1932

Abstract

The publication of Travis Hirschi's in 1969 was a watershed moment in criminology. There are many reasons for the work's lasting influence. Hirschi carefully examined the underlying assumptions of extant theories of crime in light of what was known about the individual-level correlates of offending. He then developed critical tests of hypotheses derived from social control theory and competing perspectives and empirically assessed them using original self-report delinquency data. Many of his key findings, such as the negative correlation between attachment to parents and delinquency, are now established facts that any explanation of crime must consider. is still cited hundreds of times per year, and it continues to spark new research and theoretical development in the field. Perhaps the most lasting legacy is the volume of criticism it has attracted and fended off, leading to its enduring contribution to the study of crime and delinquency.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041527
2020-01-13
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/criminol/3/1/annurev-criminol-011419-041527.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041527&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agnew R. 1985. Social control theory and delinquency: a longitudinal test. Criminology 23:147–61
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akers RL. 1994. Criminological Theories: Introduction and Evaluation Los Angeles: Roxbury
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Akers RL. 1996. Is differential association/social learning cultural deviance theory?. Criminology 34:2229–47
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Akers RL. 1998. Social Learning and Social Structure: A General Theory of Crime and Deviance Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Alarid LF, Burton VS, Cullen FT 2000. Gender and crime among felony offenders: assessing the generality of social control and differential association theories. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 37:2171–99
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes GM, Hoffman JH, Welte JW, Farrell MP, Dintcheff BA 2007. Adolescents’ time use: effects on substance use, delinquency and sexual activity. J. Youth Adolesc. 36:5697–710
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Briar S, Piliavin I. 1965. Delinquency, situational inducements, and commitment to conformity. Soc. Probl. 13:135–45
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Burkett SR, Jensen EL. 1975. Conventional ties, peer influence, and the fear of apprehension: a study of adolescent marijuana use. Sociol. Q. 16:4522–33
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Caplan A, LeBlanc M. 1985. A cross-cultural verification of a social control theory. Int. J. Comp. Appl. Crim. Justice 9:1123–38
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cloward RA, Ohlin LE. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Costello BJ. 1997. On the logical adequacy of cultural deviance theories. Theor. Criminol. 1:4403–28
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Costello BJ, Anderson BJ, Stein MD 2006. Heavy episodic drinking among adolescents: a test of hypotheses derived from control theory. J. Alcohol Drug Educ. 50:135–56
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Costello BJ, Hope TL. 2016. Peer Pressure, Peer Prevention: The Role of Friends in Crime and Conformity New York/London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Costello BJ, Vowell PR. 1999. Testing control theory and differential association: a reanalysis of the Richmond Youth Project data. Criminology 37:4815–42
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Costello BJ, Zozula C. 2018. Peer influence: mechanisms and motivations. Deviant Behav 39:194–110
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cottle TJ. 1970. Review of Causes of Delinquency.Harv.Educ. . Rev 40:4675–81
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Cullen FT. 2011. Beyond adolescence‐limited criminology: choosing our future—the American Society of Criminology 2010 Sutherland address. Criminology 49:2287–330
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Daly K, Chesney-Lind M. 1988. Feminism and criminology. Justice Q 5:4497–535
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Dooley BD. 2015. Ruth Rosner Kornhauser's 1963 manuscript: an introduction. Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 19: Challenging Criminological Theory: The Legacy of Ruth Rosner Kornhauser FT Cullen, P Wilcox, RJ Sampson, BD Dooley 45–57 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fagan J, Tyler TR. 2005. Legal socialization of children and adolescents. Soc. Justice Res. 18:3217–41
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ford TL. 2017. Life unfiltered: social control theory in the age of social media and substance abuse PhD Diss Sam Houston State Univ. Huntsville, TX:
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Friedman J, Rosenbaum DP. 1988. Social control theory: the salience of components by age, gender, and type of crime. J. Quant. Criminol. 4:4363–81
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gardner L, Shoemaker DJ. 1989. Social bonding and delinquency: a comparative analysis. Sociol. Q. 30:3481–99
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gibbons D. 1970. Review of Causes of Delinquency by Travis Hirschi. J. Crim. Law Criminol. Police Sci. 61:2235–36
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibson HB. 1970. Review of Causes of Delinquency. Sociol. Rev 18:3452–53
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Glueck S, Glueck E. 1950. Unraveling Juvenile Delinquency New York: Commonw. Fund
  27. Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. 1990. A General Theory of Crime Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  28. Heimer K. 1996. Gender, interaction, and delinquency: testing a theory of differential social control. Soc. Psychol. Q. 59:139–61
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hindelang MJ. 1973. Causes of delinquency: a partial replication and extension. Soc. Probl. 20:471–87
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hirschfield PJ, Gasper JJ. 2011. The relationship between school engagement and delinquency in late childhood and early adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 40:13–22
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hirschi T. 1969. Causes of Delinquency Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  32. Hirschi T. 1973. Procedural rules and the study of deviant behavior. Soc. Probl. 21:2159–73
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hirschi T. 1983. Crime and the family. Crime and Public Policy JQ Wilson 53–68 San Francisco: ICS Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hirschi T. 1996. Theory without ideas: reply to Akers. Criminology 34:2249
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hirschi T. 2002. 1969. Causes of Delinquency New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
  36. Hirschi T. 2015. Ruth and me. Advances in Criminological Theory Vol. 19: Challenging Criminological Theory: The Legacy of Ruth Rosner Kornhauser FT Cullen, P Wilcox, RJ Sampson, BD Dooley 87–102 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hirschi T, Selvin HC. 1967. Delinquency Research: An Appraisal of Analytic Methods New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hoeve M, Stams GJJM, van der Put CE, Dubas JS, van der Laan PH, Gerris JRM 2012. A meta-analysis of attachment to parents and delinquency. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 40:5771–85
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Jensen GJ, Eve R. 1976. Sex differences in delinquency. Criminology 13:4427–48
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Junger M, Marshall IH. 1997. The interethnic generalizability of social control theory: an empirical test. J. Res. Crime Delinquency 34:179–112
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Junger-Tas J. 1992. An empirical test of social control theory. J. Quant. Criminol. 8:19–28
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Kempf KL. 1993. The empirical status of Hirschi's control theory. Advances in Criminological Theory Vol. 4: New Directions in Criminological Theory F Adler, WS Laufer 143–85 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Kierkus CA, Baer D. 2002. Social control explanation of the relationship between family structure and delinquent behaviour. Can. J. Criminol. 44:4425–58
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Kirk DS, Papachristos AV. 2011. Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. Am. J. Sociol. 116:41190–233
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kornhauser RR. 1978. Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Methods Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Kornhauser RR. 2015. Theoretical issues in the study of juvenile delinquency. Advances in Criminological Theory Vol. 19: Challenging Criminological Theory: The Legacy of Ruth Rosner Kornhauser FT Cullen, P Wilcox, RJ Sampson, BD Dooley 59–86 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Krohn MD, Massey JL. 1980. Social control and delinquent behavior: an examination of the elements of the social bond. Sociol. Q. 21:4529–44
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Laub JH 2002. The Craft of Criminology: Selected Papers by Travis Hirschi New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Laub JH. 2004. The life course of criminology in the United States: the American Society of Criminology 2003 presidential address. Criminology 42:11–26
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 1988. Unraveling families and delinquency: a reanalysis of the Gluecks' data. Criminology 26:3355–80
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 1995. The long-term effect of punitive discipline. Coercion and Punishment in Long-Term Perspectives J McCord 247–58 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Laub JH, Sampson RJ. 2003. Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Lauritsen JL. 1994. Explaining race and gender differences in adolescent sexual behavior. Soc. Forces 72:3859–83
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Lemert E. 1970. Book review: the varieties of delinquent experience. Am. J. Sociol. 76:1188–91
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Liljeberg JF, Eklund JM, Fritz MV, af Klinteberg B 2011. Poor school bonding and delinquency over time: bidirectional effects and sex differences. J. Adolesc. 34:11–9
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M. 1986. Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. Crime and Justice M Tonry, N Morris 29–149 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Mack KY, Leiber MJ, Featherstone RA, Monserud MA 2007. Reassessing the family-delinquency association: Do family type, family processes, and economic factors make a difference?. J. Crim. Justice 35:151–67
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Marcos AC, Bahr SJ, Johnson RE 1986. Test of a bonding/association theory of adolescent drug use. Soc. Forces 65:1135–61
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Matsueda RL. 1982. Testing control theory and differential association: a causal modeling approach. Am. Sociol. Rev. 47:4489–504
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Matsueda RL. 1988. The current state of differential association theory. Crime Delinquency 34:3277–306
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Matza D. 1964. Delinquency and Drift New York: Wiley
  62. McGee ZT. 1992. Social class differences in parental and peer influence on adolescent drug use. Dev. Behav. 13:349–72
    [Google Scholar]
  63. McGloin JM, Thomas KJ. 2019. Peer influence and delinquency. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 2:241–64
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Merton RK. 1938. Social structure and anomie. Am. Sociol. Rev. 3:5672–82
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Messerschmidt JW. 1993. Masculinities and Crime: Critique and Reconceptualization of Theory Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Miller WB. 1958. Lower class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. J. Soc. Issues 14:5–19
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Nofziger S. 2019. A return to the girls in the Richmond Youth Survey. Advances in Criminological Theory Vol. 25: Fifty Years of Causes of Delinquency: The Criminology of Travis Hirschi JC Oleson, BJ Costello New York: Routledge In press
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Osgood DW, Anderson AL. 2004. Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology 42:3519–50
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Özbay Ö, Özcan YZ. 2006. Test of Hirschi's social bonding theory: juvenile delinquency in the high schools of Ankara, Turkey. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 50:6711–26
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Patterson GR, Dishion TJ. 1985. Contributions of families and peers to delinquency. Criminology 23:163–79
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Peguero AA, Popp AM, Latimore TL, Shekarkhar Z, Koo DJ 2011. Social control theory and school misbehavior: examining the role of race and ethnicity. Youth Violence Juv. Justice 9:3259–75
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Rankin JH, Kern R. 1994. Parental attachments and delinquency. Criminology 32:4495–515
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Rosenbaum JL. 1987. Social control, gender, and delinquency: an analysis of drug, property and violent offenders. Justice Q 4:1117–32
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Roshier B. 1988. Controlling Crime: The Classical Perspective in Criminology Milton Keynes, UK: Open Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Sampson RJ. 1999. Techniques of research neutralization. Theor. Criminol. 3:4438–51
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sampson RJ, Bartusch DJ. 1998. Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: the neighborhood context of racial differences. Law Soc. Rev. 32:4777–804
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Sampson RJ, Laub JH. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Sampson RJ, Laub JH. 1997. A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. Advances in Criminological Theory 7 Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency TP Thornberry 133–61 New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Staff J, Osgood DW, Schulenberg JE, Bachman JG, Messersmith EE 2010. Explaining the relationship between employment and juvenile delinquency. Criminology 48:41101–31
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Sutherland EH. 1934. Principles of Criminology Chicago: J.B. Lippincott Co, 2nd ed..
  81. Sutherland EH, Cressey DR, Luckenbill DF 1992. Principles of Criminology Lanham, MD: General Hall, 11th ed..
  82. Swidler A. 1986. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:2273–86
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Thompson WE, Mitchell J, Dodder RA 1984. An empirical test of Hirschi's control theory of delinquency. Deviant Behav 5:11–22
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Thornberry TP, Lizotte AJ, Krohn MD, Farnworth M, Jang SJ 1991. Testing interactional theory: an examination of reciprocal causal relationships among family, school, and delinquency. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 82:13–35
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Torstensson M. 1990. Female delinquents in a birth cohort: tests of some aspects of control theory. J. Quant. Criminol. 6:1101–15
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Travis J, Western B, Redburn S 2014. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Tyler TR, Fagan J, Geller A 2014. Street stops and police legitimacy: teachable moments in young urban men's legal socialization. J. Empir. Leg. Stud. 11:4751–85
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Uggen C, Wakefield S. 2008. What have we learned from longitudinal studies of work and crime?. The Long View of Crime: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research AM Liberman 191–219 New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Unnever JD, Cullen FT, Mathers SA, McClure TE, Allison MC 2009. Racial discrimination and Hirschi's criminological classic: a chapter in the sociology of knowledge. Justice Q 26:3377–409
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Van Glad AL. 2018. Social control, family structure, and juvenile delinquency in fragile families PhD Diss. SUNY, Albany, NY:
  91. Wadsworth T. 2000. Labor markets, delinquency and social control theory: an empirical assessment of the mediating process. Soc. Forces 78:31041–66
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Warr M. 2002. Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Welsh WN, Greene JR, Jenkins PH 1999. School disorder: the influence of individual, institutional, and community factors. Criminology 37:173–116
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Wiatrowski M, Anderson KL. 1987. Dimensionality of the social bond. J. Quant. Criminol. 3:165–81
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Wiatrowski MD, Griswold DB, Roberts MK 1981. Social control theory and delinquency. Am. Sociol. Rev. 46:5525–41
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Williams JH, Ayers CD, Abbott RD, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF 1999. Racial differences in risk factors for delinquency and substance use among adolescents. Soc. Work Res. 23:4241–56
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Wong SK. 2005. The effects of adolescent activities on delinquency: a differential involvement approach. J. Youth Adolesc. 34:4321–33
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041527
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error