1932

Abstract

Status has long been a core concept motivating sociology as a discipline. As related to the positioning and valuing of individuals, status often takes the form of reputation. How is an individual treated as a cultural object with identity provided by those who have reason to judge? Reputation may be given to known individuals, to those who are widely celebrated within a society, and to those whose past achievements are worth recalling through institutionalized forms of memory. Not all reputations are positive, and individuals may be remembered for misdeeds or violations of norms as embedded in the recall of scandal, political and otherwise. Both reputation and scandal have effects within the interaction order, local group cultures, and institutional structures, including media. As consensus develops, the linkages of individuals and their known status shape shared conceptions of morality.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022649
2019-07-30
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/45/1/annurev-soc-073018-022649.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022649&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abramowitz A. 2001. It's Monica, stupid: the impeachment controversy and the 1998 midterm election. Legislative Stud. Q. 26:211–26
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Adut A. 2008. On Scandal: Moral Disturbances in Society, Politics and Art Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  3. Adut A. 2018. Reign of Appearances: The Misery and Splendor of the Public Sphere Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Altshuler DS. 2001. Tunneling towards capitalism in the Czech Republic. Ethnography 2:115–38
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson B. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism London: Verso
  6. Anthony AK, Joshi A. 2017. (In)authenticity work: constructing the realm of inauthenticity through Thomas Kinkade. J. Consum. Cult. 17:752–73
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Arnold B. 1991. The Scandal of Ulysses: The Sensational Life of a Twentieth-Century Masterpiece New York: St. Martin's
  8. Basinger SJ. 2012. Scandals and congressional elections in the post-Watergate era. Political Res. Q. 66:385–98
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Basinger SJ, Rottinghaus B. 2012. Stonewalling and suspicion during presidential scandals. Political Res. Q. 65:290–302
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bastow S. 2012. An abortive attempt to defend an Episcopal reputation: the case of Archbishop Edwin Sandys and the innkeeper's wife. History 97:380–401
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker HS. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance New York: Free Press
  12. Becker HS. 1982. Art Worlds Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  13. Beisel N. 1998. Imperiled Innocents: Anthony Comstock and Family Reproduction in Victorian America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  14. Benediktsson MO. 2010. The deviant organization and the bad apple CEO: ideology and accountability in media coverage of corporate scandals. Soc. Forces 88:2189–216
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Benson R, Saguy AC. 2005. Constructing social problems in an age of globalization: a French-American comparison. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:233–59
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bergmann J. 1993. Discreet Indiscretions: The Social Organization of Gossip New York: Aldine de Gruyter
  17. Berinsky AJ, Hutchings VL, Mendelberg T, Shaker L, Valentino NA 2011. Sex and race: are black candidates more likely to be disadvantaged by sex scandals?. Political Behav 33:179–202
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Billig M. 1992. Talking of the Royal Family London: Routledge
  19. Billig M. 1995. Banal Nationalism London: Sage
  20. Bonomi PU. 1998. The Lord Cornbury Scandal: The Politics of Reputation in British America Chapel Hill: Univ. N. C. Press
  21. Boorstin DJ. 1962. The Image: Or What Happened to the American Dream New York: Harper & Row
  22. Bowler S, Karp JA. 2004. Politicians, scandals, and trust in government. Political Behav 26:271–87
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Braudy L. 1986. The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and Its History Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  24. Brim OG. 2009. Look at Me!: The Fame Motive from Childhood to Death Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  25. Brissett D, Edgley C 2005. Life as Theater: A Dramaturgical Sourcebook New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2nd ed..
  26. Brissonneau C, Montez de Oca J 2017. Doping in Elite Sports: Voices of French Sportspeople and Their Doctors1950–2010 New York: Routledge
  27. Brubaker R. 2016. The Dolezal affair: race, gender, and the micropolitics of identity. Ethn. Racial Stud. 39:414–48
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Brunk GG. 2001. Self-organized criticality: a new theory of political behavior and some of its implications. Br. J. Political Sci. 31:427–45
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Caughey J. 1984. Imaginary Social Worlds: A Cultural Approach Lincoln: Univ. Neb. Press
  30. Cavender G, Jurik NC, Cohen AK 1993. The baffling case of the smoking gun: the social ecology of political accounts in the Iran-Contra affair. Soc. Probl. 40:152–66
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Chanley VA, Rudolph TJ, Rahn WM 2000. The origins and consequences of public trust in government: a time series analysis. Public Opin. Q. 64:239–56
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Clavarie E. 1998. L'affaire du Chvalier de la Barra: la naissance d'une forme politique. Critique et Affaires de Blasphème à L'époque des Lumières P Roussin. Paris: Honoré Champion
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Cleminson R, Fernandez P, Garcia FV 2014. The social significance of homosexual scandals in Spain in the late nineteenth century. J. Hist. Sex. 23:358–82
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Cohen D. 2013. Family Secrets: The Things We Tried to Hide New York: Viking
  35. Collette C. 1987. Socialism and scandal: the sexual politics of the early labour movement. Hist. Workshop J. 23:102–11
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Collins R. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  37. Collins R, Restivo S. 1983. Robber barons and politicians in mathematics: a conflict model of science. Can. J. Sociol. 8:199–227
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Conroy SJ, Emerson TLN. 2006. Changing ethical attitudes: the case of the Enron and ImClone scandals. Soc. Sci. Q. 87:395–410
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Cooley CH. 1918. Social Process New York: Scribner's
  40. Coski J. 2006. The Confederate Battle Flag: America's Most Embattled Emblem Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  41. Crawford KB. 2003. Love, sodomy, and scandal: controlling the sexual reputation of Henry III. J. Hist. Sex. 12:513–42
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Currid-Halkett E. 2010. Starstruck: The Business of Celebrity New York: Faber and Faber
  43. Dagnes A, Sackleben M 2015. Scandal: An Interdisciplinary Approach to the Consequences, Outcomes, and Significance of Political Scandals New York: Bloomsbury
  44. Damico AJ, Conway MM, Damico SB 2000. Patterns of political trust and mistrust: three moments in the lives of democratic citizens. Polity 32:377–400
    [Google Scholar]
  45. De Blic D, Lemieux C 2005. Le scandale comme épreuve: éléments du sociologie pragmatique. Politix 71:9–38
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Della Porta D, Sberna S, Vannucci A 2015. Centripetal and centrifugal corruption in post-democratic Italy. Ital. Politics 30:198–217
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Douglas M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo London: Routledge Kegan Paul
  48. Dubin S. 1999. Displays of Power: Memory and Amnesia in the American Museum New York: NYU Press
  49. Ducharme L, Fine GA. 1995. The construction of nonpersonhood and demonization: commemorating the “traitorous” reputation of Benedict Arnold. Soc. Forces. 73:1309–31
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Dunham RG, Mauss AL. 1976. Waves from Watergate: evidence concerning the impact of the Watergate scandal upon political legitimacy and social control. Pacific Sociol. Rev. 19:469–90
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Durkheim E. 1915. The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life London: George Allen and Unwin
  52. Erikson K. 1966. Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance New York: Wiley
  53. Espeland WN, Sauder M. 2017. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability New York: Russell Sage
  54. Feinberg M, Willer R, Schultz M 2014. Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychol. Sci. 25:656–64
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Fernandes S. 2018. Curated Stories: The Uses and Misuses of Storytelling Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  56. Ferris KO, Harris SR. 2011. Stargazing: Celebrity, Fame and Social Interaction New York: Routledge
  57. Figone AJ. 1989. Gambling and college basketball: the scandal of 1951. J. Sport Hist. 16:44–61
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Fine GA. 1996. Reputational entrepreneurs and the memory of incompetence: melting supporters, partisan warriors, and images of President Harding. Am. J. Sociol. 101:1159–93
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Fine GA. 1997. Scandal, social conditions and the creation of public attention: “Fatty” Arbuckle and the “problem” of Hollywood. Soc. Probl. 44:297–323
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Fine GA. 1999. John Brown's body: elites, heroic embodiment, and the legitimation of political violence. Soc. Probl. 46:225–49
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Fine GA. 2001. Difficult Reputations: Collective Memories of the Evil, Inept and Controversial Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  62. Fine GA. 2012. Tiny Publics: A Theory of Group Action and Culture New York: Russell Sage
  63. Fischle M. 2000. Mass response to the Lewinsky scandal: motivated reasoning or Bayesian updating. Political Psych 21:135–59
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Fountain C. 2015. The Betrayal: How the 1919 Black Sox Scandal Changed Baseball Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  65. Fuszara M. 1999. Corruption as portrayed by the press. Pol. Sociol. Rev. 126:281–99
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Gamson J. 1994. Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  67. Gamson J. 2001. Normal sins: sex scandal narratives as institutional morality tales. Soc. Probl. 48:185–205
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Gamson J. 2017. Scandal in the age of sexting. Scandal in a Digital Age H Mandel, GM Chen 77–95 New York: Palgrave
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Garfinkel H. 1956. Conditions of successful degradation ceremonies. Am. J. Sociol. 61:420–24
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Geertz C. 1973. The Interpretation of Culture New York: Basic
  71. Gluckman M. 1963. Gossip and scandal. Curr. Anthropol. 4:307–16
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Goffman E. 1959. Presentation of Self in Everyday Life Garden City, NY: Anchor
  73. Goffman E. 1983. The interaction order. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Goode WJ. 1978. The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  75. Graffin SD, Bundy J, Porac JF, Wade JB, Quinn DP 2013. Falls from grace and the hazards of high status: the 2009 British MP expense scandal and its impact on parliamentary elites. Adm. Sci. Q. 58:313–45
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Haller MH. 2000. Introduction: crime and scandal as historical sources. Pa. Hist. 67:345–48
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Hallett T. 2003. Symbolic politics and organizational culture. Sociol. Theory 21:128–49
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Halpern J. 2006. Fame Junkies: The Hidden Truths Behind America's Favorite Addiction New York: Houghton Mifflin
  79. Hansen LL, Movahedi S. 2010. Wall Street scandals: the myth of individual greed. Sociol. Forum 25:367–74
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Hastorf AH, Schneider DJ, Polefka J 1969. Person Perception Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  81. Heinich N. 1996. The Glory of Van Gogh: An Anthropology of Admiration Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  82. Hirsch ED Jr 1987. Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know Boston: Houghton Mifflin
  83. Hochstetler K. 2006. Rethinking presidentialism: challenges and presidential falls in South America. Comp. Politics 38:401–18
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Horton D, Wohl RR. 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19:215–29
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Horwitz T. 1998. Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War New York: Pantheon
  86. Jenkins P. 1996. Pedophiles and Priests: Anatomy of a Contemporary Crisis New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  87. Johnson DK. 2004. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  88. Judd A. 2018. Lawyers for Pastner accusers file to drop clients. Atlanta Journal-Constitution June 10 C2
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Kantola A, Vesa J. 2013. Mediated scandals as social dramas: transforming the moral order in Finland. Acta Sociol 56:295–308
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Kemp KA. 1984. Accidents, scandals, and political support for regulatory agencies. J. Politics 46:401–27
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Klapp OE. 1962. Heroes, Fools, and Villains: The Changing American Character Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  92. Kumlin S, Esaiasson P. 2011. Scandal fatigue: scandal elections and satisfaction with democracy in Western Europe, 1977–2007. Br. J. Political Sci. 42:263–82
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Lang G, Lang K. 1990. Etched in Memory: The Building and Survival of Artistic Reputation Chapel Hill: Univ. N. C. Press
  94. Lelyveld J. 2011. Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and His Struggle with India New York: Knopf
  95. Levin J, Arluke A. 1987. Gossip: The Inside Scoop New York: Plenum
  96. Levinson S. 1998. Written in Stone Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  97. Loewen J. 1995. Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong New York: Simon and Schuster
  98. Martin J. 1992. Culture in Organizations: Three Perspectives Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  99. McLeod JM, Brown JD, Becker LB 1977. Watergate and the 1974 congressional elections. Public Opin. Q. 41:181–95
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Miller B. 2010. The effects of scandalous information on recall of policy-related information. Political Psych 31:887–914
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Mishina Y, Dykes BJ, Block ES, Pollock TG 2010. Why “good” firms do bad things: the effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Acad. Manag. J. 53:701–22
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Mitchell D-G. 2014. Here today, gone tomorrow? Assessing how timing and repetition of scandal information affects candidate evaluations. Political Psych 35:679–701
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Molotch H, Lester M. 1974. News as purposive behavior: on the strategic use of routine events, accidents, and scandals. Am. Sociol. Rev. 39:101–12
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Moore DA, Tetlock PE, Tanlu L, Bazerman MH 2006. Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence, moral seduction, and strategic issue cycling. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:10–29
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Mullins NC. 1973. Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology New York: Harper & Row
  106. Newman B. 2003. Integrity and presidential approval, 1980–2000. Public Opin. Q. 67:335–67
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Novick P. 1999. The Holocaust in American Life New York: Houghton-Mifflin
  108. Nyblade B, Reed SR. 2008. Who cheats? Who loots? Political competition and corruption in Japan, 1947–93. Am. J. Political Sci. 52:926–41
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Olick J, Robbins J. 1998. Social memory studies: from “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 24:105–140
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Origgi G. 2018. Reputation: What It Is and Why It Matters Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  111. Owen D. 2000. Popular politics and the Clinton/Lewinsky affair: the implications for leadership. Political Psych. 21:161–77
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Owens LA. 2011. Confidence in banks, financial institutions, and Wall Street, 1971–2011. Public Opin. Q. 76:142–62
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Polletta F. 2002. Freedom Is an Endless Meeting: Democracy in American Social Movements Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  114. Polletta F. 2006. It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  115. Puglisi R, Snyder JM Jr 2011. Newspaper coverage of political scandals. J. Politics 73:931–50
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Quirk PJ. 1998. Coping with the politics of scandal. Presidential Stud. Q. 28:898–902
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Renshon SA. 2002a. The polls: the public's response to the Clinton scandals, part I: inconsistent theories, contradictory evidence. Presidential Stud. Q. 32:169–84
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Renshon SA. 2002b. The polls: the public's response to the Clinton scandals, part II: diverse explanations, clearer consequences. Presidential Stud. Q. 32:412–27
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Robins J. 2006. The Trial of Queen Caroline: The Scandalous Affair that Nearly Ended a Monarchy New York: Free Press
  120. Rodden J. 1989. The Politics of Literary Reputation: The Making and Claiming of “St. George” Orwell New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  121. Ronson J. 2015. So You've Been Publicly Shamed New York: Riverhead
  122. Rosnow R, Fine GA. 1976. Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay New York: Elsevier
  123. Rottinghaus B. 2014. Surviving scandal: the institutional and political dynamics of national and state executive scandals. PS 47:131–40
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Samuels SM, Samuels DR. 2003. Reconstructing culture: privilege and change at the United States Air Force Academy. Race Gender Class 10:120–44
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Santayana G. 1905. The Life of Reason New York: Charles Scribner's Sons
  126. Sargeant L. 2005. Kashchei the immortal: liberal politics, cultural memory, and the Rimsky-Korsakov scandal of 1905. Russ. Rev. 64:22–43
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Sauder M, Fine GA. 2008. Arbiters, entrepreneurs and business school reputation. Sociol. Forum 23:699–723
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Scarrow SE. 2003. Party finance scandals and their consequences in the 2002 election. Ger. Politics Soc. 21:119–37
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Schlenker B. 1980. Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole
  130. Schudson M. 1989. How culture works: perspectives from media studies on the efficacy of symbols. Theor. Soc. 18:153–80
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Schudson M. 1992. Watergate in American Memory: How We Remember, Forget, and Reconstruct the Past New York: Basic
  132. Schwartz B. 2000. Abraham Lincoln and the Forge of National Memory Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  133. Schwartz B, Holyfield L. 1998. Nixon postmortem. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 560:96–110
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Schweikart L. 2009. 48 Liberal Lies About American History New York: Sentinel
  135. Scott SL. 1996. Dead work: the construction and reconstruction of the Harlan Miners Memorial. Qualit. Sociol. 19:365–94
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Shah DV, Watts MD, Domke D, Fan DP 2002. News framing and cuing of issue regimes: explaining Clinton's public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opin. Q. 66:339–70
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Sherry MS. 2007. Gay Artists in Modern American Culture: An Imagined Conspiracy Chapel Hill: Univ. N. C. Press
  138. Snow D, Anderson L. 1987. Identity work among the homeless: the verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. Am. J. Sociol. 92:1336–71
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Solove DJ. 2007. The Future of Reputation: Gossip, Rumor, and Privacy on the Internet New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  140. Sternheimer K. 2011. Celebrity Culture and the American Dream: Stardom and Social Mobility New York: Routledge
  141. Swidler A. 1986. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:273–86
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Szasz A. 1986. The process and significance of political scandals: a comparison of Watergate and “Sewergate” episode at the Environmental Protection Agency. Soc. Probl. 33:202–17
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Taylor S. 2005. Political culture and African Americans’ forgiveness of elected officials. Polity 37:491–510
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Thompson JB. 2000. Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age Cambridge, UK: Polity
  145. Tiger R. 2013. Celebrity drug scandals: media double standard. Contexts 12:36–41
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Tuchman G, Fortin NE. 1989. Edging Women Out: Victorian Novelists, Publishers and Social Change New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  147. Vinitzky-Seroussi V. 1998. After Pomp and Circumstance: High School Reunion as an Autobiographical Occasion Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  148. Vinitzky-Seroussi V. 2010. Yitzhak Rabin's Assassination and the Dilemmas of Commemoration Albany, NY: SUNY Press
  149. Weber E. 1991. About Thermidor: the oblique uses of a scandal. Fr. Hist. Stud. 17:330–42
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Zerubavel E. 1997. Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  151. Zerubavel E. 2018. Taken for Granted: The Remarkable Power of the Unremarkable Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022649
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error