ethnic geography, expectations of favoritism, and voting in urban Ghana. Comp. Political Stud. 49:1896–929
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Nichter S 2008. Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 102:19–31
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Oliveros V 2016. Making it personal: clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public administration in Argentina. Comp. Politics 48:373–91
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Onoma AK 2010. The Politics of Property Rights Institutions in Africa New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  89. Ostrom V, Tiebout CM, Warren R 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 55:831–42
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Pacheco-Vega R 2007. Mexico's pollutant release registry: taking stock, looking ahead. Mexico's Right-To-Know Reforms: Civil Society Perspectives270–75 Washington, DC/Ciudad de Mexico: FUNDAR-Woodrow Wilson Int. Cent. Scholars
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Paller J 2014. Informal institutions and personal rule in urban Ghana. Afr. Rev. 2014 57:3123–42
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Pasotti E 2009. Political Branding in Cities: The Decline of Machine Politics in Bogota, Naples, and Chicago New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  93. Perlman J 1976. The Myth of Marginality: Urban Poverty and Politics in Rio de Janeiro Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  94. Pierre J, Peters BG 2012. Urban governance. The Oxford Handbook of Urban Politics K Mossberger, SE Clarke, P John 71–86 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Post AE 2014. Foreign and Domestic Investment in Argentina: The Politics of Privatized Infrastructure New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  96. Post AE, Bronsoler V, Salman L 2017. Hybrid regimes for local public goods provision: a framework for analysis. Perspect. Politics 15:4952–66
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Read B 2012. Roots of the State: Neighborhood Organization and Social Networks in Beijing and Taipei Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  98. Resnick D 2013. Urban Poverty and Party Populism in African Democracies New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  99. Rios V 2015. How government coordination controlled organized crime: the case of Mexico's cocaine markets. J. Confl. Resolut. 59:1433–54
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Rithmire M 2015. Land Bargains and Chinese Capitalism: The Politics of Property Rights Under Reform New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  101. Robinson AL 2014. National versus ethnic identification in Africa: modernization, colonial legacy, and the origins of territorial nationalism. World Politics 66:709–46
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Sabet D 2012. Police Reform in Mexico: Informal Politics and the Challenge of Institutional Change Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  103. Sager F 2005. Metropolitan institutions and policy coordination: the integration of land use and transport policies in Swiss urban areas. Governance 18:227–56
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Sapotichne J, Jones BD, Wolfe M 2007. Is urban politics a black hole? Analyzing the boundary between political science and urban politics. Urban Aff. Rev. 43:76–106
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Sellers J 2002. Governing from Below: Urban Regions and the Global Economy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  106. Simmel G 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel KH Wolff Glencoe, IL: Free Press
  107. Singerman D 1995. Avenues for Participation: Family, Politics, and Networks in the Urban Quarters of Cairo Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  108. Snyder R 2001. Scaling down: the subnational comparative method. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 36:93–110
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Speer J 2012. Participatory governance reform: a good strategy for increasing government responsiveness and improving public services?. World Dev 40:2379–98
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Stokes S 1995. Cultures in Conflict: Social Movements and the State in Peru Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  111. Stokes S, Dunning T, Nazareno M, Brusco V 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  112. Stone C 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988 Lawrence: Kansas Univ. Press
  113. Stren R, Cameron R 2005. Metropolitan governance reform: an introduction. Public Adm. Dev. 25:275–84
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Szwarcberg M 2015. Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  115. Thachil T 2017. Do rural migrants divide ethnically in the city? Ethnographic and experimental evidence from India. Am. J. Political Sci. 61:908–26
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Trounstine J 2009. All politics is local: the reemergence of the study of city politics. Perspect. Politics 7:611–18
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Ungar M 2009. La mano dura: current dilemmas in Latin American police reform. Criminality, Public Security, and the Challenge to Democracy in Latin America M Bergman, L Whitehead 93–118 South Bend, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Ungar M 2011. Policing Democracy: Overcoming Obstacles to Citizen Security in Latin America Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  119. United Cities and Local Governments. 2008. Decentralization and local democracy in the world: 2008 first global report Rep. No. 47811 World Bank Washington, DC:
  120. United Nations 2015. World Urbanization Prospects 2014 New York: United Nations
  121. Varshney A 2003. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  122. Wampler B 2015. Activating Democracy in Brazil South Bend, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press
  123. Weber M 1978. Politics as a vocation. Max Weber: Selections in Translation WG Runciman 212–25 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Weinstein L 2008. Mumbai's development mafias: globalization, organized crime, and land development. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 32:22–39
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Weir M, Rongerude J, Ansell CK 2009. Collaboration is not enough: virtuous cycles of reform in transportation policy. Urban Aff. Rev. 44:455–89
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Weitz-Shapiro R 2014. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  127. Wilkinson S 2004. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  128. Wirth L 1938. Urbanism as a way of life. Am. J. Sociol. 44:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
  129. World Bank. 2009. World Development Report: Reshaping Economic Geography Washington, DC: World Bank
  130. World Values Surv. Assoc. 2010–2014. World Values Survey wave 6. Official aggregate v.20150418 http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp
  131. Zhang Y 2013. The Fragmented Politics of Urban Preservation: Beijing, Chicago, and Paris Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-102405
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error