1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Public Health
  4. Volume 42, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Public Health

Volume 42, 2021

Trends in Abortion Policies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Abstract

The decision to terminate a pregnancy is not one that is taken lightly. The need for an abortion reflects limited sexual autonomy, ineffective or lack of access to contraceptive options, or a health indication. Abortion is protected under human rights law. That notwithstanding, access to abortions continues to be contested in many parts of the world, with vested interests from politically and religiously conservative states, patriarchal societies, and cultural mores, not just within local contexts but also within a broader geopolitical context. Criminalization of a women's choice not to carry a pregnancy is a significant driver of unsafe procedures, and even where abortions are provided legally, the policies remain constrained by the practice or by a lack of coherence. This review outlines the trends in abortion policy in low- and middle-income countries and highlights priority areas to ensure that women are safe and able to exercise their reproductive rights.

Keyword(s): abortion, criminalization, LMICs, low- and middle-income countries, policy
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442
2021-04-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/publhealth/42/1/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. 
    Allotey P. 1995. The burden of illness in pregnancy in rural Ghana : a study of maternal morbidity and interventions in Northern Ghana PhD Thesis, Dep. Gen. Pract., Univ. West. Aust Crawley:
  2. 2. 
    Allotey-Reidpath KD, Allotey P, Reidpath DD 2018. Nine months a slave: when pregnancy is involuntary servitude to a foetus. Reprod. Health Matters 26:5257–61
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 3. 
    Aniteye P, Mayhew SH. 2019. Globalisation and transitions in abortion care in Ghana. BMC Health Serv. Res. 19:185
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4. 
    Assefa EM. 2019. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of health providers towards safe abortion provision in Addis Ababa health centers. BMC Womens Health 19:183
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5. 
    Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Moller A-B, Tunçalp Ö et al. 2020. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Glob. Health 8:e1152–61
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6. 
    Bennett J. 2017. The #MeToo moment: the year in gender. The New York Times Dec. 30. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/30/us/the-metoo-moment-the-year-in-gender.html
    [Google Scholar]
  7. 7. 
    Berer M. 2017. Abortion law and policy around the world: in search of decriminalization. Health Hum. Rights 19:113–27
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8. 
    Berer M. 2020. To what extent have abortion services not been available since the Covid-19 pandemic began, and why. ? International Campaign for Women's Rights to Safe Abortion July 15. https://www.safeabortionwomensright.org/discussion-to-what-extent-have-abortion-services-not-been-available-since-the-covid-19-pandemic-began-and-why/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 9. 
    Bhaktwani A. 2012. The PC-PNDT act in a nutshell. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 22:2133–34
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10. 
    BMA (Br. Med. Assoc.) 2017. Decriminalisation of abortion Discuss. Pap., BMA London: https://www.bma.org.uk/media/1142/bma-paper-on-the-decriminalisation-of-abortion-february-2017.pdf
  11. 11. 
    Brooks N, Bendavid E, Miller G 2019. USA aid policy and induced abortion in sub-Saharan Africa: an analysis of the Mexico City Policy. Lancet Glob. Health 7:8e1046–53
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12. 
    Cent. Reprod. Rights 2019. By the numbers: the legal status of abortion worldwide Cent. Reprod. Rights New York: https://reproductiverights.org/sites/default/files/documents/World-Abortion-Map-ByTheNumbers.pdf
  13. 13. 
    Cent. Reprod. Rights 2019. The world's abortion laws Map, Cent. Reprod. Rights New York: https://reproductiverights.org/worldabortionlaws
  14. 14. 
    Cent. Reprod. Rights 2020. Law and policy guide: gestational limits. Center for Reproductive Rights https://reproductiverights.org/law-and-policy-guide-gestational-limits
    [Google Scholar]
  15. 15. 
    Chae S, Desai S, Crowell M, Sedgh G, Singh S 2017. Characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in selected low- and middle-income countries. PLOS ONE 12:3e0172976
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16. 
    Correa S. 2003. Abortion is a global political issue. DAWN Informs 2003:1–3 https://www.dawnnet.org/uploads/documents/PAPER_SONIA_Abortion%20is%20a%20Global%20Issue_SRHR.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  17. 17. 
    Datar N. 2017. Indian women seeing abortions beyond 20 weeks face desperate legal struggles. Scroll.in Jan. 17. https://scroll.in/pulse/826747/indian-women-seeing-abortions-beyond-20-weeks-face-desperate-legal-struggles
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 18. 
    Dickens BM. 2019. Post-abortion care: ethical and legal duties. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 147:2273–78
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19. 
    Ewnetu DB, Thorsen VC, Solbakk JH, Magelssen M 2020. Still a moral dilemma: how Ethiopian professionals providing abortion come to terms with conflicting norms and demands. BMC Med. Ethics 21:116
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20. 
    Fine JB, Mayall K, Sepúlveda L 2017. The role of international human rights norms in the liberalization of abortion laws globally. Health Hum. Rights 19:69–80
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21. 
    Finer L, Fine JB. 2013. Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback. Am. J. Public Health 103:4585–89
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 22. 
    Gaur KD. 1986. Abortion and the law in India. J. Indian Law Inst. 28:3348–63
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23. 
    Gillwald A. 2018. Understanding the gender gap in the Global South. World Economic Forum Novemb. 2. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/understanding-the-gender-gap-in-the-global-south/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. 24. 
    Gov. India 1971. The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 Act 34, Gov. India New Delhi: http://ncwapps.nic.in/acts/THEMEDICALTERMINATIONOFPREGNANCYACT1971.pdf
  25. 25. 
    Gov. India 2012. Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012 Act 32, Gov. India New Delhi: https://wcd.nic.in/sites/default/files/POCSO%20Act%2C%202012.pdf
  26. 26. 
    Gov. India 2015. Safe abortion guidance: ensuring access to safe abortion and addressing gender-biased sex-selection Handb., Natl. Health Mission, Minist. Health Family Welf New Delhi: https://www.ipasdevelopmentfoundation.org/resourceFiles/78201905090047.pdf
  27. 27. 
    Guttmacher Inst 2016. Adolescents’ need for and use of abortion services in developing countries Fact Sheet, Guttmacher Inst New York: https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/adolescents-need-and-use-abortion-services-developing-countries
  28. 28. 
    Guttmacher Inst 2016. Later abortion. Guttmacher Institute https://www.guttmacher.org/evidence-you-can-use/later-abortion
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 29. 
    Guttmacher Inst 2018. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access Rep., Guttmacher Inst New York: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-worldwide-2017
  30. 30. 
    Hedayat KM, Shooshtarizadeh P, Raza M 2006. Therapeutic abortion in Islam: contemporary views of Muslim Shiite scholars and effect of recent Iranian legislation. J. Med. Ethics 32:11652–57
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 31. 
    Holcombe SJ, Berhe A, Cherie A 2015. Personal beliefs and professional responsibilities: Ethiopian midwives’ attitudes toward providing abortion services after legal reform. Stud. Fam. Plann. 46:173–95
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32. 
    Hum. Rights Watch 2018. Trump's “Mexico City policy” or “global gag rule”: questions and answers. Human Rights Watch Febr. 14. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/02/14/trumps-mexico-city-policy-or-global-gag-rule#
    [Google Scholar]
  33. 33. 
    Hunt K. 2019. Twitter, social movements, and claiming allies in abortion debates. J. Inf. Technol. Politics 16:4394–410
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34. 
    Igde FA, Gul R, Igde M, Yalcin M 2008. Abortion in Turkey: women in rural areas and the law. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 58:550370–73
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35. 
    Ito S. 2018. Saying #MeToo in Japan. Politico Jan. 2. https://www.politico.eu/article/metoo-sexual-assault-women-rights-japan/
    [Google Scholar]
  36. 36. 
    Jain D, Tronic B. 2019. Conflicting abortion laws in India: unintended barriers to safe abortion for adolescent girls. Indian J. Med. Ethics 4:4310–17
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37. 
    Johnson BR, Lavelanet AF, Schlitt S 2018. Global Abortion Policies Database: a new approach to strengthening knowledge on laws, policies, and human rights standards. BMC Int. Health Hum. Rights 18:135
     [Google Scholar]
  38. 38. 
    Kapp N, Glasier A. 2013. WHO technical and policy guidance emphasizes the health systems’ responsibility to provide safe abortion services. Contraception 87:5511–12
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39. 
    Keogh LA, Gillam L, Bismark M, McNamee K, Webster A et al. 2019. Conscientious objection to abortion, the law and its implementation in Victoria, Australia: perspectives of abortion service providers. BMC Med. Ethics 20:111
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40. 
    Keogh SC, Kimaro G, Muganyizi P, Philbin J, Kahwa A et al. 2015. Incidence of induced abortion and post-abortion care in Tanzania. PLOS ONE 10:9e0133933
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41. 
    Lahiri D, Konar M. 1976. Abortion hazards. J. Indian Med. Assoc. 66:11288–94
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42. 
    Mac-Seing M, Zinszer K, Eryong B, Ajok E, Ferlatte O, Zarowsky C 2020. The intersectional jeopardy of disability, gender and sexual and reproductive health: experiences and recommendations of women and men with disabilities in Northern Uganda. Sex. Reprod. Health Matters 28:1772654
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43. 
    Mandal KT. 1982. Problem of unmarried mothers (a study of sociopsychological aspects of 100 women seeking MTP). J. Indian Med. Assoc. 79:5–681–86
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44. 
    Maternity Worldwide 2020. Why do women die in childbirth in low-income countries. ? Maternity Worldwide https://www.maternityworldwide.org/the-issues/women-die-childbirth/
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 45. 
    McBroom K, Jain D, Gandhi M 2017. The POCSO Act and the MTP Act: key information for medical providers Policy Brief, IPAS, Delhi India: https://www.ipasdevelopmentfoundation.org/publications/policy-brief-the-pocso-act-and-the-mtp-act-key-information-for-medical-providers.html
  46. 46. 
    Mutua MM, Manderson L, Musenge E, Achia TNO 2018. Policy, law and post-abortion care services in Kenya. PLOS ONE 13:9e0204240
     [Google Scholar]
  47. 47. 
    Narasimhan M, Pillay Y, García PJ, Allotey P, Gorna R et al. 2018. Investing in sexual and reproductive health and rights of women and girls to reach HIV and UHC goals. Lancet Glob. Health 6:10e1058–59
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48. 
    Ngwena CG. 2010. Inscribing abortion as a human right: significance of the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa. Hum. Rights Q. 32:4783–864
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49. 
    Ngwena CG. 2010. Protocol to the African Charter on the Rights of Women: implications for access to abortion at the regional level. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 110:2163–66
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50. 
    Oppong-Darko P, Amponsa-Achiano K, Darj E 2017. “I am ready and willing to provide the service … though my religion frowns on abortion”—Ghanaian midwives’ mixed attitudes to abortion services: a qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14:121501
     [Google Scholar]
  51. 51. 
    Pheterson G, Azize Y. 2005. Abortion practice in the northeast Caribbean: “Just write down stomach pain. .” Reprod. Health Matters 13:2644–53
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52. 
    PMNCH (Partnersh. Mat. Newborn Child Health) 2017. Supporting sexual reproductive health and rights News Release, Febr. 10. https://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2017/reproductive_right/en/
  53. 53. 
    Radhakrishnan A, Sarver E, Shubin G 2017. Protecting safe abortion in humanitarian settings: overcoming legal and policy barriers. Reprod. Health Matters 25:5140–47
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54. 
    Rahn W. 2017. Blame victims and the West—India's way of justifying sexual assaults. ? DW May 1. https://www.dw.com/en/blame-victims-and-the-west-indias-way-of-justifying-sexual-assaults/a-37023646
    [Google Scholar]
  55. 55. 
    Rasch V. 2011. Unsafe abortion and postabortion care—an overview. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand 90:7692–700
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56. 
    Rastogi A, Chandrashekar R. 2019. Assessing the judiciary's role in access to safe abortion: an analysis of Supreme Court and High Court judgements in India from June 2016-April 2019 Rep., Pratigya Campaign Gend. Equal. Safe Abort New Delhi: https://pratigyacampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/assessing-the-judiciarys-role-in-access-to-safe-abortion.pdf
  57. 57. 
    Riley T, Sully E, Ahmed Z, Biddlecom A 2020. Estimates of the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health in low- and middle-income countries. Int. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 46:73–76
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58. 
    Rodriguez MI, Mendoza WS, Guerra-Palacio C, Guzman NA, Tolosa JE 2015. Medical abortion and manual vacuum aspiration for legal abortion protect women's health and reduce costs to the health system: findings from Colombia. Reprod. Health Matters 22:44 Suppl. 1125–33
     [Google Scholar]
  59. 59. 
    Shah I, Ahman E. 2009. Unsafe abortion: global and regional incidence, trends, consequences, and challenges. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 31:121149–58
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60. 
    Singh S, Remez L, Sedgh G, Kwok L, Onda T 2018. Abortion worldwide 2017: uneven progress and unequal access Rep., Guttmacher Inst New York: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-worldwide-2017
  61. 61. 
    Singh S, Shekhar C, Acharya R, Moore AM, Stillman M et al. 2018. The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancy in India, 2015. Lancet Glob. Health 6:1e111–20
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62. 
    Stillman M, Frost JJ, Singh S, Moore AM, Kalyanwala S 2014. Abortion in India: a literature review Rep., Guttmacher Inst New York: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-india-literature-review
  63. 63. 
    Suh S. 2018. Accounting for abortion: accomplishing transnational reproductive governance through post-abortion care in Senegal. Glob. Public Health 13:6662–79
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64. 
    UN 2014. Abortion policies and reproductive health around the world Rep. ST/ESA/SER.A/343, UN New York: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/policy/AbortionPoliciesReproductiveHealth.pdf
  65. 65. 
    UN Spec. Conf 1995. Beijing declaration and platform for action Sept. 15. UN Doc. A/CONF.177/20, A/CONF.177/20/Add.1. https://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/pdfs/Beijing_Declaration_and_Platform_for_Action.pdf
  66. 66. 
    Wenham C, Arevalo A, Coast E, Corrêa S, Cuellar K et al. 2019. Zika, abortion and health emergencies: a review of contemporary debates. Glob. Health 15:149
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2012. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems Rep., WHO Geneva: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/unsafe_abortion/9789241548434/en/
  68. 68. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2017. Fragile and conflict-affected states. Health and WHO: country presence profile. WHO/CCU/17.06, WHO Geneva: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255801/WHO-CCU-17.06-eng.pdf
  69. 69. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2018. WHO recommendations on adolescents’ sexual and reproductive health and rights Rep., WHO Geneva: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/adolescent-srhr-who-recommendations/en/
  70. 70. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2020. Density of physicians (total number per 1000 population, 2020). Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data https://www.who.int/gho/health_workforce/physicians_density/en/
    [Google Scholar]
  71. 71. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.) 2020. Maintaining essential health services: operational guidance for the COVID-19 context Rep., WHO Geneva: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-essential-health-services-2020.1
  72. 72. 
    WHO (World Health Organ.), HRP (Hum, Reprod. Progr.) 2018. Legal grounds for abortion Glob. Abort. Policies Database WHO, Geneva: https://abortion-policies.srhr.org
  73. 73. 
    Zuccala E, Horton R. 2018. Addressing the unfinished agenda on sexual and reproductive health and rights in the SDG era. Lancet 391:101402581–83
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442
Loading
Trends in Abortion Policies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Annual Review of Public Health 42, 505 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082619-102442
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error