1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 8, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 8, 2016

The Economics of Wind Power

Abstract

Many countries have incentivized wind power projects to reduce their reliance on fossil fuels for generating electricity. As shown in this review, the benefits and costs of integrating electricity from an intermittent wind source into a preexisting electricity grid depend on the operating protocols of the electricity system, the preexisting generation mix, wind profiles, and the nature of economic incentives. Electricity systems are discussed from generation through transmission and distribution to retail demand, including how wind energy impacts investment in marginal (peak time) generating assets. The discussion also examines issues that could limit the usefulness of wind power at the high penetration rates now envisioned: the inability to store electricity, the need for fast-responding backup-generating capacity, network instability, low-capacity factors, and inappropriate incentives. Overall, this review finds that the costs of wind power likely exceed the benefits and that there may be limits to the proportion of electricity that can be generated by wind.

Keyword(s): climate change, demand management, electricity market deregulation, electricity storage, fossil fuel externalities, generating-capacity investment, intermittent energy, peak load pricing
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-091115-022544
2016-10-05
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/8/1/annurev-resource-091115-022544.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-091115-022544&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. ANI (Asian News Int.) 2015. Coal to remain important mainstay fuel for India and Japan's energy plans. Business Standard Apr. 29. http://www.business-standard.com/article/news-ani/coal-to-remain-important-mainstay-fuel-for-india-and-japan-s-energy-plans-115042900893_1.html
  2. Aust. Acoust. Soc 2012. Wind turbine noise. Acoust. Aust. 40:1, Spec. Issue5–83 [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker E, Fowlie J, Lemoine D, Reynolds SS. 2013. The economics of solar electricity. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5:387–426 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beck F, Martinot E. 2004. Renewable energy policies and barriers. Encyclopedia of Energy: Renewable and Alternative Sources CJ Cleveland 365–83 New York: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  5. Benitez LE, Benitez PC, van Kooten GC. 2008. The economics of wind power with energy storage. Energy Econ. 30:41973–89 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borchers AM, Duke JM, Parsons GR. 2007. Does willingness to pay for green energy differ by source?. Energy Policy 35:63327–34 [Google Scholar]
  7. Borenstein S. 2012. The private and public economics of renewable electricity generation. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:167–92 [Google Scholar]
  8. BP (Br. Pet.) 2015. BP statistical review of world energy June 2015 Rep., Br. Pet., London , 64th ed..
  9. Broeer T. 2015. Analysis of smart grid and demand response technologies for renewable energy integration: operational and environmental challenges PhD Thesis, Univ. Victoria, Victoria, BC
  10. Coady D, Parry I, Sears L, Shang B. 2015. How large are global energy subsidies? Work. Pap. WP/15/105 Fisc. Aff. Dep., Int. Monet. Fund, Washington, DC
  11. Cooper S. 2012. Wind farm noise: an ethical dilemma for the Australian Acoustical Society. Acoust. Aust. 40:2139–42 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cramton P, Stoft S. 2006. The convergence of market designs for adequate generating capacity with special attention to the CAISO's resource adequacy problem White Pap. for Electr. Overs. Board, Cent. Energy Environ. Policy Res., MIT, Cambridge, MA. http://ceepr.mit.edu/files/papers/2006-007.pdf
  13. Cullen J. 2013. Measuring the environmental benefits of wind-generated electricity. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 5:4107–33 [Google Scholar]
  14. Darwall R. 2015. Central Planning with Market Features. How Renewable Subsidies Destroyed the UK Electricity Market Surrey, UK: Cent. Policy Stud.
  15. DeCarolis JF, Keith DW. 2006. The economics of large-scale wind power in a carbon constrained world. Energy Policy 34:4395–410 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dewees DN. 2013. The economics of renewable electricity policy in Ontario Work. Pap. 478, Dep. Econ., Univ. Toronto, Toronto, ON. https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/index.php/index/research/workingPapers/
  17. EIA (US Energy Inf. Admin.) 2014. India's coal industry in flux as government sets ambitious coal production targets. Today In Energy Aug. 25. http://205.254.135.7/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=22652
  18. Ek K, Persson L. 2014. Wind farms—Where and how to place them? A choice experiment approach to measure consumer preferences for characteristics of wind farm establishment in Sweden. Ecol. Econ. 105:193–203 [Google Scholar]
  19. Energinet.dk 2015. Annual report 2014. Ready energy—now and into the future. Rep., Energinet.dk, Fredericia, Den. http://energinet.dk/SiteCollectionDocuments/Engelske%20dokumenter/Om%20os/annual-report-2014.pdf
  20. ERCOT (Electr. Reliab. Counc. Tex.) 2015. Power forward. 2014 state of the grid report Rep., Electr. Reliab. Counc. Tex., Austin, TX. http://www.ercot.com/content/news/presentations/2015/2014%20State_of_the_Grid_Web_21015.pdf
  21. Erickson WP, Johnson GD, Young DP Jr. 2005. A summary and comparison of bird mortality from anthropogenic causes with an emphasis on collisions Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-191, US Dep. Agric. For. Serv. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr191/Asilomar/pdfs/1029–1042.pdf
  22. Firestone J, Kempton W, Krueger A. 2009. Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the USA. Wind Energy 12:2183–202 [Google Scholar]
  23. Firestone J, Kempton W, Lilley MB, Samotesku K. 2012. Public acceptance of offshore wind power across regions and through time. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 55:101369–86 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fox C. 2011. The effects of CO2 abatement policies on power system expansion Master's Thesis, Univ. Victoria, Victoria, BC
  25. Gagnon L, Belanger C, Yohji U. 2002. Life-cycle assessment of electricity generation options: the status of research in year 2001. Energy Policy 30:1267–78 [Google Scholar]
  26. Groothuis PA, Groothuis JD, Whitehead JC. 2008. Green versus green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energy Policy 36:41545–50 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gross R, Heptonstall P, Leach M, Anderson D, Green T, Skea J. 2007. Renewables and the grid: understanding intermittency. ICE Proc. Energy 160:131–41 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gross R, Leach M, Bauen A. 2003. Progress in renewable energy. Environ. Int. 29:1105–22 [Google Scholar]
  29. GWEC (Glob. Wind Energy Counc.) 2015. Global wind report. Annual market update 2014. Rep., Glob. Wind Energy Counc., Brussels, Belg. http://www.gwec.net/publications/global-wind-report-2/
  30. Heintzelman MD, Tuttle CM. 2012. Values in the wind: a hedonic analysis of wind power facilities. Land. Econ. 88:3571–89 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hirst E, Hild J. 2004. Integrating large amounts of wind energy with a small electric-power system Rep., Harvard Electr. Policy Group, John F. Kennedy Sch. Gov., Ash Cent., Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA. http://www.innovations.harvard.edu/integrating-large-amounts-wind-energy-small-electric-power-system
  32. Hitaj C. 2013. Wind power development in the United States. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 65:3394–410 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hitaj C, Schymura M, Löschel A. 2014. The impact of a feed-in tariff on wind power development in Germany Disc. Pap. 14–035, Cent. Eur. Econ. Res., Mannheim, Ger. http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp14035.pdf
  34. Hoen B,, Wiser R,, Cappers P,, Thayer M,, Sethi G. 2011. Wind energy facilities and residential properties: the effect of proximity and view on sales prices. J. Real Estate Res. 33:3279–316 [Google Scholar]
  35. Hoskins E. 2015. Charting the costs and effectiveness of renewable energy in Europe. Edmhdotme Blog May 12. https://edmhdotme.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/charting-the-effectiveness-of-renewable-energy-in-europe/
  36. Hughes KR, Brown DR. 1995. Transmission line capital costs Rep. PNL-10561/UC1370 for US Dep. Energy, Pac. Northwest Lab., Portland, OR
  37. IEA (Int. Energy Agency) 2014. World Energy Outlook 2014 Paris: OECD/IEA
  38. Inhaber H. 2012. Why wind power does not deliver the expected emissions reductions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 15:62557–62 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jenkins J, Nordhaus T, Shellenberger M. 2011. Energy Emergence. Rebound and backfire as emergent phenomena. Breakthrough Inst., Oakland, CA. http://thebreakthrough.org/blog/Energy_Emergence.pdf
  40. Johnston CMT, van Kooten GC. 2015. Economics of co-firing coal and biomass: an application to Western Canada. Energy Econ. 48:7–17 [Google Scholar]
  41. Johnston CMT, van Kooten GC. 2016. Global trade impacts of increasing Europe's bioenergy demand. J. Forest Econ. 23:27–44 [Google Scholar]
  42. Joskow PL. 1997. Restructuring, competition and regulatory reform in the U.S. electricity sector. J. Econ. Perspect. 11:3119–38 [Google Scholar]
  43. Joskow PL. 2006. Competitive electricity markets and investment in new generating capacity Work. Pap. 06–009, Cent. Energy Environ. Policy Res., Dep. Econ., Sloan Sch. Manag., MIT, Cambridge, MA. http://economics.mit.edu/files/1190
  44. Joskow PL. 2008a. Capacity payments in imperfect electricity markets: need and design. Util. Policy 16:159–70 [Google Scholar]
  45. Joskow PL. 2008b. Lessons learned from electricity market liberalization. Energy J. 29:9–42 [Google Scholar]
  46. Joskow PL. 2011. Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable generating technologies. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 101:3238–41 [Google Scholar]
  47. Joskow PL. 2012. Creating a smarter U.S. electricity grid. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:129–48 [Google Scholar]
  48. Joskow PL. 2014. Incentive regulation in theory and practice: electric transmission and distribution networks. Economic Regulation and Its Reform, N Rose 291–344 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Joskow P, Tirole J. 2006. Retail electricity competition. RAND J. Econ. 37:4799–815 [Google Scholar]
  50. Joskow P, Tirole J. 2007. Reliability and competitive electricity markets. RAND J. Econ. 38:160–84 [Google Scholar]
  51. Joskow PL, Wolfram CD. 2012. Dynamic pricing of electricity. Am. Econ. Rev. Pap. Proc. 102:3381–85 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaffine DT, McBee BJ, Lieskovsky J. 2013. Emissions savings from wind power generation in Texas. Energy J. 34:1155–75 [Google Scholar]
  53. Kempton W, Firestone J, Lilley J, Rouleau T, Whitaker P. 2005. The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod. Coast. Manag. 33:2119–49 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kennedy S. 2005. Wind power planning: assessing long-term costs and benefits. Energy Policy 33:131661–75 [Google Scholar]
  55. Koop GM, McKitrick RR, Tole LA. 2010. Air pollution, economic activity and respiratory illness: evidence from Canadian cities, 1974–1994. Environ. Model. Softw. 25:7873–85 [Google Scholar]
  56. Krueger AD,, Parsons GR,, Firestone J. 2011. Valuing the visual disamenity of offshore wind power projects at varying distances from the shore: an application on the Delaware shoreline. Land. Econ. 87:2268–83 [Google Scholar]
  57. Lacal-Arántegui R, Serrano-González J. 2015. 2014 JRC Wind Status Report Brussels, Belg: Joint Res. Cent. Eur. Comm https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/2014-jrc-wind-status-report?search
  58. Ladenburg J. 2009. Stated public preferences for on-land and offshore wind power generation. Wind Energy 12:2171–81 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ladenburg J, Dubgaard A. 2007. Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from offshore wind farms in Denmark. Energy Policy 35:84059–71 [Google Scholar]
  60. Landry CE, Allen T, Cherry TL, Whitehead JC. 2012. Offshore wind turbines and coastal recreation demand. Resour. Energy Econ. 34:193–111 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ledec GC, Rapp KW, Aiello RG. 2011. Greening the Wind: Environmental and Social Considerations for Wind Power Development Washington, DC: World Bank
  62. Liik O, Oidram R, Keel M. 2003. Estimation of real emissions reduction caused by wind generators. Presented at Int. Energy Workshop, Laxenburg, Austria, June 24–26
  63. Long JCS, Greenblatt J. 2012. The 80% solution: radical carbon emission cuts for California. Issues Sci. Tech. 28:361–66 [Google Scholar]
  64. Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP. 2013. Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States. Biol. Conserv. 168:201–9 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lund H. 2005. Large-scale integration of wind power into different energy systems. Energy 30:132402–12 [Google Scholar]
  66. Mann CC. 2013. What if we never run out of oil?. The Atlantic May. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/05/what-if-we-never-run-out-of-oil/309294/
  67. McWilliam MK, van Kooten GC, Crawford C. 2012. A method for optimizing the location of wind farms. Renew. Energy 48:287–99 [Google Scholar]
  68. Miskelly A, Quirk T. 2010. Wind farming in south east Australia. Energy Environ. 20/21:1249–55 [Google Scholar]
  69. Miskelly P. 2012. Wind farms in Eastern Australia—recent lessons. Energy Environ. 23:81233–60 [Google Scholar]
  70. Miskelly P. 2013. Letter to the Editor: response to article by S. Cooper on wind farm noise. Acoust. Aust. 41:2139–40 [Google Scholar]
  71. NERC (North Amer. Electr. Reliab. Corp.) 2009. Special report: accommodating high levels of variable generation North Amer. Electr. Reliab. Corp., Princeton, NJ. http://www.nerc.com/files/ivgtf_report_041609.pdf
  72. Newbery DM. 2011. Contracting for wind generation Work. Pap. 1120. Electr. Policy Res. Group, Univ. Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/242048
  73. Newbery DM. 2012. Reforming competitive electricity markets to meet environmental targets. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 1:169–82 [Google Scholar]
  74. Nicola S, Andresen T. 2012. Merkel's green shift forces Germany to burn more coal. BloombergBusiness Aug. 20. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-08-19/merkel-s-green-shift-forces-germany-to-burn-more-coal-energy
  75. Nordel's Grid Group 2000. Non-dispatchable production in the Nordel System Presented at Annu. Meet. http://wind.ucdavis.edu/rpsintegration/library/Nordel%20non-dispatchable%20production%20May00.pdf
  76. NordREG 2014. Nordic market report 2014. Development in the Nordic electricity market. Rep. 4/2014, Nord. Energy Regul., Eskilstuna, Swed. http://www.nordicenergyregulators.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Nordic-Market-Report-2014.pdf
  77. Novan K. 2015. Valuing the wind: renewable energy policies and air pollution avoided. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 7:3291–326 [Google Scholar]
  78. Oswald J, Raine M, Ashraf-Ball H. 2008. Will British weather provide reliable electricity?. Energy Policy 36:83202–15 [Google Scholar]
  79. Owen OD. 2004. Environmental externalities, market distortions and the economics of renewable energy technologies. Energy J. 25:3127–56 [Google Scholar]
  80. Pettersson F, Söderholm P. 2009. The diffusion of renewable electricity in the presence of climate policy and technology learning: the case of Sweden. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13:82012–40 [Google Scholar]
  81. Pettersson M, Ek K, Söderholm K, Söderholm P. 2010. Wind power planning and permitting: comparative perspectives from the Nordic countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 14:93116–23 [Google Scholar]
  82. Prescott R, van Kooten GC. 2009. The economics of wind power: destabilizing an electricity grid with renewable power. Clim. Policy 9:2155–68 [Google Scholar]
  83. REN21 (Renew. Energy Policy Netw.) 2015. Renewables 2015. Global status report. Rep., Renew. Energy Policy Netw., UN Environ. Prog., Paris. http://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/REN12-GSR2015_Onlinebook_low1.pdf
  84. Roth IF, Ambs LL. 2004. Incorporating externalities into a full cost approach to electric power generation life-cycle costing. Energy 29:2125–44 [Google Scholar]
  85. Scorah H, Sopinka A, van Kooten GC. 2012. The economics of storage, transmission and drought: integrating variable wind power into spatially separated electricity grids. Energy Econ. 34:2536–41 [Google Scholar]
  86. Simmons RT, Yonk RM, Hansen ME. 2015. The true cost of energy: wind. Final report. Strata Policy, Inst. Polit. Econ., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT. https://www.strata.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Full-Report-True-Cost-of-Wind1.pdf
  87. Sims S,, Dent P, Oskrochi GR. 2008. Modelling the impact of wind farms on house prices in the UK. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 12:4251–69 [Google Scholar]
  88. Skaburskis A. 2015. The effects of wind turbines on property values in Ontario: Does public perception match empirical evidence?: Comment.. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 63:2275–76 [Google Scholar]
  89. Smil V. 2003. Energy at the Crossroads. Global Perspectives and Uncertainties Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  90. Söderholm P, Ek K, Pettersson M. 2007. Wind power development in Sweden: global policies and local obstacles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11:3365–400 [Google Scholar]
  91. Stacy TF, Taylor GS. 2015. Levelized cost of electricity from existing generation sources Rep., Inst. Energy Res., Washington, DC. http://instituteforenergyresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ier_lcoe_2015.pdf
  92. Stoft S. 2002. Power System Economics. Designing Markets for Electricity Piscataway, NJ: IEEE/Wiley-InterScience
  93. Thelander CG, Smallwood KS, Rugge L. 2003. Bird risk behaviors and fatalities at the Altamont Pass Wind Resource Area. Period of performance: March 1998–December 2000. Rep. NREL/SR-500-33829, Natl. Renew. Energy Lab., Golden, CO. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/33829.pdf
  94. Timilsina GR, van Kooten GC, Narbel PA. 2013. Global wind power development: economics and policies. Energy Policy 61:642–52 [Google Scholar]
  95. Too Mild? 2015. The Economist, Sept. 5. http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21663290-concerns-grow-about-jokowis-gentle-style-leadership-too-mild
  96. United Nations 2014. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014 UN, New York. http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2014%20MDG%20report/MDG%202014%20English%20web.pdf
  97. van Kooten GC. 2010. Wind power: the economic impact of intermittency. Lett. Spatial Resour. Sci. 3:11–17 [Google Scholar]
  98. van Kooten GC. 2012a. Wind energy policy. Comprehensive Renewable Energy 2 Wind Energy JK Kaldellis 541–68 Oxford, UK: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  99. van Kooten GC. 2012b. Natural gas, wind and nuclear options for generating electricity in a carbon constrained world REPA Work. Pap. 2012-01, Dep. Econ., Univ. Victoria, Victoria, BC. http://web.uvic.ca/∼repa/publications.htm
  100. van Kooten GC. 2015. All you want to know about the economics of wind power REPA Work. Pap. 2015-07, Dep. Econ., Univ. Victoria, Victoria, BC. http://web.uvic.ca/∼repa/publications.htm
  101. van Kooten GC, de Vries FP. 2013. Carbon offsets. Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource and Environmental Economics 1 J Shogren 6–8 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  102. van Kooten GC, Johnston C, Wong L. 2013. Wind versus nuclear options for generating electricity in a carbon-constrained world: strategizing in an energy-rich economy. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 95:2505–11 [Google Scholar]
  103. van Kooten GC, Wong L. 2010. Economics of wind power when national grids are unreliable. Energy Policy 38:41991–98 [Google Scholar]
  104. Voorspools KR, D'haeseleer WD. 2006. An analytical formula for the capacity credit of wind power. Renew. Energy 31:145–54 [Google Scholar]
  105. Vyn RJ, McCullough RM. 2014. The effects of wind turbines on property values in Ontario: Does public perception match empirical evidence?. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 62:3365–92 [Google Scholar]
  106. White DJ. 2004. Danish wind: Too good to be true? Util. J. (July):37–39. http://docs.wind-watch.org/White-DenmarkTooGood.pdf
  107. Wilson JC, Elliott M. 2009. The habitat-creation potential of offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 12:2203–12 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-091115-022544
Loading
The Economics of Wind Power
Annual Review of Resource Economics 8, 181 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-091115-022544
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-091115-022544
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-091115-022544
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error