Metabolite–Enzyme Coevolution: From Single Enzymes to Metabolic Pathways and Networks

Literature Cited

1. 1.  Hochachka PW, Somero GN 1984. Biochemical Adaptation Princeton, N.J: Princeton Univ. Press
2. 2.  Hochachka PW, Somero GN 2002. Biochemical Adaptation: Mechanism and Process in Physiological Evolution New York: Oxford Univ. Press
3. 3.  Harms MJ, Thornton JW 2013. Evolutionary biochemistry: revealing the historical and physical causes of protein properties. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14:559–71
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.  Copley SD. 2015. An evolutionary biochemist's perspective on promiscuity. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40:72–78
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.  Cornish-Bowden A, Pereto J, Cardenas ML 2014. Biochemistry and evolutionary biology: two disciplines that need each other?. J. Biosci. 39:13–27
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.  Vianello A, Passamonti S 2016. Biochemistry and physiology within the framework of the extended synthesis of evolutionary biology. Biol. Direct 11:7
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.  Kocherezhkin VG. 1967. [Evolutionary biochemistry and the origin of life]. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Biol. 2:310–13 in Russian
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.  Wachtershauser G. 1992. Groundworks for an evolutionary biochemistry: the iron-sulphur world. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 58:85–201
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.  Khersonsky O, Tawfik DS 2010. Enzyme promiscuity: a mechanistic and evolutionary perspective. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79:471–505
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.  Pandya C, Farelli JD, Dunaway-Mariano D, Allen KN 2014. Enzyme promiscuity: engine of evolutionary innovation. J. Biol. Chem. 289:30229–36
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.  O'Brien PJ, Herschlag D 1999. Catalytic promiscuity and the evolution of new enzymatic activities. Chem. Biol. 6:R91–105
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.  Hughes AL. 1994. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. Biol. Sci. 256:119–24
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.  Piatigorsky J. 2003. Gene sharing, lens crystallins and speculations on an eye/ear evolutionary relationship. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:492–99
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.  Soskine M, Tawfik DS 2010. Mutational effects and the evolution of new protein functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11:572–82
    [Google Scholar]
15. 18.  Nam H, Lewis NE, Lerman JA, Lee DH, Chang RL et al. 2012. Network context and selection in the evolution to enzyme specificity. Science 337:1101–4
    [Google Scholar]
16. 15.  Matsumura I, Ellington AD 2001. In vitro evolution of beta-glucuronidase into a beta-galactosidase proceeds through non-specific intermediates. J. Mol. Biol. 305:331–39
    [Google Scholar]
17. 16.  Rockah-Shmuel L, Tawfik DS 2012. Evolutionary transitions to new DNA methyltransferases through target site expansion and shrinkage. Nucleic Acids Res 40:11627–37
    [Google Scholar]
18. 17.  Noda-Garcia L, Camacho-Zarco AR, Medina-Ruiz S, Gaytan P, Carrillo-Tripp M et al. 2013. Evolution of substrate specificity in a recipient's enzyme following horizontal gene transfer. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30:2024–34
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.  Ferla MP, Brewster JL, Hall KR, Evans GB, Patrick WM 2017. Primordial-like enzymes from bacteria with reduced genomes. Mol. Microbiol. 105:508–24
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.  Jia B, Cheong GW, Zhang S 2013. Multifunctional enzymes in archaea: promiscuity and moonlight. Extremophiles 17:193–203
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.  Weng JK, Noel JP 2012. The remarkable pliability and promiscuity of specialized metabolism. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 77:309–20
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.  Dawson NL, Lewis TE, Das S, Lees JG, Lee D et al. 2017. CATH: an expanded resource to predict protein function through structure and sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D289–95
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.  Baier F, Copp JN, Tokuriki N 2016. Evolution of enzyme superfamilies: comprehensive exploration of sequence-function relationships. Biochemistry 55:6375–88
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.  Laurino P, Toth-Petroczy A, Meana-Paneda R, Lin W, Truhlar DG, Tawfik DS 2016. An ancient fingerprint indicates the common ancestry of Rossmann-fold enzymes utilizing different ribose-based cofactors. PLOS Biol 14:e1002396
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.  Nagano N, Orengo CA, Thornton JM 2002. One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol. 321:741–65
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.  Copley RR, Bork P 2000. Homology among (βα)₈ barrels: implications for the evolution of metabolic pathways. J. Mol. Biol. 303:627–41
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.  Baier F, Tokuriki N 2014. Connectivity between catalytic landscapes of the metallo-β-lactamase superfamily. J. Mol. Biol. 426:2442–56
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.  Gerlt JA, Babbitt PC, Jacobson MP, Almo SC 2012. Divergent evolution in enolase superfamily: strategies for assigning functions. J. Biol. Chem. 287:29–34
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.  Knutson ST, Westwood BM, Leuthaeuser JB, Turner BE, Nguyendac D et al. 2017. An approach to functionally relevant clustering of the protein universe: active site profile-based clustering of protein structures and sequences. Protein Sci 26:677–99
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.  Khersonsky O, Malitsky S, Rogachev I, Tawfik DS 2011. Role of chemistry versus substrate binding in recruiting promiscuous enzyme functions. Biochemistry 50:2683–90
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.  Soo VW, Yosaatmadja Y, Squire CJ, Patrick WM 2016. Mechanistic and evolutionary insights from the reciprocal promiscuity of two pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 291:19873–87
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.  Rossmann MG, Moras D, Olsen KW 1974. Chemical and biological evolution of nucleotide-binding protein. Nature 250:194–99
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.  Goldman AD, Beatty JT, Landweber LF 2016. The TIM barrel architecture facilitated the early evolution of protein-mediated metabolism. J. Mol. Evol. 82:17–26
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.  Alam MT, Olin-Sandoval V, Stincone A, Keller MA, Zelezniak A et al. 2017. The self-inhibitory nature of metabolic networks and its alleviation through compartmentalization. Nat. Commun. 8:16018
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.  Newton MS, Guo X, Soderholm A, Nasvall J, Lundstrom P et al. 2017. Structural and functional innovations in the real-time evolution of new (βα)₈ barrel enzymes. PNAS 114:4727–32
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.  Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL 2000. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 407:651–54
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.  Light S, Kraulis P 2004. Network analysis of metabolic enzyme evolution in Escherichia coli. BMC Bioinform 5:15
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.  Pfeiffer T, Soyer OS, Bonhoeffer S 2005. The evolution of connectivity in metabolic networks. PLOS Biol 3:e228
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.  Guimera R, Nunes Amaral LA 2005. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. Nature 433:895–900
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.  Orth JD, Conrad TM, Na J, Lerman JA, Nam H et al. 2011. A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism—2011. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7:535
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.  Lima-Mendez G, van Helden J 2009. The powerful law of the power law and other myths in network biology. Mol. Biosyst. 5:1482–93
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.  Vorobieva AA, Khan MS, Soumillion P 2014. Escherichia colid-malate dehydrogenase, a generalist enzyme active in the leucine biosynthesis pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 289:29086–96
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.  Light S, Kraulis P, Elofsson A 2005. Preferential attachment in the evolution of metabolic networks. BMC Genom 6:159
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.  D'Ari R, Casadesus J 1998. Underground metabolism. BioEssays 20:181–86
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.  Notebaart RA, Szappanos B, Kintses B, Pal F, Gyorkei A et al. 2014. Network-level architecture and the evolutionary potential of underground metabolism. PNAS 111:11762–67
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.  Kurakin A. 2007. Self-organization versus Watchmaker: ambiguity of molecular recognition and design charts of cellular circuitry. J. Mol. Recognit. 20:205–14
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.  Tawfik DS. 2010. Messy biology and the origins of evolutionary innovations. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6:692–96
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.  Jensen RA. 1976. Enzyme recruitment in evolution of new function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 30:409–25
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.  Marcheschi RJ, Li H, Zhang K, Noey EL, Kim S et al. 2012. A synthetic recursive “+1” pathway for carbon chain elongation. ACS Chem. Biol. 7:689–97
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.  Bar-Even A, Flamholz A, Noor E, Milo R 2012. Thermodynamic constraints shape the structure of carbon fixation pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817:1646–59
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.  Leipe DD, Koonin EV, Aravind L 2003. Evolution and classification of P-loop kinases and related proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 333:781–815
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.  Ycas M. 1974. On earlier states of the biochemical system. J. Theor. Biol. 44:145–60
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.  Li F, Hagemeier CH, Seedorf H, Gottschalk G, Thauer RK 2007. Re-citrate synthase from Clostridium kluyveri is phylogenetically related to homocitrate synthase and isopropylmalate synthase rather than to Si-citrate synthase. J. Bacteriol. 189:4299–304
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.  Casey AK, Hicks MA, Johnson JL, Babbitt PC, Frantom PA 2014. Mechanistic and bioinformatic investigation of a conserved active site helix in α-isopropylmalate synthase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a member of the DRE-TIM metallolyase superfamily. Biochemistry 53:2915–25
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.  Gruer MJ, Artymiuk PJ, Guest JR 1997. The aconitase family: three structural variations on a common theme. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:3–6
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.  Aktas DF, Cook PF 2009. A lysine-tyrosine pair carries out acid-base chemistry in the metal ion-dependent pyridine dinucleotide-linked β-hydroxyacid oxidative decarboxylases. Biochemistry 48:3565–77
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.  Bar-Even A, Flamholz A, Noor E, Milo R 2012. Rethinking glycolysis: on the biochemical logic of metabolic pathways. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8:509–17
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.  Noor E, Bar-Even A, Flamholz A, Reznik E, Liebermeister W, Milo R 2014. Pathway thermodynamics highlights kinetic obstacles in central metabolism. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10:e1003483
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.  Metzenberg RL. 2005. Norman Harold Horowitz, 1915–2005. Genetics 171:1445–48
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.  Srb AM, Horowitz NH 1944. The ornithine cycle in Neurospora and its genetic control. J. Biol. Chem. 154:129–39
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.  Horowitz NH. 1945. On the evolution of biochemical syntheses. PNAS 31:153–57
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.  Horowitz NH. 1965. The evolution of biochemical synthesis—retrospect and prospect. Evolving Genes and Proteins V Bryson, HJ Vogel 15–23 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.  Rison SC, Teichmann SA, Thornton JM 2002. Homology, pathway distance and chromosomal localization of the small molecule metabolism enzymes in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol 318:911–32
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.  Wilmanns M, Hyde CC, Davies DR, Kirschner K, Jansonius JN 1991. Structural conservation in parallel β/α-barrel enzymes that catalyze three sequential reactions in the pathway of tryptophan biosynthesis. Biochemistry 30:9161–69
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.  Diaz-Mejia JJ, Perez-Rueda E, Segovia L 2007. A network perspective on the evolution of metabolism by gene duplication. Genome Biol 8:R26
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.  Granick S. 1965. The evolution of heme and chlorophyll. Evolving Genes and Proteins V Bryson, HJ Vogel 67–88 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.  Dailey HA, Dailey TA, Gerdes S, Jahn D, Jahn M et al. 2017. Prokaryotic heme biosynthesis: multiple pathways to a common essential product. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 81:e00048–16
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.  Rison SC, Thornton JM 2002. Pathway evolution, structurally speaking. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:374–82
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.  Austin MB, O'Maille PE, Noel JP 2008. Evolving biosynthetic tangos negotiate mechanistic landscapes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 4:217–22
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.  Belfaiza J, Parsot C, Martel A, de la Tour CB, Margarita D et al. 1986. Evolution in biosynthetic pathways: two enzymes catalyzing consecutive steps in methionine biosynthesis originate from a common ancestor and possess a similar regulatory region. PNAS 83:867–71
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.  Kouidmi I, Levesque RC, Paradis-Bleau C 2014. The biology of Mur ligases as an antibacterial target. Mol. Microbiol. 94:242–53
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.  Velasco AM, Leguina JI, Lazcano A 2002. Molecular evolution of the lysine biosynthetic pathways. J. Mol. Evol. 55:445–59
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.  Howell DM, Harich K, Xu H, White RH 1998. α-Keto acid chain elongation reactions involved in the biosynthesis of coenzyme B (7-mercaptoheptanoyl threonine phosphate) in methanogenic Archaea. Biochemistry 37:10108–17
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.  Howell DM, Graupner M, Xu H, White RH 2000. Identification of enzymes homologous to isocitrate dehydrogenase that are involved in coenzyme B and leucine biosynthesis in methanoarchaea. J. Bacteriol. 182:5013–16
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.  Fondi M, Brilli M, Emiliani G, Paffetti D, Fani R 2007. The primordial metabolism: an ancestral interconnection between leucine, arginine, and lysine biosynthesis. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:Suppl. 2S3
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.  Xu H, Zhang Y, Guo X, Ren S, Staempfli AA et al. 2004. Isoleucine biosynthesis in Leptospira interrogans serotype lai strain 56601 proceeds via a threonine-independent pathway. J. Bacteriol. 186:5400–9
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.  Lefort V, Longueville JE, Gascuel O 2017. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34:2422–24
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.  Sonawane PD, Pollier J, Panda S, Szymanski J, Massalha H et al. 2016. Plant cholesterol biosynthetic pathway overlaps with phytosterol metabolism. Nat. Plants 3:16205
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.  Lazcano A, Miller SL 1999. On the origin of metabolic pathways. J. Mol. Evol. 49:424–31
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.  Copley SD. 2009. Evolution of efficient pathways for degradation of anthropogenic chemicals. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5:559–66
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.  Trivedi VD, Jangir PK, Sharma R, Phale PS 2016. Insights into functional and evolutionary analysis of carbaryl metabolic pathway from Pseudomonas sp. strain C5pp. Sci. Rep. 6:38430
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.  Shapir N, Mongodin EF, Sadowsky MJ, Daugherty SC, Nelson KE, Wackett LP 2007. Evolution of catabolic pathways: genomic insights into microbial s-triazine metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 189:674–82
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.  Erb TJ, Jones PR, Bar-Even A 2017. Synthetic metabolism: metabolic engineering meets enzyme design. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 37:56–62
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.  Patrick WM, Quandt EM, Swartzlander DB, Matsumura I 2007. Multicopy suppression underpins metabolic evolvability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2716–22
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.  Linster CL, van Schaftingen E, Hanson AD 2013. Metabolite damage and its repair or pre-emption. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9:72–80
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.  Lu ZJ, Markham GD 2002. Enzymatic properties of S-adenosylmethionine synthetase from the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii. J. Biol. Chem 277:16624–31
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.  da Silva RR, Dorrestein PC, Quinn RA 2015. Illuminating the dark matter in metabolomics. PNAS 112:12549–50
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.  Zampieri M, Sekar K, Zamboni N, Sauer U 2017. Frontiers of high-throughput metabolomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 36:15–23
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.  Sutherland JD. 2017. Opinion: Studies on the origin of life—the end of the beginning. Nat. Rev. Chem. 1:0012
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.  Keller MA, Piedrafita G, Ralser M 2015. The widespread role of non-enzymatic reactions in cellular metabolism. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 34:153–61
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.  Piedrafita G, Keller MA, Ralser M 2015. The impact of non-enzymatic reactions and enzyme promiscuity on cellular metabolism during (oxidative) stress conditions. Biomolecules 5:2101–22
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.  Moellering RE, Cravatt BF 2013. Functional lysine modification by an intrinsically reactive primary glycolytic metabolite. Science 341:549–53
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.  Xu XL, Grant GA 2016. Mutagenic and chemical analyses provide new insight into enzyme activation and mechanism of the type 2 iron-sulfur l-serine dehydratase from Legionella pneumophila. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 596:108–17
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.  Bar-Even A, Noor E, Savir Y, Liebermeister W, Davidi D et al. 2011. The moderately efficient enzyme: evolutionary and physicochemical trends shaping enzyme parameters. Biochemistry 50:4402–10
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.  Bar-Even A, Tawfik DS 2013. Engineering specialized metabolic pathways—is there a room for enzyme improvements?. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24:310–19
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.  Gravel E, Poupon E 2010. Biosynthesis and biomimetic synthesis of alkaloids isolated from plants of the Nitraria and Myrioneuron genera: an unusual lysine-based metabolism. Nat. Prod. Rep. 27:32–56
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.  Poupon E, Gravel E 2015. Manipulating simple reactive chemical units: fishing for alkaloids from complex mixtures. Chemistry 21:10604–15
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.  Kim J, Kershner JP, Novikov Y, Shoemaker RK, Copley SD 2010. Three serendipitous pathways in E. coli can bypass a block in pyridoxal-5′-phosphate synthesis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6:436
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.  Tani Y, Dempsey WB 1973. Glycolaldehyde is a precursor of pyridoxal phosphate in Escherichia coli B. J. Bacteriol. 116:341–45
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.  Keller MA, Turchyn AV, Ralser M 2014. Non-enzymatic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway-like reactions in a plausible Archean ocean. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10:725
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.  Keller MA, Zylstra A, Castro C, Turchyn AV, Griffin JL, Ralser M 2016. Conditional iron and pH-dependent activity of a non-enzymatic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway. Sci. Adv. 2:e1501235
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.  Messner CB, Driscoll PC, Piedrafita G, De Volder MFL, Ralser M 2017. Nonenzymatic gluconeogenesis-like formation of fructose 1,6-bisphosphate in ice. PNAS 114:7403–7
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.  Keller MA, Kampjut D, Harrison SA, Ralser M 2017. Sulfate radicals enable a non-enzymatic Krebs cycle precursor. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1:0083
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.  Laurino P, Tawfik DS 2017. Spontaneous emergence of S-adenosylmethionine and the evolution of methylation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56:343–45
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.  Heinrich R, Hoffmann E 1991. Kinetic parameters of enzymatic reactions in states of maximal activity; an evolutionary approach. J. Theor. Biol. 151:249–83
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.  Heinrich R, Klipp E 1996. Control analysis of unbranched enzymatic chains in states of maximal activity. J. Theor. Biol. 182:243–52
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.  Thomas S, Fell DA 1998. The role of multiple enzyme activation in metabolic flux control. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 38:65–85
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.  Newton MS, Arcus VL, Patrick WM 2015. Rapid bursts and slow declines: on the possible evolutionary trajectories of enzymes. J. R. Soc. Interface 12:20150036
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.  Birmingham WR, Starbird CA, Panosian TD, Nannemann DP, Iverson TM, Bachmann BO 2014. Bioretrosynthetic construction of a didanosine biosynthetic pathway. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10:392–99
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.  Braakman R, Smith E 2012. The emergence and early evolution of biological carbon-fixation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8:e1002455
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.  Firn RD, Jones CG 2000. The evolution of secondary metabolism—a unifying model. Mol. Microbiol. 37:989–94
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.  Benderoth M, Textor S, Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Gershenzon J, Kroymann J 2006. Positive selection driving diversification in plant secondary metabolism. PNAS 103:9118–23
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.  Park JW, Park SR, Nepal KK, Han AR, Ban YH et al. 2011. Discovery of parallel pathways of kanamycin biosynthesis allows antibiotic manipulation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 7:843–52
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.  Hamed RB, Gomez-Castellanos JR, Henry L, Ducho C, McDonough MA, Schofield CJ 2013. The enzymes of beta-lactam biosynthesis. Nat. Prod. Rep. 30:21–107
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.  Kawai S, Murata K 2008. Structure and function of NAD kinase and NADP phosphatase: key enzymes that regulate the intracellular balance of NAD(H) and NADP(H). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 72:919–30
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.  Zhu G, Golding GB, Dean AM 2005. The selective cause of an ancient adaptation. Science 307:1279–82
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.  Cahn JK, Werlang CA, Baumschlager A, Brinkmann-Chen S, Mayo SL, Arnold FH 2017. A general tool for engineering the NAD/NADP cofactor preference of oxidoreductases. ACS Synth. Biol. 6:326–33
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.  Cvetesic N, Palencia A, Halasz I, Cusack S, Gruic-Sovulj I 2014. The physiological target for LeuRS translational quality control is norvaline. EMBO J 33:1639–53
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.  Cvetesic N, Semanjski M, Soufi B, Krug K, Gruic-Sovulj I, Macek B 2016. Proteome-wide measurement of non-canonical bacterial mistranslation by quantitative mass spectrometry of protein modifications. Sci. Rep. 6:28631
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.  Buchan DW, Shepherd AJ, Lee D, Pearl FM, Rison SC et al. 2002. Gene3D: structural assignment for whole genes and genomes using the CATH domain structure database. Genome Res 12:503–14
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.  Gophna U, Bapteste E, Doolittle WF, Biran D, Ron EZ 2005. Evolutionary plasticity of methionine biosynthesis. Gene 355:48–57
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.  Martin WF, Weiss MC, Neukirchen S, Nelson-Sathi S, Sousa FL 2016. Physiology, phylogeny, and LUCA. Microb. Cell 3:582–87
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123.  Gumulya Y, Gillam EM 2017. Exploring the past and the future of protein evolution with ancestral sequence reconstruction: the ‘retro’ approach to protein engineering. Biochem. J. 474:1–19
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124.  Fischer WW, Hemp J, Valentine JS 2016. How did life survive Earth's great oxygenation?. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 31:166–78
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125.  Raymond J, Segre D 2006. The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science 311:1764–67
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126.  Weiss MC, Sousa FL, Mrnjavac N, Neukirchen S, Roettger M et al. 2016. The physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor. Nat. Microbiol. 1:16116
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127.  Alva V, Soding J, Lupas AN 2015. A vocabulary of ancient peptides at the origin of folded proteins. eLife 4:e09410
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128.  Goncearenco A, Berezovsky IN 2015. Protein function from its emergence to diversity in contemporary proteins. Phys. Biol. 12:045002
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129.  Li L, Francklyn C, Carter CW Jr 2013. Aminoacylating urzymes challenge the RNA world hypothesis. J. Biol. Chem. 288:26856–63
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130.  Sapienza PJ, Li L, Williams T, Lee AL, Carter CW Jr 2016. An ancestral tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase precursor achieves high catalytic rate enhancement without ordered ground-state tertiary structures. ACS Chem. Biol. 11:1661–68
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131.  Delepine B, Libis V, Carbonell P, Faulon JL 2016. SensiPath: computer-aided design of sensing-enabling metabolic pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W226–31
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132.  Bar-Even A. 2016. Formate assimilation: the metabolic architecture of natural and synthetic pathways. Biochemistry 55:3851–63
     [Google Scholar]
133. 133.  Szappanos B, Fritzemeier J, Csorgo B, Lazar V, Lu X et al. 2016. Adaptive evolution of complex innovations through stepwise metabolic niche expansion. Nat. Commun. 7:11607
     [Google Scholar]