1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 46, 2020
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 46, 2020

Organizations and the Governance of Urban Poverty

Abstract

Many recent sociological studies of urban poverty have drawn inspiration from the Chicago School model of social disorganization. Studies of urban poverty and formal organizations have been profoundly shaped by this theoretical perspective, casting organizations as components of neighborhoods and thus relevant for study as potential contributors to neighborhood social control. We argue that this approach obscures many ways in which formal organizations are involved in the production and management of urban poverty. In order to take advantage of the many insights offered by sociological studies of organizations, we propose that students of urban poverty expand their theoretical perspective on formal organizations. We develop such an approach, an amalgamation of key concepts from two existing theoretical frameworks rarely discussed in urban poverty studies: urban governance and strategic action fields This perspective offers new directions for research on urban poverty and urges greater integration with related studies from political science and geography.

Keyword(s): organizations, social disorganization, strategic action fields, urban governance, urban poverty
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054708
2020-07-30
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/46/1/annurev-soc-121919-054708.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054708&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Auletta K. 1982. The Underclass New York: Vintage
  2. Brenner N. 2001. The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 25:591–614
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner N. 2005. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  4. Breton R. 1964. Institutional completeness of ethnic communities and the personal relations of immigrants. Am. J. Sociol. 70:193–205
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks-Gunn J, Duncan GJ, Aber JL 1997. Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children 1 New York: Russell Sage Found.
  6. Chaskin RJ, Joseph ML. 2011. Social interaction in mixed-income developments: relational expectations and emerging reality. J. Urban Aff. 33:209–37
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chaskin RJ, Joseph ML. 2015. Integrating the Inner City: The Promise and Perils of Mixed-Income Public Housing Transformation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  8. Clifford D. 2018. Neighborhood context and enduring differences in the density of charitable organizations: reinforcing dynamics of foundation and dissolution. Am. J. Sociol. 123:1535–600
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Desmond M. 2012. Eviction and the reproduction of urban poverty. Am. J. Sociol. 118:88–133
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Desmond M. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City New York: Crown Publishing
  11. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147–60
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Faber JW. 2019. Segregation and the cost of money: race, poverty, and the prevalence of alternative financial institutions. Soc. Forces 98:819–48
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fligstein N. 2001. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociol. Theory 19:105–25
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fligstein N, McAdam D. 2011. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociol. Theory 29:1–26
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Fligstein N, McAdam D. 2012. A Theory of Fields Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  16. Fording RC, Soss J, Schram SF 2011. Race and the local politics of punishment in the new world of welfare. Am. J. Sociol. 116:1610–57
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Freeman-Anderson K. 2017. Racial residential segregation and the distribution of health-related organizations in urban neighborhoods. Soc. Probl. 64:256–76
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Goffman A. 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  19. Goldstein A. 2018. The social ecology of speculation: community organization and non-occupancy investment in the U.S. housing bubble. Am. Sociol. Rev. 83:1108–43
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Graves EM. 2010. The structuring of urban life in a mixed-income housing “community. .” City Community 9:109–31
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Guthrie D, McQuarrie M. 2008. Providing for the public good: corporate-community relations in the era of the receding welfare state. City Community 7:113–39
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Harding DJ, Gennetian L, Winship C, Sanbonmatsu L 2011. Unpacking neighborhood influences on education outcomes: setting the stage for future research. Whither Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children's Life Chances GJ Duncan, R Murnane 277–96 New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Jencks C, Mayer SE. 1990. The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. Inner-City Poverty in the United States LE Lynn Jr., MGH McGeary 111–86 Washington, DC: Natl. Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Joseph ML. 2008. Early resident experiences at a new mixed-income development in Chicago. J. Urban Aff. 30:229–57
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Joseph ML. 2010. Creating mixed-income developments in Chicago: developer and service provider perspectives. Hous. Policy Debate 20:91–118
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Joseph ML, Chaskin RJ. 2010. Living in a mixed-income development: resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago. Urban Stud 47:2347–66
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kefalas M. 2003. Working-Class Heroes: Protecting Home, Community, and Nation in a Chicago Neighborhood Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  28. Kingdon JW. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies New York: HarperCollins, 2nd ed..
  29. Korver-Glenn E. 2018. Compounding inequalities: how racial stereotypes and discrimination accumulate across the stages of housing exchange. Am. Sociol. Rev. 83:627–56
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Krinsky J, Simonet M. 2017. Who Cleans the Park? Public Work and Urban Governance in New York City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  31. Krivo LJ, Washington HM, Peterson RD, Browning CR, Calder CA, Kwan M-P 2013. Social isolation of disadvantage and advantage: the reproduction of inequality in urban space. Soc. Forces 92:141–64
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lara-Millán A. 2014. Public emergency room overcrowding in the era of mass imprisonment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:866–87
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Leitner H, Sheppard E, Sziarto KM 2008. The spatialities of contentious politics. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 33:157–72
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Levine JR. 2013. Organizational parochialism: “placing” interorganizational network ties. City Community 12:309–34
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Levine JR. 2016. The privatization of political representation: community-based organizations as nonelected neighborhood representatives. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:1251–75
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Lipsky M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services New York: Russell Sage Found.
  37. Logan JR. 1978. Growth, politics, and the stratification of places. Am. J. Sociol. 84:404–16
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Logan JR, Molotch HL. 2007. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  39. Lyons CJ, Velez MB, Santoro WA 2013. Neighborhood immigration, violence, and city political opportunity structures. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:604–32
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Manduca RA, Sampson RJ. 2019. Punishing and toxic neighborhood environments independently predict the intergenerational social mobility of black and white children. PNAS 116:7772–77
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Marquis C, Battilana J. 2009. Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 29:283–302
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Marwell NP. 2004. Privatizing the welfare state: nonprofit community-based organizations as political actors. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:265–91
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Marwell NP. 2007. Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community Organizations in the Entrepreneurial City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  44. Marwell NP, Gullickson A. 2013. Inequality in the spatial allocation of social services: government contracts to nonprofit organizations in New York City. Soc. Serv. Rev. 87:319–53
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Marwell NP, Marantz EA, Baldassarri D 2020. The micro-relations of urban governance: patronage and partnership. Am. J. Sociol. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Marwell NP, McQuarrie M. 2013. People, place and system: organizations and the renewal of urban social theory. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 647:126–43
     [Google Scholar]
  47. McQuarrie M. 2013. Community organizations in the foreclosure crisis: the failure of neoliberal civil society. Politics Soc 41:73–101
     [Google Scholar]
  48. McQuarrie M, Krumholz N. 2011. Institutionalized social skill and the rise of mediating organizations in urban governance: the case of the Cleveland housing network. Hous. Policy Debate. 21:421–42
     [Google Scholar]
  49. McQuarrie M, Marwell NP. 2009. The missing organizational dimension in urban sociology. City Community 8:247–68
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Miller R, Stuart F. 2017. Carceral citizenship: race, rights, and responsibilization in the age of mass supervision. Theor. Criminol. 21:532–48
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Molina ET. 2016. Neighborhood inequalities and the long-term impact of foreclosures: evidence from the Los Angeles-Inland Empire region. City Community 15:315–37
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Mollenkopf JH. 1983. The Contested City Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  53. Mollenkopf JH. 1994. A Phoenix in the Ashes: The Rise and Fall of the Koch Coalition in New York City Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  54. Molotch HL. 1967. Toward a more human human ecology: an urban research strategy. Land Econ 43:336–41
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Molotch HL. 1972. Managed Integration: Dilemmas of Doing Good in the City Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  56. Molotch HL. 1976. The city as a growth machine: toward a political economy of place. Am. J. Sociol. 82:309–32
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Mosley JE, Grogan CM. 2012. Representation in nonelected participatory processes: how residents understand the role of nonprofit community-based organizations. J. Public Adm. Res. Theory 23:839–63
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Pacewicz J. 2013. Tax increment financing, economic development professionals and the financialization of urban politics. Socio-Econ. Rev. 11:413–40
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Pacewicz J. 2015. Playing the neoliberal game: why community leaders left party politics to partisan activists. Am. J. Sociol. 121:826–81
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Papachristos AV, Smith CM, Scherer ML, Fugiero MA 2011. More coffee, less crime? The relationship between gentrification and neighborhood crime rates in Chicago, 1991 to 2005. City Community 10:215–40
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Park RE. 1967. Human ecology. Robert E. Park on Social Control and Collective Behavior: Selected Papers RH Turner 69–84 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Park RE, Burgess EW, McKenzie RD 1925. The City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  63. Pattillo M. 2007. Black on the Block: The Politics of Race and Class in the City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  64. Pattillo M. 2013. Housing: commodity versus right. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 39:509–31
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Pegram K, Brunson RK, Braga AA 2016. The doors of the church are now open: black clergy, collective efficacy, and neighborhood violence. City Community 15:289–314
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Peterson RD, Krivo LJ. 2009. Segregated spatial locations, race-ethnic composition, and neighborhood violent crime. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 623:93–107
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Pierre J. 1999. Models of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban polities. Urban Aff. Rev. 34:372–96
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Robinson JN III 2017. Negotiating the (legal) right to the city: public housing demolition and the federal courts in two postindustrial U.S. cities. J. Urban Aff. 39:277–90
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Saito LT. 2012. How low-income residents can benefit from urban development: the LA Live community benefits agreement. City Community 11:129–50
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Sampson RJ. 2011. Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  71. Sampson RJ, Morenoff JD, Earls F 1999. Beyond social capital: spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. Am. Sociol. Rev. 64:633–60
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918–24
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Schram SF, Fording RC, Soss J 2008. Neo-liberal poverty governance: race, place and the punitive turn in U.S. welfare policy. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 1:17–36
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Seim J. 2017. The ambulance: toward a labor theory of poverty governance. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:451–75
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Sharkey P, Faber JW. 2014. Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:559–79
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Sharkey P, Torrats-Espinosa G, Takyar D 2017. Community and the crime decline: the causal effect of local nonprofits on violent crime. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:1214–40
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sharp G. 2018. Eclipsing community? Neighborhood disadvantage, social mechanisms, and neighborly attitudes and behaviors. City Community 17:615–35
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Shaw CR, McKay HD. 1969. Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press, 2nd ed..
  79. Shrider EA, Ramey DM. 2018. Priming the pump: public investment, private mortgage investment, and violent crime. City Community 17:996–1014
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Sites W, Vonderlack-Navarro R. 2012. Tipping the scale: state rescaling and the strange odyssey of Chicago's Mexican hometown associations. Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City MP Smith, M McQuarrie 151–69 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Small ML. 2004. Villa Victoria: The Transformation of Social Capital in a Boston Barrio Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  82. Small ML. 2009. Unanticipated Gains: Origins of Network Inequality in Everyday Life Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  83. Small ML, McDermott M. 2006. The presence of organizational resources in poor urban neighborhoods: an analysis of average and contextual effects. Soc. Forces 84:1697–1724
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Small ML, Stark L. 2005. Are poor neighborhoods resource deprived? A case study of childcare centers in New York. Soc. Sci. Q. 86:Suppl.1013–36
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Soss J, Fording RC, Schram SF 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  86. Stone CN. 1989. Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946–1988 Lawrence: Univ. Kansas Press
  87. Stuart F. 2016. Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  88. Swaroop S, Morenoff JD. 2006. Building community: the neighborhood context of social organization. Soc. Forces 84:1665–95
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Swyngedouw E. 1996. Reconstructing citizenship, the re-scaling of the state and the new authoritarianism: closing the Belgian mines. Urban Stud 33:1499–521
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Swyngedouw E. 2004. Scaled geographies: nature, place, and the politics of scale. Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method E Sheppard, RB McMaster 129–53 Malden, MA: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Tach L, Emory AD. 2017. Public housing redevelopment, neighborhood change, and the restructuring of urban inequality. Am. J. Sociol. 123:686–739
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Thomas WI, Znaniecki F. 1918. The Polish Peasant in Europe and America New York: Knopf
  93. Tran VC, Graif C, Jones AD, Small ML, Winship C 2013. Participation in context: neighborhood diversity and organizational involvement in Boston. City Community 12:187–210
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Vargas R. 2016. Wounded City: Violent Turf Wars in a Chicago Barrio Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  95. Vargas R. 2019. Gangstering grants: bringing power to collective efficacy theory. City Community 18:369–91
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Velez MB, Lyons CJ, Boursaw B 2012. Neighborhood housing investments and violent crime in Seattle, 1981–2007. Criminology 50:1025–56
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Velez MB, Lyons CJ, Santoro WA 2015. The political context of the percent black-neighborhood violence link. Soc. Probl. 62:93–119
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Velez MB, Richardson K. 2012. The political economy of neighborhood homicide in Chicago: the role of bank investment. Br. J. Criminol. 52:490–513
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Wacquant LJD. 2008. Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality Cambridge, UK: Polity
  100. Watkins-Hayes C. 2013. The micro dynamics of support seeking: the social and economic utility of institutional ties for HIV-positive women. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 647:83–101
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Wilson WJ. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  102. Wo JC. 2018. Understanding the density of nonprofit organizations across Los Angeles neighborhoods: Does concentrated disadvantage and violent crime matter. Soc. Sci. Res. 71:56–71
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Wolf-Powers L. 2010. Community benefits agreements and local government: a review of recent evidence. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76:141–59
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054708
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error