The Biological Impact of the Hypervariable N-Terminal Region of Potyviral Genomes

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Revers F, García JA. 2015. Molecular biology of potyviruses. Adv. Virus Res. 92:101–99
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Wylie SJ, Adams M, Chalam C, Kreuze J, López-Moya JJ et al. 2017. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Potyviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 98:352–54
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Ivanov KI, Eskelin K, Lohmus A, Makinen K 2014. Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying potyvirus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 95:1415–29
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Sanfacon H. 2006. Biodiversity and evolution of Picorna-like viruses. Biodiversity 7:45–50
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Gall OL, Christian P, Fauquet CM, King AM, Knowles NJ et al. 2008. Picornavirales, a proposed order of positive-sense single-stranded RNA viruses with a pseudo-T = 3 virion architecture. Arch. Virol. 153:715–27
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Rodamilans B, Shan H, Pasin F, García JA 2018. Plant viral proteases: beyond the role of peptide cutters. Front. Plant Sci. 9:666
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Siaw MFE, Shahabuddin M, Ballard S, Shaw JG, Rhoads RE 1985. Identification of a protein covalently linked to the 5′ terminus of tobacco vein mottling virus RNA. Virology 142:134–43
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Laín S, Riechmann J, Méndez E, García JA 1988. Nucleotide sequence of the 3′ terminal region of plum pox potyvirus RNA. Virus Res 10:325–41
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Yuan W, Du K, Fan Z, Zhou T 2017. Complete genomic sequence of common reed chlorotic stripe virus, a novel member of the family Potyviridae. Arch. Virol 162:3541–44
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Mollov D, Lockhart B, Zlesak D 2013. Complete nucleotide sequence of rose yellow mosaic virus, a novel member of the family Potyviridae. Arch. Virol 158:1917–23
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Adams MJ, Lefkowitz EJ, King A, Harrach B, Harrison RL et al. 2017. Changes to taxonomy and the international code of virus classification and nomenclature ratified by the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. Arch. Virol. 162:2505–38
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Seo JK, Kwak HR, Kim MK, Kim JS, Choi HS 2017. The complete genome sequence of a novel virus, bellflower veinal mottle virus, suggests the existence of a new genus within the family Potyviridae. Arch. Virol 162:2457–61
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Yang K, Ran M, Li Z, Hu M, Zheng L et al. 2018. Analysis of the complete genomic sequence of a novel virus, areca palm necrotic spindle-spot virus, reveals the existence of a new genus in the family Potyviridae. Arch. Virol 163:3471–75
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Seo JK, Kim MK, Kwak HR, Kim JS, Choi HS 2017. Complete genome sequence of longan witches’ broom-associated virus, a novel member of the family Potyviridae. Arch Virol 162:2885–89
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Yang K, Shen W, Li Y, Li Z, Miao W et al. 2019. Areca palm necrotic ringspot virus, classified within a recently proposed genus Arepavirus of the family Potyviridae, is associated with necrotic ringspot disease in areca palm. Phytopathology 109:887–94
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Chung BY, Miller WA, Atkins JF, Firth AE 2008. An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. PNAS 105:5897–902
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Wei T, Zhang C, Hong J, Xiong R, Kasschau KD et al. 2010. Formation of complexes at plasmodesmata for potyvirus intercellular movement is mediated by the viral protein P3N-PIPO. PLOS Pathog 6:e1000962
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Olspert A, Chung BY, Atkins JF, Carr JP, Firth AE 2015. Transcriptional slippage in the positive-sense RNA virus family Potyviridae. EMBO Rep 16:995–1004
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    White KA. 2015. The polymerase slips and PIPO exists. EMBO Rep 16:885–86
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Rodamilans B, Valli A, Mingot A, San León D, Baulcombe D et al. 2015. RNA polymerase slippage as a mechanism for the production of frameshift gene products in plant viruses of the Potyviridae family. J. Virol. 89:6965–67
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Kashiwazaki S, Minobe Y, Omura T, Hibino H 1990. Nucleotide sequence of barley yellow mosaic virus RNA 1: a close evolutionary relationship with potyviruses. J. Gen. Virol. 71:2781–90
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Kashiwazaki S, Minobe Y, Hibino H 1991. Nucleotide sequence of barley yellow mosaic virus RNA2. J. Gen. Virol. 72:995–99
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    You Y, Shirako Y. 2010. Bymovirus reverse genetics: requirements for RNA2-encoded proteins in systemic infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11:383–94
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Valli A, Gallo A, Rodamilans B, López-Moya JJ, García JA 2018. The HCPro from the Potyviridae family: an enviable multitasking Helper Component that every virus would like to have. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19:744–63
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Beaudoin F 2005. Overview and analysis of the polyprotein cleavage sites in the family Potyviridae. Mol. Plant Pathol 6:471–87
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Sorel M, García JA, German-Retana S 2014. The Potyviridae cylindrical inclusion helicase: a key multipartner and multifunctional protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 27:215–26
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Ivanov KI, Mäkinen K. 2012. Coat proteins, host factors and plant viral replication. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2:712–18
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Jiang J, Laliberte JF. 2011. The genome-linked protein VPg of plant viruses—a protein with many partners. Curr. Opin. Virol. 1:347–54
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    García JA, Glasa M, Cambra M, Candresse T 2014. Plum pox virus and sharka: a model potyvirus and a major disease. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15:226–41
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Ryan MD, Flint M. 1997. Virus-encoded proteinases of the picornavirus super-group. J. Gen. Virol. 78:699–723
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Ziebuhr J, Bayer S, Cowley JA, Gorbalenya AE 2003. The 3C-like proteinase of an invertebrate nidovirus links coronavirus and potyvirus homologs. J. Virol. 77:1415–26
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Rawlings ND, Waller M, Barrett AJ, Bateman A 2013. MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D503–9
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ, Finn R 2016. Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D343–50
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Rodamilans B, Valli A, García JA 2013. Mechanistic divergence between P1 proteases of the family Potyviridae. J. Gen. Virol 94:1407–14
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Rohožkova J, Navratil M. 2011. P1 peptidase—a mysterious protein of family Potyviridae. J. Biosci 36:189–200
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Janssen D, Martin G, Velasco L, Gomez P, Segundo E et al. 2005. Absence of a coding region for the helper component-proteinase in the genome of cucumber vein yellowing virus, a whitefly-transmitted member of the Potyviridae. Arch. Virol 150:1439–47
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Valli A, Martín-Hernández AM, López-Moya JJ, García JA 2006. RNA silencing suppression by a second copy of the P1 serine protease of Cucumber vein yellowing ipomovirus, a member of the family Potyviridae that lacks the cysteine protease HCPro. J. Virol. 80:10055–63
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Li W, Hilf ME, Webb SE, Baker CA, Adkins S 2008. Presence of P1b and absence of HCPro in Squash vein yellowing virus suggests a general feature of the genus Ipomovirus in the family Potyviridae. Virus Res 135:213–19
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Susaimuthu J, Tzanetakis IE, Gergerich RC, Martin RR 2008. A member of a new genus in the Potyviridae infects Rubus. Virus Res 131:145–51
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Clark CA, Davis JA, Abad JA, Cuellar WJ, Fuentes S et al. 2012. Sweet potato viruses: 15 years of progress on understanding and managing complex diseases. Plant Dis 96:168–85
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Mingot A, Valli A, Rodamilans B, León DS, Baulcombe DC et al. 2016. The P1N-PISPO trans-frame gene of sweet potato feathery mottle potyvirus is produced during virus infection and functions as an RNA silencing suppressor. J. Virol. 90:3543–57
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Untiveros M, Olspert A, Artola K, Firth AE, Kreuze JF, Valkonen JP 2016. A novel sweet potato potyvirus open reading frame (ORF) is expressed via polymerase slippage and suppresses RNA silencing. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17:1111–23
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Cui H, Wang A. 2016. The Plum pox virus 6K1 protein is required for viral replication and targets the viral replication complex at the early infection stage. J. Virol. 90:5119–31
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Cheng X, Xiong R, Li Y, Li F, Zhou X, Wang A 2017. Sumoylation of the turnip mosaic virus RNA polymerase promotes viral infection by counteracting the host NPR1-mediated immune response. Plant Cell 29:508–25
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Cheng X, Wang A. 2017. The potyviral silencing suppressor protein VPg mediates degradation of SGS3 via ubiquitination and autophagy pathways. J. Virol. 91:e01478–16
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Cui X, Wei T, Chowda-Reddy RV, Sun G, Wang A 2010. The Tobacco etch virus P3 protein forms mobile inclusions via the early secretory pathway and traffics along actin microfilaments. Virology 397:56–63
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Cui X, Yaghmaiean H, Wu G, Wu X, Chen X et al. 2017. The C-terminal region of the Turnip mosaic virus P3 protein is essential for viral infection via targeting P3 to the viral replication complex. Virology 510:147–55
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Gallo A, Valli A, Calvo M, García JA 2018. A functional link between RNA replication and virion assembly in the potyvirus Plum pox virus. J. Virol 92:e02179–17
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Jiang J, Patarroyo C, Cabanillas DG, Zheng H, Laliberté JF 2015. The vesicle-forming 6K2 protein of turnip mosaic virus interacts with the COPII coatomer Sec24a for viral systemic infection. J. Virol. 89:6695–710
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Restrepo-Hartwig MA, Carrington JC. 1994. The tobacco etch potyvirus 6-kilodalton protein is membrane associated and involved in viral replication. J. Virol. 68:2388–97
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Schaad MC, Jensen PE, Carrington JC 1997. Formation of plant RNA virus replication complexes on membranes: role of an endoplasmic reticulum-targeted viral protein. EMBO J 16:4049–59
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Wei T, Wang A. 2008. Biogenesis of cytoplasmic membranous vesicles for plant potyvirus replication occurs at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites in a COPI- and COPII-dependent manner. J. Virol. 82:12252–64
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Wei T, Huang TS, McNeil J, Laliberté JF, Hong J et al. 2010. Sequential recruitment of the endoplasmic reticulum and chloroplasts for plant potyvirus replication. J. Virol. 84:799–809
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Wan J, Cabanillas DG, Zheng H, Laliberté JF 2015. Turnip mosaic virus moves systemically through both phloem and xylem as membrane-associated complexes. Plant Physiol 167:1374–88
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Deng P, Wu Z, Wang A 2015. The multifunctional protein CI of potyviruses plays interlinked and distinct roles in viral genome replication and intercellular movement. Virol. J. 12:141
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Sabharwal P, Srinivas S, Savithri HS 2018. Mapping the domain of interaction of PVBV VPg with NIa-Pro: role of N-terminal disordered region of VPg in the modulation of structure and function. Virology 524:18–31
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Besong-Ndika J, Ivanov KI, Hafrèn A, Michon T, Mäkinen K 2015. Cotranslational coat protein-mediated inhibition of potyviral RNA translation. J. Virol. 89:4237–48
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Eskelin K, Hafren A, Rantalainen KI, Makinen K 2011. Potyviral VPg enhances viral RNA translation and inhibits reporter mRNA translation in planta. J. Virol. 85:9210–21
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Knierim D, Menzel W, Winter S 2016. Analysis of the complete genome sequence of euphorbia ringspot virus, an atypical member of the genus Potyvirus. Arch. Virol 162:291–93
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Mbanzibwa DR, Tian YP, Mukasa SB, Valkonen JPT 2009. Cassava brown streak virus (Potyviridae) encodes a putative Maf/HAM1 pyrophosphatase implicated in reduction of mutations and a P1 proteinase that suppresses RNA silencing but contains no HCPro. J. Virol. 83:6934–40
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Winter S, Koerbler M, Stein B, Pietruszka A, Paape M, Butgereitt A 2010. The analysis of cassava brown streak viruses reveals the presence of a distinct virus species causing cassava brown streak disease in East Africa. J. Gen. Virol. 91:1365–72
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Seo JK, Kang SH, Seo BY, Jung JK, Kim KH 2010. Mutational analysis of interaction between coat protein and helper component-proteinase of Soybean mosaic virus involved in aphid transmission. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11:265–76
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Moreno A, Tjallingii WF, Fernandez-Mata G, Fereres A 2012. Differences in the mechanism of inoculation between a semi-persistent and a non-persistent aphid-transmitted plant virus. J. Gen. Virol. 93:662–67
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Anandalakshmi R, Pruss GJ, Ge X, Marathe R, Mallory AC et al. 1998. A viral suppressor of gene silencing in plants. PNAS 95:13079–84
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Kasschau KD, Carrington JC. 1998. A counterdefensive strategy of plant viruses: suppression of posttranscriptional gene silencing. Cell 95:461–70
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Carrington JC, Cary SM, Parks TD, Dougherty WG 1989. A second proteinase encoded by a plant potyvirus genome. EMBO J 8:365–70
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Carrington JC, Freed DD, Oh CS 1990. Expression of potyviral polyproteins in transgenic plants reveals three proteolytic activities required for complete processing. EMBO J 9:1347–53
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    García JA, Pallás V. 2015. Viral factors involved in plant pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Virol. 11:21–30
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Tian YP, Valkonen JP. 2015. Recombination of strain O segments to HCpro-encoding sequence of strain N of Potato virus Y modulates necrosis induced in tobacco and in potatoes carrying resistance genes Ny or Nc. Mol. Plant Pathol 16:735–47
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Valli A, Gallo A, Calvo MV, Pérez JJ, García JA 2014. A novel role of the potyviral helper component proteinase contributes to enhance the yield of viral particles. J. Virol. 88:9808–18
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    del Toro FJ, Mencía E, Aguilar E, Tenllado F, Canto T 2018. HCPro-mediated transmission by aphids of purified virions does not require its silencing suppression function and correlates with its ability to coat cell microtubules in loss-of-function mutant studies. Virology 525:10–18
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    García-Ruíz H, Carbonell A, Hoyer JS, Fahlgren N, Gilbert KB et al. 2015. Roles and programming of Arabidopsis ARGONAUTE proteins during Turnip mosaic virus infection. PLOS Pathog 11:e1004755
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    del Toro FJ, Donaire L, Aguilar E, Chung B, Tenllado F, Canto T 2017. Potato virus Y HCPro suppression of antiviral silencing in Nicotiana benthamiana plants correlates with its ability to bind in vivo to 21- and 22-nucleotide small RNAs of viral sequence. J. Virol. 91:e00367-17
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Lakatos L, Csorba T, Pantaleo V, Chapman EJ, Carrington JC et al. 2006. Small RNA binding is a common strategy to suppress RNA silencing by several viral suppressors. EMBO J 25:2768–80
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Sahana N, Kaur H, Jain RK, Palukaitis P, Canto T, Praveen S 2014. The asparagine residue in the FRNK box of potyviral helper-component protease is critical for its sRNA binding and subcellular localization. J. Gen. Virol. 95:1167–77
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Ivanov KI, Eskelin K, Basic M, De S, Lohmus A et al. 2016. Molecular insights into the function of the viral RNA silencing suppressor HCPro. Plant J 85:30–45
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Varallyay E, Havelda Z. 2013. Unrelated viral suppressors of RNA silencing mediate the control of ARGONAUTE1 level. Mol. Plant Pathol. 14:567–75
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Zhang X, Du P, Lu L, Xiao Q, Wang W et al. 2008. Contrasting effects of HC-Pro and 2b viral suppressors from Sugarcane mosaic virus and Tomato aspermy cucumovirus on the accumulation of siRNAs. Virology 374:351–60
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Carbonell A, Dujovny G, García JA, Valli A 2012. The Cucumber vein yellowing virus silencing suppressor P1b can functionally replace HCPro in Plum pox virus infection in a host-specific manner. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 25:151–64
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Maliogka VI, Calvo M, Carbonell A, García JA, Valli A 2012. Heterologous RNA-silencing suppressors from both plant- and animal-infecting viruses support plum pox virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 93:1601–11
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Giner A, Lakatos L, García-Chapa M, López-Moya JJ, Burgyán J 2010. Viral protein inhibits RISC activity by argonaute binding through conserved WG/GW motifs. PLOS Pathog 6:e1000996
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Tatineni S, Qu F, Li R, Morris TJ, French R 2012. Triticum mosaic poacevirus enlists P1 rather than HCPro to suppress RNA silencing-mediated host defense. Virology 433:104–15
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Young BA, Stenger DC, Qu F, Morris TJ, Tatineni S, French R 2012. Tritimovirus P1 functions as a suppressor of RNA silencing and an enhancer of disease symptoms. Virus Res 163:672–77
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Stenger DC, Hein GL, Gildow FE, Horken KM, French RC 2005. Plant virus HC-Pro is a determinant of eriophyid mite transmission. J. Virol. 79:9054–61
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Stenger DC, Hein GL, French RC 2006. Nested deletion analysis of Wheat streak mosaic virus HC-Pro: mapping of domains affecting polyprotein processing and eriophyid mite transmission. Virology 350:465–74
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Young BA, Hein GL, French RC, Stenger DC 2007. Substitution of conserved cysteine residues in wheat streak mosaic virus HC-Pro abolishes virus transmission by the wheat curl mite. Arch. Virol. 152:2107–11
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Tatineni S, Hein GL. 2018. Genetics and mechanisms underlying transmission of Wheat streak mosaic virus by the wheat curl mite. Curr. Opin. Virol. 33:47–54
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Singh K, Wegulo SN, Skoracka A, Kundu JK 2018. Wheat streak mosaic virus: a century old virus with rising importance worldwide. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19:2193–206
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Mengual-Chuliá B, Bedhomme S, Lafforgue G, Elena SF, Bravo IG 2016. Assessing parallel gene histories in viral genomes. BMC Evol. Biol. 16:32
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Valli A, López-Moya JJ, García JA 2007. Recombination and gene duplication in the evolutionary diversification of P1 proteins in the family Potyviridae. J. Gen. Virol 88:1016–28
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Shan H, Pasin F, Tzanetakis IE, Simón-Mateo C, García JA, Rodamilans B 2018. Truncation of a P1 leader proteinase facilitates potyvirus replication in a non-permissive host. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19:1504–10
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Untiveros M, Quispe D, Kreuze J 2010. Analysis of complete genomic sequences of isolates of the Sweet potato feathery mottle virus strains C and EA: molecular evidence for two distinct potyvirus species and two P1 protein domains. Arch. Virol. 155:2059–63
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Valli A, Dujovny G, García JA 2008. Protease activity, self interaction, and small interfering RNA binding of the silencing suppressor P1b from Cucumber vein yellowing ipomovirus. J. Virol 82:974–86
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Valli A, Oliveros JC, Molnar A, Baulcombe D, García JA 2011. The specific binding to 21-nt double-stranded RNAs is crucial for the antisilencing activity of Cucumber vein yellowing virus P1b and perturbs endogenous small RNA populations. RNA 17:1148–58
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Salvador B, Saénz P, Yangüez E, Quiot JB, Quiot L et al. 2008. Host-specific effect of P1 exchange between two potyviruses. Mol. Plant Pathol. 9:147–55
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Maliogka VI, Salvador B, Carbonell A, Sáenz P, León D et al. 2012. Virus variants with differences in the P1 protein coexist in a Plum pox virus population and display particular host-dependent pathogenicity features. Mol. Plant Pathol. 13:877–86
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Pasin F, Simón-Mateo C, García JA 2014. The hypervariable amino-terminus of P1 protease modulates potyviral replication and host defense responses. PLOS Pathog 10:e1003985
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Verchot J, Carrington JC. 1995. Evidence that the potyvirus P1 proteinase functions in trans as an accessory factor for genome amplification. J. Virol. 69:3668–74
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99. 

    Verchot J, Carrington JC. 1995. Debilitation of plant potyvirus infectivity by P1 proteinase-inactivating mutations and restoration by second-site modifications. J. Virol. 69:1582–90
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Shan H, Pasin F, Valli A, Castillo C, Rajulu C et al. 2015. The Potyviridae P1a leader protease contributes to host range specificity. Virology 476:264–70
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Thornbury DW, van den Heuvel JF, Lesnaw JA, Pirone TP 1993. Expression of potyvirus proteins in insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus. J. Gen. Virol. 74:2731–35
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Verchot J, Herndon KL, Carrington JC 1992. Mutational analysis of the tobacco etch potyviral 35-kDa proteinase: identification of essential residues and requirements for autoproteolysis. Virology 190:298–306
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Desbiez C, Lecoq H. 2004. The nucleotide sequence of Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV, Potyvirus) reveals interspecific recombination between two related potyviruses in the 5′ part of the genome. Arch. Virol. 149:1619–32
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     Salvador B, Delgadillo MO, Saenz P, García JA, Simón-Mateo C 2008. Identification of Plum pox virus pathogenicity determinants in herbaceous and woody hosts. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 21:20–29
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Carbonell A, Maliogka VI, Pérez JD, Salvador B, León DS et al. 2013. Diverse amino acid changes at specific positions in the N-terminal region of the coat protein allow Plum pox virus to adapt to new hosts. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 26:1211–24
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Decroocq V, Salvador B, Sicard O, Glasa M, Cosson P et al. 2009. The determinant of potyvirus ability to overcome the RTM resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana maps to the N-terminal region of the coat protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 22:1302–11
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Calvo MV, Malinowski T, García JA 2014. Single amino acid changes in the 6K1-CI region can promote the alternative adaptation of Prunus- and Nicotiana-propagated plum pox virus C isolates to either host. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 27:136–49
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Rodamilans B, Valli A, Mingot A, León DS, López-Moya JJ, García JA 2018. An atypical RNA silencing suppression strategy provides a snapshot of the evolution of sweet potato-infecting potyviruses. Sci. Rep. 8:15937
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Wang A. 2015. Dissecting the molecular network of virus-plant interactions: the complex roles of host factors. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 53:45–66
     [Google Scholar]