1932

Abstract

Despite substantial progress, gender gaps persist in many developing countries. Since the 1990s, a literature has emerged arguing that these gaps not only are inequitable but also reduce economic performance. This review finds that, first, it is methodologically difficult to determine reliable effects of gender gaps on economic performance. Second, accounting studies that calculate how much larger GDP would be if gender gaps in employment disappeared vastly overestimate likely effects. Third, the theoretical literature has generated important insights on mechanisms linking gender gaps to economic performance. Fourth, systematic reviews of the cross-country evidence robustly show that lowering gender gaps in education leads to higher economic performance, while the literature on the impact of other gaps is much more limited. Fifth, there is accumulating micro evidence on how reducing particular gender gaps at the level of households, farms, or firms can improve economic performance in particular contexts, with robust results in some areas, and less clear evidence in others.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023429
2018-10-05
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/10/1/annurev-resource-100517-023429.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023429&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abington CR 2014. Determining the importance of human capital for growth using a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates approach. Glob. Bus. Econ. Res. J. 3:4962–78
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alderman H, Behrman J, Khan S, Ross D, Sabot R 1995. Public schooling expenditures in rural Pakistan: efficiently targeting girls and a lagging region. Public Spending and the Poor: Theory and Evidence D van de Walle, K Nead 187–22 Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alderman H, Behrman JR, Ross DR, Sabot R 1996. Decomposing the gender gap in cognitive skills in a poor rural economy. J. Hum. Resour. 31:229–54
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandiera O, Natraj A 2012. Does gender inequality hinder development and economic growth? Evidence and policy implications. World Bank Res. Obs. 28:2–21
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Barro R, Lee J-W 1994. Sources of economic growth. Carnegie-Rochester Conf. Ser. Public Policy 40:1–46
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baskaran T, Bhalotra S, Min B, Uppal Y 2017. Women legislators: A tradeoff between pro-female policies and economic growth? Youngstown State Univ Youngstown, OH:
  7. Becker G 1981. A Treatise on the Family Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  8. Bhalotra A, Clots-Figueras I 2014. Health and the political agency of women. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 6:2164–97
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blackden M, Canagarajah S, Klasen S, Lawson D 2007. Gender and growth in Africa: evidence and issues. Advancing Development: Core Themes in Global Development G Mavrotas, A Shorrocks 349–70 London: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Blecker RA, Seguino S 2002. Macroeconomic effects of reducing gender wage inequality in an export-oriented, semi-industrialized economy. Rev. Dev. Econ. 6:1103–19
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bloom DE, Kuhn M, Prettner K 2015. The contribution of female health to economic development NBER Work. Pap21411
  12. Bloom DE, Williamson JG 1998. Demographic transition and economic miracles in emerging Asia. World Bank Econ. Rev. 12:3419–55
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Borrowman M, Klasen S 2017. Drivers of gendered sectoral and occupational segregation in developing countries Discuss. Pap. 222 Courant Res. Cent Göttingen, Ger:
  14. Branisa B, Klasen S, Ziegler M 2013. Gender inequality in social institutions and gendered development outcomes. World Dev 45:252–68
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Branisa B, Klasen S, Ziegler M, Drechsler D, Jütting J 2014. The institutional basis of gender inequality: the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI). Fem. Econ. 20:229–64
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bulte E, Lensink R, van Velzen R, Vu NT 2017. Do gender and business trainings affect business outcomes? Experimental evidence from Vietnam. Manag. Sci. 63:92885–902
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Busse M, Spielmann C 2006. Gender inequality and trade. Rev. Int. Econ. 14:3362–79
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Cavalcanti T, Tavares J 2016. The output cost of gender discrimination: a model-based macroeconomic estimate. Econ. J. 126:109–34
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E 2004. Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized experiment in India. Econometrica 72:1409–43
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cho S-Y 2014. International women's convention, democracy, and gender equality. Soc. Sci. Q. 95:3719–39
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Croppenstedt A, Goldstein M, Rosas N 2013. Gender and agriculture: inefficiencies, segregation, and low productivity traps. World Bank Res. Obs. 28:179–109
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Cuberes D, Teignier M 2016. Aggregate effects of gender gaps in the labor market: a quantitative estimate. J. Hum. Cap. 10:11–32
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dahal MP 2011. Effect of gender gap in education on district level GDP per capita of Nepal. Econ. J. Dev. Issues 13–14:65–74
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Daly K 2007. Gender inequality, growth and global ageing Glob. Econ. Pap 154 Goldman Sachs New York:
  25. de la Croix D, Vander Donckt M 2010. Would empowering women initiate the demographic transition in least developed countries. ? J. Hum. Cap. 4:285–129
    [Google Scholar]
  26. de Mel S, McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2014. Business training and female enterprise start-up, growth, and dynamics: experimental evidence from Sri Lanka. J. Dev. Econ. 106:199–210
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Diebolt C, Perrin F 2013. From stagnation to sustained growth: the role of female empowerment. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:3545–49
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dollar D, Gatti R 1999. Gender inequality, income and growth: Are good times good for women? Policy Res. Rep., Work. Pap. Ser. 1 World Bank Washington, DC:
  29. Duflo E 2012. Women's empowerment and economic development. J. Econ. Lit. 50:41051–79
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Esteve-Volart B 2009. Gender discrimination and growth: theory and evidence from India Work. Pap., Univ York, Toronto:
  31. Ferrant G, Kolev A 2016. Does gender discrimination in social institutions matter for long-term growth? Dev. Cent. Work. Pap. 330 OECD, Paris:
  32. Field E, Jayachandran S, Pande R 2010. Do traditional institutions constrain female entrepreneurship? A field experiment on business training in India. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:2125–29
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fox L, Kaul U 2017. The evidence is in: How should youth employment programs in low-income countries be designed? Rep., USAID Washington, DC:
  34. Gaddis I, Klasen S 2014. Economic development, structural change, and women's labor force participation: a reexamination of the feminization U hypothesis. J. Popul. Econ. 27:639–81
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Galor O, Weil D 1996. The gender gap, fertility, and growth. Am. Econ. Rev. 86:374–87
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Goldstein M, Udry C 2008. The profits of power: land rights and agricultural investment in Ghana. J. Political Econ. 116:6981–1032
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Haddad L, Hoddinott J, Alderman H 1997. Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  38. Hakura D, Hussain M, Newiak M, Thakoor V, Yang F 2016. Inequality, gender gaps and economic growth: comparative evidence for Sub-Saharan Africa Work. Pap. WP/16/111, IMF Washington, DC:
  39. Hallward-Driemeier M, Hasan T, Rusu AB 2013.a Women's legal rights over 50 years: Progress, stagnation or regression? Policy Res. Work. Pap. 6616 World Bank Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hallward-Driemeier M, Hasan T, Rusu AB 2013.b Women's legal rights over 50 years: What is the impact of reform? Policy Res. Work. Pap. 6617 World Bank Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hill MA, King E 1995. Women's education and economic well-being. Fem. Econ. 1:221–46
    [Google Scholar]
  42. ILO (Int. Labor Organ.). 2017. World employment and social outlook: trends for women 2017 Rep., ILO Geneva:
  43. Kabeer N 2017. Women's economic empowerment and inclusive growth: labour markets and enterprise development GrOW Work. Pap. Ser. GWP-2017-01 McGill Univ Montreal:
  44. King EM, Hill MA 1993. Women's Education in Developing Countries: Barriers, Benefits, and Policies Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  45. King EM, Klasen S, Porter M 2009. Women and development. Global Crises, Global Solutions B Lomborg 585–637 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Klasen S 1999. Does gender inequality reduce growth and development? Evidence from cross-country regressions Policy Res. Rep. Work. Pap. Ser. 7 World Bank Washington, DC:
  47. Klasen S 2002. Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross‐country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. World Bank Econ. Rev. 16:3345–73
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Klasen S 2007. Gender-related indicators of well-being. Human Well-Being: Concept and Measurement M McGillivray 167–92 London: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Klasen S 2017. Gender, institutions, and economic development GrOW Work. Pap. Ser. GWP-2017-04 McGill Univ Montreal:
  50. Klasen S, Lamanna F 2009. The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth: new evidence for a panel of countries. Fem. Econ. 15:391–132
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Klasen S, Pieters J 2015. What explains the stagnation of female labor force participation in urban India?. World Bank Econ. Rev. 29:3449–78
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Klasen S, Vollmer S 2013. Missing women: age and disease: a correction CRC Discuss. Pap. 133 Courant Res. Cent., Univ Göttingen, Ger:
  53. Klasen S, Wink C 2003. Missing women: revisiting the debate. Fem. Econ. 9:263–99
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Knowles S, Lorgelly PK, Owen PD 2002. Are educational gender gaps a brake on economic development? Some cross-country empirical evidence. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 54:118–49
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Lagarde C 2016. The business case for women's empowerment Presented at APEC CEO Summit Nov. 17 Lima, Peru: https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2016/11/18/SP111816-The-Business-Case-for-Womens-Empowerment
  56. Lagerlöf N 2003. Gender equality and long-run growth. J. Econ. Growth 8:4403–26
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lorgelly PK, Owen PD 1999. The effect of female and male schooling on economic growth in the Barro-Lee model. Empir. Econ. 24:537–57
    [Google Scholar]
  58. McKenzie D, Puerto S 2017. Growing markets through business training for female entrepreneurs: a market-level randomized experiment in Kenya. Policy Res. Work. Pap7993 World Bank Washington, DC:
    [Google Scholar]
  59. McKenzie D, Woodruff C 2014. What are we learning from business training and entrepreneurship evaluations around the developing world?. World Bank Res. Obs. 29:148–82
    [Google Scholar]
  60. McKinsey Glob. Inst. 2015. The power of parity: how advancing women's equality can add $12 trillion to global growth Rep., McKinsey Glob. Inst New York:
  61. Minasyan A, Zenker J, Klasen S, Vollmer S 2018. The impact of gender inequality in education on economic growth: a systematic review and meta-analysis Work. Pap., Univ Göttingen, Ger:
  62. OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.). 1995. Household Production in OECD Countries: Data Sources and Measurement Methods 81 Paris: OECD
  63. OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.), Int. Labour Off., Int. Monet. Fund, World Bank. 2014. Achieving stronger growth by promoting a more gender-balanced economy Rep., G20 Labour Employ. Minist. Meet Melbourne, Aust., Sept OECD, Paris: https://www.oecd.org/g20/topics/employment-and-social-policy/ILO-IMF-OECD-WBG-Achieving-stronger-growth-by-promoting-a-more-gender-balanced-economy-G20.pdf
  64. Oostendorp RH 2009. Globalization and the gender wage gap. World Bank Econ. Rev. 23:1141–61
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Pitt MM, Khandker SR 1998. The impact of group-based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter?. J. Political Econ. 106:958–96
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Pitt MM, Khandker SR, Cartwright J 2006. Empowering women with micro finance: evidence from Bangladesh. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 54:4791–831
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Prettner K, Strulik H 2017. Gender equity and the escape from poverty. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 69:155–74
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Pritchett L 2001. Where has all the education gone?. World Bank Econ. Rev. 15:3367–91
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Quisumbing AR, Maluccio JA 2003. Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 65:3283–327
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller RI 2004. Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:4813–35
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Schober T, Winter-Ebmer R 2011. Gender wage inequality and economic growth: Is there really a puzzle?—A comment. World Dev 39:81476–84
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Seguino S 2000.a Accounting for gender in Asian economic growth. Fem. Econ. 6:327–58
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Seguino S 2000.b Gender inequality and economic growth: a cross-country analysis. World Dev 28:1211–30
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Seguino S, Floro MS 2003. Does gender have any effect on aggregate saving? An empirical analysis. Int. Rev. Appl. Econ. 17:2147–66
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sen A 1990. Gender and cooperative conflict. Persistent Inequalities: Women and World Development I Tinker 123–49 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Stotsky JG 2006. Gender and its relevance to macroeconomic policy: a survey Work. Pap. WP/06/233 IMF Washington, DC:
  77. Swamy A, Knack S, Lee Y, Azfar O 2001. Gender and corruption. J. Dev. Econ. 64:125–55
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Tansel A, Gungor N 2013. Gender effects of education on economic development in Turkey. J. Econ. Stud. 40:6794–821
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Taylor AM 1998. On the costs of inward looking development: price distortions, growth, and divergence in Latin America. J. Econ. Hist. 58:11–28
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Tertilt M, Doepke M 2014. Does female empowerment promote economic development? NBER Work. Pap 19888
  81. Thomas D 1990. Intrahousehold resource allocation: an inferential approach. J. Hum. Resour. 25:4635–64
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Thomas D 1997. Incomes, expenditures and health outcomes: evidence on intrahousehold resource allocation. Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries L Haddad, J Hoddinott, H Alderman 142–64 Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Udry C 1996. Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. J. Political Econ. 104:551–69
    [Google Scholar]
  84. UNDP (United Nations Dev. Prog.). 1995. Human Development Report 1995 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  85. UNDP (United Nations Dev. Prog.). 2016. Accelerating gender equality and women's empowerment in Africa Africa Human Dev. Rep., UNDP New York: http://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/hdr/2016-africa-human-development-report.html
  86. United Nations 2008. The 2008 System of National Accounts New York: United Nations
  87. Weichselbaumer D, Winter-Ebmer R 2005. A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. J. Econ. Surv. 19:3479–511
    [Google Scholar]
  88. World Bank 1994. The East Asian Miracle Washington, DC: World Bank
  89. World Bank 2001. Engendering Development Washington, DC: World Bank
  90. World Bank 2004. Gender and Development in the Middle East and North Africa: Women in the Public Sphere Washington, DC: World Bank
  91. World Bank 2006. Gender Equality as Smart Economics: A World Bank Group Gender Action Plan (Fiscal Years 2007–10) Washington, DC: World Bank
  92. World Bank 2011. World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development Washington, DC: World Bank
  93. World Bank 2014. Voice and Agency: Empowering Women and Girls for Shared Prosperity Washington, DC: World Bank
  94. Yoon J, Klasen S 2018. An application of partial least squares to the construction of the Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) and the Corruption Perception Index (CPI). Soc. Indic. Res. 138:61–88
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023429
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023429
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error