The Origin and Dispersal of Uralic: Distributional Typological View

Literature Cited

1. Abondolo D 1998. The Uralic Languages London/New York: Routledge
2. Aikio A. 2012. An essay on Saami ethnolinguistic prehistory. See Grünthal & Kallio 2012 63–117
3. Aikio A. 2020. Proto-Uralic. See Bákro-Nagy et al. 2020. In press
4. Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Sjögren KG, Rasmussen S, Rasmussen M et al. 2015. Population genomics of Bronze Age Eurasia. Nature 522:167–72
   [Google Scholar]
5. Anthony DW. 2007. The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
6. Anthony DW, Ringe D. 2015. The Indo-European homeland from linguistic and archaeological perspectives. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 1:199–219
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bákro-Nagy M, Laakso J, Skribnik E 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Uralic Languages Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press In press
8. Balanovsky O. 2019. Evolution of the Y-chromosomal pool in East Europe Presented at CONTACTS: Archaeology, Genetics & Languages, Suomenlinna Helsinki: May 9–10
9. Barfield T. 1989. The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China, 221 BC to AD 1757 London: Blackwell
10. Bickel B, Nichols J, Zakharko T, Witzlack-Makarevich A, Hildebrandt K et al. 2017. The AUTOTYP Database release version 0.1.0. https://github.com/autotyp/autotyp-data
11. Carpelan C, Parpola A, Koskikallio P 2001. Early Contacts Between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and Archaeological Considerations Helsinki: Suom.-Ugr. Seura
12. Chang W, Hall D, Cathcart C, Garrett A 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the steppe chronology of Indo-European origins. Language 91:1194–244
    [Google Scholar]
13. Corbett GG. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83:18–42
    [Google Scholar]
14. Corbett GG. 2015. Morphosyntactic complexity: a typology of lexical splits. Language 91:1145–93
    [Google Scholar]
15. Darden BJ. 2001. On the question of the Anatolian origin of Indo-Hittite. Greater Anatolia and the Indo-Hittite Language Family R Drews 184–228 Washington, DC: Inst. Study Man
    [Google Scholar]
16. de Barros Damgaard P, Martiniano R, Kamm J, Moreno-Mayar JV, Kroonen G et al. 2018. The first horse herders and the impact of early Bronze Age steppe expansions into Asia. Science 360:eaar7711
    [Google Scholar]
17. Diebold A. 1960. Determining the centers of dispersal of language groups. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 26:11–10
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dyen I. 1956. Language distribution and migration theory. Language 32:4611–26
    [Google Scholar]
19. Feist T. 2015. A Grammar of Skolt Saami Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Soc.
20. Grünthal R. 2012. Baltic loanwords in Mordvin. See Grünthal & Kallio 2012 297–343
21. Grünthal R, Kallio P 2012. A Linguistic Map of Prehistoric Northern Europe Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Soc.
22. Grünthal R, Nichols J. 2016. Transitivizing/detransitivizing typology and language family history. Ling. Posnan. 58:211–31
    [Google Scholar]
23. Grünthal R, Salminen T. 1993. Geographical Distribution of the Uralic Languages Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Soc.
24. Häkkinen J. 2009. Kantauralin ajoitus ja paikannus: perustelut putarissa. J. Finno-Ugrian Soc. 92:9–56
    [Google Scholar]
25. Helama S, Oinonen M. 2019. Exact dating of the Meghalayan lower boundary based on high-latitude tree-ring isotope chronology. Quat. Sci. Rev. 214:178–84
    [Google Scholar]
26. Helimski E. 2001. Early Indo-Uralic linguistic relationship: real kinship and imagined contacts. See Carpelan et al. 2001 235–63
27. Holopainen S. 2019. Indo-Iranian borrowings in Uralic: critical overview of the sound substitutions and distribution criterion PhD Diss., Univ. Helsinki Helsinki:
28. Ilumäe AM, Reidla M, Chukhryaeva M, Järve M, Post H et al. 2016. Human Y chromosome haplogroup N: a non-trivial time-resolved phylogeography that cuts across language families. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99:163–73
    [Google Scholar]
29. Janhunen J. 1990. Material on Manchurian Khamnigan Mongol Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Soc.
30. Janhunen J. 1991. Material on Manchurian Khamnigan Evenki Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Soc.
31. Janhunen J. 1996. Manchuria: An Ethnic History Helsinki: Suom.-Ugr. Seura
32. Janhunen J. 2005. Khamnigan Mongol Munich: Lincom
33. Janhunen J. 2020. Grammaticalization in Uralic as viewed from a general Eurasian perspective.. Grammaticalization Scenarios: Cross-Linguistic Variation and Universal Tendencies, Vol. 1: Grammaticalization Scenarios from Europe and Asia W Bisang, A Malchukov 361–98 Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton
    [Google Scholar]
34. Junttila S. 2012. The prehistoric context of the oldest contacts between Baltic and Finnic languages. See Grünthal & Kallio 2012 261–96
35. Kaiser J. 2004. Ural farmers got milk gene first. Science 306:1284–85
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kallio P. 2006. Suomen kantakielen absoluuttista kronologiaa. Virittäjä 110:2–25
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kallio P. 2015. The language contact situation in prehistoric northeastern Europe. The Linguistic Roots of Europe R Mailhammer, T Vennemann, BA Olsen 77–102 Copenhagen, Den: Mus. Tuscul. Press, Univ. Copenhagen
    [Google Scholar]
38. Khanina O, Koryakov Y, Shluinsky A 2018. Enets in space and time: a case study in linguistic geography. Finn.-Ugr. Mitt. 42:109–35
    [Google Scholar]
39. Klumpp G, Mazzitelli LF, Rozhanskiy F 2018. Typology of Uralic languages: current views and new perspectives. J. Estonian Finno-Ugr. Linguist. 9:1 https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2018.9.1.01
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
40. Koivulehto J. 2001. The earliest contacts between Indo-European and Uralic speakers in the light of lexical loans. See Carpelan et al. 2001 235–63
41. Lang V. 2018. Läänemeresoome Tulemised Tartu, Estonia: Univ. Tartu Press
42. Lehtinen J, Honkola T, Korhonen K, Syrjänen K, Wahlberg N, Vesakoski O 2014. Behind family trees: secondary connections in Uralic language networks. Lang. Dyn. Change 4:189–221
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mallory JP. 1997. Poltavka culture. Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture JP Mallory, DQ Adams 439–40 London: Fitzroy Dearborn
    [Google Scholar]
44. Marchenko ZV, Svyatko SV, Molodin VI, Grishin AE, Rykun MP 2017. Radiocarbon chronology of complexes with Seima-Turbino type objects (Bronze Age) in southwestern Siberia. Radiocarbon 59:51381–97
    [Google Scholar]
45. Mathieson I, Lazaridis I, Rohland N, Mallick S, Patterson N et al. 2015. Genome-wide patterns of selection in 230 ancient Eurasians. Nature 528:499–503
    [Google Scholar]
46. Matveev AK. 1962. Az ugor népek ősi letelepulési helyei. Nyelvtud. Közlemények 64:289–97
    [Google Scholar]
47. Meillet A. 2005 (1908). The Indo-European Dialects Tuscaloosa: Univ. Ala. Press
48. Miestamo M, Tamm A, Gáspár K, Wagner-Nagy B 2015. Negation in Uralic Languages Amsterdam: Benjamins
49. Nichols J. 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 26:359–84
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nichols J. 2007. A typological geography for Indo-European. Proceedings of the 18th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference K Jones-Bley, ME Huld, A Della Volpe, MR Dexter 191–211 JIES Monogr. 53 Washington, DC: Inst. Study Man
    [Google Scholar]
51. Nichols J. 2010. Proof of Dene-Yeniseian relatedness. The Dene-Yeniseian Connection J Kari, BA Potter 266–78 Fairbanks: Alsk. Nativ. Lang. Cent.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Nichols J. 2018. Non-linguistic conditions for causativization as a linguistic attractor. Front. Psychol. 8:2356
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nichols J. 2019. Why is gender so complex? New typological considerations. Grammatical Gender and Linguistic Complexity F Di Garbo, B Wälchli 63–92 Berlin: Lang. Sci.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Nichols J. 2020a. Canonical complexity. The Complexities of Morphology P Arkadiev, F Gardani 163–92 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
55. Nichols J. 2020b. For better and/or for worse: complexity and person hierarchies. Language Change for the Worse D Enke, T Weber, G Seiler, L Hyman, J Nichols Berlin: Lang. Sci In press
    [Google Scholar]
56. Nichols J, Rhodes RA. 2018. Vectors of language spread at the central steppe periphery: Finno-Ugric as catalyst language. Digging for Words G Kroonen, R Iversen 58–68 Oxford, UK: BAR
    [Google Scholar]
57. Nikolaeva I. 2014. A Grammar of Tundra Nenets Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton
58. Nordqvist K, Heyd V. 2020. The forgotten child of the wider Corded Ware family: the Fatyanovo culture in context. Proc. Prehist. Soc. 86: In press
    [Google Scholar]
59. Outram AK, Stear NA, Bendrey R, Olsen S, Kasparov A et al. 2009. The earliest horse harnessing and milking. Science 323:1332–35
    [Google Scholar]
60. Pajusalu K, Uiboaed K, Pomozi P, Németh E, Fehér T 2018. Towards a phonological typology of Uralic languages. J. Estonian Finno-Ugr. Linguist. 9:1187–207
    [Google Scholar]
61. Parpola A. 2012. Formation of the Indo-European and Uralic (Finno-Ugric) language families in the light of archaeology: revised and integrated “total” correlations. See Grünthal & Kallio 2012 119–84
62. Perşoiu A, Ionita M, Weiss H 2019. Atmospheric blocking induced by the strengthened Siberian High led to drying in west Asia during the 4.2 ka BP event—a hypothesis. Clim. Past 15:781–93
    [Google Scholar]
63. Rahkonen P. 2013. Southeastern contact area of Finnic languages in the light of onomastics PhD Diss., Univ. Helsinki Helsinki:
64. Rootsi S, Zhivotovsky LA, Baldovič M, Kayser M, Kutuev IA et al. 2007. A counterclockwise northern route of the Y-chromosome haplogroup N from Southeast Asia toward Europe. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 15:2204–11
    [Google Scholar]
65. Saag L, Laneman M, Varul L, Malve M, Valk H et al. 2019. The arrival of Siberian ancestry connecting the eastern Baltic to Uralic speakers further east. Curr. Biol. 29:1701–11.e16
    [Google Scholar]
66. Saarikivi JS. 2020. Uralic intermediate protolanguages: a descendent reconstruction. See Bákro-Nagy et al. 2020. In press
67. Salminen T. 2001. The rise of the Finno-Ugric language family. See Carpelan et al. 2001 385–96
68. Sapir E. 1949 (1916). Time perspective in aboriginal American culture: a study in method. Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality DG Mandelbaum 389–467 Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
69. Simon Z. 2020. Urindogermanische Lehnwörter in den uralischen und finno-ugrischen Grundsprachen: eine Fata Morgana. Indoger. Forsch. In press
    [Google Scholar]
70. Tambets K, Yunusbayev B, Hudjashov G, Ilumäe AM, Rootsi S, Metspalu M 2018. Genes reveal traces of common recent demographic history for most of the Uralic-speaking populations. Genome Biol 19:139
    [Google Scholar]
71. Toldova SJ, Xolodilova MA, Tatevosov SG, Kashkin EV, Kozlov AA et al. 2018. Èlementy mokšanskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom osveščenii Moscow: Buki Vedi
72. Toporov VN, Trubačev ON. 1962. Lingvističeskij analiz gidronimov verxnego podneprov'ja Moscow: AN SSSR
73. Trudgill P. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Structure and Complexity Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
74. Wilbur J. 2015. A Grammar of Pite Saami Berlin: Lang. Sci.