1932

Abstract

The effects of climate change on natural systems will be substantial, widespread, and likely irreversible. Warmer temperatures and changing precipitation patterns have already contributed to forest dieback and pushed some species toward extinction. Natural systems contribute to human welfare both as an input to the production of consumption goods and through the provision of nonuse values (i.e., existence and bequest values). But because they are often unpriced, it can be difficult to constrain these benefits. Understanding how climate change effects on the natural capital stock affect human well-being, and therefore the social cost of carbon (SCC), requires understanding not just the biophysical effects of climate change but also the particular role they play in supporting human welfare. This article reviews a range of topics from natural capital accounting through climate change economics important for quantifying the ecological costs of climate change and integrating these costs into SCC calculations.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-020204
2022-10-05
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/14/1/annurev-resource-111820-020204.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-020204&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. AghaKouchak A, Chiang F, Huning LS, Love CA, Mallakpour I et al. 2020. Climate extremes and compound hazards in a warming world. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 48:519–48
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderegg WRL, Trugman AT, Badgley G, Anderson CM, Bartuska A et al. 2020. Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science 368:6497eaaz7005
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson LG, Seijo JC. 2010. Bioeconomics of Fisheries Management Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
  4. Anthoff D, Emmerling J. 2019. Inequality and the social cost of carbon. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6:2243–73
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ. 2014. The climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution (FUND), technical description, version 3.9 https://www.fund-model.org/files/documentation/Fund-3-9-Scientific-Documentation.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ, Yohe GW. 2009. Risk aversion, time preference, and the social cost of carbon. Environ. Res. Lett. 4:2024002
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Antle JM, Stöckle CO. 2017. Climate impacts on agriculture: insights from agronomic-economic analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11:2299–318
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, Oleson K. 2012. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environ. Dev. Econ. 17:3317–53
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bastien-Olvera BA, Moore FC 2021. Use and non-use value of nature and the social cost of carbon. Nat. Sustain. 4:101–8
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumgärtner S, Klein AM, Thiel D, Winkler K. 2015. Ramsey discounting of ecosystem services. Environ. Resour. Econ. 61:2273–96
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Blanc E, Schlenker W. 2017. The use of panel models in assessments of climate impacts on agriculture. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11:2258–79
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bradford JB, Betancourt JL, Butterfield BJ, Munson SM, Wood TE. 2018. Anticipatory natural resource science and management for a changing future. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16:5295–303
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Brander LM, Florax RJGM, Vermaat JE. 2006. The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environ. Resour. Econ. 33:2223–50
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brander LM, Rehdanz K, Tol RSJ, Van Beukering PJH. 2012. The economic impact of ocean acidification on coral reefs. Clim. Change Econ. 3:11250002
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Diaz S, Ngo HT, eds. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Bonn, Ger.: IPBES
  16. Brooks WR, Newbold SC. 2014. An updated biodiversity nonuse value function for use in climate change integrated assessment models. Ecol. Econ. 105:342–49
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Carleton TA, Hsiang SM. 2016. Social and economic impacts of climate. Science 353:6304aad9837
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Carter C, Cui X, Ghanem D, Mérel P. 2018. Identifying the economic impacts of climate change on agriculture. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 10:361–80
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chan NW, Wichman CJ. 2020. Climate change and recreation: evidence from North American cycling. Environ. Resour. Econ. 76:119–51
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cheung WWL, Lam VWY, Sarmiento JL, Kearney K, Watson R et al. 2009. Large-scale redistribution of maximum fisheries catch potential in the global ocean under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 16:124–35
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cropper ML, Oates WE. 1992. Environmental economics: a survey. J. Econ. Lit. 30:2675–740
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dai A. 2013. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3:52–58
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Dasgupta P. 2001. Human Well-Being and the Natural Environment Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  24. Dasgupta P. 2014. Measuring the wealth of nations. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6:17–31
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Dasgupta P. 2021. The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review Indep. Rep. HM Treas., Gov UK, London:
  26. Dasgupta P, Mäler K-G. 2000. Net national product, wealth, and social well-being. Environ. . Dev. Econ. 5:169–93
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dell BM, Jones BF, Olken BA. 2012. Temperature shocks and economic growth: evidence from the last half century. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 4:366–95
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dell M, Jones BF, Olken BA. 2014. What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. J. Econ. Lit. 52:3740–98
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dennig F, Budolfson MB, Fleurbaey M, Siebert A, Socolow RH. 2015. Inequality, climate impacts on the future poor, and carbon prices. PNAS 112:521582732
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Diaz D, Moore FC. 2017. Quantifying the economic risks of climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7:774–82
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dietz S, van der Ploeg F, Rezai A, Venmans F. 2021. Are economists getting climate dynamics right and does it matter?. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 8:5895–921
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Diffenbaugh NS, Swain DL, Touma D. 2015. Anthropogenic warming has increased drought risk in California. PNAS 112:133931–36
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Drupp MA. 2018. Limits to substitution between ecosystem services and manufactured goods and implications for social discounting. Environ. Resour. Econ. 69:135–58
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Drupp MA, Hänsel MC. 2020. Relative prices and climate policy: how the scarcity of non-market goods drives policy evaluation. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 13:168–201
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dudney J, Hobbs RJ, Heilmayr R, Battles JJ, Suding KN. 2018. Navigating novelty and risk in resilience management. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33:11863–73
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Dudney J, Willing CE, Das AJ, Latimer AM, Nesmith JCB, Battles JJ. 2021. Nonlinear shifts in infectious rust disease due to climate change. Nat. Commun. 12:5102
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dundas SJ, von Haefen RH. 2020. The effects of weather on recreational fishing demand and adaptation: implications for a changing climate. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 7:2209–42
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ebert U. 2003. Environmental goods and the distribution of income. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25:4435–59
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Fenichel EP, Abbott JK. 2014. Natural capital: from metaphor to measurement. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1:1/21–27
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fenichel EP, Abbott JK, Bayham J, Boone W, Haacker EMK, Pfeiffer L. 2016a. Measuring the value of groundwater and other forms of natural capital. PNAS 113:92382–87
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fenichel EP, Levin SA, McCay B, St. Martin K, Abbott JK, Pinsky ML 2016b. Wealth reallocation and sustainability under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 6:3237–44
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:5734570–74
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Friedlingstein P, O'Sullivan M, Jones MW, Andrew RM, Hauck J et al. 2020. Global carbon budget 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12:43269–3340
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Gaffney M. 2008. Keeping land in capital theory: Ricardo, Faustmann, Wicksell, and George. Am. J. Econ. Sociol. 67:1119–41
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hackett SB, Moxnes E. 2015. Natural capital in integrated assessment models of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 116:354–61
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hamilton K, Clemens M. 1999. Genuine savings rates in developing countries. World Bank Econ. Rev. 13:2333–56
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hamilton K, Hartwick J. 2014. Wealth and sustainability. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 30:1170–87
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Hertel TW, Lobell DB. 2014. Agricultural adaptation to climate change in rich and poor countries: Current modeling practice and potential for empirical contributions. Energy Econ 46:562–75
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Hertel TW, Rosch SD. 2010. Climate change, agriculture, and poverty. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 32:3355–85
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hoel M, Sterner T. 2007. Discounting and relative prices. Clim. Change 84:3–4265–80
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Hope CW. 2011. The PAGE09 integrated assessment model: a technical description Work. Pap. 4/2011 Univ. Cambridge Judge Bus. Sch. Cambridge, UK: https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/wp1104.pdf
  52. Howard PH, Sterner T. 2017. Few and not so far between: a meta-analysis of climate damage estimates. Environ. Resour. Econ. 68:1197–225
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hsiang S, Kopp R, Jina A, Rising J, Delgado M et al. 2017. Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science 356:1362–69
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Hubau W, Lewis SL, Phillips OL, Affum-Baffoe K, Beeckman H et al. 2020. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579:779780–87
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hughes TP. 2003. Climate change, human impacts, and the resilience of coral reefs. Science 301:5635929–33
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Johnson JA, Ruta G, Baldos U, Cervigni R, Chonabayashi S et al. 2021. The economic case for nature: a global earth-economy model to assess development policy pathways Rep. World Bank Group Washington, DC:
  57. Jones GP, McCormick MI, Srinivasan M, Eagle JV. 2004. Coral decline threatens fish biodiversity in marine reserves. PNAS 101:218251–53
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kikstra JS, Waidelich P, Rising J, Yumashev D, Hope C et al. 2021. The social cost of carbon dioxide under climate-economy feedbacks and temperature variability. Environ. Res. Lett. 16:094037
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kopp RE, Golub A, Keohane N, Onda C. 2012. The influence of the specification of climate change damages on the social cost of carbon. Economics 6:12012–13
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kovacs K, Holmes TP, Englin JE, Alexander J 2011. The dynamic response of housing values to a forest invasive disease: evidence from a sudden oak death infestation. Environ. Resour. Econ. 49:3445–71
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Kramer RA, Mercer DE. 1997. Valuing a global environmental good: U.S. residents’ willingness to pay to protect tropical rain forests. Land Econ 73:2196–210
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Krutilla JV. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 57:4777–86
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Lange G-M, Wodon Q, Carey K 2018. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2018: Building a Sustainable Future Washington, DC: World Bank
  64. Liang Y, Rudik I, Zou E. 2021. Economic production and biodiversity in the United States NBER Work. Pap. 29357
  65. Maher SM, Fenichel EP, Schmitz OJ, Adamowicz WL. 2020. The economics of conservation debt: a natural capital approach to revealed valuation of ecological dynamics. Ecol. Appl. 30:6e02132
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Managi S, Kumar P. 2018. Inclusive Wealth Report 2018: Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability New York: Routledge
  67. Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind New York: Universe Books
  68. Mendelsohn R. 2000. Efficient adaptation to climate change. Clim. Change 45:583–600
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Moore FC, Diaz DB. 2015. Temperature impacts on economic growth warrant stringent mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change 5:127–31
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Moore FC, Stokes A, Conte M, Dong X. 2022. Noah's Ark in a warming world: climate change, biodiversity loss and public adaptation costs in the United States. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. In press. https://doi.org/10.1086/716662
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Nordhaus WD. 1992. An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258:50861315–19
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Nordhaus WD. 2007. Critical assumptions in the Stern Review on climate change. Science 317:201–2
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Nordhaus WD. 2017. Revisiting the social cost of carbon. PNAS 114:71518–23
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Nordhaus WD, Moffat A. 2017. A survey of global impacts of climate change: replication, survey methods, and a statistical analysis NBER Work. Pap. 23646
  75. Pearce D. 1993. Economic Values and the Natural World London: Earthscan
  76. Pearce D, Atkinson GD. 1993. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 8:2103–8
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Piontek F, Drouet L, Emmerling J, Kompas T, Méjean A et al. 2021. Integrated perspective on translating biophysical to economic impacts of climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 11:7563–72
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Richardson L, Loomis JB. 2009. The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: an updated meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 68:51535–48
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Robinson R, Crick H, Learmonth J, Maclean I, Thomas C et al. 2009. Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. Endanger. Species Res. 7:287–99
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Rose SK, Diaz DB, Blanford GJ. 2017. Understanding the social cost of carbon: a model diagnostic and inter-comparison study. Clim. Change Econ. 8:21750009
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Scholes JR, Betts R, Bunn S, Leadley R, Nepstad D et al. 2014. Terrestrial and inland water systems. AR5 Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC 5th Assessment Report CB Field, VR Barros, DJ Dokken, KJ Mach, M Mastrandrea et al.271–359 Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Seidl R, Thom D, Kautz M, Martin-Benito D, Peltoniemi M et al. 2017. Forest disturbances under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 7:6395–402
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Siikamäki J, Santiago-Ávila FJ, Vail P 2015. Global assessment of non-wood forest ecosystem services Work. Pap., Prog. For. Washington, DC:
  84. Sitch S, Huntingford C, Gedney N, Levy PE, Lomas M et al. 2008. Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate-carbon cycle feedbacks using five Dynamic Global Vegetation Models (DGVMs). Glob. Change Biol. 14:92015–39
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Solow RM. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 70:165–94
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Solow RM. 1974. The economics of resources or the resources of economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 64:21–14
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Sterner T, Persson UM. 2008. An even sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2:161–76
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Stiglitz J. 1974. Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41:123–37
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Tierney JE, Poulsen CJ, Montañez IP, Bhattacharya T, Feng R et al. 2020. Past climates inform our future. Science 370:6517680–89
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Tittensor DP, Beger M, Boerder K, Boyce DG, Cavanagh RD et al. 2019. Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean. Sci. Adv. 5:11eaay9969
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Tol RSJ. 1994. The damage costs of climate change: a note on tangibles and intangibles, applied to DICE. Energy Policy 22:5436–38
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Tol RSJ. 2002. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part I: benchmark estimates. Environ. Resour. Econ. 21:47–73
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Touma D, Ashfaq M, Nayak MA, Kao S-C, Diffenbaugh NS. 2015. A multi-model and multi-index evaluation of drought characteristics in the 21st century. J. Hydrol. 526:196–207
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Turner BL, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L et al. 2003. Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. PNAS 100:148080–85
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Urban MC. 2015. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348:6234571–73
    [Google Scholar]
  96. van der Ploeg S, De Groot R. 2010. The TEEB Valuation Database: A Searchable Database of 1310 Estimates of Monetary Values of Ecosystem Services Wageningen, Neth.: Found. Sustain. Dev. https://www.cbd.int/financial/gmr/teeb-database.xls
  97. Venter O, Sanderson EW, Magrach A, Allan JR, Beher J et al. 2016. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7:112558
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Weitzman ML. 2012. What is the “damages function” for global warming—and what difference might it make?. Clim. Change Econ. 1:57–69
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wiens JA, Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell CA, Snyder MA. 2009. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. PNAS 106:Suppl. 219729–36
    [Google Scholar]
  100. World Bank 2006. Where Is the Wealth Of Nations? Measuring Capital for the 21st Century Washington, DC: World Bank
  101. World Bank 2011. The Changing Wealth Of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium Washington, DC: World Bank
  102. Zscheischler J, Martius O, Westra S, Bevacqua E, Raymond C et al. 2020. A typology of compound weather and climate events. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1:7333–47
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-020204
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111820-020204
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error