Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability to Promote Equitable Impacts on Health

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Anderson N, Orleans C, Gruman J. 1999. Roadmaps for the next frontier: getting evidence-based behavioral medicine into practice Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine San Diego, CA: Mar. 3–6
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Archambault PM, Van De Belt TH, Grajales FJ III, Faber MJ, Kuziemsky CE et al. 2013. Wikis and collaborative writing applications in health care: a scoping review. J. Med. Internet Res. 15:e210
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Archibald MM, Caine V, Scott SD. 2014. The development of a classification schema for arts-based approaches to knowledge translation. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs 11:316–24
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Ashcraft LE, Quinn DA, Brownson RC 2020. Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implement. Sci. 15:89
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Balas EA, Boren SA. 2000. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearb. Med. Inform. 1:65–70
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Bauman AE, Nelson DE, Pratt M, Matsudo V, Schoeppe S 2006. Dissemination of physical activity evidence, programs, policies, and surveillance in the international public health arena. Am. J. Prev. Med. 31:57–65
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Baumann AA, Cabassa LJ. 2020. Reframing implementation science to address inequities in healthcare delivery. BMC Health Serv. Res. 20:190
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Bayliss EA, Bonds DE, Boyd CM, Davis MM, Finke B et al. 2014. Understanding the context of health for persons with multiple chronic conditions: moving from what is the matter to what matters. Ann. Fam. Med. 12:260–69
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Bennett GG, Shelton RC. 2017. Extending our reach for greater impact. Health Educ. Behav. 44:835–38
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Bergström A, Dinh H, Duong D, Pervin J, Rahman A et al. 2014. The Context Assessment for Community Health tool - investigating why what works where in low- and middle-income settings. BMC Health Serv. Res. 14:P8
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Berman J, Mitambo C, Matanje-Mwagomba B, Khan S, Kachimanga C et al. 2015. Building a knowledge translation platform in Malawi to support evidence-informed health policy. Health Res. Policy Syst. 13:73
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA 1998. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317:465–68
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Best A, Berland A, Herbert C, Bitz J, van Dijk MW et al. 2016. Using systems thinking to support clinical system transformation. J. Health Organ. Manag. 30:302–23
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Blachman-Demner DR, Wiley TRA, Chambers DA 2017. Fostering integrated approaches to dissemination and implementation and community engaged research. Transl. Behav. Med. 7:543–46
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Bland DJ, Osterwalder A. 2019. Testing Business Ideas: A Field Guide for Rapid Experimentation Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
16. 16. 

    Blevins M, Wehbe FH, Rebeiro PF, Caro-Vega Y, McGowan CC et al. 2016. Interactive data visualization for HIV cohorts: leveraging data exchange standards to share and reuse research tools. PLOS ONE 11:e0151201
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Bodkin A, Hakimi S. 2020. Sustainable by design: a systematic review of factors for health promotion program sustainability. BMC Public Health 20:964
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Botsis T, Fairman JE, Moran MB, Anagnostou V. 2020. Visual storytelling enhances knowledge dissemination in biomedical science. J. Biomed. Inform. 107:103458
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Braithwaite J, Ludlow K, Testa L, Herkes J, Augustsson H et al. 2020. Built to last? The sustainability of healthcare system improvements, programmes and interventions: a systematic integrative review. BMJ Open 10:e036453
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Braveman PA, Kumanyika S, Fielding J, LaVeist T, Borrell LN et al. 2011. Health disparities and health equity: The issue is justice. Am. J. Public Health 101:S149–55
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Brown CH, Curran G, Palinkas LA, Aarons GA, Wells KB et al. 2017. An overview of research and evaluation designs for dissemination and implementation. Annu. Rev. Public Health 38:1–22
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Brownson RC, Allen P, Duggan K, Stamatakis KA, Erwin PC. 2012. Fostering more-effective public health by identifying administrative evidence-based practices: a review of the literature. Am. J. Prev. Med. 43:309–19
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA. 2009. Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am. J. Public Health 99:1576–83
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. 2018. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
25. 25. 

    Brownson RC, Eyler AA, Harris JK, Moore JB, Tabak RG 2018. Getting the word out: new approaches for disseminating public health science. J. Public Health Manag. 24:102–11
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Green LW. 2018. Building capacity for evidence-based public health: reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annu. Rev. Public Health 39:27–53
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Brownson RC, Jacobs JA, Tabak RG, Hoehner CM, Stamatakis KA. 2013. Designing for dissemination among public health researchers: findings from a national survey in the United States. Am. J. Public Health 103:1693–99
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Brownson RC, Kumanyika SK, Kreuter MW, Haire-Joshu D. 2021. Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity. Implement. Sci. 16:28
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Calancie L, Anderson S, Branscomb J, Apostolico AA, Lich KH. 2018. Using behavior over time graphs to spur systems thinking among public health practitioners. Prev. Chronic Dis. 15:E16
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Cameron R, Brown KS, Best JA. 1996. The dissemination of chronic disease prevention programs: linking science and practice. Can. J. Public Health 87:Suppl. 2S50–53
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Canfield KN, Menezes S, Matsuda SB, Moore A, Mosley Austin AN et al. 2020. Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Front. Commun. 5:2
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Carpenter JS, Kesling M, Schmidt KK. 2019. An arts-based educational exhibit on menopausal hot flashes. Menopause 26:1062–67
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Carpenter JS, Schmidt KK, Jarvis LM, Lapum JL, Kesling MD. 2019. Focus group reactions to an arts-based educational exhibit on menopausal hot flashes. Menopause 26:981–98
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Carter N, Lavis JN, MacDonald-Rencz S. 2014. Use of modified Delphi to plan knowledge translation for decision makers: an application in the field of advanced practice nursing. Policy Politics Nurs. Pract. 15:93–101
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Chambers DA, Glasgow RE, Stange KC. 2013. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement. Sci. 8:117
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Chambers DA, Norton WE. 2016. The adaptome: advancing the science of intervention adaptation. Am. J. Prev. Med. 51:S124–31
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Chan TM, Dzara K, Dimeo SP, Bhalerao A, Maggio LA. 2020. Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: a scoping review. Perspect. Med. Educ. 9:20–30
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, Patel K, Wong JB et al. 2014. A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29:1692–701
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Corso KA, Hunter CL, Dahl O, Kallenberg GA, Manson L. 2016. Integrating Behavioral Health into the Medical Home: A Rapid Implementation Guide Phoenix, MD: Greenbranch Publ.
40. 40. 

    Craven MP, Goodwin R, Rawsthorne M, Butler D, Waddingham P et al. 2019. Try to see it my way: exploring the co-design of visual presentations of wellbeing through a workshop process. Perspect. Public Health 139:153–61
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Crick K, Hartling L. 2015. Preferences of knowledge users for two formats of summarizing results from systematic reviews: infographics and critical appraisals. PLOS ONE 10:e0140029
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Cross A, Rosenbaum P, Grahovac D, Brocklehurst J, Kay D et al. 2018. A web-based knowledge translation resource for families and service providers (the “F-words” in Childhood Disability Knowledge Hub): developmental and pilot evaluation study. JMIR Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 5:e10439
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Curry SJ. 2000. Organizational interventions to encourage guideline implementation. Chest 118:40S–46S
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Daly-Smith A, Quarmby T, Archbold VSJ, Corrigan N, Wilson D et al. 2020. Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based design process to co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 17:13
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    De Tarde G. 1903. The Laws of Imitation New York: H. Holt
46. 46. 

    Dearing JW. 2004. Improving the state of health programming by using diffusion theory. J. Health Commun. 9:21–36
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Dearing JW, Kee KF, Peng T 2018. Historical roots of dissemination and implementation science. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice RC Brownson, GA Colditz, EK Proctor 47–61 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Dobbins M, DeCorby K, Robeson P, Husson H, Tirilis D, Greco L 2010. A knowledge management tool for public health: health-evidence.ca. BMC Public Health 10:496
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Dobbins M, Robeson P, Ciliska D, Hanna S, Cameron R et al. 2009. A description of a knowledge broker role implemented as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating three knowledge translation strategies. Implement. Sci. 4:23
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Escoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Haardoerfer R, Boing E, Udelson H et al. 2018. A systematic review of adaptations of evidence-based public health interventions globally. Implement. Sci. 13:125
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Escoffery C, Lebow-Skelley E, Udelson H, Böing EA, Wood R et al. 2019. A scoping study of frameworks for adapting public health evidence-based interventions. Transl. Behav. Med. 9:1–10
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Estrada CA, Krishnamoorthy P, Smith A, Staton L, Korf MJ et al. 2011. Marketing to increase participation in a web-based continuing medical education cultural competence curriculum. J. Contin. Educ. Health 31:21–27
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Evans-Agnew RA, Johnson S, Liu F, Boutain DM 2016. Applying critical discourse analysis in health policy research: case studies in regional, organizational, and global health. Policy Politics Nurs. Pract. 17:136–46
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Farrelly MC, Chaloupka FJ, Berg CJ, Emery SL, Henriksen L et al. 2017. Taking stock of tobacco control program and policy science and impact in the United States. J. Addict. Behav. Ther. 1:8
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Feldstein AC, Glasgow RE. 2008. A practical, robust implementation and sustainability model (PRISM) for integrating research findings into practice. Joint Comm. J. Q. Patient Saf. 34:228–43
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Fraser I. 2004. Organizational research with impact: working backwards. Worldviews Evidence-Based Nurs 1:S52–59
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Fung IC, Blankenship EB, Ahweyevu JO, Cooper LK, Duke CH et al. 2020. Public health implications of image-based social media: a systematic review of Instagram, Pinterest, Tumblr, and Flickr. Perm. J. 24:18.307
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Ghaffarzadegan N, Lyneis J, Richardson GP. 2011. How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. Syst. Dyn. Rev. 27:22–44
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PE. 2018. Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings. Prev. Chronic Dis. 15:E02
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Goodman RM, Steckler A. 1989. A model for the institutionalization of health promotion programs. Fam. Community Health 11:63–78
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Green AE, Fettes DL, Aarons GA. 2012. A concept mapping approach to guide and understand dissemination and implementation. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 39:362–73
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Green LW, Fielding JE, Brownson RC. 2021. More on fake news, disinformation, and countering these with science. Annu. Rev. Public Health 42:v–vi
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Guastaferro K, Collins LM. 2019. Achieving the goals of translational science in public health intervention research: the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Am. Public Health Assoc. 109:S2S128–29
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Guerry JD. 2016. Another way through the two-way mirror: a review of Psychotherapy.net. Cogn. Behav. Pract. 23:256–61
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Hampshaw S, Cooke J, Mott L. 2018. What is a research derived actionable tool, and what factors should be considered in their development? A Delphi study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 18:740
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Hanneke R, Link JM. 2019. The complex nature of research dissemination practices among public health faculty researchers. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 107:341–51
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Harrison D, Wilding J, Bowman A, Fuller A, Nicholls SG et al. 2016. Using YouTube to disseminate effective vaccination pain treatment for babies. PLOS ONE 11:e0164123
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Hayman SL, Tieman JJ. 2016. Discovering the dementia evidence base: tools to support knowledge to action in dementia care (innovative practice). Dementia 15:1279–88
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Haynes A, Rowbotham SJ, Redman S, Brennan S, Williamson A, Moore G. 2018. What can we learn from interventions that aim to increase policy-makers’ capacity to use research? A realist scoping review. Health Res. Policy Syst. 16:31
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Heintzman J, Gold R, Krist A, Crosson J, Likumahuwa S, DeVoe JE 2014. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) are promising laboratories for conducting dissemination and implementation research. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 27:759–62
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Hill K, Vrantsidis F, Clemson L, Lovarini M, Russell M. 2011. Community Falls Prevention Program Sustainability Guidelines and Workbook Natl. Health Med. Res. Counc., Victorian Gov. Dept. Health, Austr.
72. 72. 

    Hodgkins M, Khoury C, Katz C, Lloyd S, Barron M 2018. Health care industry requires a roadmap to accelerate the impact of digital health innovations. Health Affairs Blog June 8. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20180606.523635/full/
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Hristov N, Strohecker C, Allen L, Merson M 2018. Designing for broad understanding of science insights from practice. Integr. Comp. Biol. 58:113–26
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Hundt GL, Bryanston C, Lowe P, Cross S, Sandall J, Spencer K. 2011. Inside ‘Inside View’: reflections on stimulating debate and engagement through a multimedia live theatre production on the dilemmas and issues of pre-natal screening policy and practice. Health Expect 14:1–9
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Kapp JM, Hensel B, Schnoring KT. 2015. Is Twitter a forum for disseminating research to health policy makers?. Ann. Epidemiol. 25:883–87
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Kastner M, Estey E, Hayden L, Chatterjee A, Grudniewicz A et al. 2014. The development of a guideline implementability tool (GUIDE-IT): a qualitative study of family physician perspectives. BMC Fam. Pract. 15:19
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Kastner M, Sayal R, Oliver D, Straus SE, Dolovich L. 2017. Sustainability and scalability of a volunteer-based primary care intervention (Health TAPESTRY): a mixed-methods analysis. BMC Health Serv. Res. 17:514
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Kepper MM, Walsh-Bailey C, Brownson RC, Kwan BM, Morrato EH et al. 2021. Development of a health information technology tool for behavior change to address obesity and prevent chronic disease among adolescents: designing for dissemination and sustainment using the ORBIT model. Front. Digit. Health 3:648777
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Kerner J, Rimer B, Emmons K. 2005. Introduction to the special section on dissemination: dissemination research and research dissemination: How can we close the gap?. Health Psychol 24:443–46
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Kilbourne AM, Braganza MZ, Bowersox NW, Goodrich DE, Miake-Lye I et al. 2019. Research lifecycle to increase the substantial real-world impact of research: accelerating innovations to application. Med. Care 57:10 Suppl. 3S206–12
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Kinsinger LS, Jones KR, Kahwati L, Harvey R, Burdick M et al. 2009. Design and dissemination of the MOVE! Weight-Management Program for veterans. Prev. Chronic Dis. 6:A98
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. 2005. Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Ann. Behav. Med. 29:66–75
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Klonowska K, Czubak K, Wojciechowska M, Handschuh L, Zmienko A et al. 2016. Oncogenomic portals for the visualization and analysis of genome-wide cancer data. Oncotarget 7:176–92
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Knoepke CE, Ingle MP, Matlock DD, Brownson RC, Glasgow RE. 2019. Dissemination and stakeholder engagement practices among dissemination & implementation scientists: results from an online survey. PLOS ONE 14:e0216971
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Kotler P, Lee N. 2008. Social Marketing: Influencing Behaviors for Good London: Sage
86. 86. 

    Kreps GL, Gustafson D, Salovey P, Perocchia RS, Wilbright W et al. 2007. The NCI digital divide pilot projects: implications for cancer education. J. Cancer Educ. 22:S56–60
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Kreuter MW, Bernhardt JM. 2009. Reframing the dissemination challenge: a marketing and distribution perspective. Am. J. Public Health 99:2123–27
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Kukkonen T, Cooper A. 2019. An arts-based knowledge translation (ABKT) planning framework for researchers. Evidence Policy J. Res. Debate Pract. 15:293–311
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Kuruvilla S, Mays N, Pleasvant A, Walt G. 2006. Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework. BMC Health Serv. Res. 6:134
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Laycock A, Harvey G, Percival N, Cunningham F, Bailie J et al. 2018. Application of the i-PARIHS framework for enhancing understanding of interactive dissemination to achieve wide-scale improvement in Indigenous primary healthcare. Health Res. Policy Syst. 16:117
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Lehoux P, Denis J-L, Tailliez S, Hivon M 2005. Dissemination of health technology assessments: identifying the visions guiding an evolving policy innovation in Canada. J. Health Politics Policy Law 30:603–42
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Lobb R, Colditz GA. 2013. Implementation science and its application to population health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 34:235–51
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Lobb R, Petermann L, Manafo E, Keen D, Kerner J. 2013. Networking and knowledge exchange to promote the formation of transdisciplinary coalitions and levels of agreement among transdisciplinary peer reviewers. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 19:E9–20
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Luke DA, Calhoun A, Robichaux CB, Elliott MB, Moreland-Russell S. 2014. The program sustainability assessment tool: a new instrument for public health programs. Prev. Chronic Dis. 11:130184
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Luke DA, Harris JK 2007. Network analysis in public health: history, methods, and applications. Annu. Rev. Public Health 28:69–93
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Luke DA, Sarli CC, Suiter AM, Carothers BJ, Combs TB et al. 2018. The translational science benefits model: a new framework for assessing the health and societal benefits of clinical and translational sciences. Clin. Transl. Sci. 11:77–84
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Luke DA, Stamatakis KA 2012. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu. Rev. Public Health 33:357–76
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Luke DA, Wald LM, Carothers BJ, Bach LE, Harris JK. 2013. Network influences on dissemination of evidence-based guidelines in state tobacco control programs. Health Educ. Behav. 40:33S–42S
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99. 

    Malone R. 2010. The tobacco industry. The Bottom Line or Public Health: Tactics Corporations Use to Influence Health and Health Policy, and What We Can Do to Counter Them WH Wiist 155–91 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Malone S, Prewitt K, Hackett R, Lin JC, McKay V et al. 2021. The Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool: measuring organizational capacity to promote sustainability in healthcare. Implement. Sci. Commun. 2:77
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Mangin D, Lamarche L, Oliver D, Bomze S, Borhan S et al. 2020. Health TAPESTRY Ontario: protocol for a randomized controlled trial to test reproducibility and implementation. Trials 21:714
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Margolis E, Pauwels L. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods London: Sage
103. 103. 

     Mazzucca S, Tabak RG, Pilar M, Ramsey AT, Baumann AA et al. 2018. Variation in research designs used to test the effectiveness of dissemination and implementation strategies: a review. Front. Public Health 6:32
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     McCormack L, Sheridan S, Lewis M, Boudewyns V, Melvin CL et al. 2013. Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Evidence Rep. Technol. Assess. 213:1–520
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Mills SL, Bergeron K, Pérez G. 2015. Using concept mapping to develop a strategy for self-management support for underserved populations living with chronic conditions, British Columbia, August 2013–June 2014. Prev. Chronic Dis. 12:E173
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 2012. MOH Health Equity Impact Assessment (HEIA) Tool Ministry of Health Ontario, Canada: https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/heia/tool.aspx
107. 107. 

     Minkler M, Salvatore A, Chang C 2018. Participatory approaches for study design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice RC Brownson, GA Colditz, EK Proctor 175–90. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Moore JB, Maddock JE, Brownson RC. 2017. The role of dissemination in promotion and tenure for public health. J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 24:1–3
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Morrato EH, Hamer MK, Sills M, Kwan B, Schilling LM. 2019. Applying a commercialization-readiness framework to optimize value for achieving sustainability of an electronic health data research network and its data capabilities: the SAFTINet Experience. eGEMs 7:48
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Morrato EH, Lennox LA, Sendro ER, Schuster AL, Pincus HA et al. 2020. Scale-up of the Accrual to Clinical Trials (ACT) network across the Clinical and Translational Science Award Consortium: a mixed-methods evaluation of the first 18 months. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 4:515–28
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Moullin JC, Dickson KS, Stadnick NA, Rabin B, Aarons GA 2019. Systematic review of the exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment (EPIS) framework. Implement. Sci. 14:1
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Mummah SA, Robinson TN, King AC, Gardner CD, Sutton S. 2016. IDEAS (integrate, design, assess, and share): a framework and toolkit of strategies for the development of more effective digital interventions to change health behavior. J. Med. Internet Res. 18:e317
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Nash D. 2020. Designing and disseminating metrics to support jurisdictional efforts to end the public health threat posed by HIV epidemics. Am. J. Public Health 110:53–57
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114. 

     NCI (Natl. Cancer Inst.) 2002. Designing for Dissemination: Conference Summary Report Washington, DC: Natl. Cancer Inst.
115. 115. 

     Naumann RB, Austin AE, Sheble L, Lich KH. 2019. System dynamics applications to injury and violence prevention: a systematic review. Curr. Epidemiol. Rep. 6:248–62
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116. 

     Nearing K, Rainwater J, Morrato E, Neves S, Bhatti P et al. 2020. I-Corps@NCATS: A novel designing-for-dissemination learning laboratory for clinical and translational researchers to increase intervention relevance and speed dissemination. Implement. Sci. 15:25
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117. 

     Nearing K, Rainwater J, Neves S, Bhatti P, Conway B et al. 2021. I-Corps@ NCATS trains clinical and translational science teams to accelerate translation of research innovations into practice. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 5:e66
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118. 

     Nilsen P, Bernhardsson S. 2019. Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19:189
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119. 

     Ninomiya MEM. 2017. More than words: using visual graphics for community-based health research. Can. J. Public Health 108:e91–94
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120. 

     Nooraie RY, Kwan BM, Cohn E, AuYoung M, Roberts MC et al. 2020. Advancing health equity through CTSA programs: opportunities for interaction between health equity, dissemination and implementation, and translational science. J. Clin. Transl. Sci. 4:168–75
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121. 

     Northridge ME, Metcalf SS. 2016. Enhancing implementation science by applying best principles of systems science. Health Res. Policy Syst. 14:74
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122. 

     Nutbeam D. 1996. Achieving ‘best practice’ in health promotion: improving the fit between research and practice. Health Educ. Res. 11:317–26
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123. 

     Oh A, Gaysynsky A, Knott CL, Nock NL, Erwin DO, Vinson CA 2019. Customer discovery as a tool for moving behavioral interventions into the marketplace: insights from the NCI SPRINT program. Transl. Behav. Med. 9:1139–50
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124. 

     Orleans CT. 2007. Increasing the demand for and use of effective smoking-cessation treatments: reaping the full health benefits of tobacco-control science and policy gains—in our lifetime. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33:S340–48
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125. 

     Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y, Bernarda G, Smith A 2014. Value Proposition Design: How to Create Products and Services Customers Want Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
126. 126. 

     Owen N, Goode A, Sugiyama T, Koohsari J, Healy G et al. 2017. Designing for dissemination in chronic disease prevention and management. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice RC Brownson, GA Colditz, EK Proctor 107–20 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127. 

     Padek M, Colditz G, Dobbins M, Koscielniak N, Proctor EK et al. 2015. Developing educational competencies for dissemination and implementation research training programs: an exploratory analysis using card sorts. Implement. Sci. 10:114
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128. 

     Palinkas LA, Chou C-P, Spear SE, Mendon SJ, Villamar J, Brown CH. 2020. Measurement of sustainment of prevention programs and initiatives: the sustainment measurement system scale. Implement. Sci. 15:71
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129. 

     Parsons JA, Lavery JV. 2012. Brokered dialogue: a new research method for controversial health and social issues. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 12:92
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130. 

     Pauwels L, Mannay D. 2019. The SAGE Handbook of Visual Research Methods London: Sage
131. 131. 

     Peskin MF, Hernandez BF, Gabay EK, Cuccaro P, Li DH et al. 2017. Using intervention mapping for program design and production of iCHAMPSS: an online decision support system to increase adoption, implementation, and maintenance of evidence-based sexual health programs. Front. Public Health 5:203
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132. 

     Pfadenhauer LM, Gerhardus A, Mozygemba K, Lysdahl KB, Booth A et al. 2017. Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework. Implement. Sci. 12:21
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133. 

     Porat T, Marshall IJ, Sadler E, Vadillo MA, McKevitt C et al. 2019. Collaborative design of a decision aid for stroke survivors with multimorbidity: a qualitative study in the UK engaging key stakeholders. BMJ Open 9:e030385
     [Google Scholar]
134. 134. 

     Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G et al. 2011. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm. Policy Ment. Health Ment. Health Serv. Res. 38:65–76
     [Google Scholar]
135. 135. 

     Quanbeck A, Brown RT, Zgierska AE, Johnson RA, Robinson JM, Jacobson N 2016. Systems consultation: protocol for a novel implementation strategy designed to promote evidence-based practice in primary care. Health Res. Policy Syst. 14:8
     [Google Scholar]
136. 136. 

     Rabin BA, Brownson RC 2017. Terminology for dissemination and implementation research. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating Science to Practice RC Brownson, GA Colditz, EK Proctor 19–45 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
137. 137. 

     Robertson T, Darling M, Leifer J, Footer O, Grodsky D. 2017. Behavioral design teams: the next frontier in clinical delivery innovation? Issue Brief, Nov. 10 Commonwealth Fund Washington, DC: https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2017/nov/behavioral-design-teams-next-frontier-clinical-delivery
138. 138. 

     Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Driedger SM, Eyles J, O'Loughlin J et al. 2005. Using linking systems to build capacity and enhance dissemination in heart health promotion: a Canadian multiple-case study. Health Educ. Res. 20:499–513
     [Google Scholar]
139. 139. 

     Rogers E. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations New York: Free Press
140. 140. 

     Rogers E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations New York: Free Press
141. 141. 

     Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Nylund HK, Oxman AD. 2010. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 63:607–19
     [Google Scholar]
142. 142. 

     Ryan B, Gross NC 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol 8:15–24
     [Google Scholar]
143. 143. 

     Salloum RG, Theis RP, Pbert L, Gurka MJ, Porter M et al. 2018. Stakeholder engagement in developing an electronic clinical support tool for tobacco prevention in adolescent primary care. Children 5:170
     [Google Scholar]
144. 144. 

     Sanders MR, Kirby JN. 2012. Consumer engagement and the development, evaluation, and dissemination of evidence-based parenting programs. Behav. Ther. 43:236–50
     [Google Scholar]
145. 145. 

     Savoia E, Preston J, Biddinger PD 2013. A consensus process on the use of exercises and after action reports to assess and improve public health emergency preparedness and response. Prehospital Disaster Med 28:305–8
     [Google Scholar]
146. 146. 

     Scheirer MA. 2005. Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Am. J. Eval. 26:320–47
     [Google Scholar]
147. 147. 

     Scheirer MA, Dearing JW. 2011. An agenda for research on the sustainability of public health programs. Am. J. Public Health 101:2059–67
     [Google Scholar]
148. 148. 

     Schell SF, Luke DA, Schooley MW, Elliott MB, Herbers SH et al. 2013. Public health program capacity for sustainability: a new framework. Implement. Sci. 8:15
     [Google Scholar]
149. 149. 

     Schmelz K, Bowles S. 2021. Overcoming COVID-19 vaccination resistance when alternative policies affect the dynamics of conformism, social norms, and crowding out. PNAS 118:e2104912118
     [Google Scholar]
150. 150. 

     Shelton RC, Chambers DA, Glasgow RE. 2020. An extension of RE-AIM to enhance sustainability: addressing dynamic context and promoting health equity over time. Front. Public Health 8:134
     [Google Scholar]
151. 151. 

     Slater MD, Kelly KJ, Thackeray R 2006. Segmentation on a shoestring: health audience segmentation in limited-budget and local social marketing interventions. Health Promot. Pract. 7:170–73
     [Google Scholar]
152. 152. 

     Smith WR, Atala AJ, Terlecki RP, Kelly EE, Matthews CA 2020. Implementation guide for rapid integration of an outpatient telemedicine program during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 231:216–22.e2
     [Google Scholar]
153. 153. 

     Sterman JD. 2006. Learning from evidence in a complex world. Am. J. Public Health 96:505–14
     [Google Scholar]
154. 154. 

     Stirman SW, Kimberly J, Cook N, Calloway A, Castro F, Charns M. 2012. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement. Sci. 7:17
     [Google Scholar]
155. 155. 

     Tabak RG, Stamatakis KA, Jacobs JA, Brownson RC. 2014. What predicts dissemination efforts among public health researchers in the United States?. Public Health Rep 129:361–68
     [Google Scholar]
156. 156. 

     Turck CJ, Silva MA, Tremblay SR, Sachse SL. 2014. A preliminary study of health care professionals’ preferences for infographics versus conventional abstracts for communicating the results of clinical research. J. Contin. Educ. Health 34:S36–38
     [Google Scholar]
157. 157. 

     Valaitis R, Longaphy J, Ploeg J, Agarwal G, Oliver D et al. 2019. Health TAPESTRY: co-designing interprofessional primary care programs for older adults using the persona-scenario method. BMC Fam. Pract. 20:122
     [Google Scholar]
158. 158. 

     Valente TW. 2012. Network interventions. Science 337:49–53
     [Google Scholar]
159. 159. 

     van Karnebeek CDM, Houben RFA, Lafek M, Giannasi W, Stockler S 2012. The treatable intellectual disability APP www.treatable-id.org: a digital tool to enhance diagnosis & care for rare diseases. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 7:47
     [Google Scholar]
160. 160. 

     Vitale R, Blaine T, Zofkie E, Moreland-Russell S, Combs T et al. 2018. Developing an evidence-based program sustainability training curriculum: a group randomized, multi-phase approach. Implement. Sci. 13:126
     [Google Scholar]
161. 161. 

     Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN et al. 2017. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement. Sci. 12:108
     [Google Scholar]
162. 162. 

     Wharf Higgins J. 2011. Navigating through translational research: a social marketing compass. Health Mark. Q. 28:1–15
     [Google Scholar]
163. 163. 

     Williams F, Colditz GA, Hovmand P, Gehlert S. 2018. Combining community-engaged research with group model building to address racial disparities in breast cancer mortality and treatment. J. Health Disparities Res. Pract. 11:160–78
     [Google Scholar]
164. 164. 

     Willis CD, Mitton C, Gordon J, Best A 2012. System tools for system change. BMJ Q. Saf. 21:250–62
     [Google Scholar]
165. 165. 

     WHO (World Health Organ.) 2009. Practical Guidance for Scaling Up Health Service Innovations Geneva: World Health Organ.
166. 166. 

     Zimmerman L, Lounsbury DW, Rosen CS, Kimerling R, Trafton JA, Lindley SE. 2016. Participatory system dynamics modeling: increasing stakeholder engagement and precision to improve implementation planning in systems. Adm. Policy Ment. Health Ment. Health Serv. Res. 43:834–49
     [Google Scholar]