1932

Abstract

In this article I comment on areas where I agree/disagree with the five previous perspectives on organizational psychology/organizational behavior (OP/OB). This is followed by a dire prediction of the future for OP doctoral programs, criticisms of the journal editorial processes and the overemphasis on deductive theory building, the value of qualitative analyses and enumerative reviews, the importance of mentors for advancing one's career, and the strengths and weaknesses of our scholarly societies. The article ends with a call for improving the balance currently in favor of scientists at the expense of practitioners.

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: The Three Secrets to Gary’s Success

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Mentors - Seek and Embrace Criticism

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: On the Marriage Between Locke and Latham

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Resiliency - Overcoming 90% Rejection Rates

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Lesson Learned #1 - How Do You Win by Putting Other People Down- You Don’t

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Advice for Every Stage of Your Graduate Career

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: On the HR/OB Dichotomy

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Gary’s Soapbox: This Is the Scandal of Our Field

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: On the Importance of Mentors

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: What Does It Take to Be a Good Mentee?

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Theory - Everything in Moderation

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: How Do We Make Sure Our Research Is Relevant for Organizations and Managers?

Associated Article

There are media items related to this article:
Gary P. Latham: Lesson Learned #2 - Don’t Get Scooped
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015323
2019-01-21
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/6/1/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015323.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015323&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Bandura A 1977. Social Learning Theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
  2. Brayfield AH, Crockett WH 1955. Employee attitudes and employee performance. Psychol. Bull. 52:396–424
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown TC, Latham GP 2018. Maintaining relevance and rigor: how we can bridge the practitioner-scholar divide within human resource development. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 29:99–105
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Campbell DT, Stanley JC 1966. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research Chicago: Rand McNally
  5. Campbell JP, Dunnette MD, Lawler EE, Weick KE 1970. Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness New York: McGraw-Hill
  6. Campbell JP, Wilmot MP 2018. The functioning of theory in industrial, work and organizational psychology (IWOP). The Sage Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1: Personnel Psychology and Employee Performance DS Ones, N Anderson, C Viswesvaran, HK Sinangil 3–37 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Eden D 2016. Field experiments in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4:91–122
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hambrick DC 2007. The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing. ? Acad. Manag. J. 50:1346–52
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johns G 2006. The essential importance of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:386–408
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Johns G 2018. Advances in the treatment of context in organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 5:21–46
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kahneman D 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  12. Krech D, Crutchfield RS, Bellachey EL 1962. Individuals in Society: A Textbook of Social Psychology New York: McGraw-Hill
  13. Latham GP 2017. Mandating the licensing of I-O psychologists lacks merit. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 10:182–86
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Latham GP, Latham SD 2003. Facilitators and inhibitors of the transfer of knowledge between scientists and practitioners in human resource management: leveraging cultural, individual and institutional variables. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 12:245–56
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Latham GP, Locke EA 1975. Increasing productivity with decreasing time limits: a field replication of Parkinson's law. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:524–26
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Latham GP, Locke EA 2018. Goal setting theory: controversies and resolutions. The Sage Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 2: Organizational Psychology DS Ones, N Anderson, C Viswesvaran, HK Sinangil 103–24 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Latham GP, Mitchell TR, Dossett DL 1978. The importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 63:163–71
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Latham GP, Yukl GA 1975. Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:299–302
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Locke EA 1986. Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
  20. Locke EA 2007. The case for inductive theory building. J. Manag. 33:867–90
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mischel W 2009. Becoming a cumulative science. APS Observer 22:1 https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/becoming-a-cumulative-science
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mitchell TR 2018. A dynamic, inclusive and affective evolutionary view of organizational behavior. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:1–32
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Porter LW, Schneider B 2014. What was, what is, and what may be in OP/OB. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:1–21
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ronan WW, Latham GP, Kinne SB 1973. The effects of goal setting and supervision on worker behavior in an industrial situation. J. Appl. Psychol. 58:302–7
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rynes SL, McNatt DB, Bretz RD 1999. Academic research inside organizations: inputs, processes, and outcomes. Pers. Psychol. 52:869–98
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schein EH 2015. Organizational psychology then and now: some observations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:1–19
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Staw B 2016. Stumbling toward a social psychology of organizations: an autobiographical look at the direction of organizational research. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:1–19
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Stouten J, Rousseau DM, De Cremer D 2018. Successful organizational change: integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Acad. Manag. Ann. 12:2
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Trevino LK, Den Nieuwenboer NA, Kish-Gephart JJ 2014. (Un)ethical behavior in organizations. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:635–60
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Weber M 2018. Individuals matter, but the situation is the thing: the case for a habitual situational lens in leadership and organizational decision making. Organ. Dyn. In press
  31. Weick KE 2017. Perspective construction in organizational behavior. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4:1–17
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015323
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015323
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

The Three Secrets to Gary’s Success

On the Importance of Mentors

Mentors - Seek and Embrace Criticism

Resiliency - Overcoming 90% Rejection Rates

What Does It Take to Be a Good Mentee?

On the Marriage Between Locke and Latham

Theory - Everything in Moderation

Advice for Every Stage of Your Graduate Career

On the HR/OB Dichotomy

How Do We Make Sure Our Research Is Relevant for Organizations and Managers?

Gary’s Soapbox: This Is the Scandal of Our Field

Lesson Learned #1 - How Do You Win by Putting Other People Down? You Don’t

Lesson Learned #2 - Don’t Get Scooped

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error