1932

Abstract

As urban environments transform across the globe, debates over urban nature and its future forms have introduced important critical questions. How, for instance, do we study emergent, dynamic configurations of nature and culture in cities? How do we conceptualize the city as a field site when urbanization encompasses the full spatial continuum from city to countryside? How do we understand the place of history in an environmental era often categorized as unprecedented? This article traces political ecology from its noncity origins to its present engagements with urban life and forms. It argues that ethnographic work both enriches and complicates recent debates about the urban past, present, and future, and it calls for more vigorous and refined anthropological engagement with the biophysical sciences, the theoretical and methodological challenges of scale, and the work of historical contextualization in the history-evasive era now widely known as the Anthropocene.

Keyword(s): cityecosystemnatureurbanization
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208
2015-10-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/44/1/annurev-anthro-102214-014208.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams P. 1982. Historical Sociology Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  2. Agrawal A. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  3. Alley K. 2002. On the Banks of the Ganga: When Wastewater Meets a Sacred River Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  4. Anand N. 2011. Pressure: the politechnics of water supply in Mumbai. Cult. Anthropol. 26:542–64 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anand N. 2012. Municipal disconnect: on abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography 13:487–509 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anand N. 2015. Leaky states: water audits, infrastructure and the politics of infrastructure. Public Cult. 27:2305–30 [Google Scholar]
  7. Angelo H, Wachsmuth D. 2014. Urbanizing urban political ecology: a critique of methodological cityism. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 39:16–27 [Google Scholar]
  8. Anjaria JS. 2009. Guardians of the bourgeois city: citizenship, public space, and middle-class activism in Mumbai. City Commun. 8:391–406 [Google Scholar]
  9. Appadurai A. 1996. Modernity at Large Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  10. Arnold D, Guha R. 1995. Nature, Culture, Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press
  11. Auyero J, Swistun D. 2009. Flammable: Environmental Suffering in an Argentine Shantytown Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  12. Baviskar A. 1995. In the Belly of the River: Tribal Conflicts over Development in the Narmada Valley New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press
  13. Baviskar A. 2003a. Between violence and desire: space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Delhi. Int. Soc. Sci. J. 55:89–98 [Google Scholar]
  14. Baviskar A. 2003b. For a cultural politics of natural resources. Econ. Polit. Wkly. 28:5051–55 [Google Scholar]
  15. Baviskar A. 2004. Waterlines: The Penguin Book of River Writings Delhi: Penguin
  16. Benton T. 1989. Marxism and natural limits: an ecological critique and reconstruction. New Left Rev. 178:51–86 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blaikie P. 1985. The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries New York: Longman
  18. Blaikie P, Brookfield H. 1987. Land Degradation and Society London: Methuen
  19. Bocking S. 2004. Nature's Experts: Science, Politics, and the Environment New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press
  20. Braun B. 2005. Environmental issues: writing a more-than-human urban geography. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 29.5:635–50 [Google Scholar]
  21. Brenner N. 2014. Implosions/Explosions: Toward a Study of Planetary Urbanization Berlin: Jovis
  22. Brookfield H. 1999. A review of political ecology: issues, epistemology, and analytical narratives. Z. Wirtschaftsgeogr.131–47
  23. Brosius JP. 1999a. Comments on Escobar's “after nature: steps to an antiessentialist political ecology.”. Curr. Anthropol. 40:16–17 [Google Scholar]
  24. Brosius JP. 1999b. Green dots, pink hearts: displacing politics from the Malaysian rain forest. Am. Anthropol. 101:36–57 [Google Scholar]
  25. Brosius JP, Russell D. 2003. Conservation from above: an anthropological perspective on transboundary protected areas and ecoregional planning. J. Sustain. For. 17:39–65 [Google Scholar]
  26. Brosius JP, Tsing A, Zerner C. 2005. Communities and Conservation: Histories and Politics of Community-Based Natural Resource Management Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira
  27. Bryant RL. 1992. Political ecology: an emerging research agenda in third world studies. Polit. Geogr. 11:12–36 [Google Scholar]
  28. Bryant RL. 1998. Power, knowledge, and political ecology in the third world. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 22:79–94 [Google Scholar]
  29. Bryant RL, Bailey S. 1997. Third World Political Ecology London: Routledge
  30. Caldeira T. 2001. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  31. Callon M. 1998. The Laws of the Markets Oxford, UK: Blackwell/Sociol. Rev.
  32. Callon M. 2009. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. Power, Action, Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? J Law 196–223 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  33. Castells M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture 1 Cambridge, MA/Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  34. Castree N, Braun B. 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics New York: Wiley-Blackwell
  35. Chakrabarty D. 2002. Of garbage, modernity and the citizen's gaze. Habitations of Modernity: Essays in the Wake of Subaltern Studies D Chakrabarty 65–79 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  36. Chakrabarty D. 2009. The climate of history: four theses. Crit. Inq. 35:197–222 [Google Scholar]
  37. Chatterjee P. 2004. The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  38. Choy T. 2011. Ecologies of Comparison: An Ethnography of Endangerment in Hong Kong Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  39. Cohelo K, Raman NV. 2013. From the frying pan to the floodplain: negotiating land, water, and fire in Chennai's development. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 145–68
  40. Cronon W. 1983. Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists, and the Ecology of New England New York: Hill & Wang
  41. Cronon W. 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West New York: Norton
  42. Cronon W. 1995. The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature. Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature W Cronon 69–90 New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  43. Davilla A. 2004. Barrio Dreams: Puerto Ricans, Latinos, and the Neoliberal City Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  44. Davis D. 2000. The Consumer Revolution in Urban China Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  45. Demeritt D. 1994. The nature of metaphors in cultural geography and environmental history. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 18:163–85 [Google Scholar]
  46. Doshi S. 2013. Resettlement ecologies: environmental subjectivity and graduated citizenship in Mumbai. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 225–48
  47. Dove M. 1991. Anthropology of development versus development anthropology: mediating the forester-farmer relationship in Pakistan. Pract. Anthropol. 13:21–25 [Google Scholar]
  48. Escobar A. 1996. Constructing nature: elements for a poststructuralist political ecology. See Peet & Watts 1996 46–68
  49. Escobar A. 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. J. Polit. Ecol. 4:53–82 [Google Scholar]
  50. Escobar A. 1999. After nature: steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Curr. Anthropol. 40:16–17 [Google Scholar]
  51. Fairhead J, Leach M. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in Forest-Savanna Mosaic Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Ferguson J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  53. Ferguson J. 1999. Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  54. Fischer MJ. 2007. Four genealogies for a recombinant anthropology of science and technology. Cult. Anthropol. 22:539–615 [Google Scholar]
  55. Forsyth T. 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science London: Routledge
  56. Franklin S. 1995. Science of cultures, cultures of science. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 24:162–85 [Google Scholar]
  57. Furlong K. 2012. Municipal disconnect: on abject water and its urban infrastructures. Ethnography 13:487–509 [Google Scholar]
  58. Gandy M. 2002. Concrete and Clay: Reworking Nature in New York City London: MIT Press
  59. Ghertner A. 2013. Nuisance talk: middle class discourses of a slum free Delhi. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 249–76
  60. Gidwani V. 2013. Value struggles: waste work and urban ecology in Delhi. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 169–200
  61. Gregory S. 1998. Black Corona: Race and the Politics of Place in an Urban Community Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  62. Grove R. 1989. Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism 1600–1860 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  63. Gupta A. 1995. Blurred boundaries: the discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. Am. Ethnol. 22:375–402 [Google Scholar]
  64. Gupta A, Ferguson J. 1992. Beyond culture: space, identity, and the politics of difference. Cult. Anthropol. 7:6–23 [Google Scholar]
  65. Gururani S. 2013. Flexible planning: the making of India's millennium city, Gurgaon. See Rademacher & Sivaramakrishnan 2013 119–44
  66. Hansen TB. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  67. Haraway DJ. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science New York: Routledge
  68. Haraway DJ. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature New York: Routledge
  69. Haraway DJ. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience New York: Routledge
  70. Harvey D. 1973. Social Justice and the City Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
  71. Heynen N. 2013. Urban political ecology 1: the urban century. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38:598–604 [Google Scholar]
  72. Holston J, Appadurai A. 1999. Cities and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  73. Jasanoff S, Martello M. 2004. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  74. Joyce P. 2003. The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City New York: Verso
  75. Kaika M. 2005. City of Flows: Modernity, Nature, and the City London: Routledge
  76. Kirksey SE, Helmreich S. 2010. The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cult. Anthropol. 25:545–76 [Google Scholar]
  77. Latour B. 1988. Science in Action: How To Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  78. Latour B. 1993a. We Have Never Been Modern Transl. C Porter Cambridge MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  79. Latour B. 1993b. The Pasteurization of France Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  80. Latour B. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  81. Latour B, Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory Life: the Construction of Scientific Facts Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  82. Lefebvre H. 2003. The Urban Revolution Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  83. Li T. 1999. Transforming the Indonesian Uplands: Marginality, Power and Production Amsterdam, The Neth: Harwood Acad.
  84. Liechty M. 2003. Suitably Modern: Making Middle Class Culture in a New Consumer Society Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  85. Low S. 2003. Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America New York: Routledge
  86. Mankekar P. 1999. Screening Culture, Viewing Politics: An Ethnography of Television, Womanhood, and Nation in Postcolonial India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  87. Mathews A. 2011. Instituting Nature: Authority, Expertise, and Power in Mexican Forests. Cambridge: MIT Press
  88. Mazzarella W. 2003. Shoveling Smoke: Advertising and Globalization in Contemporary India Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  89. Meehan K. 2013. Tool-power: water infrastructure as wellsprings of state power. Geoforum 57:215–44 [Google Scholar]
  90. Mitchell T. 1991. The limits of the state: beyond statist approaches and their critics. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 85:77–96 [Google Scholar]
  91. Mitchell T. 2002a. Can the mosquito speak?. See Mitchell 2002b 327–360
  92. Mitchell T. 2002b. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Technopolitics, Modernity Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  93. Mosse D. 1997. The symbolic making of a common property resource: history, ecology and locality in a tank-irrigated landscape in South India. Dev. Change 28:467–504 [Google Scholar]
  94. Mosse D. 2003. The Rule of Water: Statecraft, Ecology, and Collective Action in South India New Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press
  95. O'Dougherty M. 2002. Consumption Intensified: The Politics of Middle Class Daily Life in Brazil Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  96. Ogden L, Hall B, Tanita K. 2010. Animals, plants, people, and things: a review of multispecies ethnography. Environ. Soc. 4:5–24 [Google Scholar]
  97. Ong A. 1999. Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  98. Peet R, Watts M. 1996. Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development, Social Movements New York: Routledge
  99. Peluso N, Watts M. 2001. Violent Environments Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  100. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. 2002. Ecosystem as a multidimensional concept: meaning, model and metaphor. Ecosystems 5:1–10 [Google Scholar]
  101. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML. 2006. Advancing urban ecological studies: frameworks, concepts, and results from the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. Austral Ecol. 31:114–25 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove M. 2004. Resilient cities: meaning, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economic, and planning realms. Landsc. Urban Plan. 69:369–84 [Google Scholar]
  103. Rademacher A. 2009. When is housing an environmental problem? Reforming informality in Kathmandu. Curr. Anthropol. 50:513–33 [Google Scholar]
  104. Rademacher A. 2011. Reigning the River: Urban Ecologies and Political Transformation in Kathmandu Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  105. Rademacher A, Sivaramakrishnan K. 2013. Ecologies of Urbanism in India: Metropolitan Civility and Sustainability. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press
  106. Raffles H. 2002. In Amazonia Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  107. Riles A. 2000. The Network Inside Out Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  108. Robbins P. 2004. Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction New York: Blackwell
  109. Roy A. 2009. Civic governmentality: the politics of inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode 41:159–79 [Google Scholar]
  110. Saberwal VK. 1999. Pastoral Politics: Shepherds, Bureaucrats, and Conservation in the Western Himalaya Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  111. Sassen S. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  112. Scott J. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes To Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  113. Sivaramakrishnan K. 1999. Modern Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  114. Sivaramakrishnan K. 2002. Forest co-management as science and democracy in West Bengal, India. Environ. Values 11:277–302 [Google Scholar]
  115. Skaria A. 1999. Hybrid Histories: Forests, Frontiers, and Wildness in Western India Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press
  116. Smith N. 1984. Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space New York: Blackwell
  117. Swyngedouw E. 1996. The city as a hybrid: on nature, society, and cyborg urbanisation. Capital. Nat. Social. 7:65–80 [Google Scholar]
  118. Swyngedouw E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 89:444–65 [Google Scholar]
  119. Taylor P, Buttel F. 1992. How do we know we have global environmental problems? Science and the globalization of environmental discourse. Geoforum 23.3:405–16 [Google Scholar]
  120. Tsing A. 1993. In the Realm of the Diamond Queen: Marginality in an Out of the Way Place Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  121. Tsing A. 2000. The global situation. Curr. Anthropol. 15:327–60 [Google Scholar]
  122. Tsing A. 2005. Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connections Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  123. Tsing A. 2012. Unruly edges: mushrooms as companion species. Environ. Hum. 1:141–54 [Google Scholar]
  124. Vandergeest P, Peluso N. 1995. Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory Soc. 24:385–426 [Google Scholar]
  125. Vayda A, Walters B. 1999. Against political ecology. Hum. Ecol. 27:167–79 [Google Scholar]
  126. West P. 2006. Conservation Is Our Government Now: The Politics of Ecology in Papua New Guinea Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  127. Williams R. 1980. Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays London: New Left Books
  128. Wolf E. 1982. Europe and the People Without History Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  129. Wolfe C. 2009. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  130. Worster D. 1977. Nature's Economy: The Roots of Ecology San Francisco: Sierra Club
  131. Zeiderman A. 2015a. Endangered City: The Politics of Security and Risk in Bogota Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  132. Zeiderman A. 2015b. Zones of uncertainty: governing urban environmental hazards. Modes of Uncertainty: Anthropological Cases L Samimian-Darash, P Rabinow 182–200 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  133. Zimmerer K. 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature society hybrids. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 90:356–69 [Google Scholar]
  134. Zimmerer K, Bassett T. 2003. Political Ecology: An Integrative Approach to Geography and Environment-Development Studies. New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014208
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error