1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 47, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 47, 2021

New Directions in the Study of Institutional Logics: From Tools to Phenomena

Abstract

In this article, we take stock of the institutional logics perspective and highlight opportunities for new scholarship. While we celebrate the growth and generativity of the literature on institutional logics, we also note that there has been a troubling tendency in recent work to use logics as analytical tools, feeding disquiet about reification and reductionism. Seeding a broader scholarly agenda that addresses such weaknesses in the literature, we highlight nascent efforts that aim to more systematically understand institutional logics as complex, dynamic phenomena in their own right. In doing so, we argue for more research that probes how logics cohere and endure by unpacking the role of values, the centrality of practice, and the governance dynamics of institutional logics and their orders. Furthermore, we encourage bridging the study of institutional logics with various literatures, including ethnomethodology, phenomenology, professions, elites, world society, and the old institutionalism, to enhance progress in these directions.

Keyword(s): culture, governance, institution, institutional logics, institutional theory, practice, value
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
2021-07-31
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/47/1/annurev-soc-090320-111734.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott A. 1988. The System of Professions Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  2. Abbott A. 2005. Linked ecologies: states and universities as environments for professions. Sociol. Theory 23:3245–74
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Almandoz J. 2012. Arriving at the starting line: the impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Acad. Manag. J. 55:61381–406
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Battilana J, Dorado S. 2010. Building sustainable hybrid organizations: the case of commercial microfinance organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 53:61419–40
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Becker HS. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance New York: Free Press of Glencoe
  6. Berger PL, Luckmann T. 1967. The Social Construction of Reality: Everything That Passes for Knowledge in Society London: Allen Lane
  7. Besharov ML, Smith WK. 2014. Multiple institutional logics in organizations: explaining their varied nature and implications. Acad. Manag. Rev. 39:3364–81
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Boli J, Thomas GM. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  9. Boltanski L, Thévenot L. 1991. De la Justification. Les Économies de la Grandeur Paris: Gallimard
  10. Bourdieu P. 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  11. Breiger RL, Mohr JW. 2004. Institutional logics from the aggregation of organizational networks: operational procedures for the analysis of counted data. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 10:117–43
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Brint S. 1994. In an Age of Experts: The Changing Roles of Professionals in Politics and Public Life Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  13. Bromley P, Longhofer W, Schofer E. 2019. Contentions over world culture: the rise of legal restrictions on foreign funding to NGOs, 1994–2015. Soc. Forces 99:281–304
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Campbell JL, Hollingsworth JR, Lindberg LN 1991. Governance of the American Economy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  15. Campbell JL, Pedersen OK 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  16. Cardinale I. 2018. Beyond constraining and enabling: toward new microfoundations for institutional theory. Acad. Manag. Rev. 43:1132–55
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Carruthers BG, Stinchcombe AL. 1999. The social structure of liquidity: flexibility, markets, and states. Theory Soc 28:3353–82
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chung CN, Luo X. 2008. Institutional logics or agency costs: the influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organ. Sci. 19:5766–84
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cobb JA, Wry T, Zhao EY. 2016. Funding financial inclusion: institutional logics and the contextual contingency of funding for microfinance organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 59:62103–31
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Creed WD, DeJordy R, Lok J. 2010. Being the change: resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Acad. Manag. J. 53:61336–64
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Dalpiaz E, Rindova V, Ravasi D. 2016. Combining logics to transform organizational agency: blending industry and art at Alessi. Adm. Sci. Q. 61:3347–92
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Davis GF. 2009. Managed by the Markets: How Finance Reshaped America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  23. DiMaggio PJ 1988. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment LG Zucker 3–21 Cambridge, MA: Ballinger
     [Google Scholar]
  24. DiMaggio PJ. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:263–87
     [Google Scholar]
  25. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147–60
     [Google Scholar]
  26. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1991. Introduction. See Powell & DiMaggio 1991 1–40
  27. Djelic ML, Quack S 2010. Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  28. Djelic ML, Sahlin-Anderson K. 2006. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  29. Dobbin F. 1994. Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  30. Dobbin F, Sutton JR. 1998. The strength of a weak state: the rights revolution and the rise of human resources management divisions. Am. J. Sociol. 104:2441–76
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Domhoff GW. 2006. Who Rules America? Power and Politics and Social Change Boston: McGraw-Hill
  32. Drori GS, Meyer JW, Ramirez FO, Schofer E. 2003. Science in the Modern World Polity: Institutionalization and Globalization Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  33. Dunn MB, Jones C. 2010. Institutional logics and institutional pluralism: the contestation of care and science logics in medical education, 1967–2005. Adm. Sci. Q. 55:1114–49
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Durkheim E. 2001. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  35. Edelman LB, Suchman MC 2007. The Legal Lives of Private Organizations Surrey, UK: Ashgate
  36. Edelman LB, Uggen C, Erlanger HS. 1999. The endogeneity of legal regulation: grievance procedures as rational myth. Am. J. Sociol. 105:406–54
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Fiss PC, Cambré B, Marx A 2013. Configurational theory and methods in organizational research. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 38: Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research PC Fiss, B Cambré, A Marx 1–22 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Fligstein N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  39. Fligstein N, McAdam D. 2012. A Theory of Fields Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  40. Frank DJ, Hironaka A, Schofer E. 2000. The nation-state and the natural environment over the twentieth century. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65:196–116
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Freidson E. 2001. Professionalism, The Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  42. Friedland R. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure, and process italicM@n@gement 155583–95
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Friedland R. 2018. Moving institutional logics forward: emotion and meaningful material practice. Organ. Stud. 39:515–42
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Friedland R. 2021. Toward a religious institutionalism: ontologies, teleologies and the Godding of institution. See Lounsbury et al. 2021a 29–118
  45. Friedland R, Alford R 1991. Bringing society back in: symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. See Powell & DiMaggio 1991 232–63
  46. Friedland R, Mohr JW 2004. Matters of Culture: Cultural Sociology in Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  47. Friedland R, Mohr JW, Roose H, Gardinali P. 2014. The institutional logics of love: measuring intimate life. Theory Soc 43:3–4333–70
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Furnari S. 2014. Interstitial spaces: microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Acad. Manag. Rev. 39:439–62
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Furnari S 2020. Situating frames and institutional logics: the social situation as a key institutional microfoundation. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 65B: Microfoundations of Institutions P Haack, J Sieweke, L Wessel 193–209 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Furnari S, Crilly D, Misangyi VF, Greckhamer T, Fiss PC, Agilera RV. 2020. Capturing causal complexity: heuristics for configurational theorizing. Acad. Manag. Rev. In press. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0298
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Garfinkel H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  52. Glaser VL, Fast NJ, Harmon DJ, Green SE. 2016. Institutional frame switching: how institutional logics shape individual action. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 48A: How Institutions Matter! J Gehman, M Lounsbury, R Greenswood 35–69 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Glynn MA, Lounsbury M. 2005. From the critics’ corner: logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. J. Manag. Stud. 42:1031–55
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Goffman E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  55. Granovetter M. 2018. The Sociology of Economic Life New York: Routledge
  56. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB, Meyer RE 2017. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism London: Sage. , 2nd ed..
  57. Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  58. Greenwood R, Raynard M, Kodeih F, Micelotta ER, Lounsbury M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Acad. Manag. Ann. 5:317–71
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Gümüşay AA. 2020. The plurality and prevalence of the religious institutional logic. Business Soc 59:855–80
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Gümüşay AA, Smets M, Morris T. 2020.. “ God at work”: engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Acad. Manag. J. 63:124–54
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Haack P, Sieweke J, Wessel L 2019. Microfoundations and multi-level research on institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 65A: Microfoundations of Institutions P Haack, J Sieweke, L Wesel 11–40 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Hall PA, Soskice DW. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  63. Hampel CE, Lawrence TB, Tracey P. 2017. Institutional work: taking stock and making it matter. See Greenwood et al. 2017 558–90
  64. Haveman HA, Rao H. 1997. Structuring a theory of moral sentiments: institutional and organizational coevolution in the early thrift industry. Am. J. Sociol. 102:1606–51
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Hedberg L, Lounsbury M. 2021. Not just small potatoes: cultural entrepreneurship in the moralizing of markets. Organ. Sci. 32:2433–54
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Hirsch PM, Lounsbury M. 1997. Ending the family quarrel: towards a reconciliation of the ‘old’ and ‘new’ institutionalism. Am. Behav. Sci. 40:406–18
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Hwang H, Colyvas JA. 2020. Ontology, levels of society, and degrees of generality: theorizing actors as abstractions in institutional theory. Acad. Manag. Rev. 45:3570–95
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Hwang H, Colyvas JA, Drori GS 2019. Agents, Actors, Actorhood: Institutional Perspectives on the Nature of Agency, Action, and Authority Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
  69. Jakob-Sadeh L, Zilber TB 2019. Bringing “together”: emotions and power in organizational responses to institutional complexity. Acad. Manag. J. 62:51413–43
     [Google Scholar]
  70. King BG, Pearce NA. 2010. The contentiousness of markets: politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:249–67
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Klingbeil C, Semrau T, Ebers M, Wilhelm H. 2019. Logics, leaders, lab coats: a multi-level study on how institutional logics are linked to entrepreneurial intentions in academia. J. Manag. Stud. 56:5929–65
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Kraatz MS 2015. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 44: Institutions and Ideals: Philip Selznick's Legacy for Organizational Studies Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Kraatz MS, Block ES. 2008. Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. See Greenwood et al. 2008 243–75
  74. Kraatz MS, Flores R, Chandler D. 2020. The value of values for institutional analysis. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14:474–512
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Kroezen JJ, Heugens PP. 2019. What is dead may never die: institutional regeneration through logic reemergence in Dutch beer brewing. Adm. Sci. Q. 64:4976–1019
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Kyratsis Y, Atun R, Phillips N, Tracey P, George G. 2017. Health systems in transition: professional identity work in the context of shifting institutional logics. Acad. Manag. J. 60:2610–41
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Lamont M, Molnár V. 2002. The study of boundaries across the social sciences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28:167–95
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Lee MDP, Lounsbury M. 2015. Filtering institutional logics: community logic variation and differential responses to the institutional complexity of toxic waste. Organ. Sci. 26:3847–66
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Lizardo O, Strand M. 2010. Skills, toolkits, contexts and institutions: clarifying the relationship between different approaches to cognition in cultural sociology. Poetics 38:2205–28
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Loewenstein J, Ocasio W, Jones C. 2012. Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: a new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. Acad. Manag. Ann. 6:141–86
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lok J. 2010. Institutional logics as identity projects. Acad. Manag. J. 53:61305–35
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Lounsbury M. 2002. Institutional transformation and status mobility: the professionalization of the field of finance. Acad. Manag. J. 45:255–66
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Lounsbury M. 2007. A tale of two cities: competing logics and practice variation in the professionalizing of mutual funds. Acad. Manag. J. 50:289–307
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Lounsbury M, Anderson D, Spee P 2021a. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 70: On Practice and Institution: Theorizing the Interface Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Lounsbury M, Anderson D, Spee P 2021b. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 71: On Practice and Institution: New Empirical Directions Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Lounsbury M, Glynn MA. 2019. Cultural Entrepreneurship: A New Agenda for the Study of Entrepreneurial Processes and Possibilities. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  87. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ. 2003. The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization 10:457–80
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Lounsbury M, Wang MS. 2020. Into the clearing: back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis. Organ. Theory 1:1 https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719891173
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mair J, Marti I, Ventresca MJ 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: how intermediaries work institutional voids. Acad. Manag. J. 55:819–50
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Malhotra N, Zietsma C, Morris T, Smets M. 2020. Handling resistance to change when societal and workplace logics conflict. Adm. Sci. Q. 66:475–520
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Martin JL, Lembo A. 2020. On the other side of values. Am. J. Sociol. 126:152–98
     [Google Scholar]
  92. McPherson CM, Sauder M. 2013. Logics in action: managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Adm. Sci. Q. 58:2165–96
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Meyer JW, Boli J, Thomas GM 1987. Ontology and rationalization in the Western cultural account. Institutional Structure: Constituting State, Society, and the Individual GM Thomas, JW Meyer, FO Ramirez, J Boli 12–37 Newbury Park, CA: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Meyer JW, Jepperson RL. 2000. The ‘actors’ of modern society: the cultural construction of social agency. Sociol. Theory 18:1100–20
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83:340–63
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Meyer RE. 2008. New sociology of knowledge: historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research. See Greenwood et al. 2008 517–36
  97. Meyer RE, Jancsary D, Höllerer MA. 2021. Zones of meaning, Leitideen, institutional logics – and practices: a phenomenological institutional perspective on shared meaning structures. See Lounsbury et al. 2021a 161–86
  98. Meyer RE, Vaara E. 2020. Institutions and actorhood as co-constitutive and co-constructed: the argument and areas for future research. J. Manag. Stud. 57:4898–910
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Micelotta E, Lounsbury M, Greenwood R. 2017. Pathways of institutional change: an integrative review and research agenda. J. Manag. 43:61885–910
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Mills CW. 1956. The Power Elite New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  101. Mizruchi MS. 2013. The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  102. Mohr JW. 1998. Measuring meaning structures. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:345–70
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Mohr JW, Bail CA, Frye M, Lena JC, Lizardo O et al. 2020. Measuring Culture New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  104. Mohr JW, Duquenne V. 1997. The duality of culture and practice: poverty relief in New York City, 1888–1917. Theory Soc 26:305–56
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Mohr JW, Ghaziani A. 2014. Problems and prospects of measurement in the study of culture. Theory Soc 43:225–46
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Mohr JW, White HC. 2008. How to model an institution. Theory Soc 37:5485–512
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Murray F. 2010. The oncomouse that roared: hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions. Am. J. Sociol. 116:2341–88
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Nigam A, Ocasio W. 2010. Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: an inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton's health care reform initiative. Organ. Sci. 21:4823–41
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Ocasio W, Gai SL. 2020. Institutions: everywhere but not everything. J. Manag. Inq. 29:3262–71
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Ocasio W, Loewenstein J, Nigam A. 2015. How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: the role of categories. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40:128–48
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Ocasio W, Mauskapf M, Steele CWJ. 2016. History, society, and institutions: the role of collective memory in the emergence and evolution of societal logics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 41:4676–99
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Ocasio W, Thornton PH, Lounsbury M. 2017. Advances to the institutional logics perspective. See Greenwood et al. 2017 509–31
  113. Ostrom E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  114. Pache AC, Santos F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Acad. Manag. J. 56:4972–1001
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Pachucki MA, Breiger RL. 2010. Cultural holes: beyond relationality in social networks and culture. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:205–24
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Pahnke EC, Katila R, Eisenhardt KM. 2015. Who takes you to the dance? How partners’ institutional logics influence innovation in young firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 60:4596–633
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  118. Purdy JM, Gray B. 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Acad. Manag. J. 52:2355–80
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Quattrone P. 2015. Governing social orders, unfolding rationality, and Jesuit accounting practices: a procedural approach to institutional logics. Adm. Sci. Q. 60:3411–45
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Rao H, Monin P, Durand R. 2003. Institutional change in Toque Ville: nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Am. J. Sociol. 108:795–843
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Reay T, Hinings CR. 2009. Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organ. Stud. 30:6629–52
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Schatzki TR 2019. Social Change in a Material World: How Activity and Material Processes Dynamize Practices Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  123. Schatzki TR, Knorr-Cetina K, von Savigny E 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory London: Routledge
  124. Schneiberg M, Clemens ES. 2006. The typical tools for the job: research strategies in institutional analysis. Sociol. Theory 3:195–227
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Schneiberg M, Lounsbury M. 2017. Social movements and the dynamics of institutions and organizations. See Greenwood et al. 2017 281–310
  126. Schofer E, Meyer JW. 2005. The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:6898–920
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Schütz A. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World, transl. G Walsh, F Lehnert Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Scott WR. 2013. Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  129. Scott WR, Ruef M, Mendel PJ, Caronna CA. 2000. Institutional Change and Healthcare Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  130. Shipilov AV, Greve HR, Rowley TJ. 2010. When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Acad. Manag. J. 53:4846–64
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Smets M, Aristidou A, Whittington R. 2017. Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. See Greenwood et al. 2017 384–411
  132. Smets M, Morris T, Greenwood R. 2012. From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Acad. Manag. J. 55:4877–904
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Steele CWJ. 2021a.. “ They're alive!” Exploring the intentionality of institutional logics, their variable orientation toward jurisdictional expansion, and the general significance of their internal dynamics. See Lounsbury et al. 2021a. 179–93
  134. Steele CWJ. 2021b. When things get odd: exploring the interactional choreography of taken-for-grantedness. Acad. Manag. Rev 46:341–61
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Steele CWJ, Hannigan TR 2020. Integrating and complicating the micro and the macro ‘foundations’ of institutions: towards a more optometric institutionalism and an institutionalist optometry. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 68: Macrofoundations: Exploring the Institutionally Situated Nature of Activity CWJ Steele, TR Hannigan, VL Glaser, M Toubiana, J Gehman 19–46 Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Steele CWJ, Hannigan TR, Glaser VL, Toubiana M, Gehman J 2020. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 68: Macrofoundations: Exploring the Institutionally Situated Nature of Activity Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Stinchcombe AL. 1997. On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:1–18
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Strang DA, Soule SA. 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: from hybrid corn to poison pills. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 24:265–90
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Swidler A. 1986. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:273–86
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Thornton PH. 2004. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  141. Thornton PH, Ocasio W. 1999. Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. Am. J. Sociol. 105:801–43
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Thornton PH, Ocasio W. 2008. Institutional logics. See Greenwood et al. 2008 99–128
  143. Thornton PH, Ocasio W, Lounsbury M. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure, and Process Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  144. Toubiana M. 2020. Once in orange always in orange? Identity paralysis and the enduring influence of institutions on identity. Acad. Manag. J. 63:1739–74
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Toubiana M, Greenwood R, Zietsma C. 2017. Beyond ethos: outlining an alternate trajectory for emotional competence and investment. Acad. Manag. Rev. 42:551–56
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Toubiana M, Zietsma C. 2017. The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Acad. Manag. J. 60:3922–53
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Ventresca M. 1995. Counting people when people count: global establishment of the modern population census, 1820–1980. PhD diss Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Voronov M, Weber K. 2016. The heart of institutions: emotional competence and institutional actorhood. Acad. Manag. Rev. 41:3456–78
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Voronov M, Weber K. 2017. Emotional competence, institutional ethos and the heart of institutions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 42:3556–60
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Waeger D, Weber K. 2019. Institutional complexity and organizational change: an open polity perspective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 44:2336–59
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Wang MS, Raynard M, Greenwood R. 2020. From grace to violence: stigmatizing the medical profession in China. Acad. Manag. JIn press https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0715
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  152. Yan S, Ferraro F, Almandoz J. 2019. The rise of socially responsible investment funds: the paradoxical role of the financial logic. Adm. Sci. Q. 64:2466–501
     [Google Scholar]
  153. York JG, Vedula S, Lenox MJ. 2018. It's not easy building green: the impact of public policy, private actors, and regional logics on voluntary standards adoption. Acad. Manag. J. 61:41492–523
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Zald MN, Lounsbury M. 2010. The wizards of Oz: towards an institutional approach to elites, expertise and command posts. Organ. Stud. 31:963–96
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Zhao EY, Wry T. 2016. Not all inequality is equal: deconstructing the societal logic of patriarchy to understand microfinance lending to women. Acad. Manag. J. 59:61994–2020
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Zietsma C, Toubiana M. 2018. The valuable, the constitutive, and the energetic: exploring the impact and importance of studying emotions and institutions. Organ. Stud. 39:4427–43
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Zilber TB. 2018. Bringing institutional logics into being through interactions Paper presented at the Strategy, Entrepreneurship & Management Research Seminar Alberta School of Business Edmonton, Can.: Oct. 12
  158. Zilber TB. 2020. The methodology/theory interface: ethnography and the microfoundations of institutions. Organ. Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720919439
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  159. Zilber TB. 2021. Practice-driven institutionalism: a path toward a fruitful borrowing. See Lounsbury et al. 2021a 225–41
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Zucker LG. 1977. The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. Am. Sociol. Rev. 42:5726–43
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error