1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 48, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 48, 2022

Accounting for Credit

Abstract

This article examines differing accounts of how and why consumers use credit as well as the consequences of credit for inequality and social solidarity. We articulate these explanations as () political economy, () racialized, () relational, and () ranked accounts. The first account looks to the political economy to understand what drives credit use and its consequences. In the second, access to credit and the terms of access depend on the formal and informal rules that support a hierarchy of groups ostensibly based on racial categorization. In the third, the consumer makes decisions about how to use credit as a consequence of how she is managing the different types of relationships implicated in its use. The final account focuses on consumer credit ratings as a categorization process that consumers and businesses use when ranking individuals and when assessing the bases for solidarity; the ratings themselves shape future individual and group behaviors as well as life chances. We conclude by identifying future directions for research.

Keyword(s): consumption, credit, debt collection, household finances, race and racialization, relational accounting
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-114444
2022-07-29
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/48/1/annurev-soc-030320-114444.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-114444&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Addo FR. 2014. Debt, cohabitation, and marriage in young adulthood. Demography 51:51677–701
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexander JC 2004. Toward a theory of cultural trauma. Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity JC Alexander, R Eyerman, B Giesen, NJ Smelser, P Sztompka 1–29 Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bandelj N. 2020. Relational work in the economy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 46:251–72
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandelj N, Wherry FF, Zelizer VA 2017. Introduction: advancing money talks. Money Talks: Explaining How Money Really Works, ed. N Bandelj, FF Wherry, VA Zelizer 1–22 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaman J, Petts A. 2020. Towards a global theory of colorblindness: comparing colorblind racial ideology in France and the United States. Sociol. Compass 14:4e12774
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin R. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code Malden, MA: Polity
  7. Bennett AM, Baker SM, Cross S, James JP, Bartholomew G et al. 2016. Omission and commission as marketplace trauma. J. Public Policy Mark. 35:2280–91
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertrand M, Karlan D, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Zinman J. 2005. What's psychology worth? A field experiment in the consumer credit market NBER Work. Pap. 11892
  9. Bone SA, Christensen GL, Williams JD. 2014. Rejected, shackled, and alone: the impact of systemic restricted choice on minority consumers’ construction of self. J. Consum. Res. 41:2451–74
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonilla-Silva E 2011. The invisible weight of whiteness: the racial grammar of everyday life in contemporary America. Ethn. Racial Stud. 35:2173–94
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Borlay v. Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc. 363 F.Supp. 2d 969 (M.D. Tenn 2005.)
  12. Bourdieu P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  13. Bourdieu P, Wacquant L. 1999. On the cunning of imperialist reason. Theory Cult. Soc. 16:141–58
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown DA. 2021. The Whiteness of Wealth: How the Tax System Impoverishes Black Americans—and How We Can Fix It New York: Crown
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Burrell J, Fourcade M. 2021. The society of algorithms. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 47:213–37
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Calder LG. 1999. Financing the American Dream: A Cultural History of Consumer Credit Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  17. Carruthers BG, Ariovich L. 2010. Money and Credit: A Sociological Approach Malden, MA: Polity
  18. Charron-Chénier R. 2020. Predatory inclusion in consumer credit: explaining black and white disparities in payday loan use. Sociol. Forum 35:2370–92
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Charron-Chénier R, Seamster L. 2020. Racialized debts: racial exclusion from credit tools and information networks. Crit. Sociol. 47:977–92
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Claytor CP. 2020. Black Privilege: Modern Middle-Class Blacks with Credentials and Cash to Spend Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  21. Cohen MA. 2012. Imperfect competition in auto lending: subjective markup, racial disparity, and class action litigation. Rev. Law Econ. 8:121–58
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cohen-Cole E 2011. Credit card redlining. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:2700–13
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Collins D, Morduch J, Rutherford S, Ruthen O 2009. Portfolios of the Poor: How the World's Poor Live on $2 a Day Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  24. Crockett D. 2017. Paths to respectability: consumption and stigma management in the contemporary Black middle class. J. Consum. Res. 44:3554–81
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis GF. 2009. Managed by the Markets: How Finance Re-Shaped America Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  26. DeMarco LM, Dwyer RE, Haynie DL. 2021. The accumulation of disadvantage: criminal justice contact, credit, and debt in the transition to adulthood. Criminology 59:3545–80
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Durand D. 1941. Risk Elements in Consumer Installment Financing Cambridge, MA: NBER
  28. Dwyer RE. 2018. Credit, debt, and inequality. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:237–61
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Elyachar J. 2012. Next practices: knowledge, infrastructure, and public goods at the bottom of the pyramid. Public Cult 24:1109–29
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Eyerman R. 2001. Cultural Trauma: Slavery and the Formation of African American Identity Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  31. Faber JW. 2019. Segregation and the cost of money: race, poverty, and the prevalence of alternative financial institutions. Soc. Forces 98:2819–48
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Fassin D. 2001. The biopolitics of otherness: undocumented foreigners and racial discrimination in French public debate. Anthropol. Today 17:13–7
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fisher RA. 1936. The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann. Eugen. 7:2179–88
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Fligstein N, Goldstein A. 2015. The emergence of a finance culture in American households, 1989–2007. Socio-Econ. Rev. 13:3575–601
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Fourcade M. 2021. Ordinal citizenship. Br. J. Sociol. 72:2154–73
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fourcade M, Healy K. 2013. Classification situations: life chances in the neoliberal era. Acc. Organ. Soc. 38:559–72
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Friedline T, Chen Z. 2021. Digital redlining and the fintech marketplace: evidence from US zip codes. J. Consum. Aff. 55:2366–88
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gabor D, Brooks S. 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: international development in the fintech era. New Political Econ 22:4423–36
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Goffman E. 1961. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill
  40. González-López F. 2021a. Society against markets: the commodification of money and the repudiation of debts. Sociol. Anthropol. 5:297–122
     [Google Scholar]
  41. González-López F. 2021b. The financialization of social policy and the politicization of student debt in Chile. J. Cult. Econ. 14:2176–93
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Goodstein RM, Lloro A, Rhine SLW, Weinstein JM. 2021. What accounts for racial and ethnic differences in credit use?. J. Consum. Aff. 55:2389–416
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gubbins P, Totolo E. 2018. Digital Credit in Kenya: Evidence from Demand-Side Surveys Nairobi: FSD Kenya
  45. Guérin I. 2014. Juggling with debt, social ties, and values: the everyday use of microcredit in rural South India. Curr. Anthropol. 55:Suppl. 9S40–50
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Harris A-MG, Henderson GR, Williams JD. 2005. Courting customers: assessing consumer racial profiling and other marketplace discrimination. J. Public Policy Mark. 24:1163–71
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hayes A. 2019. The social meaning of financial wealth: relational accounting in the context of 401(k) retirement accounts. Finance Soc 5:161–83
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hayes A, O'Brien R. 2020. Earmarking risk: relational investing and portfolio choice. Soc. Forces 99:31086–112
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hayes AS. 2020. The behavioral economics of Pierre Bourdieu. Soc. Theory 38:116–35
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Henderson GR, Hakstian A-M, Williams JD. 2016. Consumer Equality: Race and the American Marketplace Denver, CO: Praeger
  51. Henderson GR, Zhang K 2019. Race and consumer inequality. The Oxford Handbook of Consumption FF Wherry, I Woodward 397–412 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Herzberg A. 2019. Kitchen conversations: how households make economic choices. Economic Insights Q4 19–25 https://www.philadelphiafed.org/the-economy/kitchen-conversations-how-households-make-economic-choices
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Hodson R, Dwyer RE, Neilson LA. 2014. Credit card blues: the middle class and the hidden costs of easy credit. Sociol. Q. 55:2315–40
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kear M. 2012. Governing homo subprimicus: beyond financial citizenship, exclusion, and rights. Antipode 45:4926–46
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kiviat B. 2019a. The art of deciding with data: evidence from how employers translate credit reports into hiring decisions. Socio-Econ. Rev. 17:2283–309
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kiviat B. 2019b. The moral limits of predictive practices: the case of credit-based insurance scores. Am. Sociol. Rev. 84:61134–58
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Kiviat B. 2021. Which data fairly differentiate? American views on the use of personal data in two market settings. Soc. Sci. 8:126–47
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Krippner GR. 2011. Capitalizing on Crisis Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  59. Krippner GR. 2017. Democracy of credit: ownership and the politics of credit access in late twentieth-century America. Am. J. Sociol. 123:11–47
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kusimba S. 2018.. “ It is easy for women to ask!”: gender and digital finance in Kenya. Econ. Anthropol. 5:2247–60
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Kusimba S. 2021. Reimagining Money: Kenya in the Digital Finance Revolution Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  62. Lacy KR. 2007. Blue-Chip Black: Race, Class, and Status in the New Black Middle Class Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  63. Langley P. 2008. Financialization and the consumer credit boom. Compet. Change 12:2133–47
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Lawrence DB, Solomon A. 2002. Managing a Consumer Lending Business New York: Solomon Lawrence
  65. Lazarus J, Lacan L 2020. Toward a relational sociology of credit: an exploration of the French literature. Socio-Econ. Rev. 18:2575–97
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lei Y-W. 2021. Delivering solidarity: platform architecture and collective contention in China's platform economy. Am. Sociol. Rev. 86:2279–309
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Leicht K, Fitzgerald S 2006. Postindustrial Peasants: The Illusion of Middle-Class Prosperity Chicago: Macmillan
  68. Mann RJ 2009. Patterns of credit card use among low- and moderate-income households. Insufficient Funds: Savings, Assets, Credit, and Banking Among Low-Income Households RM Blank, MS Barr 257–84 New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. McMillan Cottom T. 2020. Where platform capitalism and racial capitalism meet: the sociology of race and racism in the digital society. Sociol. Race Ethn. 6:4441–49
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Meagher K. 2021. Informality and the infrastructures of inclusion: an introduction. Dev. Change 52:4729–55
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Morduch J, Schneider R. 2017. The Financial Diaries: How American Families Cope in a World of Uncertainty Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  72. Muldrew C. 1993. Interpreting the market: the ethics of credit and community relations in early modern England. Soc. Hist. 18:163–83
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Mullainathan S, Shafir E. 2013. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much New York: Times
  74. Noble S. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism New York: NYU Press
  75. O'Brien RL. 2012. Depleting capital? Race, wealth and informal financial assistance. Soc. Forces 91:375–96
     [Google Scholar]
  76. O'Brien RL, Kiviat B 2018. Disparate impact? Race, sex, and credit reports in hiring. Socius 4:1–20
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Ogden T. 2019. The great convergence: toward a global strategy for financial inclusion Rep. Aspen Inst. Washington, DC: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/publications/the-great-convergence-toward-a-global-strategy-for-financial-inclusion/
  78. Peebles G. 2010. The anthropology of credit. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 39:225–40
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Polletta F, Tufail Z. 2014. The moral obligations of some debts. Soc. Forum 29:1–28
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Poon M. 2007. Scorecards as devices for consumer credit: the case of Fair, Isaac & Company Incorporated. Soc. Rev. 55:Suppl. 2284–306
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Portes A. 1998. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Prasad M. 2012. The Land of Too Much: American Abundance and the Paradox of Poverty Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  83. Pugliese M, Le Bourdais C, Clark S 2020. Credit card debt and the provision of financial support to kin in the US. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 42:616–32
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Quinn SL. 2019. American Bonds: How Credit Shaped a Nation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  85. Ray V. 2019. A theory of racialized organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 84:126–53
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Robinson JN. 2020. Making markets on the margins: housing finance agencies and the racial politics of credit expansion. Am. J. Sociol. 125:4974–1029
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Rona-Tas A, Guseva A 2018. Consumer credit in comparative perspective. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:55–75
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Rossman G. 2014. Obfuscatory relational work and disreputable exchange. Soc. Theory 32:43–63
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Satz D. 2008. The moral limits of markets: the case of human kidneys. Proc. Aristot. Soc. 108:269–88
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Servon L. 2017. The Unbanking of America: How the New Middle Class Survives New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
  91. Shafir E. 2015. Manipulated as a way of life. J. Mark. Behav. 1:245–60
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Shepherd S, Matherly T. 2021. Racialization of peer-to-peer transactions: inequality and barriers to legitimacy. J. Consum. Aff. 55:2417–44
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Small ML, Akhavan A, Torres M, Wang Q. 2021. Banks, alternative institutions and the spatial–temporal ecology of racial inequality in US cities. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5:1622–28
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Smith EB, Menon T, Thompson L. 2012. Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organ. Sci. 23:67–82
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Soman D, Ahn H. 2011. Mental accounting and individual welfare. Perspectives on Framing G Keren 65–92 New York: Psychology
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Sykes J, Križ K, Edin K, Halpern-Meekin S. 2015. Dignity and dreams: what the earned income tax credit (EITC) means to low-income families. Am. Sociol. Rev. 80:243–67
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Taylor K-Y. 2019. Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership Chapel Hill: Univ. N. C. Press
  98. Tilly C. 2001. Relational origins of inequality. Anthropol. Theory 1:3355–72
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Vaughan D. 2004. Theorizing disaster: analogy, historical ethnography, and the Challenger accident. Ethnography 5:3315–47
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Vaughan D 2014. Analogy, cases, and comparative social organization. Theorizing in Social Science: The Context of Discovery R Swedberg 61–84 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Watkins JP. 2017. Financialization and society's protective response: reconsidering Karl Polanyi's double movement. J. Econ. Issues 51:198–117
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Wherry FF 2017. How relational accounting matters. Money Talks: Explaining How Money Really Works, ed. FF Wherry, N Bandelj, VA Zelizer 57–70 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Wherry FF, Perry VG. 2021. Anti-black currents in consumer affairs: an introduction to the special issue. J. Consum. Aff. 55:2356–65
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Wherry FF, Seefeldt KS, Alvarez AS. 2019a. Credit Where It's Due: Rethinking Financial Citizenship New York: Russell Sage Found.
  105. Wherry FF, Seefeldt KS, Alvarez AS. 2019b. To lend or not to lend to friends and kin: awkwardness, obfuscation, and negative reciprocity. Soc. Forces 98:2753–93
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Wiedemann A. 2021. Indebted Societies: Credit and Welfare in Rich Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  107. Wilkis A. 2017. The Moral Power of Money: Morality and Economy in the Life of the Poor Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  108. Yenkey C, Doering L, Aceves P. 2015. Is Kenya's digital revolution informalising financial inclusion? SSRN Work. Pap. 2562520. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2562520
    [Crossref]
  109. Zelizer VA. 1989. The social meaning of money: “special monies. .” Am. J. Sociol. 95:342–77
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Zelizer VA. 2012. How I became a relational economic sociologist and what does that mean?. Politics Sociol 40:145–74
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Zelizer VA. 2017. The Social Meaning of Money Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-114444
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error