Importance of Pollinator-Mediated Interspecific Pollen Transfer for Angiosperm Evolution

Literature Cited

1. Abbott R, Albach D, Ansell S, Arntzen JW, Baird SJE et al. 2013. Hybridization and speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 26:229–46
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alarcon R, Campbell DR. 2000. Absence of conspecific pollen advantage in the dynamics of an Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) hybrid zone. Am. J. Bot. 87:6819–24
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albrecht M, Ramis MR, Traveset A 2016. Pollinator-mediated impacts of alien invasive plants on the pollination of native plants: the role of spatial scale and distinct behaviour among pollinator guilds. Biol. Invasions 18:71801–12
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aldridge G, Campbell DR. 2006. Asymmetrical pollen success in Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) contact sites. Am. J. Bot. 93:903–9
   [Google Scholar]
5. Aldridge G, Campbell DR. 2007. Variation in pollinator preference between two Ipomopsis contact sites that differ in hybridization rate. Evolution 61:99–110
   [Google Scholar]
6. Amaya-Márquez M. 2009. Floral constancy in bees: a revision of theories and a comparison with other pollinators. Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 35:206–16
   [Google Scholar]
7. Anderson B, Alexandersson R, Johnson SD 2010. Evolution and coexistence of pollination ecotypes in an African Gladiolus (Iridaceae). Evolution 64:4960–72
   [Google Scholar]
8. Anderson B, Pauw A, Cole WW, Barrett SCH 2016. Pollination, mating and reproductive fitness in a plant population with bimodal floral-tube length. J. Evol. Biol. 29:1631–42
   [Google Scholar]
9. Andrew RL, Kane NC, Baute GJ, Grassa CJ, Rieseberg LH 2013. Recent nonhybrid origin of sunflower ecotypes in a novel habitat. Mol. Ecol. 22:799–813
   [Google Scholar]
10. Andrew RL, Ostevik KL, Ebert DP, Rieseberg LH 2012. Adaptation with gene flow across the landscape in a dune sunflower. Mol. Ecol. 21:2078–91
    [Google Scholar]
11. Arceo-Gómez G, Abdala-Roberts L, Jankowiak A, Kohler C, Meindl GA et al. 2016a. Patterns of among- and within-species variation in heterospecific pollen receipt: the importance of ecological generalization. Am. J. Bot. 103:3396–407
    [Google Scholar]
12. Arceo-Gómez G, Alonso C, Ashman TL, Parra-Tabla V 2018. Variation in sampling effort affects the observed richness of plant–plant interactions via heterospecific pollen transfer: implications for interpretation of pollen transfer networks. Am. J. Bot. 105:91601–8
    [Google Scholar]
13. Arceo-Gómez G, Ashman TL. 2011. Heterospecific pollen deposition: Does diversity alter the consequences. New Phytol 192:3738–46
    [Google Scholar]
14. Arceo-Gómez G, Ashman T-L. 2014. Coflowering community context influences female fitness and alters the adaptive value of flower longevity in Mimulus guttatus. Am. Nat 183:2E50–63
    [Google Scholar]
15. Arceo-Gómez G, Raguso RA, Geber MA 2016b. Can plants evolve tolerance mechanisms to heterospecific pollen effects? An experimental test of the adaptive potential in Clarkia species. Oikos 125:5718–25
    [Google Scholar]
16. Armbruster WS. 2014. Floral specialization and angiosperm diversity: phenotypic divergence, fitness trade-offs and realized pollination accuracy. AoB PLANTS 6:Sept.plu003
    [Google Scholar]
17. Armbruster WS, Edwards ME, Debevec EM 1994. Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75:2315–29
    [Google Scholar]
18. Armbruster WS, Hansen TF, Pélabon C, Pérez-Barrales R, Maad J 2009. The adaptive accuracy of flowers: measurement and microevolutionary patterns. Ann. Bot. 103:91529–45
    [Google Scholar]
19. Armbruster WS, Shi XQ, Huang S-Q 2014. Do specialized flowers promote reproductive isolation? Realized pollination accuracy of three sympatric Pedicularis species. Ann. Bot. 113:2331–40
    [Google Scholar]
20. Arnold ML, Cornman RS, Martin NH 2008. Hybridization, hybrid fitness and the evolution of adaptations. Plant Biosyst 142:1166–71
    [Google Scholar]
21. Arnold ML, Hamrick JL, Bennett BD 1993. Interspecific pollen competition and reproductive isolation in Iris. J. Hered 84:13–16
    [Google Scholar]
22. Arnold ML, Tang S, Knapp SJ, Martin NH 2010. Asymmetric introgressive hybridization among Louisiana iris species. Genes 1:9–22
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ashman TL, Arceo-Gómez G. 2013. Toward a predictive understanding of the fitness costs of heterospecific pollen receipt and its importance in co-flowering communities. Am. J. Bot. 100:61061–70
    [Google Scholar]
24. Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D 2015. The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytol 207:968–84
    [Google Scholar]
25. Barrett SCH, Harder LD. 2017. The ecology of mating and its evolutionary consequences in seed plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48:135–57
    [Google Scholar]
26. Bascompte J, Jordano P, Olesen JM 2006. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:April431–33
    [Google Scholar]
27. Beans CM. 2014. The case for character displacement in plants. Ecol. Evol. 4:6852–65
    [Google Scholar]
28. Bedinger PA, Broz AK, Tovar-Mendez A, McClure B 2017. Pollen-pistil interactions and their role in mate selection. Plant Physiol 173:179–90
    [Google Scholar]
29. Bell JM, Karron JD, Mitchell RJ 2005. Interspecific competition for pollination lowers seed production and outcrossing in Mimulus ringens. Am. J. Bot 86:3762–71
    [Google Scholar]
30. Borchsenius F, Lozada T, Knudsen JT 2016. Reproductive isolation of sympatric forms of the understorey palm Geonoma macrostachys in western Amazonia. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 182:2398–410
    [Google Scholar]
31. Brandvain Y, Haig D. 2005. Divergent mating systems and parental conflict as a barrier to hybridization in flowering plants. Am. Nat. 166:3330–38
    [Google Scholar]
32. Briggs HM, Anderson LM, Atalla LM, Delva AM, Dobbs EK, Brosi BJ 2015. Heterospecific pollen deposition in Delphinium barbeyi: linking stigmatic pollen loads to reproductive output in the field. Ann. Bot. 117:341–47
    [Google Scholar]
33. Briscoe Runquist RD. 2012. Pollinator-mediated competition between two congeners, Limnanthes douglasii subsp. rosea and L. alba (Limnanthaceae). Am. J. Bot. 99:71125–32
    [Google Scholar]
34. Briscoe Runquist RD, Chu E, Iverson JL, Kopp JC, Moeller DA 2014. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation between incipient outcrossing and selfing Clarkia species. Evolution 68:102885–900
    [Google Scholar]
35. Briscoe Runquist RD, Moeller DA 2014. Floral and mating system divergence in secondary sympatry: testing an alternative hypothesis to reinforcement in Clarkia. Ann. Bot. 113:2223–35
    [Google Scholar]
36. Brothers AN, Delph LF. 2017. Divergence in style length and pollen size leads to a postmating-prezygotic reproductive barrier among populations of Silene latifolia. Evolution 71:61532–40
    [Google Scholar]
37. Brown BJ, Mitchell RJ. 2001. Competition for pollination: effects of pollen of an invasive plant on seed set of a native congener. Oecologia 129:143–49
    [Google Scholar]
38. Bruckman D, Campbell DR. 2016. Timing of invasive pollen deposition influences pollen tube growth and seed set in a native plant. Biol. Invasions 18:61701–11
    [Google Scholar]
39. Brys R, van Cauwenberghe J, Jacquemyn H 2016. The importance of autonomous selfing in preventing hybridization in three closely related plant species. J. Ecol. 104:2601–10
    [Google Scholar]
40. Buerkle CA, Wolf DE, Rieseberg LH 2003. The origin and extinction of species through hybridization. Population Viability in Plants 165 CA Brigham, MW Schwartz 117–41 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
41. Burgess KS, Morgan M, Husband BC 2008. Interspecific seed discounting and the fertility cost of hybridization in an endangered species. New Phytol 177:1276–84
    [Google Scholar]
42. Burke JM, Carney SE, Arnold ML 1998. Hybrid fitness in the Louisiana irises: analysis of parental and F₁ performance. Evolution 52:37–43
    [Google Scholar]
43. Campbell DR. 1985. Pollen and gene dispersal: the influences of competition for pollination. Evolution 39:2418–31
    [Google Scholar]
44. Campbell DR, Motten AF. 1985. The mechanism of competition for pollination between two forest herbs. Ecology 66:2554–63
    [Google Scholar]
45. Campbell DR, Waser NM. 2007. Evolutionary dynamics of an Ipomopsis hybrid zone: confronting models with lifetime fitness data. Am. Nat. 169:3298–310
    [Google Scholar]
46. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Pederson GT 2002. Predicting patterns of mating and potential hybridization from pollinator behavior. Am Nat 159:5438–50
    [Google Scholar]
47. Campbell DR, Waser NM, Wolf PG 1998. Pollen transfer by natural hybrids and parental species in an Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Evolution 52:61602–11
    [Google Scholar]
48. Carney SE, Hodges SA, Arnold ML 1996. Effects of differential pollen-tube growth on hybridization in the Louisiana irises. Evol. Evol. 50:5051871–78
    [Google Scholar]
49. Caruso CM, Alfaro M. 2000. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: effect of Castilleja linariaefolia pollen on seed set of Ipomopsis aggregata. Can. J. Bot. 78:5600–6
    [Google Scholar]
50. Castellanos MC, Wilson P, Thomson JD 2003. Pollen transfer by hummingbirds and bumblebees, and the divergence of pollination modes in Penstemon. Evolution 57:122742
    [Google Scholar]
51. Cheptou PO. 2019. Does the evolution of self-fertilization rescue populations or increase the risk of extinction. Ann. Bot. 123:1mcy144
    [Google Scholar]
52. Chittka L, Thomson JD, Waser NM 1999. Flower constancy, insect psychology, and plant evolution. Naturwissenschaften 86:361–77
    [Google Scholar]
53. Christie K, Strauss SY. 2018. Along the speciation continuum: quantifying intrinsic and extrinsic isolating barriers across five million years of evolutionary divergence in California jewelflowers. Evolution 72:51063–79
    [Google Scholar]
54. Clay DL, Novak SJ, Serpe MD, Tank DC, Smith JF 2012. Homoploid hybrid speciation in a rare endemic Castilleja from Idaho (Castilleja christii, Orobanchaceae). Am. J. Bot. 99:121976–90
    [Google Scholar]
55. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
56. De Jager ML, Dreyer LL, Ellis AG 2011. Do pollinators influence the assembly of flower colours within plant communities. Oecologia 166:543–53
    [Google Scholar]
57. De Queiroz K. 2011. Branches in the lines of descent: Charles Darwin and the evolution of the species concept. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 103:Jan.19–35
    [Google Scholar]
58. Diaz A, Macnair MR. 1999. Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol 144:3471–78
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ducarme V, Vrancken J, Wesselingh RA 2010. Hybridization in annual plants: patterns and dynamics during a four-year study in mixed Rhinanthus populations. Folia Geobot 45:387–405
    [Google Scholar]
60. Eaton DAR, Fenster CB, Hereford J, Huang S, Ree RH 2012. Floral diversity and community structure in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae). Ecology 93:S182–93
    [Google Scholar]
61. Ellstrand NC. 2014. Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants. Am. J. Bot. 101:5737–53
    [Google Scholar]
62. Emms SK, Arnold ML. 2000. Site-to-site differences in pollinator visitation patterns in a Louisiana iris hybrid zone. Oikos 91:568–78
    [Google Scholar]
63. Fang Q, Huang S-Q. 2013. A directed network analysis of heterospecific pollen transfer in a biodiverse community. Ecology 94:51176–85
    [Google Scholar]
64. Feinsinger P, Tiebout HM III 1991. Competition among plants sharing hummingbird pollinators: laboratory experiments on a mechanism. Ecology 72:61946–52
    [Google Scholar]
65. Figueroa-Castro DM, Holtsford TP. 2009. Post-pollination mechanisms in Nicotiana longiflora and N. plumbaginifolia: pollen tube growth rate, offspring paternity and hybridization. Sex. Plant Reprod. 22:3187–96
    [Google Scholar]
66. Fishman L, Aagaard J, Tuthill JC 2008. Toward the evolutionary genomics of gametophytic divergence: patterns of transmission ratio distortion in monkeyflower (Mimulus) hybrids reveal a complex genetic basis for conspecific pollen precedence. Evolution 62:122958–70
    [Google Scholar]
67. Fishman L, Wyatt R. 1999. Pollinator-mediated competition, reproductive character displacement, and the evolution of selfing in Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae). Evolution 53:61723–33
    [Google Scholar]
68. Flanagan RJ, Mitchell RJ, Knutowski D, Karron JD 2009. Interspecific pollinator movements reduce pollen deposition and seed production in Mimulus ringens (Phrymaceae). Am. J. Bot. 96:4809–15
    [Google Scholar]
69. Galen C, Gregory T. 1989. Interspecific pollen transfer as a mechanism of competition: consequences of foreign pollen contamination for seed set in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oecologia 81:120–23
    [Google Scholar]
70. Gegear RJ, Laverty TM. 2005. Flower constancy in bumblebees: a test of the trait variability hypothesis. Anim. Behav. 69:939–49
    [Google Scholar]
71. Goodwillie C, Ness JM. 2013. Interactions of hybridization and mating systems: a case study in Leptosiphon (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 100:61002–13
    [Google Scholar]
72. Goulson D. 2000. Are insects flower constant because they use search images to find flowers. Oikos 88:547–52
    [Google Scholar]
73. Grant V. 1994. Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms. PNAS 91:13–10
    [Google Scholar]
74. Grossenbacher D, Briscoe Runquist RD, Goldberg EE, Brandvain Y 2016. No association between plant mating system and geographic range overlap. Am. J. Bot. 103:1110–17
    [Google Scholar]
75. Grossenbacher DL, Stanton ML. 2014. Pollinator-mediated competition influences selection for flower-color displacement in sympatric monkeyflowers. Am. J. Bot. 101:111915–24
    [Google Scholar]
76. Grossenbacher DL, Whittall JB. 2011. Increased floral divergence in sympatric monkeyflowers. Evolution 65:92712–18
    [Google Scholar]
77. Harder LD, Cruzan MB, Thomson JD 1993. Unilateral incompatibility and the effects of interspecific pollination for Erythronium americanum and Erythronium albidum (Liliaceae). Can. J. Bot. 71:2353–58
    [Google Scholar]
78. Hasegawa Y, Suyama Y, Seiwa K 2015. Variation in pollen-donor composition among pollinators in an entomophilous tree species, Castanea crenata, revealed by single-pollen genotyping. PLOS ONE 10:31–15
    [Google Scholar]
79. Heinrich B. 1975. Bee flowers: a hypothesis on flower variety and blooming times. Evolution 29:325–34
    [Google Scholar]
80. Hipperson H, Dunning LT, Baker WJ, Butlin RK, Hutton I et al. 2016. Ecological speciation in sympatric palms: 2. Pre- and post-zygotic isolation. J. Evol. Biol. 29:112143–56
    [Google Scholar]
81. Hopkins R. 2013. Reinforcement in plants. New Phytol 197:41095–1103
    [Google Scholar]
82. Hopkins R, Rausher MD. 2012. Pollinator-mediated selection on flower color allele drives reinforcement. Science 335:1090–92
    [Google Scholar]
83. Howard DJ. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109–32
    [Google Scholar]
84. Huang S-Q, Shi XQ. 2013. Floral isolation in Pedicularis: How do congeners with shared pollinators minimize reproductive interference. New Phytol 199:3858–65
    [Google Scholar]
85. Huang Z-H, Liu H-L, Huang S-Q 2015. Interspecific pollen transfer between two coflowering species was minimized by bumblebee fidelity and differential pollen placement on the bumblebee body. J. Plant Ecol. 8:2109–15
    [Google Scholar]
86. Ippolito A, Fernandes GW, Holtsford TP 2004. Pollinator preferences for Nicotiana alata, N. forgetiana, and their F₁ hybrids. Evolution 58:122634–44
    [Google Scholar]
87. Jakobsson A, Padrón B, Traveset A 2008. Pollen transfer from invasive Carpobrotus spp. to natives—a study of pollinator behaviour and reproduction success. Biol. Conserv. 141:1136–45
    [Google Scholar]
88. Johnson AL, Ashman T. 2019. Consequences of invasion for pollen transfer and pollination revealed in a tropical island ecosystem. New Phytol 221:142–54
    [Google Scholar]
89. Johnson SD, Raguso RA. 2016. The long-tongued hawkmoth pollinator niche for native and invasive plants in Africa. Ann. Bot. 117:125–36
    [Google Scholar]
90. Kalisz S, Randle A, Chaiffetz D, Faigeles M, Butera A, Beight C 2012. Dichogamy correlates with outcrossing rate and defines the selfing syndrome in the mixed-mating genus Collinsia. Ann. Bot 109:3571–82
    [Google Scholar]
91. Karrenberg S, Liu X, Hallander E, Favre A, Herforth-Rahmé J, Widmer A 2018. Ecological divergence plays an important role in strong but complex reproductive isolation in campions (Silene). Evolution 73:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
92. Karron JD, Ivey CT, Mitchell RJ, Whitehead MR, Peakall R, Case AL 2012. New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems. Ann. Bot. 109:3493–503
    [Google Scholar]
93. Kay KM. 2006. Reproductive isolation between two closely related hummingbird-pollinated neotropical gingers. Evolution 60:3538–52
    [Google Scholar]
94. Kay KM, Schemske DW. 2008. Natural selection reinforces speciation in a radiation of neotropical rainforest plants. Evolution 62:102628–42
    [Google Scholar]
95. Kay KM, Zepeda AM, Raguso RA 2019. Experimental sympatry reveals geographic variation in floral isolation by hawkmoths. Ann. Bot. 123:405–13
    [Google Scholar]
96. Kohn JR, Waser NM. 1985. The effect of Delphinium nelsonii pollen on seed set in Ipomopsis aggregata, a competitor for hummingbird pollination. Am. J. Bot. 72:1144–48
    [Google Scholar]
97. Kostyun JL, Moyle LC. 2017. Multiple strong postmating and intrinsic postzygotic reproductive barriers isolate florally diverse species of Jaltomata (Solanaceae). Evolution 71:61556–71
    [Google Scholar]
98. Laverty TM. 1994. Costs to foraging bumble bees of switching plant species. Can. J. Zool. 72:43–47
    [Google Scholar]
99. Lloyd DG. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:370–80
    [Google Scholar]
100. Lowry DB, Modliszewski JL, Wright KM, Wu CA, Willis JH 2008. The strength and genetic basis of reproductive isolating barriers in flowering plants. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363:15063009–21
     [Google Scholar]
101. Lyu N, Du W, Wang XF 2016. Unique growth paths of heterospecific pollen tubes result in late entry into ovules in the gynoecium of Sagittaria (Alismataceae). Plant Biol 19:2108–14
     [Google Scholar]
102. Mallet J, Besansky N, Hahn MW 2016. How reticulated are species. BioEssays 38:2140–49
     [Google Scholar]
103. Martin NH, Willis JH. 2007. Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61:168–82
     [Google Scholar]
104. Matallana G, Godinho MAS, Guilherme FAG, Belisario M, Coser TS, Wendt T 2010. Breeding systems of Bromeliaceae species: evolution of selfing in the context of sympatric occurrence. Plant Syst. Evol. 289:1–257–65
     [Google Scholar]
105. McLernon SM, Murphy SD, Aarssen LW 1996. Heterospecific pollen transfer between sympatric species in a midsuccessional old-field community. Am. J. Bot. 83:1168–74
     [Google Scholar]
106. Miller TJ, Raguso RA, Kay KM 2014. Novel adaptation to hawkmoth pollinators in Clarkia reduces efficiency, not attraction of diurnal visitors. Ann. Bot. 113:2317–29
     [Google Scholar]
107. Minder AM, Rothenbuehler C, Widmer A 2007. Genetic structure of hybrid zones between Silene latifolia and Silene dioica (Caryophyllaceae): evidence for introgressive hybridization. Mol. Ecol. 16:2504–16
     [Google Scholar]
108. Minnaar C, Anderson B. 2019. Using quantum dots as pollen labels to track the fates of individual pollen grains. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10:5604–14
     [Google Scholar]
109. Minnaar C, Anderson B, de Jager ML, Karron JD 2019. Plant–pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity. Ann. Bot. 123:1225–45
     [Google Scholar]
110. Mitchell RJ, Flanagan RJ, Brown BJ, Waser NM, Karron JD 2009. New frontiers in competition for pollination. Ann. Bot. 103:91403–13
     [Google Scholar]
111. Montgomery BR, Soper DM, Delph LF 2010. Asymmetrical conspecific seed-siring advantage between Silene latifolia and S. dioica. Ann. Bot. 105:4595–605
     [Google Scholar]
112. Morales CL, Traveset A. 2008. Interspecific pollen transfer: magnitude, prevalence and consequences for plant fitness. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27:4221–38
     [Google Scholar]
113. More M, Sersic AN, Cocucci AA 2007. Restriction of pollinator assemblage through flower length and width in three long-tongued hawkmoth-pollinated species of Mandevilla (Apocynaceae, Apocynoideae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 94:2485–504
     [Google Scholar]
114. Muchhala N. 2006. The pollination biology of Burmeistera (Campanulaceae): specialization and syndromes. Am. J. Bot. 93:1081–89
     [Google Scholar]
115. Muchhala N. 2007. Adaptive trade-off in floral morphology mediates specialization for flowers pollinated by bats and hummingbirds. Am. Nat. 169:4494–504
     [Google Scholar]
116. Muchhala N. 2008. Functional significance of interspecific variation in Burmeistera flower morphology: evidence from nectar bat captures in Ecuador. Biotropica 40:3332–37
     [Google Scholar]
117. Muchhala N, Brown Z, Armbruster WS, Potts MD 2010. Competition drives specialization in pollination systems through costs to male fitness. Am. Nat. 176:6732–43
     [Google Scholar]
118. Muchhala N, Caiza A, Vizuete JC, Thomson JD 2009. A generalized pollination system in the tropics: bats, birds and Aphelandra acanthus. Ann. Bot. 103:91481–87
     [Google Scholar]
119. Muchhala N, Jarrín-V P. 2002. Flower visitation by bats in cloud forests of Western Ecuador. Biotropica 34:3387–95
     [Google Scholar]
120. Muchhala N, Johnsen S, Smith SD 2014. Competition for hummingbird pollination shapes flower color variation in Andean Solanaceae. Evolution 68:82275–86
     [Google Scholar]
121. Muchhala N, Potts MD. 2007. Character displacement among bat-pollinated flowers of the genus Burmeistera: analysis of mechanism, process and pattern. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274:2731–37
     [Google Scholar]
122. Muchhala N, Thomson JD. 2012. Interspecific competition in pollination systems: costs to male fitness via pollen misplacement. Funct. Ecol. 26:2476–82
     [Google Scholar]
123. Muir G, Dixon CJ, Harper AL, Filatov DA 2012. Dynamics of drift, gene flow, and selection during speciation in Silene. Evolution 66:1447–58
     [Google Scholar]
124. Murcia C, Feinsinger P. 1996. Interspecific pollen loss by hummingbirds visiting flower mixtures: effects of floral architecture. Ecology 77:2550–60
     [Google Scholar]
125. Murphy SD, Aarssen LW. 1995. Allelopathic pollen extract from Phleum pratense L. (Poaceae) reduces germination, in vitro, of pollen of sympatric species. Int. J. Plant Sci. 156:425–34
     [Google Scholar]
126. Natalis LC, Wesselingh RA. 2012a. Shared pollinators and pollen transfer dynamics in two hybridizing species, Rhinanthus minor and R. angustifolius. Oecologia 170:3709–21
     [Google Scholar]
127. Natalis LC, Wesselingh RA. 2012b. Post-pollination barriers and their role in asymmetric hybridization in Rhinanthus (Orobanchaceae). Am. J. Bot. 99:111847–56
     [Google Scholar]
128. Natalis LC, Wesselingh RA. 2013. Parental frequencies and spatial configuration shape bumblebee behavior and floral isolation in hybridizing Rhinanthus. Evolution 67:1692–705
     [Google Scholar]
129. Ne'eman G, Jürgens A, Newstrom-Lloyd L, Potts SG, Dafni A 2010. A framework for comparing pollinator performance: effectiveness and efficiency. Biol. Rev. 85:3435–51
     [Google Scholar]
130. Newman E, Manning J, Anderson B 2015. Local adaptation: mechanical fit between floral ecotypes of Nerine humilis (Amaryllidaceae) and pollinator communities. Evolution 69:92262–75
     [Google Scholar]
131. Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S 2011. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals. Oikos 120:3321–26
     [Google Scholar]
132. Ortiz-Barrientos D, Grealy A, Nosil P 2009. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement: implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1168:156–82
     [Google Scholar]
133. Ostevik KL, Andrew RL, Otto SP, Rieseberg LH 2016. Multiple reproductive barriers separate recently diverged sunflower ecotypes. Evolution 70:2322–35
     [Google Scholar]
134. Oyama RK, Jones KN, Baum DA 2010. Sympatric sister species of Californian Antirrhinum and their transiently specialized pollinators. Am. Midl. Nat. 164:337–47
     [Google Scholar]
135. Palmer M, Travis J, Antonovics J 1989. Temporal mechanisms influencing gender expression and pollen flow within a self-incompatible perennial, Amianthium muscaetoxicum (Liliaceae). Oecologia 78:231–36
     [Google Scholar]
136. Paudel BR, Burd M, Shrestha M, Dyer AG, Li QJ 2018. Reproductive isolation in alpine gingers: how do coexisting Roscoea (R. purpurea and R. tumjensis) conserve species integrity. Evolution 72:91840–50
     [Google Scholar]
137. Payseur BA, Rieseberg LH. 2016. A genomic perspective on hybridization and speciation. Mol. Ecol. 25:112337–60
     [Google Scholar]
138. Pettengill JB, Moeller DA. 2012. Tempo and mode of mating system evolution between incipient Clarkia species. Evolution 66:1210–25
     [Google Scholar]
139. Ramsey J, Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:71520–34
     [Google Scholar]
140. Randall JL, Hilu KW. 1990. Interference through improper pollen transfer in mixed stands of Impatiens capensis and I. pallida (Balsaminaceae). Am. J. Bot. 77:939–44
     [Google Scholar]
141. Randle AM, Spigler RB, Kalisz S 2018. Shifts to earlier selfing in sympatry may reduce costs of pollinator sharing. Evolution 72:81587–99
     [Google Scholar]
142. Rathcke BJ. 1983. Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. Pollination Biology L Real 305–29 New York: Academic
     [Google Scholar]
143. Rausher MD. 2017. Selfing, local mate competition, and reinforcement. Am. Nat. 189:287–104
     [Google Scholar]
144. Renaut S, Rowe HC, Ungerer MC, Rieseberg LH 2014. Genomics of homoploid hybrid speciation: diversity and transcriptional activity of long terminal repeat retrotransposons in hybrid sunflowers. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 369:164820130345
     [Google Scholar]
145. Roda F, Mendes FK, Hahn MW, Hopkins R 2017. Genomic evidence of gene flow during reinforcement in Texas Phlox. Mol. Ecol. 26:2317–30
     [Google Scholar]
146. Rodríguez-Gironés MA, Santamaría L. 2007. Resource competition, character displacement, and the evolution of deep corolla tubes. Am. Nat. 170:455–64
     [Google Scholar]
147. Ruane LG, Donohue K. 2008. Pollen competition and environmental effects on hybridization dynamics between Phlox drummondii and Phlox cuspidata. Evol. Ecol. 22:229–41
     [Google Scholar]
148. Schiestl FP, Schlüter PM. 2009. Floral isolation, specialized pollination, and pollinator behavior in orchids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 54:425–46
     [Google Scholar]
149. Schmickl R, Marburger S, Bray S, Yant L, Henderson I 2017. Hybrids and horizontal transfer: introgression allows adaptive allele discovery. J. Exp. Bot. 68:205453–70
     [Google Scholar]
150. Schouppe D, Brys R, Vallejo-Marín M, Jacquemyn H 2017. Geographic variation in floral traits and the capacity of autonomous selfing across allopatric and sympatric populations of two closely related Centaurium species. Sci. Rep. 7:April46410
     [Google Scholar]
151. Scribailo R, Barrett S. 1994. Effects of prior self-pollination on outcrossed seed set in tristylous Pontederia sagittata (Pontederiaceae). Sex. Plant Reprod. 7:273–81
     [Google Scholar]
152. Shore JS, Barrett SC. 1984. The effect of pollination intensity and incompatible pollen on seed set in Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Can. J. Bot. 62:1298–303
     [Google Scholar]
153. Sicard A, Lenhard M. 2011. The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Ann. Bot. 107:91433–43
     [Google Scholar]
154. Smith RA, Rausher MD. 2008. Experimental evidence that selection favors character displacement in the ivyleaf morning glory. Am. Nat. 171:11–9
     [Google Scholar]
155. Sobel JM, Chen GF. 2014. Unification of methods for estimating the strength of reproductive isolation. Evolution 68:1511–22
     [Google Scholar]
156. Sobel JM, Streisfeld MA. 2014. Strong premating reproductive isolation drives incipient speciation in Mimulus aurantiacus. Evolution 69:447–61
     [Google Scholar]
157. Stankowski S, Streisfeld MA. 2015. Introgressive hybridization facilitates adaptive divergence in a recent radiation of monkeyflowers. Proc. R. Soc. B 282:181420151666
     [Google Scholar]
158. Surget-Groba Y, Kay KM. 2013. Restricted gene flow within and between rapidly diverging Neotropical plant species. Mol. Ecol. 22:194931–42
     [Google Scholar]
159. Takahashi Y, Takakura KI, Kawata M 2016. Spatial distribution of flower color induced by interspecific sexual interaction. PLOS ONE 11:10e0164381
     [Google Scholar]
160. Temeles EJ, Mazzotta AR, Williamson A 2017. Resource partitioning by color in a tropical hummingbird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71:129
     [Google Scholar]
161. Thomson JD, Andrews BJ, Plowright RC 1982. The effect of foreign pollen on ovule development in Diervilla lonicera (Caprifoliaceae). New Phytol 90:777–83
     [Google Scholar]
162. Thomson JD, Fung HF, Ogilvie JE 2018. Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity. Ann. Bot. 123:2303–10
     [Google Scholar]
163. Tiffin P, Olson MS, Moyle LC 2001. Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. B 268:1469861–67
     [Google Scholar]
164. Tscheulin T, Petanidou T, Potts SG, Settele J 2009. The impact of Solanum elaeagnifolium, an invasive plant in the Mediterranean, on the flower visitation and seed set of the native co-flowering species Glaucium flavum. Plant Ecol 205:177–85
     [Google Scholar]
165. Tur C, Sáez A, Traveset A, Aizen MA 2016. Evaluating the effects of pollinator-mediated interactions using pollen transfer networks: evidence of widespread facilitation in south Andean plant communities. Ecol. Lett. 19:5576–86
     [Google Scholar]
166. Vallejo-Marín M, Cooley AM, Lee MY, Folmer M, McKain MR, Puzey JR 2016. Strongly asymmetric hybridization barriers shape the origin of a new polyploid species and its hybrid ancestor. Am. J. Bot. 103:71272–88
     [Google Scholar]
167. Vallejo-Marín M, Hiscock SJ. 2016. Hybridization and hybrid speciation under global change. New Phytol 211:1170–87
     [Google Scholar]
168. Vallejo-Marín M, Walker C, Friston-Reilly P, Solís-Montero L, Igic B 2014. Recurrent modification of floral morphology in heterantherous Solanum reveals a parallel shift in reproductive strategy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 369:164920130256
     [Google Scholar]
169. Vrancken J, Brochmann C, Wesselingh RA 2012. A European phylogeography of Rhinanthus minor compared to Rhinanthus angustifolius: unexpected splits and signs of hybridization. Ecol. Evol. 2:1531–48
     [Google Scholar]
170. Wang J, Cruzan MB. 1998. Interspecific mating in the Piriqueta caroliniana (Turneraceae) complex: effects of pollen load size and composition. Am. J. Bot. 85:91172–79
     [Google Scholar]
171. Waser NM. 1978a. Interspecific pollen transfer and competition between co-occurring plant species. Oecologia 36:2223–36
     [Google Scholar]
172. Waser NM. 1978b. Competition for hummingbird pollination and sequential flowering in two Colorado wildflowers. Ecology 59:5934–44
     [Google Scholar]
173. Waser NM. 1983. Competition for pollination and floral character differences among sympatric plant species: a review of the evidence. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology CE Jones, RJ Little 277–93 New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
     [Google Scholar]
174. Waser NM. 1986. Flower constancy: definition, cause, and measurement. Am. Nat. 127:593–603
     [Google Scholar]
175. Waser NM, Fugate ML. 1986. Pollen precedence and stigma closure: a mechanism of competition for pollination between Delphiniium nelsonii and Ipomopss aggregata. Oecologia 70:573–77
     [Google Scholar]
176. Weber MG, Cacho NI, Phan MJQ, Disbrow C, Ramírez SR, Strauss SY 2018. The evolution of floral signals in relation to range overlap in a clade of California Jewelflowers (Streptanthus s.l.). Evolution 72:4798–807
     [Google Scholar]
177. Whitehead MR, Lanfear R, Mitchell RJ, Karron JD 2018. Plant mating systems often vary widely among populations. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6:April1–9
     [Google Scholar]
178. Whitney KD, Randell RA, Rieseberg LH 2010. Adaptive introgression of abiotic tolerance traits in the sunflower Helianthus annuus. New Phytol 187:1230–39
     [Google Scholar]
179. Whitton J, Sears CJ, Maddison WP 2017. Co-occurrence of related asexual, but not sexual, lineages suggests that reproductive interference limits coexistence. Proc. R. Soc. B 284:186820171579
     [Google Scholar]
180. Wilson P, Stine M. 1996. Floral constancy in bumble bees: handling efficiency or perceptual conditioning. Oecologia 106:493–99
     [Google Scholar]
181. Wolf PG, Campbell DR, Waser NM, Sipes SD, Toler TR, Archibald JK 2001. Tests of pre- and postpollination barriers to hybridization between sympatric species of Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88:2213–19
     [Google Scholar]
182. Wu CA, Campbell DR. 2005. Cytoplasmic and nuclear markers reveal contrasting patterns of spatial genetic structure in a natural Ipomopsis hybrid zone. Mol. Ecol. 14:781–92
     [Google Scholar]
183. Yang CF, Gituru RW, Guo YH 2007. Reproductive isolation of two sympatric louseworts, Pedicularis rhinanthoides and Pedicularis longiflora (Orobanchaceae): How does the same pollinator type avoid interspecific pollen transfer. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90:137–48
     [Google Scholar]
184. Zhang J-J, Montgomery BR, Huang S-Q 2016. Evidence for asymmetrical hybridization despite pre- and post-pollination reproductive barriers between two Silene species. AoB PLANTS 8:plw032
     [Google Scholar]