1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 20, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 20, 2017

Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States

Abstract

This article analyzes voter identification laws in the United States and their effects on voter turnout. Theoretically, there are plausible reasons to hypothesize turnout lowering effects, though there are also reasons to hypothesize those effects might be minimal. Methodologically, there are research design hurdles to clear in order to produce effect estimates that may be attributed to voter identification laws. Empirically, a small number of studies have employed suitable research designs and generally find modest, if any, turnout effects of voter identification laws. This may indicate that voter identification laws have only minor effects on turnout, or it may be due to the fact that the type of voter identification law that may have the most significant effects—a strict photo identification law—is a relatively recent phenomenon. Future elections and the related additional data may make it possible to adjudicate among these possibilities.

Keyword(s): election administration, electoral rules, photo identification, voting laws
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822
2017-05-11
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-051215-022822.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. 2010. Synthetic control methods for comparative case studies: estimating the effect of California's tobacco control program. J. Am. Stat. Control Assoc. 105:493–505 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aldrich JH. 1993. Rational choice and turnout. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37:246–78 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez MR, Bailey D, Katz JN. 2008. The Effect of Voter Identification Laws on Turnout Pasadena: Calif. Inst. Technol.
  4. Alvarez MR, Bailey D, Katz JN. 2011. An empirical Bayes approach to estimating ordinal treatment effects. Polit. Anal. 19:20–31 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ansolabehere S. 2009. Effects of identification requirements on voting: evidence from the experiences of voters on Election Day. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 42:127–30 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ansolabehere S, Konisky DM. 2006. The introduction of voter registration and its effect on turnout. Polit. Anal. 14:83–100 [Google Scholar]
  7. Atkeson LR, Bryant LA, Hall TE, Saunders KL, Alvarez MR. 2010. A new barrier to participation: heterogeneous application of voter identification policies. Elect. Stud. 29:66–73 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bali VA, Silver BD. 2006. Politics, race, and American state electoral reforms after election 2000. State Polit. Policy Q. 6:21–48 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barreto MA, Nuño SA, Sanchez GR. 2009. The disproportionate impact of voter-ID requirements on the electorate—new evidence from Indiana. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 42:111–16 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bentele KG, O'Brien EE. 2013. Jim Crow 2.0? Why states consider and adopt restrictive voter access policies. Perspect. Polit. 11:1088–116 [Google Scholar]
  11. Biggers DR, Hanmer MJ. 2017. Understanding the adoption of voter identification laws in the American states. Am. Polit. Res. In press
  12. Burden BC, Neiheisel JR. 2013. Election administration and the pure effect of voter registration on turnout. Polit. Res. Q. 66:77–90 [Google Scholar]
  13. CFER (Comm. Fed. Elect. Reform). 2005. Building confidence in U.S. elections Rep., Comm. Fed. Elect. Reform, Cent. Democr. Elect. Manag., Am. Univ., Washington, DC
  14. Citrin J, Green DP, Levy M. 2014. The effects of voter ID notification on voter turnout: results from a large-scale field experiment. Election Law J 13:228–42 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cobb RV, Greiner DJ, Quinn KM. 2012. Can voter ID laws be administered in a race-neutral manner? Evidence from the city of Boston in 2008. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 7:1–33 [Google Scholar]
  16. De Alth S. 2009. ID at the polls: assessing the impact of recent state voter ID laws on voter turnout. Harvard Law Policy Rev 3:185–202 [Google Scholar]
  17. de Figueiredo RJP Jr. 2003. Budget institutions and political insulation: why states adopt the item veto. J. Public Econ. 87:2677–701 [Google Scholar]
  18. Downs A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy New York: Harper & Row
  19. Dropp KA. 2013. Voter identification laws and voter turnout Unpublished manuscript. http://kyledropp.weebly.com/current-research.html
  20. Erikson RS, Minnite LC. 2009. Modeling problems in the voter identification–voter turnout debate. Election Law J 8:85–101 [Google Scholar]
  21. GAO (Gov. Account. Off.). 2014. Issues related to state voter identification laws Rep., U.S. Gov. Account. Off., Washington, DC
  22. Gillespie JA. 2015. Voter identification and black voter turnout: an examination of black voter turnout patterns in Georgia, 2000–2014. Phylon 52:43–67 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hajnal Z, Lajevardi N. 2015. Voter identification laws and the suppression of minority votes Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Sept. 3–6, San Francisco
  24. Hale K, McNeal R. 2010. Election administration reform and state choice: voter identification requirements and HAVA. Policy Stud. J. 38:281–302 [Google Scholar]
  25. Hanmer MJ. 2009. Discount Voting: Voter Registration Reforms and Their Effects New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  26. Hicks WD, McKee SC, Sellers MD, Smith DA. 2015. A principle or a strategy? Voter identification laws and partisan competition in the American states. Polit. Res. Q. 68:18–33 [Google Scholar]
  27. Highton B. 2004. Voter registration and turnout in the United States. Perspect. Polit. 2:507–15 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hood MVI, Bullock CSI. 2008. Worth a thousand words? An analysis of Georgia's voter identification statute. Am. Polit. Res. 36:555–79 [Google Scholar]
  29. Hood MVI, Bullock CSI. 2012. Much ado about nothing? An empirical assessment of the Georgia voter identification statute. State Polit. Policy Q. 12:394–414 [Google Scholar]
  30. Keele L, Minozzi W. 2013. How much is Minnesota like Wisconsin? Assumptions and counterfactuals in causal inference with observational data. Polit. Anal. 21:193–216 [Google Scholar]
  31. Key VOJ. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation New York: Alfred A. Knopf
  32. Keyssar A. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States New York: Basic Books
  33. Knee MR, Green DP. 2011. The effects of registration laws on voter turnout: an updated assessment. Facing the Challenge of Democracy: Explorations in the Analysis of Public Opinion and Political Participation ed. PM Sniderman, B Highton 312–28 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Kousser JM. 1974. The Shaping of Southern Politics: Suffrage Restrictions and the Establishment of the One-Party South, 1880–1910 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ Press
  35. McKee SC. 2015. Politics is local: state legislator voting on restrictive voter identification legislation. Res. Polit. 2:32053168015589804 [Google Scholar]
  36. Milyo J. 2007. The effects of photographic identification on voter turnout in Indiana: a county-level analysis Rep., Inst. Public Policy, Univ. Missouri, Columbia
  37. Mycoff JD, Wagner MW, Wilson DC. 2009. The empirical effects of voter-ID laws: present or absent. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 42:121–26 [Google Scholar]
  38. NCSBE (N. C. State Board Elect.). 2013. April 2013 SBOE-DMV ID analysis Memo, N.C. State Board Elect., Raleigh. http://nc-democracy.org/downloads/SBOE-DMVMatchMemoApril2013.pdf
  39. NCSL (Natl. Conf. State Legis.). 2016a. Voter ID history Natl. Conf. State Legis Washington, DC: http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id-history.aspx
  40. NCSL (Natl. Conf. State Legis.). 2016b. Voter identification requirements/voter ID laws Natl. Conf. State Legis Washington, DC: http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx
  41. NCSL (Natl. Conf. State Legis.). 2016c. Voter verification without ID documents Natl. Conf. State Legis. Washington, DC: http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-verification-without-id-documents.aspx
  42. Pastor RA, Santos R, Prevost A, Stoilov V. 2010. Voting and ID requirements: a survey of registered voters in three states. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 40:461–81 [Google Scholar]
  43. Riker WH, Ordeshook PC. 1968. A theory of the calculus of voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 62:25–43 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rocha RR, Matsubayashi T. 2014. The politics of race and voter ID laws in the States: the return of Jim Crow?. Polit. Res. Q. 673:666–79 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosenstone SJ, Hansen JM. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America New York: Macmillan
  46. Rusk JG, Stucker JJ. 1978. The effect of the Southern system of election laws on voting participation. The History of American Electoral Behavior JH Silbey, AG Bogue, WH Flanigan 198–250 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Sekhon JS. 2008. The Neyman-Rubin model of causal inference and estimation via matching methods. Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology J Box-Steffensmeier, HE Brady, D Collier 271–99 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Sobel R. 2009. Voter-ID issues in politics and political science. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 42:81–85 [Google Scholar]
  49. Stewart C III. 2013. Voter ID: Who has them? Who shows them?. Okla. Law Rev. 66:21–52 [Google Scholar]
  50. Valentino NA, Neuner FG. 2016. Why the sky didn't fall: mobilizing anger in reaction to voter ID laws. Polit. Psychol. In press
  51. Verba S, Schlozman KL, Brady HE. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  52. Vercellotti T, Andersen D. 2009. Voter-identification requirements and the learning curve. PS Polit. Sci. Polit. 42:117–20 [Google Scholar]
  53. White AR, Nathan NL, Faller JK. 2015. What do I need to vote? Bureaucratic discretion and discrimination by local election officials. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 109:129–42 [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilson SE, Butler DM. 2007. A lot more to do: the sensitivity of time-series cross-section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Polit. Anal. 15:101–23 [Google Scholar]
  55. Wolfinger RE, Rosenstone SJ. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822
Loading
Voter Identification Laws and Turnout in the United States
Annual Review of Political Science 20, 149 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-022822
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error