1932

Abstract

We review the literature on the rise of identity politics and populism in Europe. Populist parties have gained large vote shares since the Great Recession of 2008. We observe in many countries, and even in the European Parliament, a transformation of the main dimension of politics from the left–right cleavage to a new cleavage opposing the mainstream parties to populist parties. We examine how this transformation relates to changes in voter attitudes and the adjustment of political parties to these changes. Two main types of causes for the rise of populism have emerged: economic and cultural. In reviewing the evidence, we find a complex interaction between economic and cultural factors. Economic anxiety among large groups of voters related to the Great Recession and austerity policies triggers a heightened receptivity to the messages of cultural backlash from populist parties.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033542
2020-05-11
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/23/1/annurev-polisci-050718-033542.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033542&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abou-Chadi T, Krause W. 2018. The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: a regression discontinuity approach. Br. J. Political Sci. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000029
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksoy CG, Guriev S, Treisman DS 2018. Globalization, government popularity, and the great skill divide NBER Work. Pap25062
  3. Algan Y, Guriev S, Papaioannou E, Passari E 2017. The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brookings Pap. Econ. Activity 2017.309–82
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Allcott H, Gentzkow M. 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31:2211–36
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson GH 2013. The China syndrome: local labor market effects of import competition in the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:2121–68
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Majlesi K 2016. Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure NBER Work. Pap22637
  7. Barrera Rodriguez O, Guriev SM, Henry E, Zhuravskaya E 2020. Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. J. Public Econ. 182:104123
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Becker SO, Fetzer T, Novy D 2017. Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Econ. Policy 32:601–50
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernstein M. 2005. Identity politics. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 31:47–74
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhambra GK. 2017. Locating Brexit in the pragmatics of race, citizenship and empire. Brexit: Sociological Responses W Outhwaite 91–100 London: Anthem
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bornschier S. 2010. Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
  12. Brubaker R. 2017. Why populism?. Theory Soc 46:357–85
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Burgoon B, van Noort S, Rooduijn M, Underhill G 2018. Positional deprivation and support for radical right and radical left parties. Econ. Policy 34:49–93
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cantoni D, Hagemeister F, Westcott M 2019. Persistence and activation of right-wing political ideology Rationality and Competition Disc. Pap. No. 143, Collab. Res. Cent. Transregio 190, Munich, Ger .
  15. Chandra K. 2006. What is ethnic identity and does it matter?. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 9:397–424
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clarke HD, Goodwin M, Whiteley P 2017. Why Britain voted for Brexit: an individual-level analysis of the 2016 referendum vote. Parliam. Aff. 70:439–64
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018a. Global competition and Brexit. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:201–18
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Colantone I, Stanig P. 2018b. The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. Am. J. Political Sci. 62:936–53
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Costello R, Thomassen J, Rosema M 2012. European Parliament elections and political representation: policy congruence between voters and parties. West Eur. Politics 35:1226–48
    [Google Scholar]
  20. De Vries CE. 2018. The cosmopolitan-parochial divide: changing patterns of party and electoral competition in the Netherlands and beyond. J. Eur. Public Policy 25:1541–65
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dinas E, Matakos K, Xefteris D, Hangartner D 2019. Waking up the golden dawn: Does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties?. Political Anal 27:244–54
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dustmann C, Eichengreen B, Otten S, Sapir A, Tabellini G, Zoega G 2017. Europe's trust deficit: causes and remedies Rep., Cent. Econ. Policy Res London, UK: http://www.christiandustmann.com/content/4-research/11-europe-s-trust-deficit-causes-and-remedies/europe-s-trust-deficit-causes-and-remedies.pdf
  23. Dustmann C, Vasiljeva K, Piil Damm A 2018. Refugee migration and electoral outcomes. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86:2035–91
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Eatwell R, Goodwin M. 2018. National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy London: Penguin Books
  25. Engesser S, Ernst N, Esser F, Büchel F 2017. Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Inf. Commun. Soc. 20:81109–26
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Erikson EH. 1968. Identity, Youth, and Crisis New York: W.W. Norton
  27. Essletzbichler J, Disslbacher F, Moser M 2018. The victims of neoliberal globalisation and the rise of the populist vote: a comparative analysis of three recent electoral decisions. Cambridge J. Regions Econ. Soc. 11:73–94
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fearon JD. 1999. What is identity (as we now use the word)? Work. Pap., Dep. Political Sci., Stanford Univ.
  29. Foster C, Frieden J. 2017. Crisis of trust: socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. Eur. Union Politics 18:511–35
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fukuyama F. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  31. Gennaioli N,, Tabellini G 2019. Identity, beliefs, and political conflict CEPR Disc. Pap. 13390, Cent. Econ. Policy Res London, UK:
  32. Gest J, Reny T, Mayer J 2018. Roots of the radical right: nostalgic deprivation in the United States and Britain. Comp. Political Stud. 51:1694–719
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gidron N, Hall PA. 2017. The politics of social status: economic and cultural roots of the populist right. Br. J. Sociol. 68:S57–84
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Goodwin MJ, Heath O. 2016. The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: an aggregate‐level analysis of the result. Political Q 87:323–32
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Grossman GM, Helpman E. 2018. Identity politics and trade policy NBER Work. Pap25348
  36. Guiso L, Herrera H, Morelli M, Sonno T 2017. Populism: demand and supply CEPR Disc. Pap. 11871, Cent. Econ. Policy Res London, UK:
  37. Guiso L, Herrera H, Morelli M, Sonno T 2019. Global crises and populism: the role of Eurozone institutions. Econ. Policy 34:95–139
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hameleers M, Bos L, de Vreese CH 2017. “They did it”: the effects of emotionalized blame attribution in populist communication. Commun. Res. 44:870–900
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hameleers M, van der Meer TGLA 2019. Misinformation and polarization in a high-choice media environment: How effective are political fact-checkers. ? Commun. Res 47:227–50
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hangartner D, Dinas E, Marbach M, Matakos K, Xefteris D 2019. Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 113:442–55
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Harteveld E, Schaper J, De Lange SL, Van Der Brug W 2018. Blaming Brussels? The impact of (news about) the refugee crisis on attitudes towards the EU and national politics. J. Common Market Stud. 56:157–77
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hawkins KA, Rovira Kaltwasser C 2017. What the (ideational) study of populism can teach us, and what it can't. Swiss Political Sci. Rev. 23:526–42
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hix S, Noury A, Roland G 2005. Power to the parties: cohesion and competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001. Br. J. Political Sci. 35:209–34
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hix S, Noury A, Roland G 2019. Changing political cleavages in advanced democracies: evidence from the European Parliament Work. Pap., London Sch. Econ. Political Sci.
  45. Hix S, Noury AG, Roland G 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  46. Hobolt SB, Tilley J. 2016. Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West Eur. Politics 39:971–91
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hochschild JL. 2003. Pluralism, identity politics, and coalitions: toward Madisonian constitutionalism. The Future of American Democratic Politics: Principles and Practices G Pomper, M Weiner 11–28 New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hooghe L, Marks G. 2018. Cleavage theory meets Europe's crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. J. Eur. Public Policy 25:109–35
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Hutter S, Kriesi H, Vidal G 2018. Old versus new politics: the political spaces in Southern Europe in times of crises. Party Politics 24:10–22
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Inglehart RF, Norris P. 2016. Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash HKS Faculty Res Work. Pap. RWP16-026, Harvard Univ https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/trump-brexit-and-rise-populism-economic-have-nots-and-cultural-backlash
  51. Jankowski M, Schneider S, Tepe M 2017. Ideological alternative? Analyzing Alternative für Deutschland candidates’ ideal points via black box scaling. Party Politics 23:704–16
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Katsanidou A, Otjes S. 2016. How the European debt crisis reshaped national political space: the case of Greece. Eur. Union Politics 17:262–84
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kaufmann E. 2018. Whiteshift: Populism, Immigration and the Future of White Majorities London: Penguin Books
  54. Kitschelt H. 2018. Party systems and radical right-wing parties. The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right J Rydgren Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274559.013.9
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Krämer B. 2014. Media populism: a conceptual clarification and some theses on its effects. Commun. Theory 24:42–60
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Krastev I. 2017. After Europe Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  57. Kriesi H. 2010. Restructuration of partisan politics and the emergence of a new cleavage based on values. West Eur. Politics 33:673–85
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kriesi H. 2018. Revisiting the populist challenge. Politologický Časopis-Czech J. Political Sci. 25:5–27
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kriesi H, Grande E, Dolezal M, Helbling M, Höglinger D et al. 2012. Political Conflict in Western Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Kriesi H, Grande E, Lachat R, Dolezal M, Bornschier S, Frey T 2006. Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared. Eur. J. Political Res. 45:921–56
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Kriesi H, Grande E, Lachat R, Dolezal M, Bornschier S, Frey T 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Kriesi H, Pappas TS. 2015. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession Colchester, UK: ECPR Press
  63. Mair P. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations Oxford, UK: Clarendon
  64. Margalit Y. 2019. Political responses to economic shocks. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:277–95
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Marks G, Rovny J, Hooghe L 2017. Dealignment meets cleavage theory Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association San Francisco, CA: Aug. 31–Sep. 3
  66. Mazzoleni G. 2008. Populism and the media. Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy D Albertazzi, D McDonnell 49–64 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Milner HV. 2018. Globalization and its political consequences: the effects on party politics in the West Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Boston, MA: Aug. 30–Sep. 2
  68. Milner HV. 2019. Globalisation, populism and the decline of the welfare state. Survival Global Politics Strategy 61:91–95
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Moffitt B. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  70. Mudde C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  71. Mudde C, Kaltwasser CR. 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  72. Müller J-W. 2017. What is Populism? London: Penguin Books
  73. Müller P, Schemer C, Wettstein M, Schulz A, Wirz DS et al. 2017. The polarizing impact of news coverage on populist attitudes in the public: evidence from a panel study in four European democracies. J. Commun. 67:968–92
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Norris P, Inglehart R. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  75. O'Rourke K. 2019. A Short History of Brexit: From Brentry to Backstop London: Penguin Books
  76. Otjes S, Katsanidou A. 2017. Beyond Kriesiland: EU integration as a super issue after the Eurocrisis. Eur. J. Political Res. 56:301–19
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Pappas TS, Kriesi H. 2015. Populism and crisis: a fuzzy relationship. European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession H Kriesi, TS Pappas 303–25 Colchester, UK: ECPR Press
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Pastor L, Veronesi P. 2018. Inequality aversion, populism, and the backlash against globalization NBER Work. Pap 24900
  79. Piketty T. 2018. Brahmin left vs merchant right: rising inequality and the changing structure of political conflict WID.world Work. Pap. 7, World Inequality Database, World Inequality Lab, Paris Sch. Econ Paris, France:
  80. Polyakova A, Fligstein N. 2016. Is European integration causing Europe to become more nationalist? Evidence from the 2007–9 financial crisis. J. Eur. Public Policy 23:60–83
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Reinemann C, Aalberg T, Esser F, Strömbäck J, de Vreese CH 2016. Populist political communication: toward a model of its causes, forms, and effects. Populist Political Communication in Europe T Aalberg, F Esser, C Reinemann, J Strömbäck, CH de Vreese 22–36 New York/London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Reuter C, Hartwig K, Kirchner J, Schlegel N 2019. Fake news perception in Germany: a representative study of people's attitudes and approaches to counteract disinformation. Wirtschaftsinformatik 2019 Proceedings https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2019/track09/papers/5/
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Rodrik D. 2018. Populism and the economics of globalization. J. Int. Bus. Policy 1:12–33
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Roland G. 2019. Culture, institutions and development. The Handbook of Economic Development and Institutions JM Baland, F Bourguignon, J-P Platteau, T Verdier 12–25 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Rooduijn M. 2014. The mesmerising message: the diffusion of populism in public debates in Western European media. Political Stud 62:726–44
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Rooduijn M. 2019. State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A plea for both more and less focus. Eur. J. Political Res. 58:1362–72
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Rooduijn M, Burgoon B. 2018. The paradox of well-being: Do unfavorable socioeconomic and sociocultural contexts deepen or dampen radical left and right voting among the less well-off?. Comp. Political Stud. 51:1720–53
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Rovny AE, Rovny J. 2017. Outsiders at the ballot box: operationalizations and political consequences of the insider–outsider dualism. Socio-Economic Rev 15:161–85
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Schattschneider E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of American Democracy New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  90. Schradie J. 2019. The Revolution That Wasn't: How Digital Activism Favors Conservatives Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  91. Shayo M. 2020. Social identity and economic policy. Annu. Rev. Econ. 12:In press
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Stanley B. 2017. Populism in central and Eastern Europe. The Oxford Handbook of Populism C Rovira Kaltwasser, P Taggart, P Ochoa Espejo, P Ostiguy 140–60 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Steinmayr A. 2016. Exposure to refugees and voting for the far-right: (unexpected) results from Austria. IZA Disc. Pap. 9790. Inst. Labor Econ. (IZA) Bonn, Germany: https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp9790.html
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Stockemer D. 2016. Structural data on immigration or immigration perceptions? What accounts for the electoral success of the radical right in Europe?. J. Common Market Stud. 54:999–1016
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Stockemer D, Lentz T, Mayer D 2018. Individual predictors of the radical right-wing vote in Europe: a meta-analysis of articles in peer-reviewed journals (1995–2016). Gov. Opposition 53:569–93
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Taggart P. 2017. Populism in Western Europe. The Oxford Handbook of Populism C Rovira Kaltwasser, P Taggart, P Ochoa Espejo, P Ostiguy 248–63 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Tavits M, Potter JD. 2015. The effect of inequality and social identity on party strategies. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:744–58
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Van Aelst P, Strömbäck J, Aalberg T, Esser F, De Vreese C et al. 2017. Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 41:13–27
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Vertier P, Viskanic M. 2018. Dismantling the “jungle”: migrant relocation and extreme voting in France CESifo Work. Pap. 6927, CESifo Inst., Munich Germany:
  100. Zhuravskaya E, Petrova M, Enikolopov R 2020. Political effects of the internet and social media. Annu. Rev. Econ. 12: In press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033542
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-033542
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error