1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 23, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 23, 2020

Climate Change and Work: Politics and Power

Abstract

Climate warming is the fundamental challenge of our time, not only because it will radically transform our natural environment but also because it will redefine jobs and livelihoods. This article builds an interpretive bridge for understanding the political consequences of how climate change pressures will affect work, production, and technology. We organize this review along three themes: commodification and the processes through which costs and resources are made visible; the production of knowledge and the politics of representing the future; and just transitions and how to distribute the costs and the opportunities of change equitably. These themes all address the ways that the dominance of the market—both in rhetoric and in policy—eclipses the materiality of economic production and social exchange. Together, however, the three themes also allow us to contemplate new political and institutional actions for tackling the twinned challenges of mitigating climate change and safeguarding our livelihoods.

Keyword(s): climate change, commodification, future of work, gender, just transition, knowledge
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061418-095236
2020-05-11
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/23/1/annurev-polisci-061418-095236.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061418-095236&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adler PS, Borys B. 1989. Automation and skill: three generations of research on the NC case. Politics Soc 17:3377–402
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahlquist JS. 2017. Labor unions, political representation, and economic inequality. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 20:409–32
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahlquist JS, Levi M. 2013. In the Interest of Others: Organizations and Social Activism Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  4. Arora-Jonsson S. 2011. Virtue and vulnerability: discourses on women, gender and climate change. Glob. Environ. Change 21:2744–51
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Attewell P. 1990. What is skill?. Work Occup 17:4422–48
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bachram H. 2004. Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: the new trade in greenhouse gases. Capitalism Nat. Socialism 15:45–20
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Barry J. 2013. Trade unions and the transition from “actually existing unsustainability”: from economic crisis to a new political economy beyond growth. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013 22–41
  8. Beane M. 2019. Shadow learning: building robotic surgical skill when approved means fail. Adm. Sci. Q. 64:187–123
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Berger S, Dore RP. 1996. National Diversity and Global Capitalism Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  10. Berk G, Galvan D. 2009. How people experience and change institutions: a field guide to creative syncretism. Theory Soc 38:6543
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bidadanure JU. 2019. The political theory of universal basic income. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:481–501
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Block F. 2019. Problems with the concept of capitalism in the social sciences. Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 51:51166–77
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bohr J. 2017. Is it hot in here or is it just me? Temperature anomalies and political polarization over global warming in the American public. Climatic Change 142:1–2271–85
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Boyd E. 2009. Governing the clean development mechanism: global rhetoric versus local realities in carbon sequestration projects. Environ. Plann. A: Econ. Space 41:102380–95
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brecher J. 2018. Climate solidarity: workers versus warming. New Labor Forum 27:196–104
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Brenner N, Peck J, Theodore N 2010. Variegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways. Glob. Netw. 10:2182–222
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Brulle RJ, Carmichael J, Jenkins JC 2012. Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the US, 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114:2169–88
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies New York: W.W. Norton
  19. Bumpus AG. 2011. The matter of carbon: understanding the materiality of tCO2e in carbon offsets. Antipode 43:3612–38
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Burawoy M. 1982. Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  21. Burgmann V. 2012. From ‘jobs versus environment’ to ‘green-collar jobs’: Australian trade unions and the climate change debate. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013 131–45
  22. Card D, Lemieux T, Riddell WC 2004. Unions and wage inequality. J. Labor Res. 25:4519–59
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Christensen D, Wibbels E. 2014. Labor standards, labor endowments, and the evolution of inequality. Int. Stud. Q. 58:2362–79
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Corson C, MacDonald KI. 2012. Enclosing the global commons: the convention on biological diversity and green grabbing. J. Peasant Stud. 39:2263–83
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Cutler MJ. 2016. Class, ideology, and severe weather: how the interaction of social and physical factors shape climate change threat perceptions among coastal US residents. Environ. Sociol. 2:3275–85
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dore R, Lazonick W, O'Sullivan M 1999. Varieties of capitalism in the twentieth century. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 15:4102–20
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dunlap RE, McCright AM. 2011. Organized climate change denial. In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Societyed JS Dryzec, RB Norgaard, D Schlosbergpp. 144–60 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Edwards R. 1982. Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century New York: Basic Books
  29. Ervine K. 2014. Diminishing returns: carbon market crisis and the future of market-dependent climate change finance. New Political Econ 19:5723–47
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Evans G, Phelan L. 2016. Transition to a post-carbon society: linking environmental justice and just transition discourses. Energy Policy 99:329–39
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fairhead J, Leach M, Scoones I 2012. Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?. J. Peasant Stud. 39:2237–61
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Farber H. 2005. Nonunion wage rates and the threat of unionization. ILR Rev 58:3335–52
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Farrell J. 2016. Corporate funding and ideological polarization about climate change. PNAS 113:192–97
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Felli R. 2014. An alternative socio-ecological strategy? International trade unions’ engagement with climate change. Rev. Int. Political Econ. 21:2372–98
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Felli R. 2015. Environment, not planning: the neoliberal depoliticisation of environmental policy by means of emissions trading. Environ. Politics 24:5641–60
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Florida R, Kenney M. 1990. The Breakthrough Illusion:. Corporate America's Failure to Move from Innovation to Mass Production New York: Basic Books
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ford M. 2015. Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future New York: Basic Books
  38. Freudenburg WR, Muselli V. 2013. Reexamining climate change debates: scientific disagreement or scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs)?. Am. Behav. Sci. 57:6777–95
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Frey CB, Osborne MA. 2017. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?. Technol. Forecasting Soc. Change 114:254–80
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Frumhoff PC, Heede R, Oreskes N 2015. The climate responsibilities of industrial carbon producers. Climatic Change 132:2157–71
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Fumagalli A. 2011. Twenty theses on contemporary capitalism (cognitive biocapitalism). Angelaki 16:37–17
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Gittleman M, Kleiner MM. 2015. Wage effects of unionization and occupational licensing coverage in the United States. ILR Rev 69:1142–72
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Goldfield M. 1989. Worker insurgency, radical organization, and New Deal labor legislation. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 83:41257–82
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Goldfield M, Bromsen A. 2013. The changing landscape of US unions in historical and theoretical perspective. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 16:231–57
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Gough I. 2010. Economic crisis, climate change and the future of welfare states. Twenty-First Century Soc 5:151–64
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Grasso M. 2019. Oily politics: a critical assessment of the oil and gas industry's contribution to climate change. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 50:106–15
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Green DA, Riddell WC. 2003. Literacy and earnings: an investigation of the interaction of cognitive and unobserved skills in earnings generation. Labour Econ 10:2165–84
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Greve B. 2017. Technology and the Future of Work: The Impact on Labour Markets and Welfare States Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar
  49. Gupta S, Lerner S, McCartin J 2018. It's not the ‘future of work,’ it's the future of workers that's in doubt. Am. Prospect. Aug. 31. https://prospect.org/article/its-not-future-work-its-future-workers-doubt
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hall PA, Soskice D. 2001. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantageed PA Hall, D Soskicepp. 1–68 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hampton P. 2015. Workers and Trade Unions for Climate Solidarity: Tackling Climate Change in a Neoliberal World Abingdon, UK/New York, NY: Routledge
  52. Hard M, Jamison A. 2013. Hubris and Hybrids: A Cultural History of Technology and Science New York: Routledge
  53. Harris MS. 2014. The myth of techno-transcendence: the rhetoric of the singularity PhD Thesis, Univ Kansas, Lawrence, KS:
  54. Harwell D. 2019. As Walmart turns to robots, it's the human workers who feel like machines. Washington Post June 12. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/06/06/walmart-turns-robots-its-human-workers-who-feel-like-machines/?utm_term=.7cceecfa10f5
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Henriksson L. 2013. Cars, crisis, climate change and class struggle. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013 8–86
  56. Herrigel G, Sabel CF. 1999. Craft production in crisis: industrial restructuring in Germany during the 1990s. The German Skills Machine: Sustaining Comparative Advantage in a Global Economy P Culpepper, D Finegold 77–114 New York: Berghahn Books
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hertel-Fernandez A. 2018. Policy feedback as political weapon: conservative advocacy and the demobilization of the public sector labor movement. Perspect. Politics 16:2364–79
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hicks AM, Swank DH. 1992. Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960–82. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 86:3658–74
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hochschild A. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  60. Hoffarth MR, Hodson G. 2016. Green on the outside, red on the inside: perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change. J. Environ. Psychol. 45:40–49
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Howe PD. 2018. Perceptions of seasonal weather are linked to beliefs about global climate change: evidence from Norway. Climatic Change 148:4467–80
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hughes JJ. 2012. The politics of transhumanism and the techno-millennial imagination, 1626–2030. Zygon 47:4757–76
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Irfan U. 2019. The Green New Deal is fracturing a critical base for Democrats: unions. Vox June 19. https://www.vox.com/2019/5/22/18628299/green-new-deal-labor-union-2020-democrats
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Iskander N, Lowe N. 2010. Hidden talent: tacit skill formation and labor market incorporation of Latino immigrants in the United States. J. Plann. Educ. Res. 30:2132–46
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Jamieson D. 2014. Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed—and What It Means for Our Future Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  66. Javeline D. 2014. The most important topic political scientists are not studying: adapting to climate change. Perspect. Politics 12:2420–34
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Kelly K. 2017. The Inevitable: Understanding the 12 Technological Forces That Will Shape Our Future New York: Penguin
  68. Kenney M, Zysman J. 2016. The rise of the platform economy. Issues Sci. Technol. 32:361–69
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Keohane RO. 2015. The global politics of climate change: challenge for political science. PS: Political Sci. Politics 48:119–26
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Kinniburgh C. 2019. Climate politics after the Yellow Vests. Dissent 66:2115–25
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Krange O, Kaltenborn BP, Hultman M 2019. Cool dudes in Norway: climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men. Environ. Sociol. 5:11–11
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Kurzweil R. 2000. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence New York: Penguin
  73. Kurzweil R. 2005. The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology New York: Penguin
  74. Larson AM, Solis D, Duchelle AE, Atmadja S, Resosudarmo IAP et al. 2018. Gender lessons for climate initiatives: a comparative study of REDD+ impacts on subjective wellbeing. World Dev 108:86–102
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Latour B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime Cambridge, UK/Medford, MA: Polity
  76. Layfield D. 2013. Turning carbon into gold: the financialisation of international climate policy. Environ. Politics 22:6901–17
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Lazonick W, Lazonick WH. 1990. Competitive Advantage on the Shop Floor Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  78. Lazonick W, Mazzucato M. 2013. The risk-reward nexus in the innovation-inequality relationship: Who takes the risks? Who gets the rewards?. Ind. Corp. Change 22:41093–128
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Leiserowitz AA, Maibach EWl, Roser-Renouf C 2013. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. Am. Behav. Sci. 57:6818–37
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Lo AY, Spash CL. 2012. How green is your scheme? Greenhouse gas control the Australian way. Energy Policy 50:150–53
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lockwood M. 2018. Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages. Environ. Politics 27:4712–32
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Lohmann L. 2010. Uncertainty markets and carbon markets: variations on Polanyian themes. New Political Econ 15:2225–54
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Lövbrand E, Beck S, Chilvers J, Forsyth T, Hedrén J et al. 2015. Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Glob. Environ. Change 32:211–18
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Lovell H, Liverman D. 2010. Understanding carbon offset technologies. New Political Econ 15:2255–73
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Lowe N. 2019. Innovation and opportunity: securing work in an age of automation Paper presented at the Association of American Geographers Annual Meeting Washington, DC:
  86. MacKenzie D. 2009. Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Account. Organ. Soc. 34:3–4440–55
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Maria-Tome Gil B. 2013. Moving towards eco-unionism: reflecting the Spanish experience. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013 64–77
  88. Mateescu A, Elish MC. 2019. AI in context: the labor of integrating new technologies Rep., Data & Soc., New York. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/DataandSociety_AIinContext.pdf
  89. Mazzucato M. 2015. The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public Versus Private Sector Myths London: Anthem
  90. McAfee K. 2012. Nature in the market-world: ecosystem services and inequality. Development 55:125–33
     [Google Scholar]
  91. McAfee K. 2014. The post- and future politics of green economy and REDD. The Politics of Carbon Markets S Benjamin, L Richard 238–56 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  92. McCarthy J. 2019. Authoritarianism, populism, and the environment: comparative experiences, insights, and perspectives. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geographers 109:2301–13
     [Google Scholar]
  93. McCright AM, Dunlap RE. 2011. Cool dudes: the denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Glob. Environ. Change 21:41163–72
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Meckling J. 2011a. Carbon Coalitions: Business, Climate Politics, and the Rise of Emissions Trading Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  95. Meckling J. 2011b. The globalization of carbon trading: transnational business coalitions in climate politics. Glob. Environ. Politics 11:226–50
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Mitchell T. 2011. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil London/New York: Verso Books
  97. Moore JW. 2015. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital London/New York: Verso Books
  98. Newman N. 2017. Reengineering workplace bargaining: how big data drives lower wages and how reframing labor law can restore information equality in the workplace. Univ. Cincinnati Law Rev. 85:5693–760
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Ogunbode CA, Demski C, Capstick SB, Sposato RG 2019. Attribution matters: revisiting the link between extreme weather experience and climate change mitigation responses. Glob. Environ. Change 54:31–39
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Ostrom E. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 20:4550–57
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Paterson M. 2012. Who and what are carbon markets for? Politics and the development of climate policy. Climate Policy 12:182–97
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Paterson M. 2014. Commodification. Critical Environmental Politics C Death 53–62 London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Paterson M, Stripple J. 2012. Virtuous carbon. Environ. Politics 21:4563–82
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Pearse R. 2016. The coal question that emissions trading has not answered. Energy Policy 99:319–28
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Pearse R, Böhm S. 2014. Ten reasons why carbon markets will not bring about radical emissions reduction. Carbon Manag 5:4325–37
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Peruzzini M, Grandi F, Pellicciari M 2018. How to analyse the workers’ experience in integrated product-process design. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 12:31–46
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Pierson P, Schickler E. 2020. Madison's constitution under stress: a developmental analysis of political polarization. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23:37–58
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Piore M, Sabel C. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity New York: Basic Books
  109. Pollin R. 2019. Advancing a viable global climate stabilization project: degrowth versus the Green New Deal. Rev. Radic. Political Econ. 51:2311–19
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Pontusson J. 2013. Unionization, inequality and redistribution. Br. J. Ind. Relat. 51:4797–825
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Räthzel N, Uzzell D 2013. Trade Unions in the Green Economy: Working for the Environment New York: Routledge
  112. Räthzel N, Uzzell D, Elliott D 2010. Can trade unions become environmental innovators?. Soundings 46:4676–87
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Rocheleau DE. 2015. Networked, rooted and territorial: green grabbing and resistance in Chiapas. J. Peasant Stud. 42:3–4695–723
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Rosenfeld J. 2014. What Unions No Longer Do Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  115. Sánchez-Monedero J, Dencik L. 2019. The datafication of the workplace Work. Pap., Cardiff Univ Cardiff, UK: https://datajusticeproject.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/30/2019/05/Report-The-datafication-of-the-workplace.pdf
  116. Satgar V. 2015. A trade union approach to climate justice: the campaign strategy of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa. Glob. Labour J. 6:3267–82
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Snell D, Fairbrother P. 2013. Just transition and labour environmentalism in Australia. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013 146–61
  118. Sovacool BK. 2011. The policy challenges of tradable credits: a critical review of eight markets. Energy Policy 39:2575–85
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Spash CL. 2010. The brave new world of carbon trading. New Political Econ 15:2169–95
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Steinberg RJ, Figart DM. 1999. Emotional labor since: The Managed Heart. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 561:18–26
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Stephan B. 2012. Bringing discourse to the market: the commodification of avoided deforestation. Environ. Politics 21:4621–39
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Stephan B, Paterson M. 2012. The politics of carbon markets: an introduction. Environ. Politics 21:4545–62
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Stevis D. 2013. Green jobs? Good jobs? Just jobs? US labour unions confront climate change. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013 179–95
  124. Stevis D. 2018. US labour unions and green transitions: depth, breadth, and worker agency. Globalizations 15:4454–69
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Stone K. 1974. The origins of job structures in the steel industry. Rev. Radic. Political Econ. 6:2113–73
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Street J. 1992. Politics and Technology New York: Macmillan Int. Higher Educ.
  127. Thelen K. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 2:369–404
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Thelen K. 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  129. Thompson P. 1995. Work Organisations: A Critical Introduction Houndmills, UK: Macmillan Int. Higher Educ.
  130. Toreini P, Langner M, Maedche A 2018. Use of attentive information dashboards to support task resumption in working environments Paper presented at the 2018 ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications Warsaw, Poland:
  131. Tranter B. 2017. It's only natural: conservatives and climate change in Australia. Environ. Sociol. 3:3274–85
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Uzzell D, Räthzel N. 2013. Mending the breach between labour and nature: a case for environmental labour studies. See Räthzel & Uzzell 2013. 1–12
  133. Weil D. 2014. The Fissured Workplace: Why Work Became So Bad for So Many and What Can Be Done to Improve It Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  134. Wesely M, Midgley L. 2019. Women and the future of work. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. May 24. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/women_and_the_future_of_work
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Western B, Rosenfeld J. 2011. Unions, norms, and the rise in U.S. wage inequality. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:4513–37
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Westholm L, Arora-Jonsson S. 2018. What room for politics and change in global climate governance? Addressing gender in co-benefits and safeguards. Environ. Politics 27:5917–38
     [Google Scholar]
  137. World Bank Group 2018. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2018 Washington, DC: World Bank Group
  138. Zimbalist A. 1975. The limits of work humanization. Rev. Radic. Political Econ. 7:250–59
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Zuboff S. 1988. In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power New York: Basic Books
  140. Zuboff S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power New York: Public Affairs
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061418-095236
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error