Law and the Dead Body: Is a Corpse a Person or a Thing?

Literature Cited

1. Anat. Board State Pa. 1902. Cadaver Receiving Books 1 Record Group 11, Series 45, Microfilm Roll 6954 Pa. State Arch Harrisburg, PA:
2. Balganesh S 2012. Quasi-property: like, but not quite property. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 160:1889–925
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bennett J 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
4. Brennan RL 1935. The Law Governing Cemetery Rules and Regulations National in Scope: An Analysis of the Power of Interment Organizations to Enact Rules and Regulations, Containing Model Rules and Regulations, Case Annotations, Practical Comments, Model Forms Los Angeles: Interment Assoc. Calif.
5. Brennan RL 1951. The Law Governing Cemetery Rules and Regulations, National in Scope: A Complete Study of the Subject of Cemetery Rules and Regulations, Containing an Annotated Set of Recommended Rules and Regulations, Court Decisions in All the States, Practical Comments, also Suggested Forms Los Angeles: Interment Assoc. Calif. Complet. , Rev. ed..
6. Cantor NL 1987. Legal Frontiers of Death and Dying Med. Ethics Ser. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
7. Cantor NL 2010. After We Die: The Life and Times of the Human Cadaver Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
8. Capron AM 1980. Death and the law: a decade of change. Sound. Interdiscip. J. 63:290–320
   [Google Scholar]
9. Clark ML 2005. Treading on hallowed ground: implications for property law and critical theory of land associated with human death and burial. Ky. Law J. 94:487–534
   [Google Scholar]
10. Connor JTH 2007. Exhibit essay review: “Faux reality” show? the “Body Worlds” phenomenon and its reinvention of anatomical spectacle. Bull. Hist. Med. 81:848–65
    [Google Scholar]
11. Conway H 2016. The Law and the Dead New York: Routledge
12. Densmore v. Evergreen Camp, No. 147, Woodmen of the World No. 8962, 61 Wash. 230, 112 Pac 255 1910. Wash. LEXIS 1320 (Dec. 15 1910.
13. Dwight T 1896. Our contribution to civilization and to science—presidential address by Dr. Thomas Dwight, Harvard Medical School. Science 3:5575–77
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fabian A 2010. The Skull Collectors: Race, Science, and America's Unburied Dead Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
15. Faust DG 2008. This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War New York: Alfred A. Knopf
16. Fry-Revere S, Reher T, Ray M 2010. Death: a new legal perspective. J. Contemp. Health Law Policy 27:1–75
    [Google Scholar]
17. Giunta LA 2010. The dead on display: a call for the international regulation of plastination exhibits. Columbia J. Transnatl. Law 49:164–94
    [Google Scholar]
18. Guthrie v. Weaver 1 Mo. App. 136 (Feb 14 1876.
19. Hochberg B 2011. Bringing Jim Thorpe home: inconsistencies in the Native American Graves and Repatriation Act note. Rutgers Race Law Rev 13:83–146
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hughes Wright R, Hughes WB III. 2007. The Death Care Industry: African American Cemeteries and Funeral Homes Hughes Wright Enterp , 2nd ed..
21. Jackson PE 1950. The Law of Cadavers and of Burial and Burial Places New York: Prentice-Hall. , 2nd ed..
22. Jones WB 1926. The law of dead bodies. Ala. Law J. 2:218–32
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kelly S 2015. Greening Death: Reclaiming Burial Practices and Restoring Our Tie to the Earth Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
24. Laderman G 1996. The Sacred Remains: American Attitudes Toward Death, 1799–1883 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
25. Laderman G 2003. Rest in Peace: A Cultural History of Death and the Funeral Home in Twentieth-Century America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
26. Laqueur TW 2015. The Work of the Dead: A Cultural History of Mortal Remains Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
27. Lock M 2001. Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
28. Manderson D 1999. Courting Death: The Law of Mortality London/Sterling, VA: Pluto
29. Marsh T 2015. Disposition of Human Remains: A Legal Research Guide Getzville, NY: William S. Hein
30. Marsh T 2016. The Law of Human Remains Tucson, AZ: Lawyers & Judges
31. Mears JE, Bryant JD, Dwight T 1896. Report of the Committee on the Collections and Preservation of Anatomical Material. Science 3:5577–84
    [Google Scholar]
32. Muinzer TL 2014. The law of the dead: a critical review of burial law, with a view to its development. Oxf. J. Leg. Stud. 34:791–818
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mulqueen PJ 2012. “Only dust remains[?]”: the 9/11 memorial litigation and the reach of quasi-property rights. Brooklyn Law Rev 78:231–70
    [Google Scholar]
34. Natl. Cent. Health Stat. 2003. Medical examiners’ and coroners’ handbook on death registration and fetal death reporting DHHS Publ. No. 2003–1110 Dep. Health Hum. Serv. Hyattsville, MD:
35. Nelkin D, Andrews L 1998. Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life. Am. J. Law Med. 24:261–91
    [Google Scholar]
36. Palmer LJ 2014. Organ Transplants from Executed Prisoners: An Argument for Death Sentence Organ Removal Statutes Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co.
37. Pres. Comm. Study Ethical Probl. Med. Biomed. Behav. Res. 1981. Defining Death: A Report on the Medical, Legal and Ethical Issues in the Determination of Death Washington, DC: Pres. Counc. Bioethics
38. Prothero S 2001. Purified by Fire: A History of Cremation in America Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
39. Redman SJ 2016. Bone Rooms: From Scientific Racism to Human Prehistory in Museums Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
40. Render MM 2012. The law of the body. Emory Law J 62:549–606
    [Google Scholar]
41. Richardson R 2000. Death, Dissection and the Destitute Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. , 1st ed..
42. Sappol M 2002. A Traffic of Dead Bodies: Anatomy and Embodied Social Identity in Nineteenth-Century America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
43. Science 1896. Anatomical Law of the State of Pennsylvania, enacted June 13, 1883. Science 3:5584–86
    [Google Scholar]
44. Seaton v. Commonwealth 149 S.W. 871 (Sept 26 1912.
45. Shaffer CA 2003. The standing of the dead: solving the problem of abandoned graveyards. Cap. Univ. Law Rev. 32:479–98
    [Google Scholar]
46. Street ALH 1924. American Funeral Law: A Manual of Law Affecting Funeral Directors and Embalmers Chicago: Trade Period. Co.
47. Stroud E 2006. Dead bodies in Harlem: environmental history and the geography of death. The Nature of Cities: Culture, Landscape and Urban Space A Isenberg Rochester, NY: Univ. Rochester Press
    [Google Scholar]
48. Sun M 1980. Panel asks “when is a person dead?”. Science 209:669–70
    [Google Scholar]
49. Washington M 1991. A Survey of the Statutory Definitions of Death [microform] Washington, DC: Congr. Res. Serv., Libr. Congr.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Weinmann GH 1929. A Survey of the Law Concerning Dead Human Bodies Washington, DC: Natl. Res. Counc.
51. Westcott v. Middleton 43 N.J. Eq. 478, 11 A. 490 1887. N.J. Super. LEXIS 213 (Oct 1887.
52. Wilding Knope DL 2009. Over my dead body: how the Albrecht decisions complicate the constitutional dilemma of due process and the dead. Univ. Toledo Law Rev. 41:169–212
    [Google Scholar]
53. Young H 2012. The right to posthumous bodily integrity and implications of whose right it is. Marquette Elders Advis 14:197–268
    [Google Scholar]
54. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, DeVita MA 1999. When is “dead”. Hastings Cent. Rep. 29:14–21
    [Google Scholar]
55. Youngner SJ, Arnold RM, Schapiro R 2002. The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press