1932

Abstract

A plethora of assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) have come into routine use over the past half century. Some of these procedures were used much earlier experimentally. For example, Spallanzani performed artificial insemination in the dog in the late 1700s, and Heape did successful embryo transfer in the rabbit in 1890. Truly revolutionary tools and concepts important for ART occur at approximately half-decade intervals, for example, recombinant DNA procedures, transgenic technology, somatic cell nuclear transplantation, the polymerase chain reaction, and microRNAs. Similarly, obvious technologies sometimes take decades to come into practical use, such as sexing sperm and in vitro fertilization. I have categorized ARTs into five somewhat arbitrary categories in terms of perceived difficulty and feasibility: () when the seemingly possible turns out to be (essentially) impossible, e.g., homozygous, uniparental females; () when the seemingly impossible becomes possible, e.g., cryopreservation of embryos and transgenesis; () when the seemingly difficult turns out to be relatively easy, e.g., cryopreservation of sperm; () when the seemingly easy turns out to be difficult in key species, e.g., in vitro fertilization; and () when the seemingly difficult remains difficult, e.g., making true embryonic stem cells. The adage that “it is easy when you know how” applies repeatedly. The boundaries between what appears impossible/possible and difficult/easy change constantly owing to new tools and insights, one of the more important lessons learned. ARTs frequently are synergistic with each other. For example, somatic cell nuclear transplantation has made many kinds of experiments feasible that otherwise were impractical. Another example is that sexing sperm is useless for application without artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization. ARTs frequently are perceived as neat tricks and stimulate further thinking. This is useful for both teaching and research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103709
2015-02-16
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/animal/3/1/annurev-animal-031412-103709.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103709&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Willams RL. 1983. Beef breeding programs. Beef Cattle Sci. Handb 10:193–99 [Google Scholar]
  2. Darwin C. 1859. On the Origin of Species London: John Murray
  3. Vishwanath R. 2003. Artificial insemination: the state of the art. Theriogenology 59:571–84 [Google Scholar]
  4. Betteridge KJ. 2003. A history of farm animal embryo transfer and some associated techniques. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 79:203–44 [Google Scholar]
  5. Garner DL, Seidel GE Jr. 2008. History of commercializing sexed semen for cattle. Theriogenology 69:886–95 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kastelic JP. 2014. Understanding and evaluating bovine testes. Theriogenology 81:18–23 [Google Scholar]
  7. Back DG, Pickett BW, Voss JL, Seidel GE Jr. 1974. Observations on the sexual behavior of nonlactating mares. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 165:717–20 [Google Scholar]
  8. Spemann H. 1938. Embryonic Development and Induction New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  9. Lin TP. 1971. Egg micromanipulation. Methods in Mammalian Embryology Daniel JC Jr. 157–71 San Francisco: W.H. Freeman & Co [Google Scholar]
  10. Markert CL, Petters RM. 1977. Homozygous mouse embryos produced by microsurgery. J. Exp. Zool. 201:295–301 [Google Scholar]
  11. Tian X. 2014. Genomic imprinting in farm animals. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci 2:23–40 [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang X, Miller DC, Harman R, Antczak DF, Clark AG. 2013. Paternally expressed genes predominate in the placenta. PNAS 110:10705–10 [Google Scholar]
  13. Hoppe PC, Illmensee K. 1977. Microsurgically produced homozygous-diploid uniparental mice. PNAS 74:5657–61 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cattanach BM, Kirk M. 1985. Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice. Nature 315:496–98 [Google Scholar]
  15. Stevens L. 1978. Totipotent cells of parthenogenetic origin in a chimeric mouse. Nature 276:266–67 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kono T, Obata Y, Wu Z, Niwa K, Ono Y et al. 2004. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood. Nature 428:860–64 [Google Scholar]
  17. Deng JM, Satoh K, Wang H, Chang H, Zhang Z et al. 2011. Generation of viable male and female mice from two fathers. Biol. Reprod. 84:613–18 [Google Scholar]
  18. Olsen MW, Buss EG. 1972. Segregation of two alleles for color of down in parthenogenetic and normal turkey embryos and poults. Genetics 72:69–75 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cuellar O. 1977. Animal parthenogenesis. Science 197:837–43 [Google Scholar]
  20. Seidel GE Jr. 2011. Future reproductive technology. Equine Reproduction 2nd Edition McKinnon AO, Squires EL, Vaola WE, Varner DD. 3051–56 Chichester, UK: Bluebell Publ. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ideta A, Aoyagi Y, Tsuchiya K, Kamijima T, Nishimiya Y, Tsuda S. 2013. A simple medium enables bovine embryos to be held for seven days at 4°C. Sci. Rep. 3:11731–5 [Google Scholar]
  22. Ptak GE, Tacconi E, Czernik M, Toschi P, Modlinski JA et al. 2012. Embryonic diapause is conserved across mammals. PLOS ONE 7:e33027 [Google Scholar]
  23. Krutzsch PH, Chrichton EG, Nagle RB. 1982. Studies on prolonged spermatozoa survival in Chiroptera: a morphological examination of storage and clearance of intrauterine and caudal epididymal spermatozoa in the bats Myotis lucifugas and M. velifer. Am. J. Anat. 165:421–34 [Google Scholar]
  24. Whittingham DG, Leibo SP, Mazur P. 1972. Survival of mouse embryos frozen to –196° and –269°C. Science 178:411–14 [Google Scholar]
  25. Mazur P, Leibo SP, Seidel GE Jr. 2008. Cryopreservation of the germplasm of animals used in biological and medical research: importance, impact, status, and future directions. Biol. Reprod. 78:2–12 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rall WF, Fahy GM. 1985. Ice-free cryopreservation of mouse embryos at –196°C by vitrification. Nature 313:573–75 [Google Scholar]
  27. Vajta G, Nagy ZP. 2006. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod. Biomed. Online 12:779–96 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaneko T, Serikawa T. 2012. Long-term preservation of freeze-dried mouse spermatozoa. Cryobiology 64:211–14 [Google Scholar]
  29. Jaenisch R, Mintz B. 1974. Simian virus 40 DNA sequences in DNA of healthy adult mice derived from preimplantation blastocysts injected with viral DNA. PNAS 71:1250–54 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gordon JW, Ruddle FH. 1981. Integration and stable germ line transmission of genes injected into mouse pronuclei. Science 214:1244–46 [Google Scholar]
  31. Palmiter RD, Briuster RL, Hammer RE, Trumbauer ME, Rosenfeld MG et al. 1982. Dramatic growth of mice that develop from eggs microinjected with metallothionein-growth hormone fusion genes. Nature 300:611–15 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hammer RE, Pursel VG, Rexroad CE Jr, Wall RJ, Bolt OJ et al. 1985. Production of transgenic rabbits, sheep, and pigs by microinjection. Nature 315:680–83 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bowen RA, Reed ML, Schnieke A, Seidel GE Jr, Stacey A et al. 1994. Transgenic cattle resulting from biopsied embryos: expression of c-ski in a transgenic calf. Biol. Reprod. 50:664–68 [Google Scholar]
  34. Carlson DV, Tan W, Lillico SG, Stverakova D, Proudfoot C et al. 2012. Efficient TALEN-mediated gene knockout in livestock. PNAS 109:17382–87 [Google Scholar]
  35. James C. 2013. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013 Brief 46. Int. Serv. Aquis. Agri-biotech. Appl., Ithaca, NY
  36. Akst J. 2014. Designer livestock. The Scientist 28:41–45 [Google Scholar]
  37. Willadsen SM. 1979. A method for culture of micromanipulated sheep embryos and its use to produce monozygotic twins. Nature 277:298–300 [Google Scholar]
  38. Willadsen SM, Lehn-Jensen H, Fehilly CB, Newcomb R. 1981. The production of monozygotic twins of preselected parentage by micromanipulation of non-surgically collected cow embryos. Theriogenology 15:23–29 [Google Scholar]
  39. Williams TJ, Elsden RP, Seidel GE Jr. 1984. Pregnancy rates with bisected bovine embryos. Theriogenology 22:521–31 [Google Scholar]
  40. Briggs R, King TJ. 1952. Transplantation of living nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frog’s eggs. PNAS 38:455–63 [Google Scholar]
  41. Gurdon JB. 2013. The egg and the nucleus: a battle for supremacy. Development 140:2449–56 [Google Scholar]
  42. Willadsen SM. 1986. Nuclear transplantation in sheep embryos. Nature 350:63–65 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hill JR. 2014. Incidence of abnormal offspring from cloning and other reproductive technologies. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 2:307–21 [Google Scholar]
  44. Farin PW, Piedrahita JA, Farin CE. 2006. Errors in development of fetuses and placentas from in vitro-produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology 65:178–91 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jones HW Jr, Edwards RG, Seidel GE Jr. 1994. On attempts at cloning in the human. Fertil. Steril. 61:423–26 [Google Scholar]
  46. Campbell KH, McWhir J, Ritchie WA, Wilmut I. 1996. Sheep cloned by nuclear transfer from a cultured cell line. Nature 380:64–66 [Google Scholar]
  47. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385:810–13 [Google Scholar]
  48. Cibelli JB, Campbell KH, Seidel GE Jr, West MD, Lanza RP. 2002. The health profile of cloned animals. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:13–14 [Google Scholar]
  49. Schnieke AE, Kind AJ, Ritchie WA, Mycock K, Scott AR et al. 1997. Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science 278:2130–33 [Google Scholar]
  50. Polge C, Smith AU, Parbes AS. 1949. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 164:666 [Google Scholar]
  51. Uehara T, Yanagimachi R. 1976. Microsurgical injection of spermatozoa into hamster eggs with subsequent transformation of sperm nuclei into male pronuclei. Biol. Reprod. 15:467–70 [Google Scholar]
  52. Thadani VM. 1980. A study of heterospecific sperm-egg interactions in the rat, mouse, and deer mouse using in vitro fertilization and sperm injection. J. Exp. Zool. 212:435–53 [Google Scholar]
  53. Van Steirteghem A. 2012. Celebrating ICSI’s twentieth anniversary and the birth of more than 2.5 million children—the ‘how, why, when and where.’. Hum. Reprod. 27:1–2 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tesarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E. 1998. Treatment of severe male infertility by micromanipulation-assisted fertilization: news and views. Front. Biosci. 3:E238–46 [Google Scholar]
  55. Seidel F. 1952. Die Entwicklung potenzen einer isolierten Blastomere des Zweizellstadiums in Säugetierei. Naturwissenschaften 39:355–56 [Google Scholar]
  56. Willadsen SM. 1982. Micromanipulation of embryos of the large domestic species. Mammalian Egg Transfer Adams EC. 185–210 Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press [Google Scholar]
  57. Fehilly CB, Willadsen SM, Tucker EM. 1984. Interspecific chimerism between sheep and goat. Nature 307:634–36 [Google Scholar]
  58. Hochepied T, Schoonjans L, Staelens J, Kreemers V, Danloy S et al. 2004. Breaking the species barrier: derivation of germ-line competent embryonic stem cells from Mus spretus × C57BL/6 hybrids. Stem Cells 22:441–47 [Google Scholar]
  59. Papaioannou VE, Dieterlen-Lievre F. 1984. Making chimeras. Chimeras in Developmental Biology Le Douarin N, McLaren A. 3–37 London: Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Willadsen SM, Fehilly CB. 1983. The developmental potential and regulatory capacity of blastomeres from two-, four-, and eight-cell sheep embryos. Fertilization of the Human Egg In Vitro: Biological Basis and Clinical Application Beier HM, Lindner HR. 353–58 Berlin: Springer-Verlag [Google Scholar]
  61. Lyon MF, Glenister PH, Lamoreux ML. 1975. Normal spermatozoa from androgen-resistant germ cells of chimaeric mice and the role of androgen in spermatogenesis. Nature 258:620–22 [Google Scholar]
  62. Elsden RP, Hasler JF, Seidel GE Jr. 1976. Non-surgical recovery of bovine eggs. Theriogenology 6:523–32 [Google Scholar]
  63. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. 2006. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126:663–76 [Google Scholar]
  64. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T et al. 2007. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131:861–72 [Google Scholar]
  65. Koh S, Piedrahita JA. 2014. From “ES-like” cells to induced pluripotent stem cells: a historical perspective in domestic animals. Theriogenology 81:103–11 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang T, Shi SB, Sha HY. 2013. MicroRNAs in regulation of pluripotency and somatic cell reprogramming: small molecule with big impact. RNA Biol. 10:1255–61 [Google Scholar]
  67. Chung YG, Eum JH, Lee JE, Shim SH, Sepilian V et al. 2014. Human somatic cell nuclear transfer using adult cells. Cell Stem Cell 14:777–80 [Google Scholar]
  68. Yamada M, Johannesson B, Sagi I, Burnett LC, Kort DH et al. 2014. Human oocytes reprogram adult somatic nuclei of a type 1 diabetic to diploid pluripotent stem cells. Nature 510:533–36 [Google Scholar]
  69. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Conner JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP et al. 1988. Incidence of early pregnancy loss. N. Engl. J. Med. 319:189–94 [Google Scholar]
  70. Saunders CM, Larman MG, Parrington J, Cox LJ, Royse J et al. 2002. PLCζ: a sperm-specific trigger of Ca2+ oscillations in eggs and embryo development. Development 129:3533–44 [Google Scholar]
  71. Choi Y-H, Hinrichs K. 2011. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Equine Reproduction, McKinnon AO, Squires EL, Vaala WE, Varner DD. 2948–52 Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  72. Barceló-Fimbres M, Campos-Chillón LF, Seidel GE Jr. 2011. In vitro fertilization using nonsexed and sexed bovine sperm: sperm concentration, sorter pressure, and bull effects. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 46:495–502 [Google Scholar]
  73. Guidobaldi HA, Teves ME, Uñates DR, Giojalas LC. 2012. Sperm transport and retention at the fertilization site is orchestrated by a chemical guidance and oviduct movement. Reproduction 143:587–96 [Google Scholar]
  74. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Winer MA, First NL. 1988. Capacitation of bovine sperm by heparin. Biol. Reprod. 38:1171–80 [Google Scholar]
  75. Mújica A, Neri-Bazan L, Tash JS, Uribe S. 1994. Mechanism for procaine-mediated hyperactivated motility in guinea pig spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 38:285–92 [Google Scholar]
  76. Pincus G, Enzmann EV. 1935. The comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro: 1. The activation of ovarian eggs. J. Exp. Med. 62:665–75 [Google Scholar]
  77. Romero-Arredondo A, Seidel GE Jr. 1994. Effects of bovine follicular fluid on maturation of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology 41:383–94 [Google Scholar]
  78. Rizos D, Ward F, Duffy P, Boland MP, Lonergan P. 2002. Consequences of bovine oocyte maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic development in vitro versus in vivo: implications for blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 61:234–48 [Google Scholar]
  79. Park JY, Su YQ, Ariga M, Law E, Jin SL et al. 2004. EGF-like growth factors as mediators of LH action in the ovulatory follicle. Science 303:682–84 [Google Scholar]
  80. Blackler AW. 1965. Germ-cell transfer and sex ratio in Xenopus laevis. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 13:51–61 [Google Scholar]
  81. Dobrinsky I, Travis AJ. 2007. Germ cell transplantation for the propagation of companion animals, non-domestic and endangered species. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 19:732–39 [Google Scholar]
  82. Ledda S, Bogliolo L, Bebbere D, Ariu F, Pirino S. 2010. Characterization, isolation and culture of primordial germ cells in domestic animals: recent progress and insights from the ovine species. Theriogenology 74:534–43 [Google Scholar]
  83. Ford CE, Evans EP, Burtenshaw MD, Clegg HM, Tuffrey M et al. 1975. A functional ‘sex-reversed’ oocyte in the mouse. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 190:180–97 [Google Scholar]
  84. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL et al. 2007. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 318:1917–20 [Google Scholar]
  85. Hayflick L. 1965. The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 37:614–36 [Google Scholar]
  86. Carnevale EM. 2008. The mare model for follicular maturation and reproductive aging in the woman. Theriogenology 69:23–30 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103709
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103709
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error