The Effect of Corporate Environmental Performance on Corporate Financial Performance

Literature Cited

1. Albertini E 2013. Does environmental management improve financial performance? A meta-analytical review. Organ. Environ. 26:4431–57
   [Google Scholar]
2. Al-Tuwaijri SA, Christensen TE, Hughes KE 2004. The relations among environmental disclosure, environmental performance, and economic performance: a simultaneous equations approach. Account. Organ. Soc. 29:5447–71
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ambec S, Lanoie P 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 22:445–62
   [Google Scholar]
4. Amores-Salvadó J, Martín-de Castro G, Navas-López J 2014. Green corporate image: moderating the connection between environmental product innovation and firm performance. J. Clean. Prod. 83:356–65
   [Google Scholar]
5. Ann GE, Zailani S, Wahid NA 2006. A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms’ performance in Malaysia. Manag. Environ. Q. 17:173–93
   [Google Scholar]
6. Aragón-Correa J, Hurtado-Torres N, Sharma S, García-Morales V 2008. Environmental strategy and performance in small firms: a resource-based perspective. J. Environ. Manag. 86:188–103
   [Google Scholar]
7. Aragón-Correa J, Rubio-Lopez E 2007. Proactive corporate environmental strategies: myths and misunderstandings. Long Range Plan 40:3357–81
   [Google Scholar]
8. Blackburn VL, Doran M, Shrader CB 1994. Investigating the dimensions of social responsibility and the consequences for corporate financial performance. J. Manag. Issues 6:195–212
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bosch JC, Eckard EW, Lee I 1998. EPA enforcement, firm response strategies, and stockholder wealth: an empirical examination. Manag. Decis. Econ. 19:3167–77
   [Google Scholar]
10. Busch T, Hoffmann VH 2011. How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance. Bus. Soc. 50:2233–65
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cañón-de-Francia J, Garcés-Ayerbe C 2009. ISO 14001 environmental certification: A sign valued by the market. ? Environ. Resour. Econ. 44:2245–62
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carmona-Moreno E, Céspedes-Lorente J, De Burgos-Jiménez J 2004. Environmental strategies in Spanish hotels: contextual factors and performance. Serv. Ind. J. 24:3101–30
    [Google Scholar]
13. Christmann P 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complementary assets. Acad. Manag. J. 43:4663–80
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD 2004. The market valuation of environmental capital expenditures by pulp and paper companies. Account. Rev. 79:2329–53
    [Google Scholar]
15. Clarkson PM, Li Y, Richardson GD, Vasvari FP 2011. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. J. Account. Public Policy 30:2122–44
    [Google Scholar]
16. Clemens B 2006. Economic incentives and small firms: Does it pay to be green. ? J. Bus. Res. 59:4492–500
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cohen M, Fenn S, Naimon J 1995. Environmental and financial performance: Are they related? Work. Pap., Vanderbilt Univ Nashville, TN:
18. Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J 1997. Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Bus. Strategy Environ. 6:2104–14
    [Google Scholar]
19. de Burgos-Jiménez J, Vázquez-Brust D, Plaza-Úbeda J, Dijkshoorn J 2013. Environmental protection and financial performance: an empirical analysis in Wales. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 33:8981–1018
    [Google Scholar]
20. Delmas M, Hoffmann VH, Kuss M 2011. Under the tip of the iceberg: absorptive capacity, environmental strategy, and competitive advantage. Bus. Soc. 50:1116–54
    [Google Scholar]
21. Dixon-Fowler HR, Slater DJ, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE, Romi AM 2013. Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP–CFP relationship. J. Bus. Ethics 112:2353–66
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dowell G, Hart S, Yeung B 2000. Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value. ? Manag. Sci. 46:81059–74
    [Google Scholar]
23. Earnhart D, Lizal L 2007. Effect of pollution control on corporate financial performance in a transition economy. Environ. Policy Gov. 17:247–66
    [Google Scholar]
24. Earnhart D, Segerson K 2012. The influence of financial status on the effectiveness of environmental enforcement. J. Public Econ. 96:670–84
    [Google Scholar]
25. Elsayed K, Paton D 2005. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: static and dynamic panel data evidence. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 16:3395–412
    [Google Scholar]
26. Endrikat J, Guenther E, Hoppe H 2014. Making sense of conflicting empirical findings: a meta-analytic review of the relationship between corporate environmental and financial performance. Eur. Manag. J. 32:5735–51
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fama EF, French KR 1992. The cross-section of expected stock returns. J. Financ. 47:427–65
    [Google Scholar]
28. Filbeck G, Gorman RF 2004. The relationship between the environmental and financial performance of public utilities. Environ. Resour. Econ. 29:2137–57
    [Google Scholar]
29. Freedman M, Patten DM 2004. Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure. Account. Forum 28:127–41
    [Google Scholar]
30. Friede G, Busch T, Bassen A 2015. ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. J. Sustain. Financ. Invest. 5:4210–33
    [Google Scholar]
31. Galdeano-Gómez E 2008. Does an endogenous relationship exist between environmental and economic performance? A resource-based view on the horticultural sector. Environ. Resour. Econ. 40:173–89
    [Google Scholar]
32. Gil M, Jiménez J, Lorente J 2001. An analysis of environmental management, organizational context and performance of Spanish hotels. Omega 29:6457–71
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gilley KM, Worrell DL, Davidson WN 3rd, El-Jelly A 2000. Corporate environmental initiatives and anticipated firm performance: the differential effects of process-driven versus product-driven greening initiatives. J. Manag. 26:61199–216
    [Google Scholar]
34. González-Benito J, González-Benito Ó 2005. Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis. Omega 33:11–15
    [Google Scholar]
35. Goyal P, Rahman Z, Kazmi AA 2013. Corporate sustainability performance and firm performance research: literature review and future research agenda. Manag. Decis. 51:2361–79
    [Google Scholar]
36. Griffin JJ, Mahon JF 1997. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Bus. Soc. 36:15–31
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hamilton JT 1995. Pollution as news: media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 28:198–113
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hang M, Geyer-Klingeberg J, Rathgeber A, Stöckl S 2017. Economic development matters: a meta-regression analysis on the relation between environmental management and financial performance. J. Ind. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12573
    [Crossref]
39. Hart SL, Ahuja G 1996. Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 5:130–37
    [Google Scholar]
40. Hassel L, Nilsson H, Nyquist S 2005. The value relevance of environmental performance. Eur. Account. Rev. 14:141–61
    [Google Scholar]
41. Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Molina-Azorín JF, Dick GPM 2011. ISO 14001 certification and financial performance: selection-effect versus treatment-effect. J. Clean. Prod. 19:11–12
    [Google Scholar]
42. Horváthová E 2010. Does environmental performance affect financial performance? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 70:152–59
    [Google Scholar]
43. Horváthová E 2012. The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits. ? Ecol. Econ. 84:91–97
    [Google Scholar]
44. Iwata H, Okada K 2011. How does environmental performance affect financial performance? Evidence from Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 70:91691–700
    [Google Scholar]
45. Jacobs BW, Singhal VR, Subramanian R 2010. An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. J. Oper. Manag. 28:5430–41
    [Google Scholar]
46. Jaggi B, Freedman M 1992. An examination of the impact of pollution performance on economic and market performance: pulp and paper firms. J. Bus. Finance Account. 19:5697–713
    [Google Scholar]
47. Judge WQ, Douglas TJ 1998. Performance implications of incorporating natural environmental issues into the strategic planning process: an empirical assessment. J. Manag. Stud. 35:2241–62
    [Google Scholar]
48. Karagozoglu N, Lindell M 2000. Environmental management: testing the win-win model. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43:6817–29
    [Google Scholar]
49. Khanna M, Damon LA 1999. EPA's voluntary 33/50 program: impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 37:11–25
    [Google Scholar]
50. Khanna M, Quimio WRH, Bojilova D 1998. Toxics release information: a policy tool for environmental protection. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36:3243–66
    [Google Scholar]
51. King AA, Lenox MJ 2001. Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. J. Ind. Ecol. 5:1105–16
    [Google Scholar]
52. King AA, Lenox MJ 2002. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Manag. Sci. 48:2289–99
    [Google Scholar]
53. Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Manag. Sci. 42:81199–214
    [Google Scholar]
54. Klassen RD, Whybark DC 1999. The impact of environmental technologies on manufacturing performance. Acad. Manag. J. 42:6599–615
    [Google Scholar]
55. Konar S, Cohen MA 2001. Does the market value environmental performance. ? Rev. Econ. Stat. 83:2281–89
    [Google Scholar]
56. Laplante B, Lanoie P 1994. The market response to environmental incidents in Canada: a theoretical and empirical analysis. South. Econ. J. 25:657–72
    [Google Scholar]
57. Leonidou LC, Christodoulides P, Thwaites D 2016. External determinants and financial outcomes of an eco-friendly orientation in smaller manufacturing firms. J. Small Bus. Manag. 54:15–25
    [Google Scholar]
58. Link S, Naveh E 2006. Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits. ? IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 53:4508–19
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lu W, Chau K, Wang H, Pan W 2014. A decade's debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011. J. Clean. Prod. 79:195–206
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lucas MT, Noordewier TG 2016. Environmental management practices and firm financial performance: the moderating effect of industry pollution-related factors. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 175:24–34
    [Google Scholar]
61. Makni R, Francoeur C, Bellavance F 2009. Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: evidence from Canadian firms. J. Bus. Ethics 89:3409–22
    [Google Scholar]
62. Margolis J, Elfenbein H, Walsh J 2009. Does it pay to be good and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Los Angeles:
63. McPeak C, Devirian J, Seaman S 2010. Do environmentally friendly companies outperform the market. ? J. Glob. Bus. Issues 4:161–69
    [Google Scholar]
64. Menguc B, Ozanne LK 2005. Challenges of the “green imperative”: a natural resource-based approach to the environmental orientation–business performance relationship. J. Bus. Res. 58:4430–38
    [Google Scholar]
65. Miroshnychenko I, Barontini R, Testa F 2017. Green practices and financial performance: a global outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 147:340–51
    [Google Scholar]
66. Molina-Azorín J, Claver-Cortés E, López-Gamero M, Tarí J 2009. Green management and financial performance: a literature review. Manag. Decis. 47:71080–100
    [Google Scholar]
67. Montabon F, Sroufe R, Narasimhan R 2007. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J. Oper. Manag. 25:5998–1014
    [Google Scholar]
68. Muhammad N, Scrimgeour F, Reddy K, Abidin S 2015. The relationship between environmental performance and financial performance in periods of growth and contraction: evidence from Australian publicly listed companies. J. Clean. Prod. 102:324–32
    [Google Scholar]
69. Muoghalu MI, Robinson HD, Glascock JL 1990. Hazardous waste lawsuits, stockholder returns, and deterrence. South. Econ. J. 22:357–70
    [Google Scholar]
70. Murray A, Sinclair D, Power D, Gray R 2006. Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Account. Audit. Account. J. 19:2228–55
    [Google Scholar]
71. Nakao Y, Amano A, Matsumura K, Genba K, Nakano M 2007. Relationship between environmental performance and financial performance: an empirical analysis of Japanese corporations. Bus. Strategy Environ. 16:2106–18
    [Google Scholar]
72. Nehrt C 1996. Timing and intensity effects of environmental investments. Strateg. Manag. J. 17:7535–47
    [Google Scholar]
73. Nishitani K, Kaneko S, Fujii H, Komatsu S 2011. Effects of the reduction of pollution emissions on the economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis focusing on demand and productivity. J. Clean. Prod. 19:171956–64
    [Google Scholar]
74. Pereira-Moliner J, Font X, Tarí J, Molina-Azorin J, Lopez-Gamero M, Pertusa-Ortega E 2015. The Holy Grail: environmental management, competitive advantage and business performance in the Spanish hotel industry. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 27:5714–38
    [Google Scholar]
75. Przychodzen J, Przychodzen W 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance–evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90:253–63
    [Google Scholar]
76. Qiu Y, Shaukat A, Tharyan R 2016. Environmental and social disclosures: link with corporate financial performance. Br. Account. Rev. 48:1102–16
    [Google Scholar]
77. Rexhäuser S, Rammer C 2014. Environmental innovations and firm profitability: unmasking the Porter hypothesis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 57:1145–67
    [Google Scholar]
78. Russo MV, Fouts PA 1997. A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Acad. Manag. J. 40:3534–59
    [Google Scholar]
79. Sharma S, Vredenburg H 1998. Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strateg. Manag. J. 10:2729–53
    [Google Scholar]
80. Wagner M 2005. How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. J. Environ. Manag. 76:2105–18
    [Google Scholar]
81. Wagner M, Schaltegger S 2004. The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: an empirical study of EU manufacturing. Eur. Manag. J. 22:5557–72
    [Google Scholar]
82. Wagner M, Van Phu N, Azomahou T, Wehrmeyer W 2002. The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 9:3133–46
    [Google Scholar]
83. Wahba H 2008. Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 15:289–99
    [Google Scholar]
84. Watson K, Klingenberg B, Polito T, Geurts T 2004. Impact of environmental management system implementation on financial performance: a comparison of two corporate strategies. Manag. Environ. Q. 15:6622–28
    [Google Scholar]
85. Yu V, Ting H, Jim Wu Y 2009. Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: a resource efficiency perspective. Manag. Decis. 47:71065–79
    [Google Scholar]
86. Zeng S, Meng X, Yin H, Tam C, Sun L 2010. Impact of cleaner production on business performance. J. Clean. Prod. 18:10975–83
    [Google Scholar]