Self and Others in Adolescence

Literature Cited

1. Achterberg M, Peper JS, Van Duijvenvoorde AC, Mandl RC, Crone EA 2016. Fronto-striatal white matter integrity predicts development in delay of gratification: a longitudinal study. J. Neurosci. 36:1954–61Longitudinal MRI study with two time points demonstrating the relation between structural ventral striatum–prefrontal cortex connectivity and developmental changes in delay discounting.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arnett JJ. 2000. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am. Psychol. 55:469–80
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ayduk O, Mendoza-Denton R, Mischel W, Downey G, Peake PK, Rodriguez M 2000. Regulating the interpersonal self: strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79:776–92
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baek EC, Scholz C, O'Donnell MB, Falk EB 2017. The value of sharing information: a neural account of information transmission. Psychol. Sci. 28:851–61This innovative study uses functional neuroimaging to show that information sharing through social networks leads to activity in reward centers in the brain.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bas-Hoogendam JM, van Steenbergen H, Kreuk T, van der Wee NJA, Westenberg PM 2017. How embarrassing! The behavioral and neural correlates of processing social norm violations. PLOS ONE 12:e0176326
   [Google Scholar]
6. Becht AI, Bos MGN, Nelemans SA, Peters S, Vollebergh WAM et al. 2018. Goal-directed correlates and neurobiological underpinnings of adolescent identity: a multimethod multisample longitudinal approach. Child. Dev. 89:823–36
   [Google Scholar]
7. Becht AI, Nelemans SA, Branje SJ, Vollebergh WAM, Koot HM et al. 2016. The quest for identity in adolescence: heterogeneity in daily identity formation and psychosocial adjustment across 5 years. Dev. Psychol. 52:2010–21
   [Google Scholar]
8. Becht AI, Nelemans SA, Branje SJT, Vollebergh WAM, Koot HM, Meeus WHJ 2017a. Identity uncertainty and commitment making across adolescence: five-year within-person associations using daily identity reports. Dev. Psychol. 53:2103–12
   [Google Scholar]
9. Becht AI, Nelemans SA, van Dijk MPA, Branje SJT, Van Lier PAC et al. 2017b. Clear self, better relationships: adolescents' self-concept clarity and relationship quality with parents and peers across 5 years. Child. Dev. 88:1823–33
   [Google Scholar]
10. Berns GS, Capra CM, Moore S, Noussair C 2010. Neural mechanisms of the influence of popularity on adolescent ratings of music. NeuroImage 49:2687–96
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bickart KC, Hollenbeck MC, Barrett LF, Dickerson BC 2012. Intrinsic amygdala–cortical functional connectivity predicts social network size in humans. J. Neurosci. 32:14729–41
    [Google Scholar]
12. Blakemore SJ, Burnett S, Dahl RE 2010. The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31:926–33
    [Google Scholar]
13. Blakemore SJ, den Ouden H, Choudhury S, Frith C 2007. Adolescent development of the neural circuitry for thinking about intentions. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2:130–39
    [Google Scholar]
14. Blakemore SJ, Mills KL. 2014. Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing. ? Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:187–207This timely review raised the important question of whether neural changes during adolescence provide a window for increased social influence.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Blankenstein NE, Telzer EH, Do KT, Van Duijvenvoorde ACK, Crone EA 2019. Behavioral and neural pathways supporting the development of prosocial and risk-taking behavior across adolescence. Child Dev In press
    [Google Scholar]
16. Braams BR, Crone EA. 2017. Peers and parents: a comparison between neural activation when winning for friends and mothers in adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12:417–26
    [Google Scholar]
17. Braams BR, Güroğlu B, de Water E, Meuwese R, Koolschijn PC et al. 2014a. Reward-related neural responses are dependent on the beneficiary. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9:1030–37One of the first functional neuroimaging studies showing that vicarious gaining for others is dependent on experienced closeness with the target.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Braams BR, Peters S, Peper JS, Güroğlu B, Crone EA 2014b. Gambling for self, friends, and antagonists: differential contributions of affective and social brain regions on adolescent reward processing. NeuroImage 100:281–89
    [Google Scholar]
19. Braams BR, van Duijvenvoorde AC, Peper JS, Crone EA 2015. Longitudinal changes in adolescent risk-taking: a comprehensive study of neural responses to rewards, pubertal development, and risk-taking behavior. J. Neurosci. 35:7226–38
    [Google Scholar]
20. Burnett S, Bird G, Moll J, Frith C, Blakemore SJ 2009. Development during adolescence of the neural processing of social emotion. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 21:1736–50
    [Google Scholar]
21. Burnett S, Sebastian C, Cohen Kadosh K, Blakemore SJ 2011. The social brain in adolescence: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35:1654–64
    [Google Scholar]
22. Campbell-Meiklejohn DK, Bach DR, Roepstorff A, Dolan RJ, Frith CD 2010. How the opinion of others affects our valuation of objects. Curr. Biol. 20:1165–70
    [Google Scholar]
23. Carlson SM, Koenig MA, Harms MB 2013. Theory of mind. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 4:391–402
    [Google Scholar]
24. Carter RM, Huettel SA. 2013. A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17:328–36
    [Google Scholar]
25. Chein J, Albert D, O'Brien L, Uckert K, Steinberg L 2011. Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain's reward circuitry. Dev. Sci. 14:F1–10Important study showing for the first time that peers influence neural activity when taking risks more in adolescents than in adults.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Christakou A, Brammer M, Rubia K 2011. Maturation of limbic corticostriatal activation and connectivity associated with developmental changes in temporal discounting. NeuroImage 54:1344–54
    [Google Scholar]
27. Crocetti E, Moscatelli S, Van der Graaff J, Rubini M, Meeus W, Branje SJ 2016. The interplay of self-certainty and prosocial development in the transition from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. Eur. J. Pers. 30:594–607
    [Google Scholar]
28. Crone EA, Dahl RE. 2012. Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13:636–50
    [Google Scholar]
29. Crone EA, Konijn EA. 2018. Media use and brain development during adolescence. Nat. Commun. 9:588
    [Google Scholar]
30. Cutler J, Campbell-Meiklejohn D. 2019. A comparative fMRI meta-analysis of altruistic and strategic decisions to give. NeuroImage 184:227–41
    [Google Scholar]
31. Dahl RE, Allen NB, Wilbrecht L, Suleiman AB 2018. Importance of investing in adolescence from a developmental science perspective. Nature 554:441–50
    [Google Scholar]
32. D'Argembeau A. 2013. On the role of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in self-processing: the valuation hypothesis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:372
    [Google Scholar]
33. Davidow JY, Insel C, Somerville LH 2018. Adolescent development of value-guided goal pursuit. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22:8725–36
    [Google Scholar]
34. Denny BT, Kober H, Wager TD, Ochsner KN 2012. A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of self- and other judgments reveals a spatial gradient for mentalizing in medial prefrontal cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24:1742–52
    [Google Scholar]
35. Duell N, Steinberg L, Chein J, Al-Hassan SM, Bacchini D et al. 2016. Interaction of reward seeking and self-regulation in the prediction of risk taking: a cross-national test of the dual systems model. Dev. Psychol. 52:1593–605
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dumontheil I, Apperly IA, Blakemore SJ 2010. Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Dev. Sci. 13:331–38
    [Google Scholar]
37. Dumontheil I, Hillebrandt H, Apperly IA, Blakemore SJ 2012. Developmental differences in the control of action selection by social information. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24:2080–95
    [Google Scholar]
38. Dunbar RIM. 2018. The anatomy of friendship. Trends Cogn. Sci. 22:32–51
    [Google Scholar]
39. Falk EB, Bassett DS. 2017. Brain and social networks: fundamental building blocks of human experience. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21:674–90
    [Google Scholar]
40. Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B 2008. Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079–83
    [Google Scholar]
41. Fett AK, Gromann PM, Giampietro V, Shergill SS, Krabbendam L 2014a. Default distrust? An fMRI investigation of the neural development of trust and cooperation. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9:395–402Elegant functional neuroimaging study showing how building reciprocal relations during multiple trust trials results in stronger medial prefrontal cortex activity in adolescents compared to adults.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Fett AK, Shergill SS, Gromann PM, Dumontheil I, Blakemore SJ et al. 2014b. Trust and social reciprocity in adolescence—a matter of perspective-taking. J. Adolesc. 37:175–84
    [Google Scholar]
43. Fuligni AJ. 2019. The need to contribute during adolescence. Pers. Psychol. Sci. 14:3331–43
    [Google Scholar]
44. Genevsky A, Yoon C, Knutson B 2017. When brain beats behavior: neuroforecasting crowdfunding outcomes. J. Neurosci. 37:8625–34
    [Google Scholar]
45. Güroğlu B, van den Bos W, Crone EA 2009. Fairness considerations: increasing understanding of intentionality during adolescence. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 104:398–409
    [Google Scholar]
46. Güroğlu B, van den Bos W, Crone EA 2014a. Sharing and giving across adolescence: an experimental study examining the development of prosocial behavior. Front. Psychol. 5:291
    [Google Scholar]
47. Güroğlu B, van den Bos W, van Dijk E, Rombouts SA, Crone EA 2011. Dissociable brain networks involved in development of fairness considerations: understanding intentionality behind unfairness. NeuroImage 57:634–41
    [Google Scholar]
48. Güroğlu B, Will GJ, Crone EA 2014b. Neural correlates of advantageous and disadvantageous inequity in sharing decisions. PLOS ONE 9:e107996
    [Google Scholar]
49. Haber SN, Knutson B. 2010. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:4–26
    [Google Scholar]
50. Han S, Ma Y. 2014. Cultural differences in human brain activity: a quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage 99:293–300
    [Google Scholar]
51. Harter S. 2012. The Construction of the Self: Developmental and Sociocultural Foundations New York: The Guilford Press. , 2nd ed..
52. Herting MM, Johnson C, Mills KL, Vijayakumar N, Dennison M et al. 2018. Development of subcortical volumes across adolescence in males and females: a multisample study of longitudinal changes. NeuroImage 172:194–205
    [Google Scholar]
53. Hughes BL, Ambady N, Zaki J 2017. Trusting outgroup, but not ingroup members, requires control: neural and behavioral evidence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12:372–81
    [Google Scholar]
54. Izuma K, Saito DN, Sadato N 2010. Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22:621–31
    [Google Scholar]
55. Jankowski KF, Moore WE, Merchant JS, Kahn LE, Pfeifer JH 2014. But do you think I'm cool? Developmental differences in striatal recruitment during direct and reflected social self-evaluations. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 8:40–54One of the first functional neuroimaging studies on self-concept development showing that self-concept in adolescence is sensitive to social context.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Kanai R, Bahrami B, Roylance R, Rees G 2012. Online social network size is reflected in human brain structure. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279:1327–34
    [Google Scholar]
57. Knoll LJ, Magis-Weinberg L, Speekenbrink M, Blakemore SJ 2015. Social influence on risk perception during adolescence. Psychol. Sci. 26:583–92This large behavioral study indicates a sensitive window for peer sensitivity, especially in early adolescence.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kroger J, Martinussen M, Marcia JE 2010. Identity status change during adolescence and young adulthood: a meta-analysis. J. Adolesc. 33:683–98
    [Google Scholar]
59. Lamblin M, Murawski C, Whittle S, Fornito A 2017. Social connectedness, mental health and the adolescent brain. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 80:57–68
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lee TH, Qu Y, Telzer EH 2017. Love flows downstream: mothers' and children's neural representation similarity in perceiving distress of self and family. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12:1916–27
    [Google Scholar]
61. Lockwood PL, Apps MA, Valton V, Viding E, Roiser JP 2016. Neurocomputational mechanisms of prosocial learning and links to empathy. PNAS 113:9763–68
    [Google Scholar]
62. Luerssen A, Gyurak A, Ayduk O, Wendelken C, Bunge SA 2015. Delay of gratification in childhood linked to cortical interactions with the nucleus accumbens. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 10:1769–76
    [Google Scholar]
63. McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD 2004. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 306:503–7
    [Google Scholar]
64. Meeus W. 2011. The study of adolescent identity formation 2000–2010: a review of longitudinal research. J. Res. Adolesc. 21:75–94
    [Google Scholar]
65. Meuwese R, Braams BR, Güroğlu B 2018. What lies beneath peer acceptance in adolescence? Exploring the role of Nucleus Accumbens responsivity to self-serving and vicarious rewards. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 34:124–29
    [Google Scholar]
66. Michl P, Meindl T, Meister F, Born C, Engel RR et al. 2014. Neurobiological underpinnings of shame and guilt: a pilot fMRI study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9:150–57
    [Google Scholar]
67. Mills KL, Lalonde F, Clasen LS, Giedd JN, Blakemore SJ 2014. Developmental changes in the structure of the social brain in late childhood and adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9:123–31This longitudinal structural neuroimaging study demonstrated prolonged developmental changes in social brain structures over the entire adolescence period.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez MI 1989. Delay of gratification in children. Science 244:933–38
    [Google Scholar]
69. Moffitt TE, Arseneault L, Belsky D, Dickson N, Hancox RJ et al. 2011. A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. PNAS 108:2693–98
    [Google Scholar]
70. Moor BG, Macks ZA, Güroğlu B, Rombouts SA, Molen MW, Crone EA 2012. Neurodevelopmental changes of reading the mind in the eyes. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 7:44–52
    [Google Scholar]
71. Morelli SA, Knutson B, Zaki J 2018. Neural sensitivity to personal and vicarious reward differentially relates to prosociality and well-being. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 13:831–39This functional neuroimaging study in adults demonstrated that neural activity in the ventral striatum during vicarious rewards relates to real-life prosocial behavior.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Morelli SA, Sacchet MD, Zaki J 2015. Common and distinct neural correlates of personal and vicarious reward: a quantitative meta-analysis. NeuroImage 112:244–53
    [Google Scholar]
73. Morey RA, McCarthy G, Selgrade ES, Seth S, Nasser JD, LaBar KS 2012. Neural systems for guilt from actions affecting self versus others. NeuroImage 60:683–92
    [Google Scholar]
74. Odgers C. 2018. Smartphones are bad for some teens, not all. Nature 554:432–34
    [Google Scholar]
75. O'Donnell MB, Bayer JB, Cascio CN, Falk EB 2017. Neural bases of recommendations differ according to social network structure. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 12:61–69
    [Google Scholar]
76. Olson EA, Hooper CJ, Collins P, Luciana M 2007. Adolescents' performance on delay and probability discounting tasks: contributions of age, intelligence, executive functioning, and self-reported externalizing behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ. 43:1886–97
    [Google Scholar]
77. Op de Macks ZA, Bunge SA, Bell ON, Wilbrecht L, Kriegsfeld LJ et al. 2016. Risky decision-making in adolescent girls: the role of pubertal hormones and reward circuitry. Psychoneuroendocrinology 74:77–91
    [Google Scholar]
78. Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA 2005. Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 56:365–92
    [Google Scholar]
79. Peper JS, Braams BR, Blankenstein NE, Bos MGN, Crone EA 2018. Development of multifaceted risk taking and the relations to sex steroid hormones: a longitudinal study. Child. Dev. 89:51887–907
    [Google Scholar]
80. Pfeifer JH, Lieberman MD, Dapretto M 2007. “I know you are but what am I?!”: neural bases of self- and social knowledge retrieval in children and adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19:1323–37The first functional neuroimaging study demonstrating heightened medial prefrontal cortex activity when adolescents evaluate traits of themselves.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Pfeifer JH, Masten CL, Borofsky LA, Dapretto M, Fuligni AJ, Lieberman MD 2009. Neural correlates of direct and reflected self-appraisals in adolescents and adults: when social perspective-taking informs self-perception. Child. Dev. 80:1016–38
    [Google Scholar]
82. Pfeifer JH, Peake SJ. 2012. Self-development: integrating cognitive, socioemotional, and neuroimaging perspectives. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 2:55–69
    [Google Scholar]
83. Pingault J, Schoeler T. 2017. Assessing the consequences of cyberbullying on mental health. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1:775–77
    [Google Scholar]
84. Powell J, Lewis PA, Roberts N, Garcia-Finana M, Dunbar RI 2012. Orbital prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279:2157–62
    [Google Scholar]
85. Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC 2018. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2:223–28
    [Google Scholar]
86. Schreuders E, Braams BR, Blankenstein NE, Peper JS, Güroğlu B, Crone EA 2018a. Contributions of reward sensitivity to ventral striatum activity across adolescence and early adulthood. Child. Dev. 89:3797–810
    [Google Scholar]
87. Schreuders E, Klapwijk ET, Will GJ, Güroğlu B 2018b. Friend versus foe: neural correlates of prosocial decisions for liked and disliked peers. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 18:127–42
    [Google Scholar]
88. Schurz M, Radua J, Aichhorn M, Richlan F, Perner J 2014. Fractionating theory of mind: a meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 42:9–34
    [Google Scholar]
89. Schwartz SJ, Klimstra TA, Luyckx K, Hale WW III, Meeus WH 2012. Characterizing the self-system over time in adolescence: internal structure and associations with internalizing symptoms. J. Youth Adolesc. 41:1208–25
    [Google Scholar]
90. Scott RM, He Z, Baillargeon R, Cummins D 2012. False-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks. Dev. Sci. 15:181–93
    [Google Scholar]
91. Silverman MH, Jedd K, Luciana M 2015. Neural networks involved in adolescent reward processing: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. NeuroImage 122:427–39
    [Google Scholar]
92. Smith AR, Steinberg L, Strang N, Chein J 2015. Age differences in the impact of peers on adolescents' and adults' neural response to reward. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 11:75–82
    [Google Scholar]
93. Somerville LH, Jones RM, Ruberry EJ, Dyke JP, Glover G, Casey BJ 2013. The medial prefrontal cortex and the emergence of self-conscious emotion in adolescence. Psychol. Sci. 24:1554–62The first functional neuroimaging study demonstrating that the feeling of being observed leads to heightened medial prefrontal cortex activity in adolescents and increased self-conscious emotions.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Spaans JP, Burke SM, Altikulac S, Braams BR, Op de Macks ZA, Crone EA 2018. Win for your kin: neural responses to personal and vicarious rewards when mothers win for their adolescent children. PLOS ONE 13:e0198663
    [Google Scholar]
95. Spaans JP, Peters S, Crone EA 2019. Neural reward-related reactions to monetary gains for self and charity. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 19:845–58
    [Google Scholar]
96. Steinbeis N, Bernhardt BC, Singer T 2012. Impulse control and underlying functions of the left DLPFC mediate age-related and age-independent individual differences in strategic social behavior. Neuron 73:1040–51
    [Google Scholar]
97. Tamir DI, Hughes BL. 2018. Social rewards: from basic social building blocks to complex social behavior. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13:700–17
    [Google Scholar]
98. Tamir DI, Mitchell JP. 2012. Disclosing information about the self is intrinsically rewarding. PNAS 109:8038–43
    [Google Scholar]
99. Tamnes CK, Herting MM, Goddings AL, Meuwese R, Blakemore SJ et al. 2017. Development of the cerebral cortex across adolescence: a multisample study of inter-related longitudinal changes in cortical volume, surface area, and thickness. J. Neurosci. 37:3402–12
    [Google Scholar]
100. Telzer EH, Fuligni AJ, Lieberman MD, Galvan A 2013. Ventral striatum activation to prosocial rewards predicts longitudinal declines in adolescent risk taking. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 3:45–52
     [Google Scholar]
101. Telzer EH, Fuligni AJ, Lieberman MD, Galvan A 2014. Neural sensitivity to eudaimonic and hedonic rewards differentially predict adolescent depressive symptoms over time. PNAS 111:6600–5Highly innovative longitudinal study showing that the same neural sensitivity in the ventral striatum can lead to multiple pathways in development.
     [Google Scholar]
102. Telzer EH, Masten CL, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD, Fuligni AJ 2010. Gaining while giving: an fMRI study of the rewards of family assistance among white and Latino youth. Soc. Neurosci. 5:508–18
     [Google Scholar]
103. Telzer EH, Masten CL, Berkman ET, Lieberman MD, Fuligni AJ 2011. Neural regions associated with self control and mentalizing are recruited during prosocial behaviors towards the family. NeuroImage 58:242–49
     [Google Scholar]
104. van de Groep S, Meuwese R, Zanolie K, Güroğlu B, Crone EA 2018. Developmental changes and individual differences in trust and reciprocity in adolescence. J. Res. Adolesc. In press https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12459
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
105. Van den Bos E, de Rooij M, Sumter SR, Westenberg M 2016. Continued development of recursive thinking in adolescence: longitudinal analyses with a revised recursive thinking test. Cogn. Dev. 37:28–41
     [Google Scholar]
106. Van den Bos W, van Dijk E, Westenberg M, Rombouts SA, Crone EA 2011. Changing brains, changing perspectives: the neurocognitive development of reciprocity. Psychol. Sci. 22:60–70
     [Google Scholar]
107. Van den Bos W, Westenberg M, Van Dijk E, Crone EA 2010. Development of trust and reciprocity in adolescence. Cogn. Dev. 25:90–102
     [Google Scholar]
108. van der Aar LPE, Peters S, Crone EA 2018. The development of self-views across adolescence: investigating self-descriptions with and without social comparison using a novel experimental paradigm. Cogn. Dev. 48:256–70
     [Google Scholar]
109. van der Aar LPE, Peters S, van der Cruijsen R, Crone EA 2019. The neural correlates of academic self-concept in adolescence and the relation to making future-oriented academic choices. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 15:10–17
     [Google Scholar]
110. van der Cruijsen R, Peters S, van der Aar LPE, Crone EA 2018. The neural signature of self-concept development in adolescence: the role of domain and valence distinctions. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 30:1–12
     [Google Scholar]
111. van der Meulen M, Veldhuis J, Braams BR, Peters S, Konijn EA, Crone EA 2017. Brain activation upon ideal-body media exposure and peer feedback in late adolescent girls. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 17:4712–23
     [Google Scholar]
112. van Duijvenvoorde AC, Achterberg M, Braams BR, Peters S, Crone EA 2016. Testing a dual-systems model of adolescent brain development using resting-state connectivity analyses. NeuroImage 124:409–20
     [Google Scholar]
113. Van Hoorn J, Van Dijk E, Güroğlu B, Crone EA 2016a. Neural correlates of prosocial peer influence on public goods game donations during adolescence. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 11:923–33
     [Google Scholar]
114. Van Hoorn J, Van Dijk E, Meuwese R, Rieffe C, Crone EA 2016b. Peer influence on prosocial behavior in adolescence. J. Res. Adolesc. 26:90–100
     [Google Scholar]
115. Wierenga LM, Bos MGN, Schreuders E, van de Kamp F, Peper JS et al. 2018. Unraveling age, puberty and testosterone effects on subcortical brain development across adolescence. Psychoneuroendocrinology 91:105–14
     [Google Scholar]
116. Yeager DS, Dahl RE, Dweck CS 2018. Why interventions to influence adolescent behavior often fail but could succeed. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 13:101–22Influential review article showing the importance of evaluating adolescents’ needs for social status and admiration when developing successful interventions.
     [Google Scholar]