1932

Abstract

For the past 80 years, social scientists have been linking historical censuses across time to study economic and geographic mobility. In recent decades, the quantity of historical census record linkage has exploded, owing largely to the advent of new machine-readable data created by genealogical organizations. Investigators are examining economic and geographic mobility across multiple generations and also engaging many new topics. Several analysts are exploring the effects of early-life socioeconomic conditions, environmental exposures, or natural disasters on family, health, and economic outcomes in later life. Other studies exploit natural experiments to gauge the impact of policy interventions such as social welfare programs and educational reforms. The new data sources have led to a proliferation of record linkage methodologies, and some widespread approaches inadvertently introduce errors that can lead to false inferences. A new generation of large-scale shared data infrastructure now in preparation will ameliorate weaknesses of current linkage methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041447
2018-07-30
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/44/1/annurev-soc-073117-041447.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041447&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abramitzky R, Boustan LP, Eriksson K 2012. Europe's tired, poor, huddled masses: self-selection and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:51832–56
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Abramitzky R, Boustan LP, Eriksson K 2013. Have the poor always been less likely to migrate? Evidence from inheritance practices during the age of mass migration. J. Dev. Econ. 102:2–14
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Abramitzky R, Boustan LP, Eriksson K 2014. A nation of immigrants: assimilation and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration. J. Political Econ. 122:3467–506
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alexander JT, Gardner T, Massey CG, O'Hara A 2014. Creating a longitudinal data infrastructure at the Census Bureau Work. Pap., Cent. Adm. Rec. Res. Appl., US Census Bur Washington, DC:
  5. Antonie L, Inwood K, Lizotte DJ, Ross JA 2014. Tracking people over time in 19th century Canada for longitudinal analysis. Mach. Learn. 95:1129–46
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Antonie L, Inwood K, Ross JA 2015. Dancing with dirty data: problems in the extraction of life-course evidence from historical censuses. Population Reconstruction G Bloothooft, P Christen, K Mandemakers, M Schraagen 217–41 Cham, Switz: Springer Int. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bailey MJ 2017. The longitudinal, intergenerational family electronic micro-database project Presented at the University of Michigan College of Literature, Science, and the Arts Board Meeting Ann Arbor, MI: https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/life-m/
  8. Bailey MJ, Cole C, Henderson M, Massey C 2017. How well do automated linking methods perform in historical data? Evidence from new U.S. ground truth Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Univ. Mich Ann Arbor: http://www-personal.umich.edu/∼baileymj/Bailey_Cole_Henderson_Massey.pdf
  9. Baskerville P, Dillon L, Inwood K, Roberts E, Ruggles S et al. 2014. Mining microdata: economic opportunity and spatial mobility in Britain and the United States, 1850–1881. IEEE International Conference on Big Data5–13 Washington, DC: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Beach B, Ferrie J, Saavedra M, Troesken W 2016. Typhoid fever, water quality, and human capital formation. J. Econ. Hist. 76:141–75
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bleakley H, Lin J 2012. Thick-market effects and churning in the labor market: evidence from U.S. cities. J. Urban Econ. 72:2–387–103
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloome D, Muller C 2015. Tenancy and African American marriage in the postbellum South. Demography 52:51409–30
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Blumin SM 1976. The Urban Threshold: Growth and Change in a Nineteenth-Century American Community Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  14. Bogue AG 1963. From Prairie to Corn Belt: Farming on the Illinois and Iowa Prairies in the Nineteenth Century Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  15. Chambers R 2009. Regression analysis of probability-linked data Rep., Off. Stat. Res. Ser. Vol. 4 Stat. N. Z Wellington, NZ:
  16. Chang C-C, Lin C-J 2011. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol 2:327
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Chipperfield JO, Chambers RL 2015. Using the bootstrap to account for linkage errors when analysing probabilistically linked categorical data. J. Off. Stat. 31:3397–414
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Christen P 2008. Febrl: a freely available record linkage system with a graphical user interface. Proceedings of the Second Australasian Workshop on Health Data and Knowledge Management17–25 Darlinghurst, Aust: Aust. Comput. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Christen P 2012. Data Matching: Concepts and Techniques for Record Linkage, Entity Resolution, and Duplicate Detection New York: Springer
  20. Collins WJ, Wanamaker MH 2014. Selection and economic gains in the Great Migration of African Americans: new evidence from linked census data. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 6:1220–52
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Connor DS 2017. Putting people in their place: intergenerational inequality in the age of mass migration PhD Thesis, Univ. Calif Los Angeles:
  22. Curti M 1959. The Making of an American Community: A Case Study of Democracy in a Frontier County Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  23. Dalzell NM, Reiter JP 2017. Regression modeling and file matching using possibly erroneous matching variables. arXiv:1608.06309v3 [stat.AP]
  24. Dribe M, Eriksson B, Scalone F 2017. Migration, marriage, and social mobility: women in Sweden 1880–1900 Lund Pap. Econ. Demogr. 2017:1 Lund Univ Swed.:
  25. Eli S, Salisbury L, Shertzer A 2016. Migration responses to conflict: evidence from the border of the American Civil War NBER Work. Pap. 22591
  26. Esslinger DR 1975. Immigrants and the City: Ethnicity and Mobility in a Nineteenth-Century Midwestern Community Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press
  27. Faragher JM 1986. Sugar Creek: Life on the Illinois Prairie New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  28. Feigenbaum JJ 2016. Essays on intergenerational mobility and inequality in economic history PhD Thesis, Harvard Univ Cambridge, MA:
  29. Feigenbaum JJ 2017. Multiple measures of historical intergenerational mobility: Iowa 1915 to 1940. Econ. J. In press
  30. Ferrie JP 1996. A new sample of males linked from the public use microdata sample of the 1850 U.S. federal census of population to the 1860 U.S. federal census manuscript schedules. Hist. Methods 29:4141–56
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ferrie JP 1999. Yankeys Now: Immigrants in the Antebellum United States, 1840–1860 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  32. Ferrie JP 2004. Longitudinal data for the analysis of mobility in the U.S., 1850–1910. Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL
  33. Ferrie JP 2005. History lessons: the end of American exceptionalism? Mobility in the United States since 1850. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:3199–215
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ferrie JP, Massey C, Rothbaum J 2016. Do grandparents and great-grandparents matter? Multigenerational mobility in the US, 1910–2013 NBER Work. Pap. 22635
  35. Ferrie JP, Rolf K, Troesken W 2012. Cognitive disparities, lead plumbing, and water chemistry: prior exposure to water-borne lead and intelligence test scores among World War Two U.S. Army enlistees. Econ. Hum. Biol. 10:198–111
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Goeken R, Huynh L, Lynch TA, Vick R 2011. New methods of census record linking. Hist. Methods. 44:17–14
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goldstein H, Harron K, Wade A 2012. The analysis of record-linked data using multiple imputation with data value priors. Stat. Med. 31:283481–93
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Grusky DB, Smeeding TM, Snipp CM 2015. A new infrastructure for monitoring social mobility in the United States. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 657:163–82
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Guest AM 1987. Notes from the National Panel Study: linkage and migration in the late nineteenth century. Hist. Methods 20:263–77
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hacker JD 2013. New estimates of census coverage in the United States, 1850–1930. Soc. Sci. Hist. 37:171–101
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Hacker JD, Roberts E 2017. The impact of kin availability, parental religiosity, and nativity on fertility differentials in the late 19th-century United States. Demogr. Res. 37:341049–80
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hall PAV, Dowling GR 1980. Approximate string matching. ACM Comput. Surv. 12:4381–402
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Herscovici S 1998. Migration and economic mobility: wealth accumulation and occupational change among antebellum migrants and persisters. J. Econ. Hist. 58:4927–56
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hershberg T 1976. The Philadelphia Social History Project: an introduction. Hist. Methods Newsl. 9:2–343–58
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Hof MHP, Zwinderman AH 2015. A mixture model for the analysis of data derived from record linkage. Stat. Med. 34:174–92
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hopkins R 1968. Occupational and geographical mobility in Atlanta, 1870–1890. J. South. Hist. 34:2200–13
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hout M, Guest AM 2013. Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850: comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:52021–40
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jackson R 1982. Index to the Seventh Census of the United States Bountiful, UT: Accel. Index. Syst. Int.
  49. Jackson R 1992. Index to the Eighth Census of the United States Bountiful, UT: Accel. Index. Syst. Int.
  50. Jennings JA, Sullivan AR, Hacker JD 2012. Intergenerational transmission of reproductive behavior during the demographic transition. J. Interdiscip. Hist. 42:4543–69
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Jensen R 1974. Quantitative American studies: the state of the art. Am. Q 26:3225–40
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Johnson DS, Massey C, O'Hara A 2015. The opportunities and challenges of using administrative data linkages to evaluate mobility. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 657:1247–64
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Karbownik K, Wray A 2016.a Childhood health and long-run economic opportunity in Victorian England Work. Pap., Inst. Policy Res., Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL
  54. Karbownik K, Wray A 2016.b Long-run consequences of exposure to natural disasters Work. Pap. 6196, Cent Econ. Stud., IFO Inst., Munich Germany:
  55. Katz MB 1975. The People of Hamilton, Canada West: Family and Class in a Mid-Nineteenth-Century City Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  56. Knights PR 1971. The Plain People of Boston, 1830–1860: A Study in City Growth New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  57. Lahiri P, Larsen MD 2005. Regression analysis with linked data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100:469222–30
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lait AJ, Randell B 1996. An assessment of name matching algorithms Tech. Rep. 199710, Dep. Comput. Sci., Univ. Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  59. Laslett P, Wall R 1972. Household and Family in Past Times Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Litwak E 1960. Geographic mobility and extended family cohesion. Am. Sociol. Rev. 25:3385–94
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Long J 2005. Rural-urban migration and socioeconomic mobility in Victorian Britain. J. Econ. Hist. 65:11–35
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Long J, Ferrie J 2007. The path to convergence: intergenerational occupational mobility in Britain and the US in three eras. Econ. J. 117:519C61–71
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Long J, Ferrie J 2013. Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:41109–37
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Malin JC 1935. The turnover of farm population in Kansas. Kans. Hist. Q. 4(4):339–72
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Massey CG 2014. Creating linked historical data: an assessment of the Census Bureau's ability to assign protected identification keys to the 1960 Census Work. Pap. 2014-12, Cent. Adm. Rec. Res. Appl., US Census Bur.
  66. Massey CG 2017. Playing with matches: an assessment of accuracy in linked historical data. Hist. Methods 50:3129–43
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Mill R 2013. Inequality and discrimination in historical and modern labor markets PhD Thesis, Stanford Univ Stanford, CA:
  68. Mill R, Stein LCD 2016. Race, skin color, and economic outcomes in early twentieth-century America Work. Pap., Dep. Finance, Arizona State Univ Tempe, AZ:
  69. Modalsli J 2017. Intergenerational mobility in Norway, 1865–2011. Scand. J. Econ. 119:134–71
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Nix E, Qian N 2015. The fluidity of race: “passing” in the United States, 1880–1940 NBER Work. Pap. 20828
  71. Parman J 2015.a Childhood health and sibling outcomes: nurture reinforcing nature during the 1918 influenza pandemic. Explor. Econ. Hist. 58:22–43
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Parman J 2015.b Childhood health and human capital: new evidence from genetic brothers in arms. J. Econ. Hist. 75:130–64
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Parsons T, Bales RF 1955. Family, Socialization and Interaction Process Glencoe, IL: Free Press
  74. Porter EH, Winkler WIE 1997. Approximate string comparison and its effect on an advanced record linkage system Census Bur. Res. Rep. RR97/02, US Census Bur Suitland, MD:
  75. Prechtel-Kluskens C 2002. The WPA census Soundexing projects. Prologue Q. Natl. Arch. Rec. Adm. 34:172–77
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Rauscher E 2016. Does educational equality increase mobility? Exploiting nineteenth-century U.S. compulsory schooling laws. Am. J. Sociol. 121:61697–761
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Roberts E, Ruggles S, Dillon LY, Gardarsdóttir Ó, Oldervoll J et al. 2003. The North Atlantic Population Project: an overview. Hist. Methods 36:280–88
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Roesch A 2012. Matching data using sounds-like operators and SAS® compare functions. Proceedings of the 2012 SAS Global Forum Pap 122–2012 Cary, NC: SAS Inst.
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Ruggles S 1994. The transformation of American family structure. Am. Hist. Rev. 99:103–28
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Ruggles S 2002. Linking historical censuses: a new approach. Hist. Comput. 14:213–24
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Ruggles S 2009. Reconsidering the Northwest European family system. Popul. Dev. Rev. 35:249–73
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Ruggles S 2011. Intergenerational coresidence and family transitions in the United States, 1850–1880. J. Marriage Fam. 73:1136–48
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Ruggles S 2014. Big microdata for population research. Demography 51:1287–97
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Ruggles S, Alexander JT, Bailey MJ, Ferrie JP, Fitch CA et al. 2017. Building a national longitudinal research infrastructure Work. Pap. 2017-2, Minn. Popul. Cent., Univ Minn., Minneapolis:
  85. Ruggles S, Menard RR 1995. The Minnesota Historical Census Projects. Hist. Methods 28:16–10
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Ruggles S, Roberts E, Sarkar S, Sobek M 2011. The North Atlantic Population Project: progress and prospects. Hist. Methods 44:11–6
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Salisbury L 2017. Women's income and marriage markets in the United States: evidence from the Civil War pension. J. Econ. Hist. 77:11–38
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Saperstein A, Gullickson A 2013. A “mulatto escape hatch” in the United States? Examining evidence of racial and social mobility during the Jim Crow era. Demography 50:51921–42
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Scheuren F, Winkler WE 1993. Regression analysis of data files that are computer matched. Surv. Methodol. 19:139–58
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Schurer K, Higgs E 2014. Integrated census microdata (I-CeM), 1851–1911 SN 7481, UK Data Serv Colchester, UK: http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7481-1
    [Crossref]
  91. Steckel RH 1988. Census matching and migration: a research strategy. Hist. Methods 21:252–60
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Stephenson C 1974. Tracing those who left: mobility studies and the Soundex indexes to the U.S. Census. J. Urban Hist. 1:173–84
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Stephenson C 1975. Determinants of American migration: methods and models in mobility research. J. Am. Stud. 9:2189–197
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Sussman MB 1959. The isolated nuclear family: fact or fiction. Soc. Probl. 6:4333–40
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Szołtysek M, Gruber S 2016. Mosaic: recovering surviving census records and reconstructing the familial history of Europe. Hist. Fam. 21:138–60
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Thernstrom S 1964. Poverty and Progress: Social Mobility in a Nineteenth Century City. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Thernstrom S 1973. The Other Bostonians: Poverty and Progress in the American Metropolis, 1880–1970 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  98. Thernstrom S 1975. Rejoinder to Alcorn and Knights. Hist. Methods Newsl. 8:3115–20
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Thorvaldsen G 2007. An international perspective on Scandinavia's historical censuses. Scand. J. Hist. 32:3237–57
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Torres C, Dillon LY 2015. Using the Canadian Censuses of 1852 and 1881 for automatic data linkage: a case study of intergenerational social mobility. Population Reconstruction G Bloothooft, P Christen, K Mandemakers, M Schraagen 243–61 Cham, Switz: Springer Int. Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Turner FJ 1893. The significance of the frontier in American history Annu. Rep., Am. Hist. Assoc Washington, DC:
  102. Ward Z 2017. The not-so-hot melting pot: the persistence of outcomes for descendants of the age of mass migration Work. Pap., Res. School Econ., Aust. Natl. Univ Canberra:
  103. Warren JR, Knies L, Haas S, Hernandez EM 2012. The impact of childhood sickness on adult socioeconomic outcomes: evidence from late 19th century America. Soc. Sci. Med. 75:81531–38
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Wisselgren MJ, Edvinsson S, Berggren M, Larsson M 2014. Testing methods of record linkage on Swedish censuses. Hist. Methods 47:3138–51
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Xie Y, Killewald A 2013. Intergenerational occupational mobility in Great Britain and the United States since 1850: comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 103:52003–20
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-073117-041447
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error