1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 15, 2019
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 15, 2019

Populism and the Rule of Law

Abstract

The resurgence of populism in Europe and North America is widely thought to have placed the rule of law under pressure. But how many of the relevant developments are indeed associated with populism? And is any such association a contingent or analytic matter: Does populism inevitably threaten the rule of law, or do other conditions intervene to shape its impact? After setting out how I understand the rule of law and populism, I examine the ways in which contemporary populist discourse has challenged the rule of law through a variety of mechanisms—notably agenda setting, policy impact, influence on discretionary decisions, and convention trashing—considering the institutional and social conditions that conduce to strengthen or weaken these mechanisms in particular contexts. Finally, I consider the implications of the analysis for contemporary criminalization, assessing how many of the factors producing penal populism or overcriminalization are truly a product of populism.

Keyword(s): criminalization, democracy, institutions, penal populism, populism, rule of law
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919
2019-10-13
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department( 2004. UKHL 56
  2. Aas KS, Bosworth M 2013. Borders of Punishment: Citizenship, Crime Control and Social Exclusion Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  3. Ackerman A, Furman R 2014. The Criminalization of Immigration Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. Press
  4. Ackerman B. 2015. Three paths to constitutionalism—and the crisis of the EU. Br. J. Political Sci. 45:705–14
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Adams M, Meuwese A, Hirch Ballin E 2017. Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Aliverti A. 2013. Crimes of Mobility: Criminal Law and the Regulation of Immigration Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  7. Aliverti A, Bosworth M 2017. Criminal justice adjudication in an age of migration. New Crim. Law Rev.20
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson B. 2013. Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  9. Baer S. 2019. The rule of—and not by any—law. On the need to explain and defend constitutionalism today. Curr. Legal Probl. 71:335–68
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Barker V. 2018. Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State London: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bingham T. 2010. The Rule of Law London: Allen Lane
  12. Bobbio N. 1987 (1984). The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game transl. R Griffen Oxford, UK: Polity (from Italian)
  13. Bogg A, Freedland M. 2018. Labour law in the age of populism: towards sustainable democratic engagement Res. Pap. No. 2018–15, Max Planck Inst. Comp. Public Law Int. Law Heidelberg, Ger: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3219185
  14. Bogira S. 2005. Courtroom 302 New York: Vintage Books
  15. Bottoms AE. 1995. Reflections on the criminological enterprise. Cambridge Law J 46:240–63
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Brandes TH. 2019. International law in domestic courts in an era of populism. Int. J. Const. Law press [Work. Pap. 10/17, Jean Monnet Cent. Int. & Reg. Econ Law & Justice, NY Univ School of Law, NY: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195454 ]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Brubaker R. 2017. Why populism?. Theory Soc 46:357–85
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Canovan M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Stud 47:2–16
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Carlin W, Boltho A. 2013. EMU's problems: asymmetric shocks of asymmetric behaviour. Comp. Econ. Stud. 55:387–403
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cavadino M, Dignan J. 2005. Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach London: Sage
  21. Cheesman N. 2015. Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar's Courts Make Law and Order Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferrari A, Kaul V, Rasumussen D 2018. The populist upsurge and the decline of diversity capital. Philos. Soc. Crit. 44:345–504
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Freedland M. 2018. Brexit, the rule of law, and the idea of sustainable governance Work. Pap. 5/2018, Oxf. Leg. Stud Oxford, UK: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3117471
  24. Fuller LL. 1964. The Morality of Law London: Yale Univ. Press
  25. Garland D. 2001a. The Culture of Control New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  26. Garland D 2001b. Mass Imprisonment: Causes and Consequences London: Sage
  27. Graham-Harrison E. 2018. Vote Leave broke electoral law and British democracy is shaken. Guardian July 17. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/17/vote-leave-broke-electoral-law-and-british-democracy-is-shaken
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall PA. 2014. Varieties of capitalism and the Euro crisis. West Eur. Politics 37:1223–43
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hall PA, Soskice D 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  30. Hall S, Critcher C, Jefferson T, Clarke J, Roberts B 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order London: Palgrave Macmillan
  31. Haney L. 2016. Prisons of the past: penal nationalism and the politics of punishment in Central Europe. Punishm. Soc. 18:346–68
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Hay D. 1975. Property, authority and the criminal law. Albion's Fatal Tree D Hay, P Linebaugh, JG Rule, EP Thompson, C Winslow 17–63 London: Allen Lane
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Hochschild AR. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right New York: New Press
  34. Holmes S. 2003. Lineages of the rule of law. See Maravall & Przeworski 2003 19–61
  35. Husak D. 2007. Overcriminalization Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  36. Iversen T, Soskice D. 2018. Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism in a Turbulent Century Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  37. Jakobs G. 1985. Kriminalisierung im Vorfeld einer Rechtsgutsverletzung. Z. Gesamte Strafsrechtswiss. 97:751–85
     [Google Scholar]
  38. King P. 2000. Crime, Justice and Discretion in England, 1740–1820 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  39. King P. 2006. Crime and Law in England, 1750–1840 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  40. Kitschelt HL, McGann AJ. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis Ann Arbor: Mich. Univ. Press
  41. Kochenov D. 2017. The EU and the rule of law: Naivete or a grand design?. See Adams et al. 2017 419–45
  42. Krygier M. 2009. The rule of law: legality, teleology, sociology. Relocating the Rule of Law G Palombella, N Walker 45–69 Oxford, UK: Hart
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Krygier M. 2017a. Institutionalisation and its discontents: constitutionalism versus (anti-) constitutional populism in East Central Europe Paper presented at Transnational Law Signature Lectures London:
  44. Krygier M. 2017b. Reimagining the Rule of Law Paper presented at Denis Leslie Mahoney Prize Public Lecture Sydney:
  45. Krygier M. 2017c. Tempering power. See Adams et al. 2017 34–59
  46. Krygier M. 2019. Democracy and the rule of law. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law J Meierhenrich, M Loughlin Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press In press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lacey N. 2007. H.L.A. Hart's rule of law: the limits of philosophy in historical perspective. Quad. Fiorent. 36:1159–80
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Lacey N. 2008a. The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Punishment and Political Economy in Contemporary Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  49. Lacey N. 2008b. Philosophy, political morality and history: explaining the enduring resonance of the Hart-Fuller debate. NYU Law Rev 83:1059–87
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Lacey N. 2016. In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests and Institutions Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  51. Laclau E. 2005. On Populist Reason London: Verso
  52. Laclau E, Mouffe C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics London: Verso. , 2nd ed..
  53. Landau D. 2013. Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev 47:189–260
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Langbein J. 2003. The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  55. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018. How Democracies Die New York: Crown
  56. Lijphart A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Governments in Twenty-One Countries New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  57. Lijphart A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  58. Lindseth PL. 2017. Between the ‘real’ and the ‘right’: explorations along the institutional-constitutional frontier. See Adams et al. 2017 60–93
  59. Litman L. 2018. How Trump corrupts the rule of law. New York Times, June 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/18/opinion/trump-zero-tolerance-border.html
  60. Loader I, Sparks R. 2017. Penal populism and epistemic crime control. The Oxford Handbook of Criminology A Liebling, S Maruna, L McCara 98–115 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. , 6th ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Loader I, Walker N. 2007. Civilising Security Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Loughlin M. 2018. The apotheosis of the rule of law. Political Q 89:659–66
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Maravall JM. 2003. The rule of law as a political weapon. See Maravall & Przeworski 2003 261–301
  64. Maravall JM, Przeworski A 2003. Democracy and the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  65. McCarthy T 2018. The Supreme Court has already reshaped America—here's how. Guardian July 2. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/jul/02/supreme-court-donald-trump-anthony-kennedy-conservative-nominee-republicans?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Meuwese A. 2017. Peer review in the context of constitutionalism and the rule of law. See Adams et al. 2017 479–505
  67. Mounk Y. 2018. The People Versus Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  68. Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  69. Müller JW. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  70. Neocleous M. 2008. Critique of Security Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press
  71. Ostiguy P, Roberts KM. 2016. Putting Trump in comparative perspective: populism and the politicisation of the sociocultural law. Brown J. World Aff. 23:25–50
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Palombella G. 2009. The rule of law and its core. Relocating the Rule of Law G Palombella, N Walker 17–42 Oxford, UK: Hart
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Palombella G. 2010. The rule of law as an institutional ideal. Rule of Law and Democracy L Morlino, G Palombella 3–37 Leiden, Neth: Brill
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Pankaj M. 2017. The Age of Anger: A History of the Present New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  75. Postema GJ. 2014. Fidelity in law's commonwealth. Private Law and the Rule of Law LM Austin, D Klimchuk 17–40 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Pratt J. 2006. Penal Populism London: Sage
  77. R. Miller v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union( 2016.) EWHC (Ch) 2768, ( 2017. UKSC 5
  78. Ramsay P. 2012. The Insecurity State: Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right to Security in the Criminal Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  79. Raz J. 1979. The rule of law and its virtue. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality J Raz 210–29 Oxford, UK: Clarendon
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Reid JP. 2004. Rule of Law: The Jurisprudence of Liberty in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries DeKalb: North. Ill. Univ. Press
  81. Rovira Kaltwasser C. 2013. Populism versus Constitutionalism? Comparative Perspectives on Contemporary Western Europe, Latin America, and the United States Oxford, UK: Found. Law Justice Soc.
  82. Rovira Kaltwasser C. 2014. The responses of populism to Dahl's democratic dilemmas. Political Stud 62:470–87
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Runciman D. 2018. How Democracy Ends New York: Basic Books
  84. Scheindlin SA. 2018. Trump's hard-right judges will do lasting damage to America. Guardian May 31. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/30/trump-judge-appointments-roe-v-wade-courts
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Scheppele KL. 2013. From a war on terrorism to global security law. Institute Letter Fall. https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2013/scheppele-terrorism
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Scheppele KL. 2017. Constitutional coups in EU law. See Adams et al. 2017 446–78
  87. Scheppele KL. 2018. Autocratic legalism. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 85:545–84
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Schmitt C. 2007 (1927). The Concept of the Political transl G Schwab Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press (from German)
  89. Secret Barrister 2018. Stories of Law and How It's Broken London: Macmillan
  90. Shapiro I 1994. Nomos XXXVI: Rule of Law New York: NYU Press
  91. Shklar JN. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trials Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  92. Smith D. 2018. Trump diplomat lobbied UK over Tommy Robinson—report. Guardian July 14. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/14/us-raises-concerns-with-uk-about-safety-of-tommy-robinson-jailed-edl-founder?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Strumpf J. 2006. The Crimmigration crisis: immigrants, crime and sovereign power. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 56:368–419
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Tamanaha BZ. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  95. Tamanaha BZ. 2012. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  96. Thompson EP. 1975. Whigs and Hunters Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
  97. Urbinati N. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  98. Waldron J. 2008. The concept and the rule of law Sibley Lect. Ser. 29, School Law, Univ. Ga Athens, GA: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/lectures_pre_arch_lectures_sibley/29
  99. Waldron J. 2010. Torture, Terror and Trade-Offs: Philosophy for the White House Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  100. Waldron J. 2011. The rule of law and the importance of procedure. NOMOS L: Getting to the Rule of Law JE Fleming3–31 New York: NYU Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Walker N. 2019. Populism and constitutional tension. Int. J. Const. Law In press [Work. Pap. 15/17, Jean Monnet Cent. Int. & Reg. Econ Law & Justice, NY Univ. School of Law, NY https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/JMWP-15-Neil-Walker.pdf ]
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Wuthnow R. 2018. The Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  103. Zedner L. 2009. Security London: Routledge
  104. Zedner L. 2013. Is the criminal law only for citizens? A problem at the borders of punishment. See Aas & Bosworth 2013 40–57
  105. Zedner L. 2016. Penal subversions: When is punishment not punishment, who decides and on what grounds?. Theor. Criminol. 20:3–20
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Zengerle J. 2018. How the Trump administration is remaking the courts. New York Times Magazine Aug. 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/22/magazine/trump-remaking-courts-judiciary.html
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Zimring FE, Hawkins G, Kamin S 2001. Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California New York: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error