Temporal Patterning in the Drosophila CNS

Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology

Vol. 33:219-240 (Volume publication date October 2017)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125210

Abstract

A small pool of neural progenitors generates the vast diversity of cell types in the CNS. Spatial patterning specifies progenitor identity, followed by temporal patterning within progenitor lineages to expand neural diversity. Recent work has shown that in Drosophila, all neural progenitors (neuroblasts) sequentially express temporal transcription factors (TTFs) that generate molecular and cellular diversity. Embryonic neuroblasts use a lineage-intrinsic cascade of five TTFs that switch nearly every neuroblast cell division; larval optic lobe neuroblasts also use a rapid cascade of five TTFs, but the factors are completely different. In contrast, larval central brain neuroblasts undergo a major molecular transition midway through larval life, and this transition is regulated by a lineage-extrinsic cue (ecdysone hormone signaling). Overall, every neuroblast lineage uses a TTF cascade to generate diversity, illustrating the widespread importance of temporal patterning.

Keywords

image
image
image
image

Figure 1  (a) Stage 10 embryo flat mounted and stained for Snail protein to identify brain, thorax, and abdominal neuroblasts (NBs). (b) Third-instar larval brain and thoracic CNS stained for Deadpan to identify the indicated pools of NBs. (c) Three modes of NB cell division. The largest cells are NBs. Abbreviations: GMC, ganglion mother cell; INP, intermediate neural progenitor; n, neurons [all sibling neurons are either NotchON (n*) or NotchOFF (n)].

image

Figure 2  Temporal patterning in embryonic neuroblasts. The horizontal lines represent gene expression over time (early to late from left to right); the dashed lines represent lower-level expression. The “Cell type” rows indicate the neuron(s) born from each ganglion mother cell (GMC). The “Markers” rows indicate the molecular markers that distinguish neurons within a lineage. Abbreviations: INs, interneurons of unknown identity; PCD, programmed cell death; s, sibling cell of unknown identity. Citations to expression data are given in the text.

image

Figure 3  Temporal patterning in larval neuroblasts (NBs). Where known, hours after larval hatching are shown at the top. The lines at the top of each panel represent gene expression over time (early to late from left to right). The identity of each line is color coded with the gene name above [for example, in the mushroom body (MB) NB panel, Imp is shown in dark green, whereas Chinmo is shown in light green]. In the indicated NB population, line gradients reflect approximate expression gradients. Downward arrows indicate that the NB temporal factor is required to specify a particular neuronal identity, lack of an arrow indicates a correlation only between NB factor expression and a specific neuronal identity, a T bar indicates an inhibitory relationship, and curved upward arrows in the anterodorsal (AD) NB panel indicate the cell fate transformations occurring in the absence of Kr or Chinmo. In the AD NB panel, E denotes embryo, and L denotes larva. The “Cell type” row indicates the neuron(s) born during each expression window. The “Markers” row indicates the molecular markers that distinguish neurons within a lineage. The “Progeny” row in the thoracic NB panel indicates temporal expression in NB progeny. Abbreviations: MNs, motor neurons; OPC, outer proliferation center; tOPC, tip OPC.

Figure Locations

...The AD NB generates 18 different projection neuronal subtypes during its embryonic lineage and an additional 22 neuronal subtypes during its larval lineage (Kao et al. 2012) (Figure 3). Kr mutant clones generated in the AD NB result in a highly specific loss of the eleventh fate—the VA7l neuron—whereas clones generated in the GMC precursor to this neuron show a transformation of the eleventh fate to the twelfth fate (VA7l to VA2) (Kao et al. 2012)....

...Each lab identified candidate TTFs with sequential but overlapping expression in NBs as they age from young to old (Li et al. 2013, Suzuki et al. 2013): Homothorax (Hth) → Klumpfuss (Klu) → Eyeless (Ey) → Sloppy paired 1 and 2 (Slp1 and Slp2) → Dichaete (D) → Tailless (Tll) (Figure 3)....

...using Dll instead of Hth as the first factor and dropping the Tll expression window (Bertet et al. 2014) (Figure 3)....

...subdividing the lineages into early and late components; a few more narrowly expressed factors create diversity within early and late neuronal populations (Figure 3)....

...and old NBs have low Imp and high Syp expression (Liu et al. 2015) (Figure 3)....

...and Abrupt is required to specify α′/β′ neuronal identity (Kucherenko & Shcherbata 2013) (Figure 3)....

...which generates 40 different projection neuron subtypes characterized by their unique innervation of antennal lobe glomeruli (Jefferis et al. 2001, Yu et al. 2010). chinmo mutant clones transform the thirteenth–fifteenth fates to the sixteenth fate (DM3 neuron) and transform the seventeenth–twenty-first fates to the twenty-second fate (D neuron) (Kao et al. 2012) (Figure 3)....

...These motor neurons have a stereotyped birth order between 22 and 66 h after larval hatching (ALH), probably falling into the Chinmo+ neuronal window (Figure 3)....

...and Svp in the early phase and Broad and E93 (Eip93: Flybase) during the late phase (Syed et al. 2017) (Figure 3)....

Choose Your Access Option
Save for later

Restore content access

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Existing Users

Are you already a subscriber or have purchased pay per view access in the last 7 days?

Access Through Your Library/Institution

For institutions and librarians: a site license allows your patrons to access Annual Reviews publications seamlessly. For further information, and to obtain pricing for your institution, visit the Librarian Resource Center.