1932

Abstract

In recent decades, census taking around the world has faced major challenges, including cost pressures, concerns about intrusiveness, privacy and response burden, reduced cooperation, difficulties in accessing secure apartments and enumerating unsafe areas, more complex living arrangements, and timeliness concerns. National statistical offices have responded to these concerns with various methodological developments. These include the use of new technologies and sampling in traditional census taking. There has also been a shift from traditional census methods to greater use of registers, as pioneered in the Nordic countries, and to the combined use of registers and sample surveys. In addition to reviewing such developments, this article reviews developments in associated statistical methodology, including record linkage and coverage adjustment methods. The article concludes by discussing possible future developments in census taking around the world.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033713
2018-03-07
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/statistics/5/1/annurev-statistics-041715-033713.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033713&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander CH. 2002. Still rolling: Leslie Kish's “rolling samples” and the American Community Survey. Surv. Methodol. 28:25–41 [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson MJ. 2015. The American Census: A Social History New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
  3. Baffour B, King T, Valente P. 2013. The modern census: evolution, examples and evaluation. Int. Stat. Rev. 81:407–25 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bakker BFM. 2010. Micro-integration: state of the art Work. Pap. 10 UNECE Conf. Eur. Stat. The Hague, Neth.:
  5. Bakker BFM, Daas PJH. 2012. Methodological challenges in register-based research. Stat. Neerl. 66:2–7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakker BFM, van Rooijen J, van Toor L. 2014. The system of social statistical datasets of Statistics Netherlands: an integral approach to the production of register-based social statistics. Stat. J. IAOS 30:411–24 [Google Scholar]
  7. Beltadze D. 2016. Enumeration via Internet—Estonian experience. Stat. J. IAOS 32:563–68 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bianchini Z. 2011. The 2010 Brazilian population census: innovations and impacts in data collection Presented at 58th World Congr. Stat., 21–26 August Dublin:
  9. Brown J, Abbott O, Smith PA. 2011. Design of the 2001 and 2011 census coverage surveys for England and Wales. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 174:881–906 [Google Scholar]
  10. Brick JM. 2011. The future of survey sampling. Public Opin. Q. 75:872–88 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bycroft C. 2011. A register-based census: what is the potential for New Zealand? Rep., Stat. N. Z., Wellington, N. Z.:
  12. Bycroft C. 2013. Options for future New Zealand censuses: Census Transformation Programme Rep., Stat. N. Z., Wellington, N. Z.:
  13. Carr-Hill R. 2013. Missing millions and measuring development progress. World Dev 46:30–44 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chipperfield J, Brown J, Bell P. 2017. Estimating the count error in the Australian census. J. Off. Stat. 33:43–59 [Google Scholar]
  15. Christen P. 2012. Data Matching: Concepts and Techniques for Record Linkage, Entity Resolution and Duplicate Detection New York: Springer
  16. Citro CF. 2000. Long form. Encyclopedia of the US Census MJ Anderson 272–77 Washington, DC: CQ Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Coleman D. 2013. The twilight of the census. Popul. Dev. Rev. 38:334–51 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cukier KN, Mayer-Schoenberger V. 2013. The rise of big data: how it's changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Aff 92:28–40 [Google Scholar]
  19. De Bruin A, Kardaun J, Gast F, de Bruin E, van Sijl M, Verweij G. 2004. Record linkage of hospital discharge register with population register: experiences at Statistics Netherlands. Stat. J. UNECE 21:23–32 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunne J. 2015. The Irish statistical system and the emerging census opportunity. Stat. J. IAOS 31:391–400 [Google Scholar]
  21. Elliott MR, Valliant R. 2017. Inference for non-probability samples. Stat. Sci. 32:249–64 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fellegi I, Sunter A. 1969. A theory of record linkage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64:1183–210 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fienberg S, Prewitt K. 2010. Save your census. Nature 466:1043 [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibb S, Shrosbree E. 2014. Evaluating the potential of linked data sources for population estimates: the integrated data infrastructure as an example Rep., Stat. N. Z., Wellington, N. Z.:
  25. Guandalini A, Tillé Y. 2017. Design-based estimators calibrated on estimated totals from multiple surveys. Int. Stat. Rev. 85:250–69 [Google Scholar]
  26. Harper G, Mayhew L. 2012. Using administrative data to count local populations. Appl. Spat. Anal. Policy 5:183–209 [Google Scholar]
  27. Hogan H. 1993. The 1990 post-enumeration survey: operations and results. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88:1047–60 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hogan H. 2003. The accuracy and coverage evaluation: theory and design. Surv. Methodol. 29:129–138 [Google Scholar]
  29. Houbiers M. 2004. Towards a social statistical database and unified estimates at Statistics Netherlands. J. Off. Stat. 20:55–75 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ionnidis E, Merkouris T, Zhang L-C, Karlberg M, Petrakos M. et al. 2016. On a modular approach to the design of integrated social surveys. J. Off. Stat. 32:259–86 [Google Scholar]
  31. Isaki CT, Tsay JJ, Fuller WA. 2004. Weighting sample data subject to independent controls. Surv. Methodol. 30:35–44 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kish L. 1979. Samples and censuses. Int. Stat. Rev. 47:99–109 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kish L. 1990. Rolling samples and censuses. Surv. Methodol. 16:63–79 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kukutai T, Thompson V, McMillan R. 2015. Whither the census? Continuity and change in census methodologies worldwide, 1985–2014. J. Popul. Res. 32:3–22 [Google Scholar]
  35. MacGibbon A. 2016. Review of the events surrounding the 2016 eCensus: Improving institutional cyber security culture and practices across the Australian government Off. Cyber Secur. Spec. Advis. Canberra, ACT, Australia:
  36. Mercouris T. 2004. Combining independent regression estimators from multiple surveys. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 99:1131–9 [Google Scholar]
  37. Morris DS, Keller A, Clark B. 2016. An approach to using administrative records to reduce contacts in the 2020 Decennial Census. Stat. J. IAOS 32:177–88 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mulry MH. 2007. Summary of accuracy and coverage evaluation for the US Census 2000. J. Off. Stat. 23:345–70 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mulry MH, Bean SL, Bauder DM, Wagner D, Mule T, Petroni RJ. 2006. Evaluation of estimates of census duplications using administrative record information. J. Off. Stat. 22:655–79 [Google Scholar]
  40. NRC (Natl. Res. Counc.). 2007. Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  41. NRC (Natl. Res. Counc.). 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
  42. Nirel R, Glickman H. 2009. Sample surveys and censuses. Handbook of Statistics Sample Surveys: Design, Methods and Applications 29A D Pfeffermann, CR Rao 539–65 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  43. Nordholt ES. 2005. The Dutch virtual census 2001: a new approach by combining different sources. Stat. J. UN Econ. Comm. Europe 22:25–37 [Google Scholar]
  44. Off. Natl. Stat. 2013. Beyond 2011: matching anonymous data Work. Pap. M9, Off. Natl. Stat. London:
  45. Off. Natl. Stat. 2014. The census and future provision of population statistics in England and Wales: recommendation from the National Statistician and Chief Executive of the UK Statistics Authority Off. Natl. Stat. London:
  46. Off. Natl. Stat. 2016. Research outputs estimating the size of the population in England and Wales: 2016 release Off. Natl. Stat. London:
  47. Poulain M, Herm A. 2013. Central population registers as a source of demographic statistics in Europe. Population 68:183–212 [Google Scholar]
  48. Prewitt K. 2000. The US decennial census: political questions, scientific answers. Popul. Dev. Rev. 26:1–16 [Google Scholar]
  49. Prewitt K. 2004. What if we give a census and no one comes?. Science 304:56761452–53 [Google Scholar]
  50. Prewitt K. 2010. The U.S. decennial census: politics and political science. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 13:237–54 [Google Scholar]
  51. Ralphs M, Tutton P. 2011. Beyond 2011: international models for census taking: current processes and future developments Work. Pap., Off. Natl. Stat. London:
  52. Rampell C. 2012. The beginning of the end of the census. New York Times May 19th SR5
  53. Renaud A. 2007. Estimation of the coverage of the 2000 census of population in Switzerland: methods and results. Surv. Methodol. 33:199–210 [Google Scholar]
  54. Renssen RH, Nieuwenbroek NJ. 1997. Aligning estimates for common variables in two more sample surveys. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92:368–74 [Google Scholar]
  55. Sadinle M, Fienberg SE. 2013. A generalized Fellegi-Sunter framework for multiple record linkage with applications to homicide record systems. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 108:385–97 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schnell R. 2014. An efficient privacy-preserving record linkage technique for administrative data and censuses. Stat. J. IAOS 30:263–70 [Google Scholar]
  57. Schwyn M, Kauthen J-P. 2008. The Swiss census 2010: moving towards a comprehensive system of household and person statistics Work. Pap. Swiss Fed. Stat. Off. Neuchâtel, Switz.:
  58. Skinner C, Hollis J, Murphy M. 2013. Beyond 2011: independent review of methodology Rep. Off. Natl. Stat. London:
  59. Stat. Estonia. 2016. Statistics Estonia presents the trial census results on personal, family and household data News Release, Dec. 28. https://www.stat.ee/news-release-2016-144
  60. Smith WR. 2015. The 2011 National Household Survey—the complete statistical story. Statistics Canada blog June 4. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/eng/blog-blogue/cs-sc/2011NHSstory
  61. Stat. Nor. 2008. Topics difficult to measure in a register-based census Presented at Joint UNECE/Eurostat Meet. Pop. Hous. Censuses, May 13–15 Geneva:
  62. Stuart EA, Zaslavsky AM. 2002. Using administrative records to predict census day residency. Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics VI C Gatsonis, RE Kass, A Carriquiry, A Gelman, D Higdon et al.335–49 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  63. Thygeson L. 2015. The use of administrative sources for censuses: merits and challenges. Stat. J. IAOS 31:381–89 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tiit E-M. 2015. The register-based population and housing census: methodology and developments thereof. Q. Bull. Stat. Estonia 3:48–71 [Google Scholar]
  65. UNECE (U. N. Econ. Comm. Eur.). 2006. Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations for the 2010 Censuses of Population and Housing New York: United Nations
  66. UNECE (U. N. Econ. Comm. Eur.). 2007. Register-Based Statistics in Nordic Countries—Review of Best Practices with Focus on Population and Social Statistics New York: United Nations
  67. UNECE (U. N. Econ. Comm. Eur.). 2010. Main results for the UNECE-UNSD survey of the 2010–2011 round of censuses in the UNECE region Presented at Group Expert. Popul. Hous. Censuses 13th Meet., July 7–9 Geneva:
  68. UNECE (U. N. Econ. Comm. Eur.). 2014. Measuring Population and Housing: Practices of UNECE Countries in the 2010 Round of Censuses New York: United Nations
  69. United Nations. 1969. Methodology and Evaluation of Population Registers and Similar Systems: Studies in Methods Ser. F, no. 15 New York: United Nations
  70. United Nations. 2008. Principles and recommendations for population and housing censuses Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff. Stat. Pap., Ser. M, no. 67/Rev. 2 United Nations, New York:
  71. UNSD (U. N. Stat. Div.). 2011. Report on the results of a survey on census methods used by countries in the 2010 census round Work. Pap. UNSD/DSSB/1 Dep. Econ. Soc. Aff., UN Stat. Div. New York:
  72. Valente P. 2010. Census taking in Europe: how are populations counted in 2010?. Popul. Soc. 467:1–4 [Google Scholar]
  73. Valente P. 2014. Innovative approaches to census taking: overview of the 2011 census round in Europe. Statistical Methods and Applications from a Historical Perspective F Crescenzi, S Mignani 187–200 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  74. Vatsalan D, Christen P, Verykios VS. 2013. A taxonomy of privacy-preserving record linkage techniques. Inf. Syst. 38:946–69 [Google Scholar]
  75. Wallgren A, Wallgren B. 2014. Register-Based Statistics: Statistical Methods for Administrative Data Chichester, UK: Wiley. , 2nd ed..
  76. Williams JD. 2012. The 2010 Decennial Census: background and issues Rep Congr. Res. Serv. Washington, DC:
  77. World Bank and WHO (World Health Organ.). 2014. Global civil registration and vital statistics scaling up investment plan 2015–2024. Work. Pap. 88351 Geneva: WHO http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/health/publication/global-civil-registration-vital-statistics-scaling-up-investment [Google Scholar]
  78. Yancey WE. 2004. Bigmatch: a program for large-scale record linkage. Proc. Am. Stat. Assoc. Res. Methods Section4652–57 Alexandria, VA: Am. Stat. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhang L-C. 2011. A unit-error theory for register-based household statistics. J. Off. Stat. 14:415–32 [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang L-C. 2012. Topics of statistical theory for register-based statistics and data integration. Stat. Neerl. 66:41–63 [Google Scholar]
  81. Zhang L-C. 2015. On modelling register coverage errors. J. Off. Stat. 31:381–96 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033713
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-041715-033713
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error