1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 25, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 25, 2022

Three Faces of Climate Justice

Abstract

There is overwhelming consensus about the science of climate change. Climate politics, however, remains volatile, driven by perceptions of injustice, which motivate policy resistance and undermine policy legitimacy. We identify three types of injustice. The first pertains to the uneven exposure to climate change impacts across countries and communities within a country. Socially, politically, and economically disadvantaged communities that have contributed the least to the climate crisis tend to be affected the most. To address climate change and its impacts, countries and subnational units have enacted a range of policies. But even carefully designed mitigation and adaptation policies distribute costs (the second justice dimension) and benefits (the third justice dimension) unevenly across sectors and communities, often reproducing existing inequalities. Climate justice requires paying careful attention to who bears the costs and who gets the benefits of both climate inaction and action.

Keyword(s): adaptation, climate equity, climate justice, just transition, mitigation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125514
2022-05-12
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/25/1/annurev-polisci-051120-125514.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125514&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams B, Kim H 2019. Early adopters of new supermarket products. Appl. Econ. Lett 26:141196–201
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ajibade I, Sullivan M, Haeffner M. 2020. Why climate migration is not managed retreat: six justifications. Glob. Environ. Change 65:102187
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aklin M, Mildenberger M. 2020. Prisoners of the wrong dilemma: why distributive conflict, not collective action, characterizes the politics of climate change. Global Environ. Politics 20:44–27
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Allan JA. 1998. Virtual water: a strategic resource. Ground Water 36:4545–47
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anguelovski I, Shi L, Chu E, Gallagher D, Goh K et al. 2016. Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: critical perspectives from the global north and south. J. Plan. Educ. Res 36:3333–48
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ARC (Appalach. Reg. Comm.) 2021. Classifying economic distress in Appalachian counties Vis. Statement, ARC Washington, DC: https://www.arc.gov/classifying-economic-distress-in-appalachian-counties/
  7. Barrett S. 2013. Local level climate justice? Adaptation finance and vulnerability reduction. Glob. Environ. Change 23:61819–29
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumol W, Oates W. 1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
  9. Bergquist P, Mildenberger M, Stokes L. 2020. Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US. Environ. Res. Lett 15:5054019
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Broad R, Cavanagh J. 2021. The Water Defenders: How Ordinary People Saved a Country from Corporate Greed New York: Beacon:
  11. Brooks D, Hoberg E, Boeger W. 2019. The Stockholm Paradigm: Climate Change and Emerging Disease Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  12. Brunnermeier S, Levinson A. 2004. Examining the evidence on environmental regulations and industry location. J. Environ. Dev 13:16–41
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bullard R. 1990. Dumping in Dixie: Race, Class and Environmental Quality Boulder, CO: Westview
  14. Bullard R, Johnson G. 2000. Environmental justice: grassroots activism and its impact on public policy decision making. J. Soc. Issues 56:555–78
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Burkett M. 2011. In search of refuge: Pacific Islands, climate-induced migration, and the legal frontier. Asia Pac. Issues 98:1–8
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Carley S, Konisky D 2020. The justice and equity implications of the clean energy transition. Nat. Energy 5:569–77
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Carlisle J, Kane S, Solan D, Joe JC 2014. Support for solar energy: examining sense of place and utility-scale development in California. Energy Res. Soc. Sci 3::124–30
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Carr E, Thomson M. 2014. Gender and climate change adaptation in agrarian settings. Geogr. Compass 8:3182–97
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Castellano R, Dolsak N, Prakash A. 2021. Willingness to help climate migrants: a survey experiment in the Korail slum of Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLOS ONE 16:4e0249315
     [Google Scholar]
  20. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control Prev.) 2008. Heat related deaths among crop workers—United States, 1992–2006. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 57:1–5
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Chan G, Evans I, Grimley M, Ihde B, Mazumder P. 2017. Design choices and equity implications of community shared solar. Electr. J 30:937–41
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Conca K, Weinthal E, eds. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Water Politics and Policy Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  23. Crow B, Sultana F. 2002. Gender, class, and access to water: three cases in a poor and crowded delta. Soc. Nat. Resour 15:8709–24
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cushing L, Wander M, Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Zhu A, Sadd J 2016. A preliminary environmental equity assessment of California's cap and trade program Res. Brief, USC Dornsife Los Angeles: https://dornsife.usc.edu/PERE/enviro-equity-CA-cap-trade
  25. Davis L, Sallee J 2020. Should electric vehicle drivers pay a mileage tax?. Environ. Energy Policy Econ 1:165–94
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Deberdt R, Le Billon P. 2021. Conflict minerals and battery materials supply chains: a mapping review of responsible sourcing initiatives. Extr. Ind. Soc. 8:100935
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dolšak N, Adolph C, Prakash A 2020. Policy design and public support for carbon tax: evidence from a 2018 US national online survey experiment. Public Adm. 98:4905–21
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Dolšak N, Prakash A. 2015. Confronting the “China excuse”: the political logic of climate change adaptation. Solutions 6:27–29
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Dolšak N, Prakash A. 2016. We feel your pain: environmentalists, coal miners, and “embedded environmentalism.”. Solutions 7:32–37
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Dolšak N, Prakash A. 2018. The politics of climate change adaptation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 43:317–41
     [Google Scholar]
  31. EIA (US Energy Inf. Adm.) 2021. Electricity explained: electricity generation, capacity, and sales in the United States Fact Sheet, EIA Washington, DC: https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php
  32. Eid C, Guillén J, Marín P, Hakvoort R 2014. The economic effect of electricity net-metering with solar PV: consequences for network cost recovery, cross subsidies and policy objectives. Energy Policy 75::244–54
     [Google Scholar]
  33. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2017. Environmental justice timeline Timeline, EPA Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/environmental-justice-timeline
  34. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2021. Using trees and vegetation to reduce heat islands Environ. Top., EPA Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/heatislands/using-trees-and-vegetation-reduce-heat-islands
  35. Farrell N, Lyons S. 2016. Equity impacts of energy and climate policy: Who is shouldering the burden?. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ 5:5492–509
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fruh K. 2021. Climate change driven displacement and justice: the role of reparations. Essays Philos 22:1/2102–21
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Frynas J, Paulo M. 2007. A new scramble for African oil? Historical, political, and business perspectives. Afr. Aff 106:423229–51
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gaikwad N, Genovese F, Tingley D 2021. Climate action from abroad: assessing mass support for cross-border climate compensation Work. Pap., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  39. Gardiner S. 2006. A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environ. Values 15:3397–413
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Gasparatos A, Doll C, Esteban M, Ahmed A, Olang T 2017. Renewable energy and biodiversity: implications for transitioning to a Green Economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 70:161–84
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Gonzalez F. 2012. Distributional effects of carbon taxes: the case of Mexico. Energy Econ 34:62102–15
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gosseries A. 2004. Historical emissions and free riding. Ethical Perspect 11:36–60
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Goulder L. 2013. Markets for pollution allowances: What are the (new) lessons?. J. Econ. Perspect 27:187–102
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Greenhill B, Dolšak N, Prakash A. 2018. Exploring the adaptation–mitigation relationship: Does information on the costs of adapting to climate change influence support for mitigation?. Environ. Commun 12:7911–27
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Grösche P, Schröder C. 2014. On the redistributive effects of Germany's feed-in tariff. Empir. Econ 46:1339–83
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Guo S, Kontou E. 2021. Disparities and equity issues in electric vehicles rebate allocation. Energy Policy 154:112291
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Gupta J. 2009. Climate change and development cooperation: trends and questions. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain 1:2207–13
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hagerman S, Jaramillo P, Morgan M. 2016. Is rooftop solar PV at socket parity without subsidies?. Energy Policy 89:84–94
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Harper K, Rajan R 2007. International environmental justice: building the natural assets of the world's poor. Reclaiming Nature: Environmental Justice and Ecological Restoration JK Boyce, S Narain, EA Stanton 327–50 London: Anthem
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Hayward T. 1997. Anthropocentrism: a misunderstood problem. Environ. Values 6:149–63
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hayward T. 2007. Human rights versus emissions rights: climate justice and the equitable distribution of ecological space. Ethics Int. Aff 21:4431–50
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Helbling M. 2020. Attitudes towards climate change migrants. Clim. Change 160:89–102
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hernandez-Cortes D, Meng K. 2020. Do environmental markets cause environmental injustice? Evidence from California's carbon market NBER Work. Pap 27205
  54. Hoffman J, Shandas V, Pendleton N. 2020. The effects of historical housing policies on resident exposure to intra-urban heat: a study of 108 US urban areas. Climate 8:112
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Holtsmark B, Skonhoft A. 2014. The Norwegian support and subsidy policy of electric cars. Should it be adopted by other countries?. Environ. Sci. Policy 42:160–68
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Howell J, Elliott JR. 2018. As disaster costs rise, so does inequality. Socius 4: 2018.2378023118816795
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hsu C, Fingerman K. 2021. Public electric vehicle charger access disparities across race and income in California. Transp. Policy 100:59–67
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hummel S. 2017. Relative water scarcity and country relations along cross-boundary rivers: evidence from the Aral Sea basin. Int. Stud. Q 61:4795–808
     [Google Scholar]
  59. IEA (Int. Energy Agency) 2021. The role of critical minerals in clean energy transitions Flagship Rep., IEA Paris: https://www.iea.org/reports/the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions
  60. IHS Markit 2020. Average age of cars and light trucks in the U.S. approaches 12 years News Release, July 28 IHS Markit London: https://news.ihsmarkit.com/prviewer/release_only/slug/bizwire-2020-7-28-average-age-of-cars-and-light-trucks-in-the-us-approaches-12-years-according-to-ihs-markit
  61. Jenkins K. 2018. Setting energy justice apart from the crowd: lessons from environmental and climate justice. Energy Res. Soc. Sci 39:117–21
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Jenn A, Springel K, Gopal A 2018. Effectiveness of electric vehicle incentives in the United States. Energy Policy 119:349–56
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Johnson T. 2019. The Dakota Access pipeline and the breakdown of participatory processes in environmental decision-making. Environ. Commun 13:3335–52
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Juliana v. United States 947 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2020.)
  65. Klinsky S, Dowlatabadi H. 2009. Conceptualizations of justice in climate policy. Clim. Policy 9:188–108
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Kolstad C, Urama K, Broome J, Bruvoll A, Carino Olvera M et al. 2014. Social, economic and ethical concepts and methods. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, E Farahani, S Kadner et al.173–248 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Konisky D. 2009. Inequities in enforcement? Environmental justice and government performance. J. Policy Anal. Manag 28:1102–21
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Kopnina H, Washington H, Taylor B, Piccolo J 2018. Anthropocentrism: more than just a misunderstood problem. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 31:1109–27
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Kraft M, Scheberle D. 1995. Environmental justice and the allocation of risk: the case of lead and public health. Policy Stud. J 23:1113–22
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Laswell H. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, How New York: Meridian
  71. Lee H, Clark A 2018. Charging the future: challenges and opportunities for electric vehicle adoption Work. Pap. RWP18-026 Kennedy Sch. Gov., Harvard Univ. Cambridge, MA:
  72. Li Z, Konisky D, Zirogiannis N 2019. Racial, ethnic, and income disparities in air pollution: a study of excess emissions in Texas. PLOS ONE 14:e0220696
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Lim S, Prakash A. 2020. How the opposing pressures of industrialization and democratization influence clean water access in urban and rural areas: a panel study, 1991–2010. Environ. Policy Gov 30:4182–95
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Liu W, Agusdinata D. 2020. Interdependencies of lithium mining and communities sustainability in Salar de Atacama, Chile. J. Clean. Prod 260:120838
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Macey J, Salovaara J. 2019. Bankruptcy as bailout: coal company insolvency and the erosion of federal law. Stanford Law Rev 71:4879
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts J. 2009. Environmental justice. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour 34:405–30
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Morris A, Kaufman N, Doshi S. 2021. Revenue at risk in coal-reliant counties. Environ. Energy Policy Econ 2:183–116
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Muehlegger E, Rapson D. 2019. Understanding the distributional impacts of vehicle policy: Who buys new and used electric vehicles? Policy Brief, Inst. Transp. Stud., Univ. Calif., Davis https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1q259456
  79. Mukherjee I, Sovacool B. 2014. Palm oil–based biofuels and sustainability in southeast Asia: a review of Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 37:1–12
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Murray B, Rivers N 2015. British Columbia's revenue-neutral carbon tax: a review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy 86:674–83
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Nardone A, Casey J, Morello-Frosch R, Mujahid M, Balmes J, Thakur N. 2020. Associations between historical residential redlining and current age-adjusted rates of emergency department visits due to asthma across eight cities in California: an ecological study. Lancet Planet. Health 4:1e24–31
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Nelson V, Meadows K, Cannon T, Morton J, Martin A 2002. Uncertain predictions, invisible impacts, and the need to mainstream gender in climate change adaptations. Gender Dev. 10:251–59
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Newell P, Mulvaney D. 2013. The political economy of the ‘just transition. ’. Geogr. J 179:2132–40
     [Google Scholar]
  84. NOAA (Natl. Ocean. Atm. Adm.) 2021. Future heat events and social vulnerability Data Vis., NOAA Washington, DC: https://nihhis.cpo.noaa.gov/vulnerability-mapping
  85. Ostrom E. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 20:4550–57
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Plötz P, Schneider U, Globisch J, Dütschke E 2014. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transp. Res. A 67:96–109
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Posner E, Weisbach D. 2010. Climate Change Justice Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  88. Pralle S. 2019. Drawing lines: FEMA and the politics of mapping flood zones. Clim. Change 152:227–37
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Revesz R, Unel B. 2018. The future of distributed generation: moving past net metering. Environ. Law Rep 48:10719
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Rigaud K, de Sherbinin A, Jones B, Bergmann J, Clement V et al. 2018. Groundswell: Preparing for Internal Climate Migration Washington, DC: World Bank
  91. Ritchie H. 2020. Cars, planes, trains: Where do CO2 emissions from transport come from?. Our World in Data Blog Oct. 6. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Roberts C. 2014. EPA existing source emissions rule puts American jobs at risk, does nothing to address climate change News Release, June 2 United Mine Work. Am. Triangle, VA: http://www.ibew.org/Portals/74/Documents/UMWA-Press-Release-on-EPA-Carbon-Emissions.pdf
  93. Rosa L, Chiarelli D, Tu C, Rulli M, D'Odorico P. 2019. Global unsustainable virtual water flows in agricultural trade. Environ. Res. Lett 14:11114001
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Ross M. 2015. What have we learned about the resource curse?. Annu. Rev. Political Sci 18:239–59
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Ruggie J. 1982. International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. Int. Organ 36:2379–415
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Savage E. 2021. Repairing the damage: the costs of delaying reclamation at modern-era mines Rep., Appalachian Voices Durham, NC: https://appvoices.org/resources/RepairingTheDamage_ReclamationAtModernMines.pdf
  97. Schlosberg D, Collins L. 2014. From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 5:3359–74
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Semenza J, Rubin C, Falter K, Selanikio J, Flanders W et al. 1996. Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. N. Engl. J. Med 335:284–90
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Siders AR. 2019. Social justice implications of US managed retreat buyout programs. Clim. Change 152:239–57
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Smith E, Mayer A 2018. A social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Glob. Environ. Change 49:140–53
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Sovacool B, Ali S, Bazilian M, Radley B, Nemery B et al. 2020. Sustainable minerals and metals for a low-carbon future. Science 367:647330–33
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Spilker G, Nguyen Q, Koubi V, Böhmelt T 2020. Attitudes of urban residents towards environmental migration in Kenya and Vietnam. Nat. Climate Change 10:7622–27
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Stanley S, Williamson J 2021. Attitudes towards climate change aid and climate refugees in New Zealand: an exploration of policy support and ideological barriers. Environ. Politics https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1892982
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  104. Stevis D, Felli R. 2015. Global labour unions and just transition to a green economy. Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ 15:129–43
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Sunter D, Castellanos S, Kammen D 2019. Disparities in rooftop photovoltaics deployment in the United States by race and ethnicity. Nat. Sustain 2:171–76
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Terry G. 2009. No climate justice without gender justice: an overview of the issues. Gend. Dev 17:15–18
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Tessum CW, Apte JS, Goodkind AL, Muller NZ, Mullins KA et al. 2019. Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure. PNAS 116:136001–6
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Thomas K, Warner B 2019. Weaponizing vulnerability to climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 57:101928
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Thorpe R. 2015. Perverse politics: the persistence of mass imprisonment in the twenty-first century. Perspect. Politics 13:3618–37
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Tong K, Ramaswami A, Xu C, Feiock R, Schmitz P, Ohlsen M. 2021. Measuring social equity in urban energy use and interventions using fine-scale data. PNAS 118:24e2023554118
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Uji A, Prakash A, Song J. 2021. Does the “NIMBY syndrome” undermine public support for nuclear power in Japan?. Energy Policy 148:111944
     [Google Scholar]
  112. van der Ploeg F, Rezai A. 2020. Stranded assets in the transition to a carbon-free economy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ 12:281–98
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Vijay V, Pimm S, Jenkins C, Smith S. 2016. The impacts of oil palm on recent deforestation and biodiversity loss. PLOS ONE 11:7e0159668
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Wee S, Coffman M, La Croix S. 2018. Do electric vehicle incentives matter? Evidence from the 50 US states. Res. Policy 47:91601–10
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Wilson J, 1980. The Politics of Regulation New York: Basic
  116. Yang Y, Campana P, Yan J 2020. Potential of unsubsidized distributed solar PV to replace coal-fired power plants, and profits classification in Chinese cities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 131:109967
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Zeitoun M, Mirumachi N, Warner J 2020. Water Conflicts: Analysis for Transformation Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-125514
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error