The Criminal Law and Law Enforcement Implications of Big Data

Literature Cited

1. Ajunwa I, Crawford K, Schultz J 2017. Limitless worker surveillance. Calif. Law Rev. 105:3735–76
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barocas S, Rosenblat A, boyd d, Gangadharan SP, Yu C 2014. Data & civil rights: technology primer Presented at Data & Civil Rights: Why “Big Data” Is a Civil Rights Issue Washington, DC: Oct. 30. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2536579
3. Barocas S, Selbst A 2016. Big data's disparate impact. Calif. Law Rev. 104:671–732
   [Google Scholar]
4. Becker H 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance New York: Free Press
5. Beckett K, Nyrop K, Pfingst L, Bowen M 2005. Drug use, drug possession arrests, and the question of race: lessons from Seattle. Soc. Probl. 52:3419–41
   [Google Scholar]
6. Braga AA 2003. Serious youth gun offenders and the epidemic of youth violence in Boston. J. Quant. Criminol. 19:133–54
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braga AA, Flynn EA, Kelling GL, Cole CM 2011. Moving the Work of Criminal Investigators Towards Crime Control Washington, DC: Natl. Inst. Justice
8. Braga AA, Kennedy DM, Piehl AM, Waring EJ 2001. Reducing Gun Violence: The Boston Gun Project's Operation Ceasefire Washington, DC: Natl. Inst. Justice
9. Braga AA, Weisburd DL 2010. Policing Problem Places: Crime Hotspots and Effective Prevention New York: Oxford Univ. Press
10. Brantingham PJ, Brantingham PL 1981. Environmental Criminology New York: Sage
11. Brantingham PJ, Tita GE, Short MB, Reid SE 2012. The ecology of gang territorial boundaries. Criminology 50:3851–85
    [Google Scholar]
12. Brayne S 2014. Surveillance and system avoidance: criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:3367–91
    [Google Scholar]
13. Brayne S 2017. Big data surveillance: the case of policing. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:5977–1008
    [Google Scholar]
14. Brayne S, Rosenblat A, boyd d 2015. Predictive policing Presented at Data & Civil Rights: A New Era of Policing and Justice Washington, DC: Oct. 27. http://www.datacivilrights.org/pubs/2015-1027/Predictive_Policing.pdf
15. Christin A 2018. Counting clicks: quantification and variation in web journalism in the United States and France. Am. J. Sociol. 123:51382–415
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cohen J, Tita G 1999. Diffusion in homicide: exploring a general method for detecting spatial diffusion processes. J. Quant. Criminol. 15:4451–93
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cook PJ, Laub JH 2002. After the epidemic: recent trends in youth violence in the United States. Crime Justice 29:1–37
    [Google Scholar]
18. Daston L, Galison P 2007. Objectivity New York: Zone Books
19. Desmond M, Papachristos AV, Kirk DS 2016. Police violence and citizen crime reporting in the black community. Am. Sociol. Rev. 81:5857–76
    [Google Scholar]
20. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:2147–60
    [Google Scholar]
21. Exec. Off. Pres. 2014. Big data: seizing opportunities, preserving values Rep., White House Washington, DC: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_2014.pdf
22. Ferguson AG 2015. Big data and predictive reasonable suspicion. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 63:2327–410
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ferguson AG 2017. The Rise of Big Data Policing New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
24. Floyd et al. v. City of New York et al., 959 F. Supp. 2d 540 2013.
25. Fourcade M, Healy K 2017. Seeing like a market. Socioecon. Rev. 15:19–29
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gillespie T 2014. The relevance of algorithms. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society T Gillespie, P Boczkowski, K Foot 167–94 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
27. Goel S, Rao JM, Shroff R 2016. Precinct or prejudice? Understanding racial disparities in New York City's stop-and-frisk policy. Ann. Appl. Stat. 10:1365–94
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haggerty KD, Ericson RV 2006. The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility Toronto: Univ. Toronto Press
29. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K 2010. Drawing blood from stones: legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. Am. J. Sociol. 115:61753–99
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hetey RC, Monin B, Maitreyi A, Eberhardt JL 2016. Data for Change: A Statistical Analysis of Police Stops, Searches, Handcuffings, and Arrests in Oakland, Calif., 2013–2014 Stanford, CA: SPARQ Stanford
31. Innes M 2001. Control creep. Sociol. Res. Online 6:1–10
    [Google Scholar]
32. Int. Assoc. Chiefs Police. 2015. 2015 Social Media Survey Results Alexandria, VA: Int. Assoc. Chiefs Police http://www.iacpsocialmedia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/FULL-2015-Social-Media-Survey-Results.compressed.pdf
33. Joh E 2014. Policing by numbers: big data and the Fourth Amendment. Wash. Law Rev. 89:35–68
    [Google Scholar]
34. Joh E 2016. The new surveillance discretion: automated suspicion, big data, and policing. Harvard Law Policy Rev 10:115–42
    [Google Scholar]
35. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L 2008. The spreading of disorder. Science 322:1681–85
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kennedy DM 1997. Pulling levers: chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valpso. Univ. Law Rev. 31:449–84
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kennedy DM, Braga AA, Piehl AM 1997. The (un)known universe: mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston. Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention D Weisburd, T McEwan 219–62 New York: Crim. Justice
    [Google Scholar]
38. Kennedy LW, Caplan JM, Piza E 2011. Risk clusters, hot spots, and spatial intelligence: risk terrain modeling as an algorithm for police resource allocation strategies. J. Quant. Criminol. 27:3339–62
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kerr O 2011. An equilibrium-adjustment theory of the Fourth Amendment. Harvard Law Rev 125:476–543
    [Google Scholar]
40. Kohler-Hausmann I 2013. Misdemeanor justice: control without conviction. Am. J. Sociol. 119:2351–93
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kohler-Hausmann I 2018. Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
42. Krent H 1995. Of diaries and data banks: use restrictions under the Fourth Amendment. Tex. Law Rev. 74:49–100
    [Google Scholar]
43. Lane J 2015. The digital street: an ethnographic study of networked street life in Harlem. Am. Behav. Sci. 60:43–58
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lane J, Ramirez F 2016. Beyond admissibility: the prosecutorial affordances of social media use Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention Fukuoka, Japan: June 9–13
45. Laney D 2001. 3D data management: controlling data volume, velocity, and variety. Application Delivery Strategies Blog Feb. 6. https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf
46. Langton L, Berzofsky M, Krebs C, Smiley-McDonald H 2012. Victimizations Not Reported to the Police, 2006–2010 Washington, DC: Bur. Justice Stat.
47. Lazer D, Radford J 2017. Data ex machina: introduction to big data. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 34:19–39
    [Google Scholar]
48. Manza J, Uggen C 2006. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
49. Matsueda RL, Kreager DA, Huizinga D 2006. Deterring delinquents: a rational choice model of theft and violence. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71:195–122
    [Google Scholar]
50. Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
51. Meyer JW, Rowan B 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83:2340–63
    [Google Scholar]
52. Mohler GO, Short MB, Malinowski S, Johnson M, Tita GE et al. 2015. Randomized controlled field trials of predictive policing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 110:5121399–411
    [Google Scholar]
53. Murphy E 2013. The politics of privacy in the criminal justice system: information disclosure, the Fourth Amendment, and statutory law enforcement exemptions. Mich. Law Rev. 111:485–546
    [Google Scholar]
54. Pager D 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
55. Papachristos AV 2009. Murder by structure: dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. Am. J. Sociol. 115:74–128
    [Google Scholar]
56. Papachristos AV, Kirk DS 2015. Changing the street dynamic: evaluating Chicago's group violence reduction strategy. Criminol. Public Policy 14:3525–58
    [Google Scholar]
57. Papachristos AV, Wildeman C, Roberto E 2015. Tragic, but not random: the social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries. Soc. Sci. Med. 125:139–50
    [Google Scholar]
58. Pasquale F 2015. Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
59. Patton DU, Brunton DW, Dixon A, Miller RJ, Leonard P, Hackman R 2017. Stop and frisk online: theorizing everyday racism in digital policing in the use of social media for identification of criminal conduct and associations. Soc. Media Soc. 3:1–10
    [Google Scholar]
60. Police Exec. Res. Forum. 2014. Future Trends in Policing Washington, DC: Police Exec. Res. Forum
61. Ratcliffe JH 2008. Intelligence-Led Policing Cullompton, UK: Willan
62. Ratcliffe JH, Taniguchi T, Groff ER, Wood JD 2011. The Philadelphia foot patrol experiment: a randomized controlled trial of police patrol effectiveness in violent crime hotspots. Criminology 49:795–831
    [Google Scholar]
63. Renan D 2016. The Fourth Amendment as administrative governance. Stanford Law Rev 68:1039–129
    [Google Scholar]
64. Ridgeway G 2018. Policing in the era of big data. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:401–19
    [Google Scholar]
65. Riley v. California 573 US ___ 2014.
66. Rios V 2011. Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
67. Robinson DJ 2018. The challenges of prediction: lessons from criminal justice. I/S J. Law Policy Inf. Soc. In press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3054115
68. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:5328918–24
    [Google Scholar]
69. Saunders J, Hunt P, Hollywood JS 2016. Predictions put into practice: a quasi-experimental evaluation of Chicago's predictive policing pilot. J. Exp. Criminol. 12:347–71
    [Google Scholar]
70. Scott R 2004. Reflections on a half-century of organizational sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 30:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
71. Sherman L 2013. The rise of evidence-based policing: targeting, testing, and tracking. Crime Justice 42:377–451
    [Google Scholar]
72. Sherman LW, Gartin PR, Buerger ME 1989. Hot spots of perdatory crime: routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology 27:27–56
    [Google Scholar]
73. Sierra-Arévalo M, Papachristos AV 2017. Social networks and gang violence reduction. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 13:373–93
    [Google Scholar]
74. Slobogin C 2016. Policing as administration. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 165:91–152
    [Google Scholar]
75. Smith v. Maryland 442 U.S. 735 1979.
76. Smith M, Austin RL Jr. 2015. Launching the police data initiative. White House Blog May 18. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/05/18/launching-police-data-initiative
77. Thrasher FM 2013 (1927). The Gang: A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
78. Trottier D 2012. Policing social media. Social Media as Surveillance: Rethinking Visibility in a Converging World D Trottier 135–54 Abingdon, UK: Ashgate
    [Google Scholar]
79. Uchida CD, Swatt ML 2013. Operation LASER and the effectiveness of hotspot patrol: a panel analysis. Police Q 16:3287–304
    [Google Scholar]
80. United States v. Jones 132 S. Ct. 945, 565 U.S. __ 2012.
81. United States v. Miller 307 U.S. 174 1939.
82. US Dep. Justice. 2015 (2001). L.A. Consent Decree. Washington, DC: US Dep. Justice
83. US Dep. Justice Civil Rights Div. 2015. Investigation of the Ferguson Police Department https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/opa/press-releases/attachments/2015/03/04/ferguson_police_department_report.pdf
84. Wasserman S, Faust K 1994. Social Network Analysis Methods and Applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
85. Waxman M 2009. Police and national security: American local law enforcement and counter-terrorism after 9/11. J. Natl. Secur. Law Policy 3:377–407
    [Google Scholar]
86. Weisburd D, Mastrofski SD, McNally AM, Greenspan R, Willis JJ 2003. Reforming to preserve: COMPSTAT and strategic problem-solving in American policing. Criminol. Public Policy 2:421–56
    [Google Scholar]
87. Western B 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell: Sage Found.
88. Western B, Pettit B 2005. Black-white wage inequality, employment rates, and incarceration. Am. J. Sociol. 111:2553–78
    [Google Scholar]
89. Whyte WF 1969 (1943). Street Corner Society Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
90. Willis J, Mastrofski SD, Weisburd D 2007. Making sense of COMPSTAT: a theory-based analysis of organizational change in three police departments. Law Soc. Rev. 41:1147–88
    [Google Scholar]