1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 12, 2016
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 12, 2016

Lawyers, Globalization, and Transnational Governance Regimes

Abstract

The global law firm has become a significant actor in the provision of legal services in multiple countries. Although this reflects a response to increasing demand for these services by transnational companies, lawyers in these firms also help further the process of globalization that fuels such demand. One arena in which this occurs is the construction of transnational governance regimes that harmonize standards and expectations with respect to a variety of business activities. These regimes may be based on two different visions of the globalization process. One vision is of markets increasingly unfettered by national regulation, while another is of widely accepted human rights that impose common constraints on business activities. This article surveys the literature on transnational governance regimes and the work of transnational corporate lawyers to illuminate these dynamics, and suggests that further research on this topic can provide insight into how lawyers contribute to the globalization process.

Keyword(s): business and human rights, global law firm, globalization, transnational governance
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030617
2016-10-27
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/12/1/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030617.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030617&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott KW, Genschel P, Snidal D, Zangl B. 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  2. Abbott KW, Snidal D. 2000. Hard and soft law in international governance. Int. Organ. 54:421–56 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abel RL. 2012. What does and should influence the number of lawyers?. Int. J. Leg. Prof. 19:131–46 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez J. 2005. International Organizations as Law-makers. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  5. Amao O. 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility, Human Rights and the Law. New York: Routledge
  6. Am. Bar Assoc. Bar Counc. Engl. Wales, Bar Counc. Malays., Bar Hum. Rights Comm. Engl. Wales, Cons. Natl. Barreaux et al. 2015. Joint Declaration of Commitment on the Development and Promotion of the Field of Business and Human Rights within the Legal Profession. http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/human_rights/joint_declaration.authcheckdam.pdf
  7. Auld G. 2014. Constructing Private Governance: The Rise and Evolution of Forest, Coffee, and Fisheries Certification. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  8. Baldwin RE. 2000. Regulatory protectionism, developing nations, and a two-tier world trade system. Brookings Trade Forum 2000:237–80 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bartlett C, Ghosal S. 2002. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. Rev. Press., 2nd ed..
  10. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113:297–351 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beaverstock JV. 2004. Managing across borders: knowledge management and expatriation in professional legal service firms. J. Econ. Geogr. 4:157–79 [Google Scholar]
  12. Beaverstock JV, Smith R, Taylor PJ. 1999. The long arm of the law: London's law firms in a globalising world economy. Environ. Plan. A 13:1857–76 [Google Scholar]
  13. Beaverstock JV, Smith RG, Taylor PJ. 2000. Geographies of globalization: United States law firms in world cities. Urban Geogr. 21:95–120 [Google Scholar]
  14. Berkowitz D, Pistor K, Richard J-F. 2003. Economic development, legality, and the transplant effect. Eur. Econ. Rev. 47:1165–95 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bieri F. 2010. From Blood Diamonds to the Kimberly Process: How NGOs Cleaned Up the Global Diamond Industry. Surrey, UK: Ashgate
  16. Black J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regul. Gov. 2:137–64 [Google Scholar]
  17. Blecher L, Stafford NK, Bellamy GC. 2014. Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights Impacts: New Expectations and Paradigms. Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc.
  18. Bodansky D. 1999. The legitimacy of international governance: a coming challenge for international environmental law. Am. J. Int. Law 93:596–624 [Google Scholar]
  19. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  20. Brummer C. 2015. Soft Law and the Global Financial System: Rule-Making in the 21st Century Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2nd ed..
  21. Bulkeley H, Andonova LB, Betsill MM, Compagnon D, Hale T. et al. 2014. Transnational Climate Change Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  22. Büthe T, Mattli W. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  23. Calliess G-P. 2012. Transnational law. The Encyclopedia of Global Studies M Juergensmeyer, H Anheir 1035–39 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  24. Calliess G-P, Zumbansen P. 2010. Rough Consensus and Running Code: A Theory of Transnational Private Law. Oxford: Hart
  25. Canan P, Reichman N. 2002. Ozone Connections: Expert Networks in Global Environment Governance. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf
  26. Caporaso J, Madeira M. 2002. Globalization, Institutions & Governance. London: Sage
  27. Carroll WK, Carson C. 2003. Forging a new hegemony? The role of transnational policy groups in the network and discourses of global corporate governance. J. World-Syst. Res. 9:166–102 [Google Scholar]
  28. Cernic JG, Van Ho T. 2015. Human Rights and Business: Direct Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Oisterwikj, Neth.: Wolf Legal
  29. Chorev N. 2007. Remaking US Trade Policy: From Protectionism to Globalization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  30. Cotterell R. 2008. Transnational communities and the concept of law. Ratio Juris 21:1–18 [Google Scholar]
  31. Cotterell R. 2012. What is transnational law?. Law Soc. Inq. 37:500–24 [Google Scholar]
  32. de Sousa Santos B. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization and Emancipation London: Butterworth
  33. de Sousa Santos B, Rodríguez-Garavito CA. 2005. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Deva S. 2012. Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business New York: Routledge
  35. Deva S, Bilchitz D. 2013. Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  36. Devuyst Y. 2001. Transatlantic competition relations. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy M Pollack, G Shaffer 127–52 London: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  37. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 1996. Dealing in Virtue Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  38. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002a. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  39. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002b. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2011. Lawyers and the Rule of Law in an Era of Globalization New York: Routledge
  41. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2012a. Lawyers and the Construction of Transnational Justice New York: Routledge
  42. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2012b. Marketing and legitimating two sides of transnational justice. See Dezalay & Garth 2012a. 277–94
  43. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2012c. Corporate law firms, NGOs, and issues of legitimacy for a global legal order. Fordham Law Rev. 80:2309–45 [Google Scholar]
  44. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2012d. Introduction: constructing transnational justice. See Dezalay & Garth 2012a. 3–12
  45. Dingwerth K. 2007. The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  46. Djelic M-L, Quack S. 2003. Globalization and Institutions: Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  47. Djelic M-L, Sahlin-Andersson K. 2006. Introduction: a world of governance: the rise of transnational regulation. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, M-L Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson 1–30 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Dobusch L, Mader P, Quack S. 2013. Governance Across Borders: Transnational Fields and Transversal Themes Berlin: epubli GmbH
  49. Drahozal C. 2005. Contracting out of national law: an empirical look at the new law merchant. Notre Dame Law Rev. 80:523–52 [Google Scholar]
  50. Empson L. 2007. Managing the Modern Law Firm. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  51. Faulconbridge JR. 2007. Relational spaces of knowledge production in transnational law firms. Geoforum 38:925 [Google Scholar]
  52. Faulconbridge JR, Muzio D. 2008. Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms. Work Employ. Soc. 22:7–25 [Google Scholar]
  53. Faulconbridge JR, Muzio D, Taylor PJ. 2008. Global law firms: globalization and organizational spaces of cross-border legal work. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 28:3455–88 [Google Scholar]
  54. Fenwick M, Van Uytsel S, Wrbka S. 2014. Networked Governance, Transnational Governance, and the Law New York: Springer
  55. Fiss P, Hirsch P. 2005. The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:29–52 [Google Scholar]
  56. Flood J. 1996. Megalawyering in the global order: the cultural, social, economic transformation of global legal practice. Int. J. Leg. Prof. 3:1/2169–214 [Google Scholar]
  57. Flood J. 2007. Lawyers as sanctifiers: the role of elite law firms in international business transactions. Ind. J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 14:135–66 [Google Scholar]
  58. Flood J. 2008. Partnership and professionalism in global law firms: Resurgent professionalism?. Redirections in the Study of Expert Labour, S Ackroyd, D Muzio, JF Chanlet 52–74 New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  59. Flood J. 2012. Transnational lawyering: clients, ethics, and regulation. Lawyers in Practice: Ethical Decision Making in Context, L Levin, L Mather 176–96 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  60. Flood J. 2013. Institutional bridging: how large law firms engage in globalization. Boston Coll. Law Rev. 54:11087–121 [Google Scholar]
  61. Flood J, Lederer P. 2012. Becoming a cosmopolitan lawyer. Fordham Law Rev. 80:62513–39 [Google Scholar]
  62. Flood J, Sosa F. 2008. Lawyers, law firms and the stabilization of transnational business. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 28:3489–525 [Google Scholar]
  63. Fortun K. 2001. Advocacy After Bhopal: Environmentalism, Disaster, New Global Orders. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  64. Frankel T. 1998. Cross-border securitization: without law, but not lawless. Duke J. Comp. Int. Law 8:255–82 [Google Scholar]
  65. Fransen L. 2012. Corporate Social Responsibility and Global Labor Standards: Firms and Activists in the Making of Private Regulation New York: Routledge
  66. Galanter M, Roberts S. 2008. From kinship to magic circle: the London commercial law firm in the twentieth century. Int. J. Leg. Prof. 15:3143–78 [Google Scholar]
  67. Glenn HP. 2002. A transnational concept of law. The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies P Cane, M Tushnet 839–62 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Godoy AS. 2013. Of Medicines and Markets: Intellectual Property and Human Rights in the Free Trade Era Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  69. Graz J-C, Nolke A. 2008. Transnational Private Governance and Its Limits Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  70. Green J. 2014. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  71. Haas P. 1992. Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int. Organ. 46:11–35 [Google Scholar]
  72. Hale T, Held D. 2011. Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge, UK: Polity
  73. Halliday T. 2009. Recursivity of global normmaking: a sociological agenda. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci 5:263–90 [Google Scholar]
  74. Halliday T, Block-Lieb S, Carruthers B. 2010. Rhetorical legitimation: global scripts as strategic devices of international organizations. Socio-Econ. Rev. 8:77–112 [Google Scholar]
  75. Halliday TC, Carruthers B. 1998. Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon
  76. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  77. Halliday T, Osinsky P. 2006. Globalization of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:447–70 [Google Scholar]
  78. Halliday T, Shaffer G. 2015a. Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  79. Halliday T, Shaffer G. 2015b. Transnational legal orders. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a. 3–73
  80. Hannerz U. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. New York: Routledge
  81. Hartnell HE. 2007. Living la vida lex mercatoria. Unif. Law Rev. 12:733–60 [Google Scholar]
  82. Head M, Mann S, Kozlina S. 2012. Transnational Governance: Emerging Models of Global Legal Regulation. Surrey, UK: Ashgate
  83. Helfer L. 2015. Pharmaceutical patents and the human right to health: the contested evolution of the transnational legal order on access to medicines. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a. 311–39
  84. Helleiner E. 2015. Regulating the regulators: the emergence and limits of the transnational financial legal order. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a. 231–57
  85. Henderson W. 2007. The globalization of the legal profession. Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 14:11–5 [Google Scholar]
  86. Hestermeyer H. 2008. Human Rights and the WTO: The Case of Patents and Access to Medicine. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  87. Ho CM. 2011. Access to Medicine in the Global Economy: International Agreements on Patents and Related Rights. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  88. Holm H-H, Sorensen G. 1995. Introduction: what has changed. Whose World Order: Uneven Globalization and the End of the Cold War, H-H Holm, G Sørensen. Boulder CO: Westview [Google Scholar]
  89. Hum. Rights Watch. 1999. The Price of Oil: Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights Violations in Nigeria's Oil-Producing Communities. New York: Hum. Rights Watch
  90. Int. Bar Assoc. 2015. IBA Business and Human Rights Guidance for Bar Associations. London: Int. Bar Assoc.
  91. Jones A. 2007. More than “managing across borders?” The complex role of face-to-face interaction in globalizing law firms. J. Econ. Geogr. 7:223–46 [Google Scholar]
  92. Joseph S. 2004. Corporations and Transnational Human Rights Litigation. Oxford: Hart
  93. Kagan R, Gunningham N. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  94. Kalderimis D. 2010. Is transnational law eclipsing international law?. Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts, PHF Bekker, R Dolzer, M Waibel 93–107 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  95. Keohane R, Moravcsik A, Slaughter A-M. 2000. Legalized dispute resolution: interstate and transnational. Int. Organ. 54:457–88 [Google Scholar]
  96. Lace S. 2001. Mergers, mergers everywhere: constructing the global law firm in Germany. Legal Professions, J van Hoy 51–75 Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. [Google Scholar]
  97. Lang A. 2013. World Trade Law After Neoliberalism: Re-Imagining the Global Economic Order. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  98. Lang S. 2013. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  99. Lehmkuhl D. 2003. Structuring dispute resolution in transnational trade: competition and coevolution of public and private institutions. Globalization and Institutions, M-L Djelic, S Quack 278–301 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  100. Levitt P, Khagram S. 2008. The Transnational Studies Reader: Intersections and Innovations. New York: Taylor & Francis
  101. Liu S. 2008. Globalization as boundary-blurring: international and local law firms in China's corporate law. Law Soc. Rev. 42:4771–804 [Google Scholar]
  102. Liu S, Wu H. 2016. The ecology of organizational growth: Chinese law firms in the age of globalization. Am. J. Sociol. In press [Google Scholar]
  103. Locke EM. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  104. Luhmann N. 2014. A Sociological Theory of Law. New York: Routledge, 2nd ed..
  105. Lundan S. 2015. Transnational Corporations and Transnational Governance: The Costs of Crossing Borders in the Global Economy New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  106. Macdonald RA. 2015. Secured transactions: when lenders have too much cash and borrowers have too little law: the emergence of secured transactions transnational legal orders. See Halliday & Shaffer 2015a. 114–53
  107. Martin D, Metzger J-L, Pierre P. 2006. The sociology of globalization: theoretical and methodological reflections. Int. Sociol. 21:499–521 [Google Scholar]
  108. Mattli W, Woods N. 2009. The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  109. McKeen-Edwards H, Porter T. 2013. Transnational Financial Associations and the Governance of Global Finance New York: Routledge
  110. Milhaupt C. 2003. Global Markets, Domestic Institutions: Corporate Law and Governance in a New Era of Cross-Border Deals. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  111. Mittelman J. 2000. The Globalization Syndrome: Transformation and Resistance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  112. Mohan M, Morel C. 2015. Business and Human Rights in Southeast Asia: Risk and the Regulatory Turn New York: Routledge
  113. Morgan G. 2001. The development of transnational standards and regulations and their impacts on firms. See Morgan et al. 2001. 225–52
  114. Morgan G. 2006. Transnational actors, transnational institutions, transnational spaces: the role of law firms in the internationalization of competition regulation. Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation ed. M-L Djelic, K Sahlin-Andersson 139–60 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  115. Morgan G, Kristensen PH, Whitely R. 2001. The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across International and National Divides. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  116. Morgan G, Quack S. 2005. Institutional legacies and firm dynamics: the growth and internationalization of UK and German law firms. Organ. Stud. 26:121765–85 [Google Scholar]
  117. Morgan G, Quack S. 2006. Global networks or global firms? The organizational implications of the internationalisation of law firms. Multinationals, Institutions, and the Construction of Transnational Practices: Convergence and Diversity in the Global Economy, A Ferner, J Quintanilla, C Sanchez-Runde 213–38 New York: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
  118. Morrison J. 2014. The Social License: How to Keep Your Organization Legitimate New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  119. Moth U. 2005. Soft Law in Governance and Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  120. Ocampo JA, Stiglitz JE. 2008. Capital Market Liberalization and Development. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  121. Picciotto S. 2011. Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  122. Pollack M, Shaffer G. 2001. Transatlantic Governance in the Global Economy. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield
  123. Prasad M. 2006. The Politics of Free Markets: The Rise of Neoliberal Economic Policies in Britain, France, Germany and the United States. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  124. Quack S. 2007. Legal professionals and transnational law-making: a case of distributed agency. Organization 14:5643–66 [Google Scholar]
  125. Quayson A, Arhin A. 2012. Labour Migration, Human Trafficking, and Multinational Corporations: The Commodification of Illicit Flows. New York: Routledge
  126. Regan M, Hall K. 2016. Lawyers in the shadow of the regulatory state: transnational governance on business and human rights. Fordham Law Rev. 84:2001–37 [Google Scholar]
  127. Reich A. 1996. From diplomacy to law: the juridicization of international trade relations. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 17:775–849 [Google Scholar]
  128. Rhodes RAW. 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Polit. Stud. 44:4652–67 [Google Scholar]
  129. Rodriguez-Franco D. 2012. Globalizing intellectual property rights: the role of law and public health. See Dezalay & Garth 2012a. 139–69
  130. Rodrik D. 2012. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: W.W. Norton [Google Scholar]
  131. Ruggie J. 2013. Just Business. New York: W.W. Norton
  132. Salacuse JW. 2010. Making transnational law work through regime-building: the case of international investment law. Making Transnational Law Work in the Global Economy: Essays in Honour of Detlev Vagts P Bekker, R Dolzer, M Waibel 406–30 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  133. Schneiderman D. 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy's Promise. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  134. Shaffer G. 2003. Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
  135. Shaffer G. 2012. Transnational legal process and state change. Law Soc. Inq. 37:229–63 [Google Scholar]
  136. Shaffer G. 2013. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  137. Shaffer G, Pollack M. 2010. Hard law v. soft law: alternatives, complements, and antagonists in international governance. Minn. Law Rev. 94:706–99 [Google Scholar]
  138. Silver C. 2000. Globalization and the U.S. market in legal services: shifting identities. Law Policy Int. Bus. 31:1093–150 [Google Scholar]
  139. Silver C. 2005. Winners and losers in the globalization of legal services: situating the market for foreign lawyers. Va. J. Int. Law 45:897–934 [Google Scholar]
  140. Silver C. 2007. Local matters: internationalizing strategies for US law firms. Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 14:167–94 [Google Scholar]
  141. Simmons P, Macklin A. 2014. The Governance Gap: Extractive Industries, Human Rights, and the Home State Advantage. New York: Routledge
  142. Sinha MK. 2013. Business and Human Rights. New Delhi: Sage
  143. Slaughter A-M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  144. Sokol D. 2007. Globalization of law firms: a survey of the literature and a research agenda for future study. Indiana J. Glob. Leg. Stud. 14:5–28 [Google Scholar]
  145. Spar D. 1997. Lawyers abroad: the internationalization of legal practices. Calif. Manag. Rev. 39:8–28 [Google Scholar]
  146. Stiglitz J. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton
  147. Terry L. 2008. The legal world is flat: globalization and its effect on lawyers practicing in non-global law firms. Northwest. J. Int. Law Bus. 28:3101–33 [Google Scholar]
  148. Tsutsui K, Lim A. 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility in a Globalizing World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  149. United Nations. 2011. Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Geneva: United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf
  150. van Waarden F, Drahos M. 2002. Courts and (epistemic) communities in the convergence of competition policies. J. Eur. Public Policy 9:6913–34 [Google Scholar]
  151. Vauchez A. 2012. The force of a weak field: law and lawyers in the government of Europe. See Dezalay & Garth 2012a. 219–38
  152. Vauchez A. 2015. Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  153. Voiculescu A, Yanacopulos H. 2011. The Business of Human Rights: An Evolving Agenda for Corporate Responsibility London: Zed
  154. Walker-Said C, Kelly JD. 2015. Corporate Social Responsibility? Human Rights in the New Global Economy. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  155. Wellstein F. 2009. Multinational Corporations and Global Justice: Human Rights Obligations of a Quasi-Governmental Institution. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  156. Whytock C. 2009. The arbitration-litigation relationship in transnational dispute resolution: empirical insights from the US federal courts. World Arbitr. Mediat. Rev. 2:39–82 [Google Scholar]
  157. Zerk J. 2006. Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitations and Opportunities in International Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030617
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error