1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 14, 2018
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 14, 2018

Conditions of Confinement in American Prisons and Jails

Abstract

Research on the consequences of incarceration for inmates and ex-inmates, their families, and their communities has proliferated in just the last 20 years. Yet little of this research has documented variation across facilities in conditions of confinement or how these variations in conditions of confinement shape the consequences of incarceration for inmates and ex-inmates, their families, and their communities. Also, the conditions of confinement that have to this point been considered represent a very incomplete portrait of the range of conditions of confinement inmates could face. In this review, we fill this gap in four ways. First, we provide a partial overview of possible variations in conditions of confinement. Second, we use data from multiple years of the and the to provide an assessment of how much conditions of confinement vary across American jails, state prisons, and federal prisons, with an emphasis on variation within as well as between facility types. Third, we briefly review research on conditions of confinement in the United States and, as appropriate, other developed democracies. Finally, we conclude by providing a road map for future research to further enliven this research area.

Keyword(s): facility conditions, jail, mass incarceration, prison
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025
2018-10-13
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/14/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arrigo BA, Bullock JL 2008. The psychological effects of solitary confinement on prisoners in supermax units. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 52:6622–40
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bales WD, Mears D 2008. Inmate social ties and the transition to society: Does visitation reduce recidivism. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 45:3287–321
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Batiuk ME, Lahm KF, Mckeever M, Wilcox N, Wilcox P 2005. Disentangling the effects of correctional education: Are current policies misguided? An event history analysis. Criminol. Crim. Justice 5:155–74
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA, Heagerty PJ, Cheadle A et al. 2007. Release from prison: a high risk of death for former inmates. New Engl. J. Med. 356:2157–65
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bonczar TP 2003. Prevalence of imprisonment in the U.S. population, 1974–2001 Spec. Rep., US Bur. Justice Stat., Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  6. Braman D 2004. Doing Time on the Outside: Incarceration and Family Life in Urban America Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  7. Brewster DR, Sharp SF 2002. Educational programs and recidivism in Oklahoma: another look. Prison J 82:3314–34
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bur. Justice Stat. 1993. Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities, 1991 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06068.v1
    [Crossref]
  9. Bur. Justice Stat. 2006.a Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 1996 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06858.v1
    [Crossref]
  10. Bur. Justice Stat. 2006.b Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 1997 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR02598.v1
    [Crossref]
  11. Bur. Justice Stat. 2012. Survey of Inmates in Local Jails, 2002 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04359.v2
    [Crossref]
  12. Bur. Justice Stat. 2016. Survey of Inmates in State and Federal Correctional Facilities, 2004 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04572.v2
    [Crossref]
  13. Bur. Prisons. 2006. Survey of Inmates of Federal Correctional Facilities, 1991 Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-Univ. Consort. Political Soc. Res https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06037.v1
    [Crossref]
  14. Camp SD 1999. Do inmate survey data reflect prison conditions? Using surveys to assess prison conditions of confinement. Prison J 79:2250–68
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Camp SD, Gaes GG 2005. Criminogenic effects of the prison environment on inmate behavior: some experimental evidence. Crime Delinq 51:3425–42
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Camp SD, Gaes GG, Langan NP, Saylor WG 2003. The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: a multilevel investigation. Justice Q 20:3501–33
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Carson EA, Anderson E 2016. Prisoners in 2015 Spec. Rep., US Bur. Justice Stat., Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  18. Clear T 2008. The effects of high imprisonment rates on communities. Crime Justice 37:197–132
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Clear TR, Hardyman PL, Stout B, Lucken K, Dammer HR 2000. The value of religion in prison: an inmate perspective. J. Contemp. Crim. Justice 16:153–74
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Clear TR, Sumter MT 2002. Prisoners, prison, and religion: religion and adjustment to prison. J. Offender Rehabil. 35:3–4125–56
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Clemmer D 1940. The Prison Community New Braunfels, TX: Christopher Publ. House
  22. Cochran JC, Mears DP, Bales WD, Stewart EA 2016. Spatial distance, community disadvantage, and racial and ethnic variation in prison inmate access to social ties. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 53:2220–54
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Comfort M 2007. Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:271–96
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Comfort M 2008. Doing Time Together: Love and Family in the Shadow of the Prison Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  25. Davis LM, Steele JL, Bozick R, Williams MV, Turner S et al. 2014. How Effective Is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? The Results of a Comprehensive Evaluation Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.
  26. Dodson KD, Cabage LN, Klenowski PM 2011. An evidence-based assessment of faith-based programs: Do faith-based programs “work” to reduce recidivism. J. Offender Rehabil. 50:6367–83
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Drago F, Galbiati R, Vertova P 2011. Prison conditions and recidivism. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 13:1103–30
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Duwe G, Clark V 2014. The effects of prison-based educational programming on recidivism and employment. Prison J 94:4454–78
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Foucault M 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison New York: Pantheon
  30. Gaes GG, Camp SD 2009. Unintended consequences: experimental evidence for the criminogenic effect of prison security level placement on post-release recidivism. J. Exp. Criminol. 5:139–62
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Gawande A 2009. Hellhole: The United States holds tens of thousands of inmates in long-term solitary confinement. Is this torture. New Yorker March 30. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/03/30/hellhole
  32. Glaze LE, Maruschak LM 2008. Parents in prison and their minor children Spec. Rep., US Bur. Justice Stat., Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  33. Grassian S 2006. Psychiatric effects of solitary confinement. Wash. Univ. J. Law Policy 22:325–83
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Hagan J, Dinovitzer R 1999. Collateral consequences of imprisonment for children, communities, and prisoners. Crime Justice 26:121–62
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Haney C 2003. Mental health issues in long-term solitary and “supermax” confinement. Crime Delinq 49:1124–56
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Haney C 2006. The Law and Public Policy. Reforming Punishment: Psychological Limits to the Pains of Imprisonment Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc.
  37. Haney C 2018. Restricting the use of solitary confinement. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:285–310
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Huebner BM 2003. Administrative determinants of inmate violence: a multilevel analysis. J. Crim. Justice 31:2107–17
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Johnson BR 2004. Religious programs and recidivism among former inmates in prison fellowship programs: a long-term follow-up study. Justice Q 21:2329–54
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaeble D, Glaze L 2016. Correctional populations in the United States, 2015 Spec. Rep., US Bur. Justice Stat., Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  41. Katz L, Levitt SD, Shustorovich E 2003. Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 5:2318–43
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Kazemian L, Travis J 2015. Imperative for inclusion of long termers and lifers in research and policy. Criminol. Public Policy 14:2355–95
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim RH, Clark D 2013. The effect of prison-based college education programs on recidivism: propensity score matching approach. J. Crim. Justice 41:3196–204
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Kirk DS, Wakefield S 2018. Collateral consequences of punishment: a critical review and a path forward. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:171–94
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Kling JR 2006. Incarceration length, employment, and earnings. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:3863–76
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Kreager DA, Kruttschnitt C 2018. Inmate society in the era of mass incarceration. Annu. Rev. Criminol. 1:261–83
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kreager DA, Schaefer DR, Bouchard M, Haynie DL, Wakefield S et al. 2016. Toward a criminology of inmate networks. Justice Q 33:61000–28
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Kreager DA, Young JTN, Haynie DL, Bouchard M, Schaefer DR, Zajac G 2017. Where “old heads” prevail: inmate hierarchy in a men's prison unit. Am. Sociol. Rev. 82:4685–718
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee H, McCormick T, Hicken MT, Wildeman C 2015. Racial inequalities in connectedness to imprisoned individuals in the United States. Du Bois Rev. Soc. Sci. Res. Race 12:2269–82
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Lerner BH 2007. Subjects or objects? Prisoners and human experiments. New Engl. J. Med. 356:181806–7
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lofstrom M, Raphael S 2016. Incarceration and crime: evidence from California's public safety realignment reform. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 664:1196–220
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Massoglia M, Pridemore WA 2015. Incarceration and health. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 41:1291–310
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Minton TD, Zeng Z 2015. Jail inmates at midyear 2014 Spec. Rep., US Bur. Justice Stat., US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  54. Minton TD, Zeng Z 2016. Jail inmates in 2015 Spec. Rep., US Bur. Justice Stat., US Dep. Justice Washington, DC:
  55. Morris RG 2016. Exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement among violent prison inmates. J. Quant. Criminol. 32:11–22
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Nurse AM 2002. Fatherhood Arrested: Parenting from Within the Juvenile Justice System Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Univ. Press
  57. O'Connor TP, Perreyclear M 2002. Prison religion in action and its influence on offender rehabilitation. J. Offender Rehabil. 35:3–411–33
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Pettit B, Lyons CJ 2007. Status and the stigma of incarceration: the labor-market effects of incarceration, by race, class, and criminal involvement. Barriers to Re-entry? The Labor Market for Release Prisoners in Post-Industrial America S Bushway, MA Stoll, DD Weiman 203–26 New York: Russell Sage Found.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Pettit B, Western B 2004. Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:2151–69
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Rhodes LA 2004. Total Confinement: Madness and Reason in the Maximum Security Prison Berkley: Univ. Calif. Press
  61. Rose K, Rose C 2014. Enrolling in college while in prison: factors that promote male and female prisoners to participate. J. Correct. Educ. 65:220–39
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Roxburgh S, Fitch C 2014. Parental status, child contact, and well-being among incarcerated men and women. J. Fam. Issues 35:101394–412
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Schaefer DR, Bouchard M, Young JTN, Kreager DA 2017. Friends in locked places: an investigation of prison inmate network structure. Soc. Netw. 51:88–103
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Shuster E 1997. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code. New Engl. J. Med. 337:1436–40
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Smith PS 2006. The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: a brief history and review of the literature. Crime Justice 34:1441–528
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Stuart F 2016. Down, Out, and Under Arrest: Policing and Everyday Life in Skid Row Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  67. Sykes GM 1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  68. Travis J, Western B, Redburn S 2014. The experience of imprisonment. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences157–201 Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Turney K 2017. The unequal consequences of mass incarceration for children. Demography 54:1361–89
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Wakefield S, Wildeman C 2013. Children of the Prison Boom: Mass Incarceration and the Future of American Inequality New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  71. Walker ML 2016. Race making in a penal institution. Am. J. Sociol. 121:41051–78
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Washington HA 2006. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans from Colonial Times to the Present New York: Doubleday
  73. Western B 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found.
  74. Western B, Wildeman C 2009. The black family and mass incarceration. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 621:1221–42
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Wildeman C 2009. Parental imprisonment, the prison boom, and the concentration of childhood disadvantage. Demography 46:2265–80
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Wildeman C, Andersen LH 2015. Cumulative risks of paternal and maternal incarceration in Denmark and the United States. Demogr. Res. 32:11567–680
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Wildeman C, Andersen SH 2017. Paternal incarceration and children's risk of being charged by early adulthood: evidence from a Danish policy shock. Criminology 55:132–58
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Wildeman C, Muller C 2012. Mass imprisonment and inequality in health and family life. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 8:11–30
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Wildeman C, Turney K, Yi Y 2016. Paternal incarceration and family functioning: variation across federal, state, and local facilities. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 665:180–97
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Wilson DB, Gallagher CA, MacKenzie DL 2000. A meta-analysis of corrections-based education, vocation, and work programs for adult offenders. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 37:4347–68
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Wolff N, Blitz CL, Shi J, Siegel J, Bachman R 2007.a Physical violence inside prisons: rates of victimization. Crim. Justice Behav. 34:5588–99
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Wolff N, Shi J, Blitz CL, Siegel J 2007.b Understanding sexual victimization inside prisons: factors that predict risk. Criminol. Public Policy 6:3535–64
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Wolff N, Shi J, Siegel J 2009. Understanding physical victimization inside prisons: factors that predict risk. Justice Q 26:3445–75
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Zgoba KM, Haugebrook S, Jenkins K 2008. The influence of GED obtainment on inmate release outcome. Crim. Justice Behav. 35:3375–87
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025
Loading
Conditions of Confinement in American Prisons and Jails
Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14, 29 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031025
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error