1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Volume 70, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Psychology

Volume 70, 2019

Computer Games in Education

Abstract

Visionaries offer strong claims for the educational benefits of computer games, but there is a need to test those claims with rigorous scientific research and ground them in evidence-based theories of how people learn. Three genres of game research are () value-added research, which compares the learning outcomes of groups that learn academic material from playing a base version of a game to the outcomes of those playing the same game with one feature added; () cognitive consequences research, which compares improvements in cognitive skills of groups that play an off-the-shelf game to the skill improvements of those who engage in a control activity; and () media comparison research, which compares the learning outcomes of groups that learn academic material in a game to the outcomes of those who learn with conventional media. Value-added research suggests five promising features to include in educational computer games: modality, personalization, pretraining, coaching, and self-explanation. Cognitive consequences research suggests two promising approaches to cognitive training with computer games: using first-person shooter games to train perceptual attention skills and using spatial puzzle games to train two-dimensional mental rotation skills. Media comparison research suggests three promising areas where games may be more effective than conventional media: science, mathematics, and second-language learning. Future research is needed to pinpoint the cognitive, motivational, affective, and social processes that underlie learning with educational computer games.

Keyword(s): cognitive skill training, computer games, computer-based learning, educational games, instructional design, serious games, video games
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744
2019-01-04
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/psych/70/1/annurev-psych-010418-102744.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams DM, Clark DB 2014. Integrating self-explanation functionality into a complex game environment: keeping the gaming in motion. Comput. Educ. 73:149–59
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams DM, Mayer RE, MacNamara A, Koening A, Wainess R 2012. Narrative games for learning: testing the discovery and narrative hypotheses. J. Educ. Psychol. 104:235–49
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams DM, Pilegard C, Mayer RE 2016. Evaluating the cognitive consequences of playing Portal for a short duration. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 54:173–95
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson AF, Bavelier D 2011. Action game play as a tool to enhance perception, attention, and cognition. Computer Games and Instruction S Tobias, JD Fletcher 307–33 Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson J, Barnett M 2011. Using video games to support pre-service elementary teachers learning of basic physics principles. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 20:347–62
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Anguera JA, Boccanfuso J, Rintoul JL, Al-Hashimi O, Faraji F et al. 2013. Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature 501:746597–101
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bainbridge K, Mayer RE 2018. Shining the light of research on Lumosity. J. Cogn. Enhanc. 2:43–62
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Barab SA, Scott B, Siyahhan S, Goldstone R, Ingram-Goble A et al. 2009. Transformational play as a curricular scaffold: using videogames to support science education. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18:305–20
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bediou B, Adams DM, Mayer RE, Tipton E, Green CS, Bavelier D 2018. Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychol. Bull. 144:177–110
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Blumberg FC 2014. Learning by Playing Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Boot WR, Kramer AF, Simons DJ, Fabian M, Gratton G 2008. The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychol 129:387–98
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brom C, Preuss M, Klement D 2011. Are educational computer micro-games engaging and effective for knowledge acquisition at high schools? A quasi-experimental study. Comput. Educ. 57:1971–88
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cameron B, Dwyer F 2005. The effect of online gaming, cognition and feedback type in facilitating delayed achievement of different learning objectives. J. Interact. Learn. Res. 16:243–58
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chang K-E, Wu L-J, Weng S-E, Sung Y-T 2012. Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Comput. Educ 58:775–86
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Clark DB, Virk SS, Barnes J, Adams DM 2016. Self-explanation and digital games: adaptively increasing abstraction. Comput. Educ. 103:28–43
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark RE 2001. Learning from Media Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ
  17. Cohen J 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2nd ed..
  18. Cordova DI, Lepper MR 1996. Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. J. Educ. Psychol. 88:715–30
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cuban L 1986. Teaching and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology since 1920 New York: Teach. Coll. Press
  20. de Jong T, Martin E, Zamarro J, Esquembre F, Swaak J, van Joolingen WR 1999. The integration of computer simulation and learning support: an example from the physics domain of collisions. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 36:597–615
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Din FS, Calao J 2001. The effects of playing educational video games on kindergarten achievement. Child Study J 31:95–102
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Evans KL, Yaron D, Leinhardt G 2008. Learning stoichiometry: a comparison of text and multimedia formats. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 9:208–18
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Feng J, Spence I, Pratt J 2007. Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychol. Sci. 18:10850–55
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Fiorella L, Mayer RE 2012. Paper-based aids for learning with a computer-based game. J. Educ. Psychol. 104:1074–82
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Gee JP 2007. Good Video Games and Good Learning New York: Peter Lang
  26. Goldberg B, Cannon-Bowers J 2015. Feedback source modality effects on training outcomes in a serious game: pedagogical agents make a difference. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52:1–11
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Green CS, Bavelier D 2003. Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature 423:534–38
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Green CS, Bavelier D 2006.a Effects of action video game playing on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32:1465–78
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Green CS, Bavelier D 2006.b Enumeration versus multiple object tracking: the case of action video game players. Cognition 101:217–45
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Green CS, Bavelier D 2007. Action-video-game experience alters the spatial resolution of vision. Psychol. Sci. 18:88–94
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hattie J 2009. Visible Learning Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  32. Hickey DT, Ingram-Goble AA, Jameson EM 2009. Designing assessments and assessing designs in virtual educational environments. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 18:187–208
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Honey MA, Hilton ML 2011. Learning Science through Computer Games and Simulations Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  34. Hsu CY, Tsai CC 2013. Examining the effects of combining self-explanation principles with an educational game on learning science concepts. Interact. Learn. Environ. 21:2104–15
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hsu CY, Tsai CC, Wang HY 2016. Exploring the effects of integrating self-explanation into a multi-user game on the acquisition of scientific concepts. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24:4844–58
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Hwang G-C, Wu P-H, Chen C-C 2012. An online game approach for improving students’ learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Comput. Educ 59:1246–56
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson CI, Mayer RE 2010. Adding the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26:1246–52
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee C, Chen M 2009. A computer game as a context for non-routine mathematical problem solving: the effects of type of question prompt and level of prior knowledge. Comput. Educ. 52:530–42
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Leutner D 1993. Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learn. Instr. 3:113–32
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Li R, Polat U, Makous W, Bavelier D 2009. Enhancing the contrast sensitivity function through action video game training. Nat. Neurosci. 12:5549–51
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Liu T, Chu Y 2008. Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Comput. Educ. 55:630–43
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Loftus GR, Loftus EF 1983. Mind at Play: The Psychology of Video Games New York: Basic Books
  43. Mayer RE 2011.a Applying the Science of Learning Boston: Pearson
  44. Mayer RE 2011.b Multimedia learning and games. Computer Games and Instruction S Tobias, JD Fletcher 281–306 Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Mayer RE 2014. Computer Games for Learning: An Evidence-Based Approach Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  46. Mayer RE 2016. What should be the role of computer games in education?. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 3:120–26
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Mayer RE, Johnson CI 2010. Adding instructional features that promote learning in a game-like environment. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 42:241–65
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Mayer RE, Mautone PD, Prothero W 2002. Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. J. Educ. Psychol. 94:171–85
     [Google Scholar]
  49. McGonigal J 2011. Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World New York: Penguin Press
  50. McLaren BM, Adams D, Mayer R, Forlizzi J 2017. Decimal point: an educational game that benefits mathematics learning more than a conventional approach. Int. J. Game-Based Learn. 7:136–56
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Melby-Lervåg M, Hulme C 2012. Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Dev. Psychol. 49:2270–91
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Moreno R, Mayer RE 2000. Engaging students in active learning: the case for personalized multimedia messages. J. Educ. Psychol. 92:724–33
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Moreno R, Mayer RE 2004. Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. J. Educ. Psychol. 96:165–73
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Moreno R, Mayer RE 2005. Role of guidance, reflection, and interactivity in an agent-based multimedia game. J. Educ. Psychol. 97:117–28
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Moreno R, Mayer RE 2007. Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19:309–26
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Moreno R, Mayer RE, Spires HA, Lester J 2001. The case for social agency in computer-based teaching: Do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents. Cogn. Instr. 19:177–213
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Moreno RE, Mayer RE 2002. Learning science in virtual reality environments: role of methods and media. J. Educ. Psychol. 94:598–610
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Nelson RA, Strachan I 2009. Action and puzzle video games prime different speed/accuracy tradeoffs. Perception 38:111678–87
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Neri A, Mich O, Gerosa M, Giuliani D 2008. The effectiveness of computer assisted training for foreign language learning by children. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 21:393–408
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Nouchi R, Yasuyuki T, Takeuchi H, Hashizume H, Akitsuki Y et al. 2012. Brain training game improves executive functions and processing speed in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. PLOS ONE 7:1e29676
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Okagaki L, Frensch PA 1994. Effects of video game playing on measures of spatial performance: gender effects in late adolescence. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 15:33–58
     [Google Scholar]
  62. O'Neil HF, Chung G, Kerr D, Vendlinski T, Bushchang R, Mayer RE 2014. Adding self-explanation prompts to an educational game. Comput. Hum. Behav. 30:23–28
     [Google Scholar]
  63. O'Neil HF, Perez RS 2008. Computer Games and Team and Individual Learning Amsterdam: Elsevier
  64. Papastergiou M 2009. Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Comput. Educ. 52:1–12
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Parchman SW, Ellis JA, Christinaz D, Vogel M 2000. An evaluation of three computer-based instructional strategies in basic electricity and electronics training. Mil. Psychol. 12:73–87
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Parong J, Mayer RE, Fiorella L, MacNamara A, Homer BD, Plass JL 2018. Learning executive function skills by playing focused video games. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 51:141–51
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Pellegrino JW, Hilton ML 2012. Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  68. Phye GD, Robinson DH, Levin J 2005. Empirical Methods for Evaluating Educational Interventions Amsterdam: Elsevier
  69. Pilegard C, Mayer RE 2016. Improving academic learning from computer-based narrative games. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 44:12–20
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Pilegard C, Mayer RE 2018. Game over for Tetris as a platform for cognitive skill training. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 54:29–41
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Powers KL, Brooks PJ 2014. Evaluating the specificity effects of video game training. Learning by Playing: Frontiers of Video Gaming in Education F Blumberg 302–29 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Prensky M 2006. Don't Bother Me Mom—I'm Learning St. Paul, MN: Paragon House
  73. Ricci KE, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA 1996. Do computer-based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention?. Mil. Psychol. 8:295–307
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Saettler P 2004. The Evolution of American Educational Technology Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ
  75. Segers E, Verhoeven L 2003. Effects of vocabulary training by computer in kindergarten. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 19:557–66
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Serge SR, Priest HA, Durlach PJ, Johnson CI 2013. The effects of static and adaptive performance feedback in game-based training. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29:31150–58
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Shavelson RJ, Towne L 2002. Scientific Research in Education Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  78. Simons DJ, Boot WR, Charness N, Gathercole SE, Chabris CF et al. 2016. Do brain training programs work?. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 17:3103–86
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sims VK, Mayer RE 2002. Domain specificity of spatial expertise: the case of video game players. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 16:97–115
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Sindre G, Natvig L, Jahre M 2009. Experimental validation of the learning effect for a pedagogical game on computer fundamentals. IEEE Trans. Educ. 52:10–18
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Singley MK, Anderson JR 1989. The Transfer of Cognitive Skill Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  82. Suh S, Kim SW, Kim NJ 2010. Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary English education in Korea. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26:370–78
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Swaak J, de Jong T, van Joolingen WR 2004. The effects of discovery learning and expository instruction on the acquisition of definitional and intuitive knowledge. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 20:225–34
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Swaak J, van Joolingen WR, de Jong T 1998. Supporting simulation-based learning: the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learn. Instr. 8:235–52
     [Google Scholar]
  85. ter Vrugte J, de Jong T, Wouters P, Vandercruysse S, Elen J, van Oostendorp H 2015. When a game supports prevocational math education but integrated reflection does not. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 31:5462–80
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Tobias S, Fletcher JD 2011. Computer Games and Instruction Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ
  87. Van Eck R, Dempsey J 2002. The effect of competition and contextualized advisement on the transfer of mathematics skills in a computer-based instructional simulation game. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 50:23–41
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Vandercruysse S, ter Vrugte J, de Jong T, Wouters P, van Oostendorp H et al. 2016. The effectiveness of a math game: the impact of integrating conceptual clarification as support. Comput. Hum. Behav. 64:21–33
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Wang N, Johnson WL, Mayer RE, Rizzo P, Shaw E, Collins H 2008. The politeness effect: pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66:96–12
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Wang P, Liu HH, Zhu XT, Meng T, Li HJ, Zuo XN 2017. Action video game training for healthy adults: a meta-analytic study. Front. Psychol. 7:907
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Wentzel KR, Miele DB 2016. Handbook of Motivation at School Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2nd ed..
  92. Wouters P, van Oostendorp H 2017. Overview of instructional techniques to facilitate learning and motivation of serious games. Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games P Wouters, H van Oostendorp 1–16 Berlin: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Wrzesien M, Raya MA 2010. Learning in serious virtual worlds: evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the E-Junior project. Comput. Educ. 55:178–87
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Wu S, Cheng CK, Feng J, D'Angelo L, Alain C, Spence I 2012. Playing a first-person shooter video game induces neuroplastic change. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24:61286–93
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Yip FWM, Kwan ACM 2006. Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educ. Media Int. 43:233–49
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744
Loading
Computer Games in Education
Annual Review of Psychology 70, 531 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102744
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error