1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Law and Social Science
  4. Volume 11, 2015
  5. Article

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volume 11, 2015

Legal Control of Marginal Groups

Abstract

The legal control of marginal groups is a central topic in social scientific and legal scholarship. Examining the most influential research produced over the past two decades, as well as a broad collection of foundational and exemplary texts, this review addresses two overarching questions: First, what does it mean to study the legal control of marginal groups in the twenty-first century? Second, what are the recent developments, lingering concerns, and future directions of this work? We identify and examine the two most prevalent discussions found in contemporary research. The first centers on the practices of legal control, and the second focuses attention on the effects of these practices on their potential targets. Throughout the article, we draw specific attention to the need for future studies to more systematically account for the agency of, and ground-level dynamics impacting, both the controllers and the controlled.

Keyword(s): consequences, control, inequality, law, marginal groups, punitive turn
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121433
2015-11-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/11/1/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121433.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121433&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aas KF. 2014. Bordered penality: precarious membership and abnormal justice. Punishm. Soc. 16:5520–41 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrego L. 2008. Legitimacy, social identity, and the mobilization of law: the effects of Assembly Bill 540 on undocumented students in California. Law Soc. Inq. 33:3709–34 [Google Scholar]
  3. Aliverti A. 2012. Making people criminal: the role of the criminal law in immigration enforcement. Theor. Criminol. 16:4417–34 [Google Scholar]
  4. Amoore L. 2006. Biometric borders: governing mobilities in the war on terror. Polit. Geogr. 25:3336–51 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson B, Gibney MJ, Paoletti E. 2011. Citizenship, deportation and the boundaries of belonging. Citizensh. Stud. 15:5547–63 [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson E. 1999. Code of the Street: Decency, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City New York: Norton
  7. Annison J, Eadie T, Knight C. 2008. People first: probation officer perspectives on probation work. Probat. J. 55:3259–72 [Google Scholar]
  8. Armenta A. 2012. From sheriff's deputies to immigration officers: screening immigrant status in a Tennessee jail. Law Policy 34:2191–210 [Google Scholar]
  9. Atkinson R. 2003. Domestication by cappuccino or a revenge on urban space? Control and empowerment in the management of public spaces. Urban Stud. 40:91829–43 [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckett K, Herbert S. 2008. Dealing with disorder social control in the post-industrial city. Theor. Criminol. 12:15–30 [Google Scholar]
  11. Beckett K, Herbert S. 2010. Banished: The New Social Control in Urban America New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  12. Beckett K, Western B. 2001. Governing social marginality: welfare, incarceration, and the transformation of state policy. Punishm. Soc. 3:143–59 [Google Scholar]
  13. Black DJ, Reiss AJ Jr. 1970. Police control of juveniles. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35:163–77 [Google Scholar]
  14. Blau PM, Duncan OD. 1967. The American Occupational Structure New York: John Wiley & Sons
  15. Bosworth M, Guild M. 2008. Governing through migration control: security and citizenship in Britain. Br. J. Criminol. 48:6703–19 [Google Scholar]
  16. Braithwaite J. 1989. Crime, Shame and Reintegration New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  17. Brayne S. 2014. Surveillance and system avoidance: criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:3367–91 [Google Scholar]
  18. Brown HE. 2013. Race, legality, and the social policy consequences of anti-immigration mobilization. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:2290–314 [Google Scholar]
  19. Brunson RK, Miller J. 2006. Young black men and urban policing in the United States. Br. J. Criminol. 46:4613–40 [Google Scholar]
  20. Buerger ME, Mazerolle LG. 1998. Third-party policing: a theoretical analysis of an emerging trend. Justice Q. 15:2301–27 [Google Scholar]
  21. Burch T. 2013. Trading Democracy for Justice: Criminal Convictions and the Decline of Neighborhood Political Participation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  22. Burch T. 2014. The old Jim Crow: racial residential segregation and neighborhood imprisonment. Law Policy 36:3223–55 [Google Scholar]
  23. Calavita K. 2007. Immigration law, race, and identity. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:11–20 [Google Scholar]
  24. Carr PJ, Napolitano L, Keating J. 2007. We never call the cops and here is why: a qualitative examination of legal cynicism in three Philadelphia neighborhoods. Criminology 45:2445–80 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheliotis LK. 2006. How iron is the iron cage of new penology? The role of human agency in the implementation of criminal justice policy. Punishm. Soc. 8:3313–40 [Google Scholar]
  26. Christian J, Kennedy LW. 2011. Secondary narratives in the aftermath of crime: defining family members' relationships with prisoners. Punishm. Soc. 13:4379–402 [Google Scholar]
  27. Clear TR. 2007. Imprisoning Communities: How Mass Incarceration Makes Disadvantaged Neighborhoods Worse Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  28. Clear TR. 2008. The effects of high imprisonment rates on communities. Crime Justice 37:197–132 [Google Scholar]
  29. Comfort M. 2007. Punishment beyond the legal offender. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:1271–96 [Google Scholar]
  30. Correll SJ, Benard S, Paik I. 2007. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?. Am. J. Sociol. 112:51297–339 [Google Scholar]
  31. Coutin SB. 2000. Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants' Struggle for U.S. Residency. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
  32. Coutin SB. 2005. Contesting criminality: illegal immigration and the spatialization of legality. Theor. Criminol. 9:15–33 [Google Scholar]
  33. Cowan D, Lomax D. 2003. Policing unauthorized camping. J. Law Soc. 30:2283–308 [Google Scholar]
  34. Cowan D, Pantazis C, Gilroy R. 2001. Social housing as crime control: an examination of the role of housing management in policing sex offenders. Soc. Legal Stud. 10:4435–57 [Google Scholar]
  35. Cranford CJ. 2005. Networks of exploitation: immigrant labor and the restructuring of the Los Angeles janitorial industry. Soc. Probl. 52:3379–97 [Google Scholar]
  36. De Genova NP. 2002. Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 31:1419–47 [Google Scholar]
  37. De Genova N, Peutz NM. 2010. The Deportation Regime: Sovereignty, Space, and the Freedom of Movement. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  38. De Giorgi A. 2010. Immigration control, post-Fordism, and less eligibility: a materialist critique of the criminalization of immigration across Europe. Punishm. Soc. 12:2147–67 [Google Scholar]
  39. Desmond M, Valdez N. 2013. Unpolicing the urban poor: consequences of third-party policing for inner-city women. Am. Sociol. Rev. 78:1117–41 [Google Scholar]
  40. Donato KM, Armenta A. 2011. What we know about unauthorized migration. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 37:1529–43 [Google Scholar]
  41. Dowling J, Inda JX. 2013. Governing Immigration Through Crime: A Reader Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  42. Dreby J. 2014. U.S. immigration policy and family separation: the consequences for children's well-being. Soc. Sci. Med. 132:245–51 [Google Scholar]
  43. Eith C, Durose MR. 2011. Contacts between the police and the public, 2008 Spec. Rep. NCJ 234599, Bur. Justice Stat., Washington, DC
  44. Engbersen G, Broeders D. 2007. The fight against illegal migration. Identification policies and immigrants' counter strategies. Am. Behav. Sci. 50:121592–609 [Google Scholar]
  45. Epp CR, Maynard-Moody S, Haider-Markel DP. 2014. Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  46. Feeley MM, Simon J. 1992. The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology 30:2449–74 [Google Scholar]
  47. Fitzgibbon W, Hamilton C, Richardson M. 2010. A risky business: an examination of Irish probation officers' attitudes towards risk assessment. Probat. J. 57:2163–74 [Google Scholar]
  48. Foucault M. 1991. Governmentality. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality G Burchell, C Gordon, P Miller 87–104 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Frost NA. 2008. The mismeasure of punishment: alternative measures of punitiveness and their (substantial) consequences. Punishm. Soc. 10:3277–300 [Google Scholar]
  50. Garland D. 1996. The limits of the sovereign state strategies of crime control in contemporary society. Br. J. Criminol. 36:4445–71 [Google Scholar]
  51. Garland D. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  52. Gilliom J. 2001. Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  53. Giroux HA. 2003. Zero tolerance, domestic militarization, and the war against youth. Soc. Justice 30:259–65 [Google Scholar]
  54. Goffman A. 2009. On the run: wanted men in a Philadelphia ghetto. Am. Sociol. Rev. 74:3339–57 [Google Scholar]
  55. Goffman A. 2014. On the Run: Fugitive Life in an American City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  56. Gonzales RG. 2011. Learning to be illegal: undocumented youth and shifting legal contexts in the transition to adulthood. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:4602–19 [Google Scholar]
  57. Grabham E. 2010. Governing permanence: trans subjects, time, and the gender recognition act. Soc. Legal Stud. 19:1107–26 [Google Scholar]
  58. Greenberg G, Rosenheck R. 2008. Jail incarceration, homelessness, and mental health: a national study. Psychiatr. Serv. 59:2170–77 [Google Scholar]
  59. Gustafson KS. 2011. Cheating Welfare: Public Assistance and the Criminalization of Poverty New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
  60. Hallett MC. 2014. Temporary protection, enduring contradiction: the contested and contradictory meanings of temporary immigration status. Law Soc. Inq. 39:3621–42 [Google Scholar]
  61. Halliday S. 2000. Institutional racism in bureaucratic decision-making: a case study in the administration of homelessness law. J. Law Soc. 27:3449–71 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hamlin R. 2012. International law and administrative insulation: a comparison of refugee status determination regimes in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Law Soc. Inq. 37:4933–68 [Google Scholar]
  63. Hammett TM, Harmon MP, Rhodes W. 2002. The burden of infectious disease among inmates of and releasees from US correctional facilities. Am. J. Public Health92 11:1789–94 [Google Scholar]
  64. Harcourt BE. 2001. Illusion of Order: The False Promise of Broken Windows Policing Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press
  65. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K. 2010. Drawing blood from stones: legal debt and social inequality in the contemporary United States. Am. J. Sociol. 115:61753–99 [Google Scholar]
  66. Harris A, Evans H, Beckett K. 2011. Courtesy stigma and monetary sanctions: toward a socio-cultural theory of punishment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 76:2234–64 [Google Scholar]
  67. Herbert S. 1998. Police subculture reconsidered. Criminology 36:2343–70 [Google Scholar]
  68. Holmes SM. 2007. “Oaxacans like to work bent over”: the naturalization of social suffering among berry farm workers. Int. Migr. 45:339–68 [Google Scholar]
  69. Hood RG, Hoyle C. 2008. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  70. Huey L. 2007. Negotiating Demands: The Politics of Skid Row Policing in Edinburgh, San Francisco, and Vancouver Toronto: Univ. Tor. Press
  71. Hyde J. 2000. Homeless youth and the politics of redevelopment. PoLAR: Polit. Legal Anthropol. Rev. 23:173–85 [Google Scholar]
  72. Jacobs B. 1997. Dealing Crack: The Social World of Streetcorner Selling Boston: Northeast. Univ. Press
  73. Jenness V, Fenstermaker S. 2014. Agnes goes to prison: gender authenticity, transgender inmates in prisons for men, and pursuit of “the real deal.”. Gender Soc. 28:15–31 [Google Scholar]
  74. Johnsen S, Fitzpatrick S. 2010. Revanchist sanitisation or coercive care? The use of enforcement to combat begging, street drinking and rough sleeping in England. Urban Stud. 47:81703–23 [Google Scholar]
  75. Jones T, Newburn T. 2006. Three strikes and you're out: exploring symbol and substance in American and British crime control politics. Br. J. Criminol. 46:5781–802 [Google Scholar]
  76. King RD, Massoglia M, Uggen C. 2012. Employment and exile: U.S. criminal deportations, 1908–2005. Am. J. Sociol. 117:61786–825 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kirk DS, Papachristos AV. 2011. Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. Am. J. Sociol. 116:41190–233 [Google Scholar]
  78. Klinger DA. 1997. Negotiating order in patrol work: an ecological theory of police response to deviance. Criminology 35:2277–306 [Google Scholar]
  79. Kohler-Hausmann I. 2013. Misdemeanor justice: control without conviction. Am. J. Sociol. 119:2351–93 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lara-Millán A. 2014. Public emergency room overcrowding in the era of mass imprisonment. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:5866–87 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lareau A. 2003. Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  82. Light MT, Massoglia M, King RD. 2014. Citizenship and punishment: the salience of national membership in U.S. criminal courts. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:5825–47 [Google Scholar]
  83. Lippert R. 2009. Signs of the surveillant assemblage: privacy regulation, urban CCTV, and governmentality. Soc. Legal Stud. 18:4505–22 [Google Scholar]
  84. Lipsky M. 1980. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services New York: Russell Sage Found.
  85. Loizdou E. 2004. Criminal law and punishment: indexical permission. Punishm. Soc. 6:3303–18 [Google Scholar]
  86. Longazel JG. 2013. Moral panic as racial degradation ceremony: racial stratification and the local-level backlash against Latino/a immigrants. Punishm. Soc. 15:196–119 [Google Scholar]
  87. Longazel JG. 2014. Rhetorical barriers to mobilizing for immigrant rights: White innocence and Latina/o abstraction. Law Soc. Inq. 39:3580–600 [Google Scholar]
  88. Lynch M. 2002. Pedophiles and cyber-predators as contaminating forces: the language of disgust, pollution, and boundary invasions in federal debates on sex offender legislation. Law Soc. Inq. 27:3529–57 [Google Scholar]
  89. Lynch M. 2004. Punishing images: jail cam and the changing penal enterprise. Punishm. Soc. 6:3255–70 [Google Scholar]
  90. Lynch M, Omori M. 2014. Legal change and sentencing norms in the wake of Booker: the impact of time and place on drug trafficking cases in federal court. Law Soc. Rev. 48:2411–45 [Google Scholar]
  91. Manza J, Uggen C. 2005. Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  92. Mare RD. 1981. Change and stability in educational stratification. Am. Sociol. Rev. 46:172–87 [Google Scholar]
  93. Marshall A-M, Barclay S. 2003. In their own words: how ordinary people construct the legal world. Law Soc. Inq. 28:3617–28 [Google Scholar]
  94. Martinez D, Slack J. 2013. What part of “illegal” don't you understand? The social consequences of criminalizing unauthorized Mexican migrants in the United States. Soc. Legal Stud. 22:4535–51 [Google Scholar]
  95. Marwell NP. 2007. Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community Organizations in the Entrepreneurial City Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  96. Massaro TM. 1991. Shame, culture, and American criminal law. Mich. Law Rev. 89:71880–944 [Google Scholar]
  97. Massey DS. 2014. Manufacturing marginality among women and Latinos in neo-liberal America. Ethn. Racial Stud. 37:101747–52 [Google Scholar]
  98. Massoglia M. 2008. Incarceration, health, and racial disparities in health. Law Soc. Rev. 42:2275–306 [Google Scholar]
  99. Matthews R. 2005a. Policing prostitution: ten years on. Br. J. Criminol. 45:6877–95 [Google Scholar]
  100. Matthews R. 2005b. The myth of punitiveness. Theor. Criminol. 9:2175–201 [Google Scholar]
  101. Meadow T. 2010. “A rose is a rose”: on producing legal gender classifications. Gender Soc. 24:6814–37 [Google Scholar]
  102. McAdam D. 1983. Tactical innovation and the pace of insurgency. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:6735–54 [Google Scholar]
  103. McAlinden A-M. 2005. The use of ‘shame’ with sexual offenders. Br. J. Criminol. 45:3373–94 [Google Scholar]
  104. McKenzie S, Menjívar C. 2011. The meanings of migration, remittances, and gifts: the views of Honduran women who stay. Global Netw. 11:163–81 [Google Scholar]
  105. Meneses-Reyes R. 2013. Out of place, still in motion: shaping (im)mobility through urban regulation. Soc. Legal Stud. 22:3335–56 [Google Scholar]
  106. Menjívar C. 2006. Family reorganization in a context of legal uncertainty: Guatemalan and Salvadoran immigrants in the United States. Int. J. Sociol. Fam. 32:2223–45 [Google Scholar]
  107. Menjívar C. 2013. Central American immigrant workers and legal violence in Phoenix, Arizona. Lat. Stud. 11:2228–52 [Google Scholar]
  108. Menjívar C, Abrego LJ. 2012. Legal violence: immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants. Am. J. Sociol. 117:51380–421 [Google Scholar]
  109. Metraux S, Culhane DP. 2004. Homeless shelter use and reincarceration following prison release. Criminol. Public Policy 3:2139–60 [Google Scholar]
  110. Miller TA. 2002. Citizenship & severity: recent immigration reforms and the new penology. Georget. Immigr. Law J. 17:4611–66 [Google Scholar]
  111. Mitchell D. 1997. The annihilation of space by law: the roots and implications of anti-homeless laws in the United States. Antipode 29:3303–35 [Google Scholar]
  112. Moran D. 2012. Prisoner reintegration and the stigma of prison time inscribed on the body. Punishm. Soc. 14:5564–83 [Google Scholar]
  113. Morenoff JD, Harding DJ. 2014. Incarceration, prisoner reentry, and communities. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 40:1411–29 [Google Scholar]
  114. Moskos P. 2009. Cop in the Hood: My Year Policing Baltimore's Eastern District Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  115. Murray J. 2005. The effects of imprisonment on families and children of prisoners. The Effects of Imprisonment A Liebling, S Maruna 442–92 Cullompton, UK: Willan [Google Scholar]
  116. Myrick A. 2013. Facing your criminal record: expungement and the collateral problem of wrongfully represented self. Law Soc. Rev. 47:173–104 [Google Scholar]
  117. Nelken D. 1981. The gap problem in the sociology of law: a theoretical review. Windsor Yearb. Access Justice 1:135–61 [Google Scholar]
  118. Nellis M, Beyens K, Kaminski D. 2013. Electronically Monitored Punishment: International and Critical Perspectives New York: Routledge
  119. Newburn T, Jones T. 2007. Symbolizing crime control: reflections on zero tolerance. Theor. Criminol. 11:2221–43 [Google Scholar]
  120. Newburn T, Shiner M, Hayman S. 2004. Race, crime and injustice? Strip search and the treatment of suspects in custody. Br. J. Criminol. 44:5677–94 [Google Scholar]
  121. Pager D. 2007. Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  122. Paoline EA. 2004. Shedding light on police culture: an examination of officers' occupational attitudes. Police Q. 7:2205–36 [Google Scholar]
  123. Petrunik M, Deutschmann L. 2008. The exclusion-inclusion spectrum in state and community response to sex offenders in Anglo-American and European jurisdictions. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 52:5499–519 [Google Scholar]
  124. Pettit B, Lyons CJ. 2007. Status and the stigma of incarceration: the labor market effects of incarceration by race, class, and criminal involvement. Barriers to Reentry? The Labor Market for Released Prisoners in Post-Industrial America S Bushway, MA Stoll, DF Weiman 203–26 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  125. Pettitt B, Western B. 2004. Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:2151–69 [Google Scholar]
  126. Phelps MS. 2011. Rehabilitation in the punitive era: the gap between rhetoric and reality in US prison programs. Law Soc. Rev. 45:133–68 [Google Scholar]
  127. Phelps MS. 2013. The paradox of probation: community supervision in the age of mass incarceration. Law Policy 35:1–251–80 [Google Scholar]
  128. Pound R. 1910. Law in books and law in action. Am. Law Rev. 44:12 [Google Scholar]
  129. Pratt J. 2000a. The return of the wheelbarrow men; or, the arrival of postmodern penality?. Br. J. Criminol. 40:1127–47 [Google Scholar]
  130. Pratt J. 2000b. Emotive and ostentatious punishment: its decline and resurgence in modern society. Punishm. Soc. 2:4417–39 [Google Scholar]
  131. Pratt J, Brown D, Brown M, Hallsworth S, Morrison W. 2005. The New Punitiveness London: Willan
  132. Rios VM. 2011. Punished: Policing the Lives of Black and Latino Boys New York: N.Y. Univ. Press
  133. Rosales R. 2013. Survival, economic mobility and community among Los Angeles fruit vendors. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 39:5697–717 [Google Scholar]
  134. Rose DR, Clear TR. 1998. Incarceration, social capital, and crime: implications for social disorganization theory. Criminology 36:3441–80 [Google Scholar]
  135. Rosen E, Venkatesh S. 2007. Legal innovation and the control of gang behavior. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:1255–70 [Google Scholar]
  136. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. 2004. Seeing disorder: neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.”. Soc. Psychol. Q. 67:4319–42 [Google Scholar]
  137. Scott JC. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  138. Scott JC. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  139. Skiba RJ, Michael RS, Nardo AC, Peterson RL. 2002. The color of discipline: sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Rev. 34:4317–42 [Google Scholar]
  140. Skolnick JH, Bayley DH. 1986. The New Blue Line: Police Innovation in Six American Cities New York: Free Press
  141. Smith DA. 1986. The neighborhood context of police behavior. Crime Justice 8:313–41 [Google Scholar]
  142. Snacken S. 2010. Resisting punitiveness in Europe?. Theor. Criminol. 14:3273–92 [Google Scholar]
  143. Soss J, Fording RC, Schram S. 2011. Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  144. Spencer D. 2009. Sex offender as homo sacer. Punishm. Soc. 11:2219–40 [Google Scholar]
  145. Stuart F. 2011. Constructing police abuse after Rodney King: how skid row residents and the Los Angeles Police Department contest video evidence. Law Soc. Inq. 36:2327–53 [Google Scholar]
  146. Stuart F. 2014. From ‘rabble management’ to ‘recovery management’: policing homelessness in marginal urban space. Urban Stud. 51:91909–25 [Google Scholar]
  147. Stuesse A, Coleman M. 2014. Automobility, immobility, altermobility: surviving and resisting the intensification of immigrant policing. City Soc. 26:151–72 [Google Scholar]
  148. Stumpf JP. 2006. The crimmigration crisis: immigrants, crime, and sovereign power. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 56:2367–419 [Google Scholar]
  149. Tonry M. 2001. Punishment policies and patterns in western countries. Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries M Tonry, RS Frase 3–28 Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  150. Tonry M. 2007. Determinants of penal policies. Crime Justice 36:11–48 [Google Scholar]
  151. Toscano V. 2005. Misguided retribution: criminalization of pregnant women who take drugs. Soc. Legal Stud. 14:3359–86 [Google Scholar]
  152. Tosi A. 2007. Homelessness and the control of public space—criminalizing the poor?. Eur. J. Homelessness 1:224–36 [Google Scholar]
  153. Travis J. 2002. Invisible punishment: an instrument of social exclusion. Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment M Mauer, M Chesney-Lind 15–36 New York: New Press [Google Scholar]
  154. Tyler TR. 1990. Why People Obey the Law New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  155. Uggen C, Manza J. 2002. Democratic contraction? Political consequences of felon disenfranchisement in the United States. Am. Sociol. Rev. 67:6777–803 [Google Scholar]
  156. Van Der Leun J. 2006. Excluding illegal migrants in The Netherlands: between national policies and local implementation. West Eur. Polit. 29:2310–26 [Google Scholar]
  157. Van Maanen J. 1978. The asshole. Policing: A View from the Street PK Manning, J Van Maanen 307–28 Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear [Google Scholar]
  158. Varsanyi MW. 2010. Taking Local Control: Immigration Policy Activism in U.S. Cities and States. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
  159. Vaughan B. 2000. The government of youth: Disorder and dependence?. Soc. Legal Stud. 9:3347–66 [Google Scholar]
  160. Wacquant L. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  161. Wakefield S, Uggen C. 2010. Incarceration and stratification. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 36:1387–406 [Google Scholar]
  162. Wald J, Losen DJ. 2003. Defining and redirecting a school-to-prison pipeline. New Dir. Youth Dev. 2003:999–15 [Google Scholar]
  163. Walsh JP. 2014. Watchful citizens: immigration control, surveillance and societal participation. Soc. Legal Stud. 23:2237–59 [Google Scholar]
  164. Webster C. 2008. Marginalized white ethnicity, race and crime. Theor. Criminol. 12:3293–312 [Google Scholar]
  165. Welch M. 2011. The sonics of crimmigration in Australia: wall of noise and quiet manoeuvring. Br. J. Criminol. 52:2324–44 [Google Scholar]
  166. Western B. 2006. Punishment and Inequality in America New York: Russell Sage Found.
  167. Wilson JQ, Kelling GL. 1982. Broken windows: the police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly March
  168. Young J. 1999. The Exclusive Society: Social Exclusion, Crime, and Difference in Late Modernity Los Angeles, CA: Sage
  169. Zimring FE. 2001. Imprisonment rates and the new politics of criminal punishment. Punishm. Soc. 3:1161–66 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120814-121433
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error