1932

Abstract

Conflict is an emotional enterprise. We provide an integrative synthesis of theory and research on emotional dynamics in conflict and negotiation at three levels of analysis: the individual, the dyad, and the group. At the individual level, experienced moods and emotions shape negotiators' cognition and behavior. At the dyadic level, emotional expressions influence counterparts' cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses. At the group level, patterns of emotional experience and/or expression can instigate cooperation, coordination, and conformity, or competition, conflict, and deviance. Intrapersonal (individual-level) effects of diffuse moods can be explained by affect priming and affect-as-information models, whereas effects of discrete emotions are better explained by the appraisal-tendency framework. Interpersonal (dyadic- and group-level) effects of emotions are mediated by affective (e.g., emotional contagion) and inferential (e.g., reverse appraisal) responses, whose relative predictive power can be understood through the lens of emotions as social information (EASI) theory. We offer a critical assessment of the current literature, discuss practical implications for negotiation and conflict management, and sketch an agenda for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714
2018-01-21
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/5/1/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adam H, Brett JM. 2015. Context matters: the social effects of anger in cooperative, balanced, and competitive negotiation situations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 61:44–58 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adam H, Shirako A. 2013. Not all anger is created equal: the impact of the expresser's culture on the social effects of anger in negotiations. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:785–98 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adam H, Shirako A, Maddux WW. 2010. Cultural variance in the interpersonal effects of anger in negotiations. Psychol. Sci. 21:882–89 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allred KG, Mallozzi JS, Matsui F, Raia CP. 1997. The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 70:175–87 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson C, Thompson LL. 2004. Affect from the top down: how powerful individuals' positive affect shapes negotiations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 95:125–39 [Google Scholar]
  6. Aviezer H, Trope Y, Todorov A. 2012. Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science 338:1225–29 [Google Scholar]
  7. Baron RA. 1990. Environmentally induced positive affect: its impact on self-efficacy, task performance, negotiation, and conflict. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 20:368–84 [Google Scholar]
  8. Baron RA, Fortin SP, Frei RL, Hauver LA, Shack ML. 1990. Reducing organizational conflict: the role of socially-induced positive affect. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 1:133–52 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barry B. 1999. The tactical use of emotion in negotiation. Res. Negot. Organ. 7:93–121 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barry B, Fulmer IS, Van Kleef GA. 2004. I laughed, I cried, I settled: the role of emotions in negotiation. The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture MJ Gelfand, JM Brett 71–94 Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Barry B, Oliver RL. 1996. Affect in dyadic negotiation: a model and propositions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 67:127–43 [Google Scholar]
  12. Barsade SG. 2002. The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:644–75 [Google Scholar]
  13. Barsade SG, Knight AP. 2015. Group affect. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:21–46 [Google Scholar]
  14. Barsade SG, Ward AJ, Turner JDF, Sonnenfeld JA. 2000. To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams. Adm. Sci. Q. 45:802–36 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bar‐Tal D, Halperin E, De Rivera J. 2007. Collective emotions in conflict situations: societal implications. J. Soc. Issues 63:441–60 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bazerman MH, Tenbrunsel AE, Wade-Benzoni KA. 2008. When “sacred” issues are at stake. Negot. J. 24:113–17 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bower GH. 1981. Mood and memory. Am. Psychol. 36:129–48 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bower GH, Forgas JP. 2001. Mood and social memory. Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition JP Forgas 95–120 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  19. Brooks AW. 2014. Get excited: reappraising pre-performance anxiety as excitement. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 143:1144–58 [Google Scholar]
  20. Brooks AW, Schweitzer ME. 2011. Can Nervous Nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 115:43–54 [Google Scholar]
  21. Butt AN, Choi JN, Jaeger AM. 2005. The effects of self‐emotion, counterpart emotion, and counterpart behavior on negotiator behavior: a comparison of individual‐level and dyad‐level dynamics. J. Organ. Behav. 26:681–704 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carnevale PJ, Isen AM. 1986. The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 37:1–13 [Google Scholar]
  23. Chaiken S. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39:752–66 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cheshin A, Rafaeli A, Bos N. 2011. Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others' affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 116:2–16 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cohen-Chen S, Crisp RJ, Halperin E. 2017. Hope comes in many forms: Out-group expressions of hope override low support and promote reconciliation in conflict. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8:153–61 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cohen-Chen S, Halperin E, Crisp RJ, Gross JJ. 2014. Hope in the Middle East: malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 5:67–75 [Google Scholar]
  27. Côté S. 2005. A social interaction model of the effects of emotion regulation on work strain. Acad. Manag. Rev. 30:509–30 [Google Scholar]
  28. Côté S. 2014. Emotional intelligence in organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1:459–88 [Google Scholar]
  29. Côté S, Hideg I. 2011. The ability to influence others via emotion displays: a new dimension of emotional intelligence. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 1:53–71 [Google Scholar]
  30. Côté S, Hideg I, Van Kleef GA. 2013. The consequences of faking anger in negotiations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49:453–63 [Google Scholar]
  31. Darwin C. 1872. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals London: HarperCollins, 3rd ed..
  32. De Dreu CKW. 2010. Social conflict: the emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. Handbook of Social Psychology 2 ST Fiske, DT Gilbert, L Gardner 983–1023 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 5th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  33. De Dreu CKW, Carnevale PJD. 2003. Motivational bases of information processing and strategy in conflict and negotiation. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35:235–91 [Google Scholar]
  34. De Melo CM, Carnevale PJ, Read SJ, Gratch J. 2014. Reading people's minds from emotion expressions in interdependent decision making. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106:73–88 [Google Scholar]
  35. De Vos B, Van Zomeren M, Gordijn EH, Postmes T. 2013. The communication of “pure” group-based anger reduces tendencies toward intergroup conflict because it increases out-group empathy. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39:1043–52 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dehghani M, Carnevale PJ, Gratch J. 2014. Interpersonal effects of expressed anger and sorrow in morally charged negotiation. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 9:104–13 [Google Scholar]
  37. Deutsch M. 1973. The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  38. Druckman D, Broome BJ, Korper SH. 1988. Value differences and conflict resolution. J. Confl. Resolut. 32:489–510 [Google Scholar]
  39. Druckman D, Rozelle R, Zechmeister K. 1977. Conflict of interest and value dissensus: two perspectives. Negotiations: Social-Psychological Perspectives D Druckman 105–31 Beverley Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  40. Ekman P. 1993. Facial expression and emotion. Am. Psychol. 48:384–92 [Google Scholar]
  41. Ekman P, Davidson RJ. 1994. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  42. Filipowicz A, Barsade S, Melwani S. 2011. Understanding emotional transitions: the interpersonal consequences of changing emotions in negotiations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101:541–56 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fischer AH, Manstead ASR. 2016. Social functions of emotion and emotion regulation. Handbook of Emotion M Lewis, J Haviland, L Feldman Barrett 456–69 New York: Guilford, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fiske ST. 1993. Controlling other people: the impact of power on stereotyping. Am. Psychol. 48:621–28 [Google Scholar]
  45. Forgas JP. 1998. On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74:565–77 [Google Scholar]
  46. Frank RH. 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions New York: Norton
  47. Friedman R, Anderson C, Brett J, Olekalns M, Goates N, Lisco CC. 2004. The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:369–76 [Google Scholar]
  48. Frijda NH. 1986. The Emotions Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  49. Frijda NH. 1994. Varieties of affect: emotions and episodes, moods, and sentiments. The Nature of Emotion: Fundamental Questions P Ekman, RJ Davidson 59–67 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  50. Frijda NH, Mesquita B. 1994. The social roles and functions of emotions. Emotion and Culture: Empirical Studies of Mutual Influence S Kitayama, HS Markus 51–87 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  51. Grandey A. 2003. When “the show must go on”: surface and deep acting as determinants of emotional exhaustion and peer-rated service delivery. Acad. Manag. J. 46:86–96 [Google Scholar]
  52. Gross JJ. 1998. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74:224–37 [Google Scholar]
  53. Halperin E. 2008. Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. J. Confl. Resolut. 52:713–36 [Google Scholar]
  54. Halperin E, Porat R, Tamir M, Gross JJ. 2013. Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field. Psychol. Sci. 24:106–11 [Google Scholar]
  55. Halperin E, Russell AG, Dweck CS, Gross JJ. 2011. Anger, hatred, and the quest for peace: Anger can be constructive in the absence of hatred. J. Confl. Resolut. 55:274–91 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hareli S, Hess U. 2010. What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: an appraisal perspective on person perception. Cogn. Emot. 24:128–40 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hareli S, Rafaeli A. 2008. Emotion cycles: on the social influence of emotion. Res. Organ. Behav. 28:35–59 [Google Scholar]
  58. Harinck F, De Dreu CKW, Van Vianen AEM. 2000. The impact of conflict issue on fixed-pie perceptions, problem solving, and integrative outcomes in negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 81:329–58 [Google Scholar]
  59. Harinck F, Van Kleef GA. 2012. Be hard on the interests and soft on the values: Conflict issue moderates the effects of anger in negotiations. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 51:741–52 [Google Scholar]
  60. Heerdink MW, Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Fischer AH. 2013. On the social influence of emotions in groups: interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on conformity versus deviance. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 105:262–84 [Google Scholar]
  61. Hertenstein MJ, Holmes R, McCullough M, Keltner D. 2009. The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion 9:566–73 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hideg I, Van Kleef GA. 2017. When expressions of fake emotions elicit negative reactions: the role of observers' dialectical thinking. J. Organ. Behav. 38:1196–1212 [Google Scholar]
  63. Homan AC, Van Kleef GA, Sanchez-Burks J. 2016. Team members' emotional displays as indicators of team functioning. Cogn. Emot. 30:134–49 [Google Scholar]
  64. Isen AM, Shalker TE, Clark M, Karp L. 1978. Affect, accessibility of material in memory, and behavior: a cognitive loop?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  65. Jehn KA. 1997. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Adm. Sci. Q. 42:530–57 [Google Scholar]
  66. Kassinove H, Roth D, Owens SG, Fuller JR. 2002. Effects of trait anger and anger expression style on competitive attack responses in a wartime prisoner's dilemma game. Aggress. Behav. 28:117–25 [Google Scholar]
  67. Kelley HH, Holmes JG, Kerr NL, Reis HT, Rusbult CE, Van Lange PAM. 2003. An Atlas of Interpersonal Situations New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  68. Keltner D, Haidt J. 1999. Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cogn. Emot. 13:505–21 [Google Scholar]
  69. Ketelaar T, Au WT. 2003. The effects of feelings of guilt on the behaviour of uncooperative individuals in repeated social bargaining games: an affect-as-information interpretation of the role of emotion in social interaction. Cogn. Emot. 17:429–53 [Google Scholar]
  70. Knapp A, Clark M. 1991. Some detrimental effects of negative mood on individuals' ability to solve resource dilemmas. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17:678–88 [Google Scholar]
  71. Komorita SS, Parks CD. 1995. Interpersonal relations: mixed-motive interaction. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 46:183–207 [Google Scholar]
  72. Kopelman S, Rosette AS. 2008. Cultural variation in response to strategic emotions in negotiations. Group Decis. Negot. 17:65–77 [Google Scholar]
  73. Kopelman S, Rosette AS, Thompson L. 2006. The three faces of Eve: an examination of the strategic display of positive, negative, and neutral emotions in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 99:81–101 [Google Scholar]
  74. Kramer RM, Newton E, Pommerenke PL. 1993. Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: effects of self-esteem and mood. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 56:110–33 [Google Scholar]
  75. Kruglanski AW, Webster DM. 1996. Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing.”. Psychol. Rev. 103:263–83 [Google Scholar]
  76. Kuppens P, Oravecz Z, Tuerlinckx F. 2010. Feelings change: accounting for individual differences in the temporal dynamics of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 99:1042–60 [Google Scholar]
  77. Lazarus RS. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  78. Lelieveld G-J, Van Dijk E, Van Beest I, Van Kleef GA. 2012. Why anger and disappointment affect bargaining behavior differently: the moderating role of power and the mediating role of reciprocal and complementary emotions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 38:1209–21 [Google Scholar]
  79. Lelieveld G-J, Van Dijk E, Van Beest I, Van Kleef GA. 2013. Does communicating disappointment in negotiations help or hurt? Solving an apparent inconsistency in the social-functional approach to emotions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 105:605–20 [Google Scholar]
  80. Lerner JS, Keltner D. 2000. Beyond valence: toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgment and choice. Cogn. Emot. 14:473–93 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lerner JS, Keltner D. 2001. Fear, anger, and risk. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81:146–59 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lerner JS, Tiedens LZ. 2006. Portrait of the angry decision maker: how appraisal tendencies shape anger's influence on cognition. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 19:115–37 [Google Scholar]
  83. Morris MW, Keltner D. 2000. How emotions work: an analysis of the social functions of emotional expression in negotiations. Res. Organ. Behav. 22:1–50 [Google Scholar]
  84. Oatley K, Jenkins JM. 1992. Human emotions: function and dysfunction. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 43:55–85 [Google Scholar]
  85. O'Connor K, Arnold J, Maurizio A. 2010. The prospect of negotiating: stress, cognitive appraisal, and performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:729–35 [Google Scholar]
  86. Overbeck JR, Neale MA, Govan CL. 2010. I feel, therefore you act: intrapersonal and interpersonal effects of emotion on negotiation as a function of social power. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 112:126–39 [Google Scholar]
  87. Parkinson B. 1996. Emotions are social. Br. J. Psychol. 87:663–83 [Google Scholar]
  88. Pietroni D, Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Pagliaro S. 2008. Emotions as strategic information: effects of other's emotions on fixed-pie perception, demands and integrative behavior in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44:1444–54 [Google Scholar]
  89. Pillutla MM, Murnighan JK. 1996. Unfairness, anger, and spite: emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 68:208–24 [Google Scholar]
  90. Pruitt DG. 1998. Social conflict. The Handbook of Social Psychology 2 DT Gilbert, ST Fiske, G Lindzey 470–503 New York: McGraw-Hill, 4th ed.. [Google Scholar]
  91. Pruitt DG, Carnevale PJ. 1993. Negotiation in Social Conflict Buckingham, UK: Open Univ. Press
  92. Rafaeli A, Sutton RI. 1987. Expression of emotion as part of the work role. Acad. Manag. Rev. 12:23–37 [Google Scholar]
  93. Rothman NB. 2011. Steering sheep: how expressed emotional ambivalence elicits dominance in interdependent decision making contexts. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 116:66–82 [Google Scholar]
  94. Rubin JZ, Pruitt DG, Kim SH. 1994. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement New York: McGraw-Hill
  95. Rusbult CE, Van Lange PA. 2003. Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54:351–75 [Google Scholar]
  96. Schelling TC. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  97. Scherer KR. 2003. Vocal communication of emotion: a review of research paradigms. Speech Commun 40:227–56 [Google Scholar]
  98. Scherer KR. 2009. The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model. Cogn. Emot. 23:1307–51 [Google Scholar]
  99. Schwarz N, Clore GL. 1983. Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45:513–23 [Google Scholar]
  100. Shields SA. 2005. The politics of emotion in everyday life: “appropriate” emotion and claims on identity. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 9:3–15 [Google Scholar]
  101. Sinaceur M, Adam H, Van Kleef GA, Galinsky AD. 2013. The advantages of being unpredictable: how emotional inconsistency extracts concessions in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49:498–508 [Google Scholar]
  102. Sinaceur M, Kopelman S, Vasiljevic D, Haag C. 2015. Weep and get more: when and why sadness expression is effective in negotiations. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1847–71 [Google Scholar]
  103. Sinaceur M, Tiedens LZ. 2006. Get mad and get more than even: when and why anger expression is effective in negotiations. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42:314–22 [Google Scholar]
  104. Sinaceur M, Van Kleef GA, Neale MA, Adam H, Haag C. 2011. Hot or cold: Is communicating anger or threats more effective in negotiation?. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:1018–32 [Google Scholar]
  105. Srivastava J, Fedorikhin A, Espinoza F. 2009. Coupling and decoupling of unfairness and anger in ultimatum bargaining. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 22:475–89 [Google Scholar]
  106. Steinel W, Van Kleef GA, Harinck F. 2008. Are you talking to me?! Separating the people from the problem when expressing emotions in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44:362–69 [Google Scholar]
  107. Sy T, Côté S, Saavedra R. 2005. The contagious leader: impact of the leader's mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. J. Appl. Psychol. 90:295–305 [Google Scholar]
  108. Thompson L, Valley KL, Kramer RM. 1995. The bittersweet feeling of success: an examination of social perception in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 31:467–92 [Google Scholar]
  109. Tiedens LZ, Ellsworth PC, Mesquita B. 2000. Sentimental stereotypes: emotional expectations for high- and low-status group members. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 26:560–75 [Google Scholar]
  110. Tiedens LZ, Linton S. 2001. Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: the effects of specific emotions on information processing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81:973–88 [Google Scholar]
  111. Tng HY, Au AK. 2014. Strategic display of anger and happiness in negotiation: the moderating role of perceived authenticity. Negot. J. 30:301–27 [Google Scholar]
  112. Van Beest I, Van Kleef GA, Van Dijk E. 2008. Get angry, get out: the interpersonal effects of anger communication in multiparty negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 44:993–1002 [Google Scholar]
  113. Van Dijk E, Van Kleef GA, Steinel W, Van Beest I. 2008. A social functional approach to emotions in bargaining: when communicating anger pays and when it backfires. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94:600–14 [Google Scholar]
  114. Van Kleef GA. 2009. How emotions regulate social life: the emotions as social information (EASI) model. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18:184–88 [Google Scholar]
  115. Van Kleef GA. 2016. The Interpersonal Dynamics of Emotion: Toward an Integrative Theory of Emotions as Social Information Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  116. Van Kleef GA. 2017. The social effects of emotions are functionally equivalent across expressive modalities. Psychol. Inq. 28:211–16 [Google Scholar]
  117. Van Kleef GA, Côté S. 2007. Expressing anger in conflict: when it helps and when it hurts. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1557–69 [Google Scholar]
  118. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW. 2010. Longer-term consequences of anger expression in negotiation: retaliation or spill-over?. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 46:753–60 [Google Scholar]
  119. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR. 2004a. The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 86:57–76 [Google Scholar]
  120. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR. 2004b. The interpersonal effects of emotions in negotiations: a motivated information processing approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87:510–28 [Google Scholar]
  121. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR. 2006a. Supplication and appeasement in conflict and negotiation: the interpersonal effects of disappointment, worry, guilt, and regret. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91:124–42 [Google Scholar]
  122. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Manstead ASR. 2010. An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: the emotions as social information model. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42:45–96 [Google Scholar]
  123. Van Kleef GA, De Dreu CKW, Pietroni D, Manstead ASR. 2006b. Power and emotion in negotiations: Power moderates the interpersonal effects of anger and happiness on concession making. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 36:557–81 [Google Scholar]
  124. Van Kleef GA, Homan AC, Cheshin A. 2012. Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2:311–39 [Google Scholar]
  125. Van Kleef GA, Sinaceur M. 2013. The demise of the “rational” negotiator: emotional forces in conflict and negotiation. Handbook of Research on Negotiation M Olekalns, WL Adair 103–30 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  126. Van Kleef GA, Steinel W, Homan AC. 2013. On being peripheral and paying attention: social information processing in intergroup conflict. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:63–79 [Google Scholar]
  127. Van Kleef GA, Van Doorn EA, Heerdink MW, Koning LF. 2011. Emotion is for influence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 22:114–63 [Google Scholar]
  128. Van Kleef GA, Van Lange PAM. 2008. What other's disappointment may do to selfish people: emotion and social value orientation in a negotiation context. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34:1084–95 [Google Scholar]
  129. Wade-Benzoni KA, Hoffman AJ, Thompson LL, Moore DA, Gillespie JJ, Bazerman MH. 2002. Barriers to resolution in ideologically based negotiations: the role of values and institutions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 27:41–57 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wang L, Northcraft G, Van Kleef GA. 2012. Beyond negotiated outcomes: the hidden costs of anger expression in dyadic negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 119:54–63 [Google Scholar]
  131. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54:1063–70 [Google Scholar]
  132. Weber JM, Kopelman S, Messick DM. 2004. A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: applying a logic of appropriateness. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 8:281–307 [Google Scholar]
  133. Wilson KS, DeRue DS, Matta FK, Howe M, Conlon DE. 2016. Personality similarity in negotiations: testing the dyadic effects of similarity in interpersonal traits and the use of emotional displays on negotiation outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:1405–21 [Google Scholar]
  134. Xiao E, Houser D. 2005. Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. PNAS 102:7398–401 [Google Scholar]
  135. Yip JA, Schweinsberg M. 2017. Infuriating impasses: Angry expressions increase exiting behavior in negotiations. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 8:706–14 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104714
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error