1932

Abstract

I entered science at a particularly lucky time. By the mid-1960s, women were being encouraged to pursue serious scientific careers. During the 60-year span of my career, women have become equal partners with men in scientific research, particularly in the biological sciences. There also has been abundant funding for research, which allowed me to succeed in a “soft-money” position at Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, a place that was especially supportive for a woman scientist with children. In this article, I describe the findings that I think represent the most interesting and enduring scientific work from my career.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123844
2023-09-15
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/vision/9/1/annurev-vision-111022-123844.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123844&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Allon G, Moisseiev E, Dichter S, Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Mezer E. 2023. The 100 most cited papers on amblyopia: a bibliographic perspective. Int. Ophthalmol. 43:1075–89
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berry RN. 1948. Quantitative relations among Vernier, real depth and stereoscopic depth acuities. J. Exp. Psychol. 38:349–54
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Birch EE, Swanson WH. 2000. Hyperacuity deficits in anisometropic and strabismic amblyopes with known ages of onset. Vis. Res. 40:1035–40
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Blakemore C. 1970. The range and scope of binocular depth discrimination in man. J. Physiol. 211:599–622
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carrasco M. 2006. Covert attention increases contrast sensitivity: psychophysical, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies. Prog. Brain Res. 154:33–70
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cumming BG, Parker AJ. 2000. Local disparity not perceived depth is signaled by binocular neurons in cortical area V1 of the macaque. J. Neurosci. 20:4758–67
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Daniell E 2006. Every Other Thursday: Stories and Strategies from Successful Women Scientists. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  8. DeValois RL, Abramov I, Jacobs GH. 1966. Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56:966–77
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Graham CH, Bartlett NR, Brown JL, Hsia Y, Mueller CG et al. 1965. Vision and Visual Perception New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  10. Graham NVS. 1989. Visual Pattern Analyzers Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Klein SA, Levi DM. 1985. Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2:1170–90
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Levi DM, Klein SA. 1982. Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature 298:268–70
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Levi DM, McKee SP, Movshon JA. 2011. Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vis. Res. 51:48–57
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ludvigh E. 1953. Direction sense of the eye. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 36:139–42
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Marr DC. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information Boston: MIT Press
  16. McCann JJ, McKee SP, Taylor TH. 1976. Quantitative studies in Retinex theory: a comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the “Color Mondrian” experiments. Vis. Res. 16:445–58
    [Google Scholar]
  17. McKee SP. 1998. Binocular functioning and visual acuity in amblyopia. Vision Screening in the Preschool Child206–28. Bethesda, MD: US Dept. Health Hum. Serv.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. McKee SP, Levi DM, Movshon JA. 2003. The pattern of visual deficits in amblyopia. J. Vis. 3:380–405
    [Google Scholar]
  19. McKee SP, Levi DM, Schor CM, Movshon JA. 2016. Saccadic latency in amblyopia. J. Vis. 16:3
    [Google Scholar]
  20. McKee SP, Mitchison GJ. 1988. The role of retinal correspondence in stereoscopic matching. Vis. Res. 26:1001–12
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McKee SP, Verghese P, Farell B. 2005. Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching. J. Vis. 5:783–92
    [Google Scholar]
  22. McKee SP, Verghese P, Ma-Wyatt A, Petrov Y 2007. The wallpaper illusion explained. J. Vis. 7:10
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McKee SP, Westheimer G. 1970. Specificity of cone mechanisms in lateral interaction. J. Physiol. 206:117–28
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nakayama K, Silverman G. 1985. Detection and discrimination of sinusoidal grating displacements. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2:267–74
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ogle KN. 1953. Precision and validity of stereoscopic depth from double images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 43:906–13
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Palmer J, Verghese P, Pavel M. 2000. The psychophysics of visual search. Vis. Res. 40:1227–68
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Prince SJD, Pointon AD, Cumming BG, Parker AJ. 2000. The precision of single neuron responses in cortical area V1 during stereoscopic depth judgments. J. Neurosci. 20:3387–400
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schor CM, Fusaro RE, Wilson N, McKee SP. 1997. Prediction of early-onset esotropia from components of the infantile squint syndrome. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38:719–40
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Shapley R, Victor J. 1986. Hyperacuity in cat retinal ganglion cells. Science 28:999–1002
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stiles WS. 1949. Increment threshold and the mechanism of colour vision. Doc. Ophthalmol. 3:138–65
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Teller DY. 1984. Linking propositions. Vis. Res. 24:1233–46
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Verghese P, McKee SP. 2002. Predicting future motion. J. Vis. 2:413–23
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Verghese P, Watamaniuk SNJ, McKee SP, Grzywacz NM. 1999. Local motion detectors cannot account for the detectability of an extended trajectory in noise. Vis. Res. 39:19–30
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Watamaniuk SNJ, McKee SP, Grzywacz N. 1995. Detecting a trajectory embedded in random-direction motion noise. Vis. Res. 35:65–77
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Watamaniuk SNJ, Sekuler R, Williams DW. 1989. Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: the integration of direction information. Vis. Res. 29:47–59
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Watt RJ, Morgan MJ, Ward RM. 1983. Stimulus features that determine the visual location of a bright bar. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24:66–71
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Weinstein RS, Ayduk O, Johnson SL. 2021. Psychology part III: a social history of female faculty at Berkeley Rep. Univ. Calif., Berkeley https://psychology.berkeley.edu/psychology-part-iii-social-history-female-faculty-berkeley
  38. Westheimer G. 1967. Spatial interaction in human cone vision. J. Physiol. 190:139–54
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Westheimer G. 1970. Rod-cone independence for sensitizing interaction in the human retina. J Physiol. 206:109–16
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Westheimer G. 1979. The spatial sense of the eye. Proctor Lecture. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18:893–912
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Westheimer G, McKee SP. 1975. Visual acuity in the presence of retinal-image motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 65:847–50
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Westheimer G, McKee SP. 1977a. Integration regions for visual hyperacuity. Vis. Res. 17:89–93
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Westheimer G, McKee SP. 1977b. Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity. Vis. Res. 17:941–47
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Westheimer G, McKee SP. 1978. Stereoscopic acuity for moving retinal images. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 68:450–55
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Westheimer G, McKee SP. 1979. What prior uniocular processing is necessary for stereopsis?. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 18:614–21
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Wilson HR. 1986. Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity. Vis. Res. 26:453–69
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123844
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-vision-111022-123844
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error