The Rise of International Regime Complexity

Literature Cited

1. Abbott KW, Genschel P, Snidal D, Zangl B 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
2. Adler E, Pouliot V 2011. International practices. Int. Theory 3:1–36
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aggarwal VK 1985. Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
4. Aggarwal VK 1998. Institutional Designs for a Complex World: Bargaining, Linkages and Nesting Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
5. Ahrne GR, Brunsson N, Kerwer D 2016. The paradox of organizing states: a meta-organization perspective on international organizations. J. Int. Organ. Stud. 7:1–26
   [Google Scholar]
6. Alter KJ 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
7. Alter KJ 2018. The contested authority and legitimacy of international law. Beyond Anarchy: Rule and Authority in the International System C Daase, N Dietelhoff, A Witts. Manuscript forthcoming. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3204382
   [Google Scholar]
8. Alter KJ, Helfer L, Madsen MR 2018. International Court Authority Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
9. Alter KJ, Meunier S 2006. Banana splits: nested and competing regimes in the transatlantic banana trade dispute. J. Eur. Public Policy 13:362–82
   [Google Scholar]
10. Alter KJ, Meunier S 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspect. Politics 7:13–24
    [Google Scholar]
11. Arenas-García N 2012. 21st century regionalism in South America: UNASUR and the search for development alternatives. eSharp 18:64–85
    [Google Scholar]
12. Auld G, Green JF 2012. Unbundling the Regime Complex: The Effects of Private Authority Presented at Osgoode Hall Law School Research Paper Series, York University Tor., Can.:
13. Benvenisti E, Downs GW 2007. The empire's new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Rev 60:595–631
    [Google Scholar]
14. Benvenisti E, Harel A 2017. Embracing the tension between national and international human rights law: the case for discordant parity. Int. J. Const. Law 15:36–59
    [Google Scholar]
15. Berman A 2017. Industry, regulatory capture and transnational standard setting. AJIL Unbound 111:112–18
    [Google Scholar]
16. Betts A 2013. Regime complexity and international organizations: UNHCR as a challenged institution. Global Gov 19:69–81
    [Google Scholar]
17. Busch ML 2007. Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. Int. Organ. 61:735–61
    [Google Scholar]
18. Buzan B 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
19. De Búrca G 2010. The European court and the international legal order after Kadi. Harvard Int. Law J. 51:1–49
    [Google Scholar]
20. De Búrca G, Keohane RO, Sabel C 2013. New modes of pluralist global governance. N.Y. Univ. J. Int. Law Politics 45:723–86
    [Google Scholar]
21. De Búrca G, Keohane RO, Sabel C 2014. Global experimentalist governance. Br. J. Political Sci. 44:477–86
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dezalay Y, Garth BG 2011. Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization Abingdon, UK: Routledge
23. Drezner DW 2013. The tragedy of global institutional commons. Back to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary World M Finnemore, J Goldstein 280–310 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
24. Gehring T, Faude B 2013. The dynamics of regime complexes: microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Gov 19:119–30
    [Google Scholar]
25. Goodale M, Merry SE 2007. The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
26. Hakimi M 2017. Constructing an international community. Am. J. Int. Law 111:317–56
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hale T 2013. Gridlock: Why Global Cooperation Is Failing When We Need It Most Cambridge, UK: Polity
28. Halliday TC, Shaffer G 2015. Transnational Legal Orders Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
29. Hathaway O, Shapiro SJ 2017. The Internationalists New York: Simon & Shuster
30. Held D 2003. Cosmopolitanism globalisation tamed. Rev. Int. Stud. 29:465–80
    [Google Scholar]
31. Helfer LR 1999. Forum shopping for human rights. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 148:285–399
    [Google Scholar]
32. Helfer LR 2004. Regime shifting: the TRIPS agreement and the new dynamics of international intellectual property making. Yale J. Int. Law 29:1–81
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hofmann SC 2011. Why institutional overlap matters: CSDP in the European security architecture. J. Common Mark. Stud. 49:101–20
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hsu S 2017. How China's Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank fared its first year. Forbes Jan. 14. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahsu/2017/01/14/how-chinas-asian-infrastructure-investment-bank-fared-its-first-year/
35. Huneeus A, Couso JA, Sieder R 2011. Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
36. Huneeus A, Madsen MR 2018. Between universalism and regional law and politics: a comparative history of the American, European and African human rights systems. Int. J. Const. Law. 16:136–60
    [Google Scholar]
37. Ikenberry GJ, Lim DJ 2017. China's Emerging Institutional Statecraft: The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and Prospects for Counter-Hegemony Proj. Int. Order Strategy Washington, DC: Brookings Inst https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/chinas-emerging-institutional-statecraft.pdf
38. Jervis R 1997. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
39. Johnson T 2014. Organizational Progeny: Why Governments Are Losing Control over the Proliferating Structures of Global Governance New York: Oxford Univ. Press
40. Jupille J, Mattli W, Snidal D 2013. Institutional Choice and Global Commerce Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
41. Keohane R 1983. The demand for international regimes. International Regimes S Krasner 141–72 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Keohane RO, Nye JS 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition Boston: Little, Brown
43. Keohane RO, Nye JS 1987. Power and Interdependence revisited. Int. Organ. 41:725–53
    [Google Scholar]
44. Keohane RO, Victor DG 2011. The regime complex for climate change. Perspect. Politics 9:7–23
    [Google Scholar]
45. Koremenos B 2016. The Continent of International Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
46. Koremenos B, Lipson C, Snidal D 2001. The rational design of international institutions. Int. Organ. 55:761–99
    [Google Scholar]
47. Krasner S 1983. International Regimes Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
48. Kuyper JW 2014. Global democratization and international regime complexity. Eur. J. Int. Relat. 20:620–46
    [Google Scholar]
49. Lake DA 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
50. Lesage D, Van de Graaf T 2013. Thriving in complexity? The OECD system's role in energy and taxation. Global Gov 19:83–92
    [Google Scholar]
51. Madsen MR 2011. Reflexivity and the construction of the international object: the case of human rights. Int. Political Sociol. 5:259–75
    [Google Scholar]
52. Mallard G 2014. Crafting the nuclear regime complex (1950–1975): dynamics of harmonization of opaque treaty rules. Eur. J. Int. Law 25:445–72
    [Google Scholar]
53. Margulis ME 2013. The regime complex for food security: implications for the global hunger challenge. Global Gov 19:53–68
    [Google Scholar]
54. Mondré A 2015. Forum Shopping in International Disputes Basingstoke, UK/New York: Palgrave Macmillan
55. Morin J-F, Louafi S, Orsini A, Oubenal M 2016. Boundary organizations in regime complexes: a social network profile of IPBES. J. Int. Relat. Dev. 20:543–77
    [Google Scholar]
56. Morin J-F, Orsini A 2014. Policy coherency and regime complexes: the case of genetic resources. Rev. Int. Stud. 40:303–24
    [Google Scholar]
57. Morse J, Keohane R 2014. Contested multilateralism. Rev. Int. Organ. 9:385–412
    [Google Scholar]
58. Murphy H, Kellow A 2013. Forum shopping in global governance: understanding states, business and NGOs in multiple arenas. Global Policy 4:139–49
    [Google Scholar]
59. Orsini A 2013. Multi-forum non-state actors: navigating the regime complexes for forestry and genetic resources. Global Environ. Politics 13:34–55
    [Google Scholar]
60. Orsini A, Morin J-F, Young O 2013. Regime complexes: A buzz, a boom, or a boost for global governance. Global Gov 19:27–39
    [Google Scholar]
61. Oye K 1986. Cooperation under Anarchy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
62. Paravantis JA 2016. From game theory to complexity, emergence and agent-based modeling in world politics. Stud. Comput. Intell. 627:39–85
    [Google Scholar]
63. Pauwelyn J, Salles LE 2009. Forum shopping before international tribunals: (real) concerns, (im)possible solutions. Cornell Int. Law J. 42:77–117
    [Google Scholar]
64. Peters A 2017. The refinement of international law: from fragmentation to regime interaction and politicization. Int. J. Const. Law 15:671–704
    [Google Scholar]
65. Pogge TW 1992. Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty. Ethics 103:48–75
    [Google Scholar]
66. Pollack MA, Shaffer GC 2009. When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods New York: Oxford Univ. Press
67. Rachman G 2009. Kissinger never wanted to dial Europe. Financial Times July 22. https://www.ft.com/content/c4c1e0cd-f34a-3b49-985f-e708b247eb55
68. Raustiala K 2000. Compliance and effectiveness in international regulatory cooperation. Case West. Reserve J. Int. Law 32:387–440
    [Google Scholar]
69. Raustiala K 2002. The architecture for international cooperation: transgovernmental networks and the future of international law. Va. J. Int. Law 43:1–92
    [Google Scholar]
70. Raustiala K 2013. Institutional proliferation and the international legal order. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations J Dunoff, M Pollack 293–320 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
71. Raustiala K 2016. Governing the Internet. Am. J. Int. Law 110:491–503
    [Google Scholar]
72. Raustiala K, Victor D 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. Int. Organ. 58:277–309
    [Google Scholar]
73. Rosendal GK 2001. Impacts of overlapping international regimes: the case of biodiversity. Global Gov 7:95–117
    [Google Scholar]
74. Sanahuja JA 2012. Post-liberal regionalism in South America: the case of UNASUR Work. Pap., Eur. Univ. Inst. Fiesole, Italy:
75. Sirleaf M 2017. The African justice cascade and the Malabo Protocol. Int. J. Transit. Justice 11:71–91
    [Google Scholar]
76. Slaughter A-M 2004. A New World Order Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
77. Slaughter A-M 2017. The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
78. Stoddard E 2012. Capturing contestation in Caspian energy: regime complexity and Eurasian energy governance. Political Perspect 6:3–25
    [Google Scholar]
79. Tallberg J, Sommerer T, Squatrito T, Jönsson C 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
80. Tsepkalo VV 1998. The remaking of Eurasia (stabilizing Eurasia in the wake of the Former Soviet Union's collapse). Foreign Aff 77:107–26
    [Google Scholar]
81. Urpelainen J, Graaf TVD 2015. Your place or mine? Institutional capture and the creation of overlapping international institutions. Br. J. Political Sci. 45:799–827
    [Google Scholar]
82. Young O 1996. Institutional linkages in international society: polar perspectives. Global Gov 2:1–24
    [Google Scholar]
83. Zürn M, Binder M, Ecker-Erhard M 2012. International authority and its politicization. Int. Theory 4:69–106
    [Google Scholar]
84. Zürn M, Faude B 2013. On fragmentation, differentiation, and coordination. Global Environ. Politics 13:119–30
    [Google Scholar]